• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.207-228
• /
• 2011

IT governance is an integral part of enterprise governance and consists of the leadership, organizational structures, and processes that ensure organization's IT decision making for achieving organizational goal. Most firms have failed to resolve the balance in building IT governance. The challenge is to align IT strategy with business strategy in establishing and implementing effective IT governance. The purpose of this study is to find out the relationship between IT governance implementation factors and IS effectiveness, and the moderating effect of strategic alignment of IS strategy with business strategy on IS effectiveness. IT governance implementation factors consist of IT vendor management, IT human resource management, and IT infrastructure. Strategic alignment was measured as the alignment between business strategic orientation and IS strategic orientation that used in the research of Chan et al.(1997). In the relationship between three IT governance implementation factors and IS effectiveness, the results of multiple regression analyses showed that IT human resource management is an important determinant to influence IS effectiveness. The additional analysis using multiple regression showed that strategic alignment of IS strategy with business strategy has moderated the relationship between IT governance implementation factors and IS effectiveness.

• 한국항행학회논문지
• /
• 제14권6호
• /
• pp.935-950
• /
• 2010

본 연구는 정보보안 거버넌스(Information Security Governance)의 구성 요소인 리더십과 거버넌스, 보안 관리 조직, 보안 정책, 보안 프로그램 관리, 사용자 보안 관리, 기술적 보안과 조직 구성원의 보안 인식과 보안 행위 간의 관계를 가설 검증과 최적 모델 분석을 통해 요소간의 관계를 검증하였으며, ISG 확립을 위한 효과적인 방향을 제시하였다.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.203-220
• /
• 2008

좋은 정부가 되기 위해선 국민들이 현실을 제대로 이해할 수 있도록 정확한 정보를 공급하고 국민과 함께 정보를 공유해야 한다. 이를 위해 정부는 정보공개를 활성화하고 국민의 알권리 충족을 도모함으로서 정부와 국민간의 정보의 비대칭을 통한 편향적 관계를 개선하고, 정보공개제도의 활성화로 행정의 투명성을 제고하는 굿 거버넌스를 실천해야 한다. 이 글은 정보공개의 굿 거버넌스 사례를 소개하고 제도적 의미를 고찰한다.

• 인터넷정보학회지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.58-67
• /
• 2013

An essential prerequisite for negotiating governance of 'internet,' a world of 'end to end' nature, is to guarantee end-users' participation. Internet Governance Forum (IGF), the