• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권11호
• /
• pp.637-645
• /
• 2020

A free-market economic system supported by the progress of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 has given birth to a sharing economy with a disruptive business model. In many ways, this business model is more effective, efficient, and makes it easy for businesses and consumers. However, because disruptive innovation is not asymmetrical with the conventional business that sustains innovation, several regulatory issues arise because it is fundamentally very different and cannot be regulated by standard law. Disruptive innovation may create chaos if it is regulated by norms that are used to regulate conventional business. This research was conducted with a normative method, which examines various theories, principles, laws and regulations to get justification for how the law should govern. The findings of this study are: competition law must be designed pragmatically so that it can keep pace with changes in business models that are rapidly changing. For this reason, it is necessary to shift regulatory authority from the Government to business people to make self-regulation, as a rule, that was born from the agreement of the business actors themselves. Self-regulation is considered more effective in maintaining fair competition, so that the market will be more dynamic, and consumers will be more prosperous.

• World Technopolis Review
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.148-158
• /
• 2017

Sejong City, which has been chosen as a new administrative capital of South Korea, has completed the first phase of its development plan with the construction of the facilities needed to accommodate central administrative organizations and the required accompanying population. Now, it is undergoing the second phase of development with a focus on strengthening the region's innovation capacity to catalyze endogenous development. The strategy for phase II is to establish a regional innovation system including building necessary infrastructure and attracting innovation agents such as universities, businesses, and research institutes. The first step for this is developing a research complex, tentatively named Tech Valley, that includes universities, research institutes, and businesses, and building infrastructure comprising a science complex, a knowledge industry center, and support facilities. Phase II of the city's development initiative includes the establishment of a joint university campus, which is to serve as a center to promote cooperation among industry actors, universities, and research institutes. The concept of a joint campus has been drawn from a need to enhance capacity for innovation and specialization in the region's industries and to maximize synergy among participating universities through the sharing of research equipment, facilities, and programs. The joint campus is expected to play a key role in creating an innovation system in the region by enhancing research capacity for strategic industries, cultivating highly skilled human resources, and leading industry-academia-research cooperation. In order to ensure the sustainable development of the new city, there is a growing need to have a main player in place that could lead the region's economic development. The joint campus will propel industrial specialization and serve as a catalyst to attract competent universities to the region. This paper will examine the concept, major functions, and the establishment and operation of the joint campus.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.1-24
• /
• 2014

새 정부의 국정방향인 창조경제는 '창의적 상상력과 과학기술, ICT가 결합하여 활발하게 창업 또는 기존 산업과 융합하고 이를 통해 새로운 시장, 산업 및 일자리가 창출되는 성장전략'이라고 정의할 수 있다. 이러한 맥락에서 혁신 클러스터는 그 정책 목표가 유기적 생태계 관점에서 기술혁신을 촉진하는 것이므로 창조경제 실현의 유효한 정책 수단으로 활용될 수 있다. 이러한 개념적 배경을 기반으로 본 연구에서는 창조경제형 ICT 융합 혁신 클러스터 정책 시사점을 얻기 위해 최근 주목받고 있는 판교테크노밸리 조성 사례를 분석하였다. 먼저 조성 측면에서는 환경 변화에 대한 지방정부의 유연한 대응, 철저한 사전 기획, 민간과 공공의 균형적 참여가 중요한 요인인 것으로 나타났다. 창조경제 활성화 측면에서는 우수인력 집적을 위한 정주여건 확보, 융합을 촉진할 다양한 혁신주체들의 집적과 이들 간의 네트워크 활성화, 창업 촉진을 위한 지원 프로그램 등 창업환경 조성이 중요한 요인으로 분석되었다.

• 정보화정책
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.25-44
• /
• 2010

조직의 생존 과정에서 지식관리의 기능은 지식의 흐름을 용이하게 할 수 있는 네트워크 구조의 구축을 강조하는 구조적 접근방법과 각각의 맥락에 맞는 새로운 지식을 창출 또는 재창출하기 위한 과정으로서 지식활동 주체들 간 사회적 네트워킹의 활성화를 강조하는 과정적 접근방법의 통합적 관점에서 논의될 수 있다. 이러한 맥락에서 혁신포탈은 혁신 지식 네트워크를 형성하여 기존 지식의 공유 및 새로운 지식의 창출 또는 재창출을 촉진시킴으로써, 각 주체의 혁신역량을 강화하고 혁신 효율성 및 성과를 제고하기 위한 목적으로 2005년에 구축 개통되었다. 구축 당시 참여정부의 혁신방향이 참여형 거버넌스의 강화에 있었음을 감안할 때, 혁신포탈은 정부혁신을 한 단계 성숙시키는 중요한 정책수단이 될 것으로 기대되었다. 그러나 혁신포탈은 이와 같은 기대를 충족시키지 못한 채, 2008년 이명박 정부의 출범과 함께 폐쇄되었다. 이에 본 연구에서는 정부기관의 웹사이트 간 하이퍼링크 네트워크 분석을 적용하여 당시 혁신포탈의 실효성을 통합적인 지식관리 관점에 초점을 맞추어 분석함으로써, 향후 정부포탈의 구축 및 운영에 관한 이론적 정책적 함의를 모색하였다.

• 한국유기농업학회지
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.505-534
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study is to explore the key elements of the regional innovative milieu by analyzing the role of regional innovative elements and case organizations that promoted the emergence of 'Songakdongnesaramdeul (the people of the Songak town),' and to present pertinent policy implications. For the purpose, this study set the "Songakdongnesaramdeul," a residential community organization founded for regional innovation to revitalize the village community, as a case organization from the perspective of regional innovation system theory. The result of the study showed that creating an innovative milieu through the creation of various innovation elements to revitalize the village community is crucial. Especially, this study confirmed that the existence of regional development organizations is the key element of the innovative milieu. such as case organization that contributes to regional development while promoting interaction between actors, common learning and systemization, and new value creation activities. The implications derived through the study can be summarized in four points. First, a variety of means to promote the formation of subjects in response to the public debate of the village agenda is needed. Second, it is highly important to create innovative elements, for example, organizations and programs, resources, and spaces that promote regional innovation. Third, forming a close network between various innovative resources existing in the region and establishing regional capabilities that allow to mobilize and utilize such innovative resources are important. Fourth, the establishment of a promotion mechanism such as a case organization is suggested as a major task, to revitalize the village community. Specifically, forming and revitalizing numerous private-based community organizations with regional developmental capabilities to establish local governance also has significant importance. In this vein, based on the point of view of the regional innovation system theory, the establishment of regional policies to construct a regional innovation milieu, such as creating innovative elements that can actively promote the regeneration of the village community and establishing a promotion system, can be presented as major tasks.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.37-75
• /
• 2001

Technological systems are defined as network(s) consisting of technological infrastructure, industrial organization, and institutional infrastructure. This paper reviews SEMATECH in the U.S. and VLSI Program in Korea as a technological system for semiconductor, which is an advanced technology. Several issues are addressed : how did they get started\ulcorner ; how have they been evolved\ulcorner ; how have the actors and institutions within the system interacted\ulcorner ; what role has the government played in that process\ulcorner Both systems were created by their government, respectively, and they have been evaluated as successful. However, while SEMATECH became complete eough in terms of technological infrastructure, industrial organization, and institutional infrastructure to generate sufficient increasing returns to develop in a self-reinforcing way, a series of VLSI program in Korea is still operated discontinuously under the government subsidy. SEMATECH is more flexible and stable than Korea's VLSI program in that the system has a centralized structure and has been managed and staffed by industry substantially. In addition, both cases show that a technological system may evolve having connections with foreign technological systems and local sub-systems beyond nations, regions and industries. Many other similarities, contrasts, and insights for technological policy from each country's experiences are presented.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.21-46
• /
• 2004

Focusing on a product, this paper reconstructs the concept of technological systems first introduced by Carlsson and Stankiewicz (1991). Based on the model and our earlier works, we compare the salient features of technological systems for computer numerically controlled (CNC) machine tools in Korea, Sweden, and the United States.. We also try to measure the performance of the systems in an international comparison. Major findings are as follows: (1) The length of 'learning period' for local (national) technological system is substantial, even though it is a catching-up case. (2) The key success factor of the technological system appears to be the connectivity among various actors or infrastructures, rather than just the existence or formation of those. (3) In three countries' experience, the government played an important role in the formation of each own technological system. (4) The performance of Korea's technological system for CNC machine tools during the past two decades(1981-97) seems to be better than that of Sweden and the U.S. Lastly, many policy implication are presented.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.702-731
• /
• 2005

This article examines the legislation process of bioethics from 1997 to 2003 in Korea through three phases from a policy network point of view. In the first phase, assemblymen proposed laws concerning bioethics and various policy agenda were shaped. In the second phase, MOHW(Ministry of Health & Welfare) and MOST(Ministry of Science & Technology) introduced bills separately and policy conflicts were increasingly deepened. In the third phase, after groping for policy coordination a single bill based on MOHW's proposal was deliberated and enacted. During these processes, actors in policy network were more enlarged, conflicting interactions were dominated, and the structure of policy network was alternated by centralized form and distributed form.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.211-219
• /
• 2014

본 논문은 개방형 혁신 환경하에서 산학기술협력 활성화를 위한 기술경영전략에 대해서 연구하였다. 이를 위하여 기술경영의 중요성과 개념을 고찰하였으며 내부기술혁신과 외부혁신자원의 활용과 산학협력의 균형관점에서 기술경영의 프레임을 고찰하였다. 현재 개방형 혁신 환경하에서 기업이 성공적인 기술경영을 추진하기 위해서는 기업은 산학협력전략을 추진해야한다. 산학협력 활성화를 위한 기업의 기술경영전략을 다음과 같이 도출하였다. 첫째, 현재 개방형 환경을 고려한 산학협력전략을 추진하고 실행하여야 한다. 이를 위하여 조직내 전략기술로드맵을 활용할 수 있다. 둘째, 기업은 개방형 혁신시스템을 조직내에서 도입해야 하며 이를 위하여 조직내 문화도 NIH신드롬을 극복하고 개방형으로 전환해야 한다. 셋째, 기업은 기업, 대학, 연구소 등 다양한 혁신주체들과 다양한 목적으로 협력이 가능하도록 협력을 활성화할 수 있는 지원체계를 조직내에 갖추어야 한다.

• 과학기술학연구
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.1-28
• /
• 2008

이 글에서는 새롭게 등장하고 있는 사회적 목표를 지향하는 혁신정책의 특성들을 살펴보고 그것이 우리의 혁신정책에 주는 함의를 살펴보았다. 우선 이 정책들은 지속가능성과 같은 목표를 제시하고 그것에 경제성장보다 앞서는 우선권을 부여하고 있다. 또 이 정책들은 개별적인 기술개발이나 국지적인 문제해결을 넘어 사회 기술시스템 전체의 전환(system transition)을 염두에 두고 있다. 그리고 시스템 전환을 위해, 새로운 내용을 갖는 기술과 사회제도를 실험하여 기술적 지식을 확충하고 정당성을 향상시키는 '전략적 니치 관리' 방식을 채택하고 있다. 장기적이고 근본적인 변화 방향과 구체적이고 국지적인 정책과 사업들을 학습 과정을 통해 연계시키고 있는 것이다. 이와 함께 정책들의 기획 및 집행과정에서 공공적 참여자의 역할을 확대하고 있다. 이런 정책이 우리에게 주는 함의는 2007년에 발표된 "기술기반 삶의 질 향상 종합대책"을 중심으로 논의하였다. 이 대책은 경제성장 중심 혁신정책의 틀을 넘어서는 새로운 정책이었지만 기존 정책들의 관성으로 인해 몇 가지 한계가 있음을 지적하였다. 특히 과거 산업화 과정에서 형성된 타겟팅적 경향 때문에 장기적 관점에서 시스템 전환을 고려하는 관점이 도입되는 데 어려움이 있다는 것을 논의하였다.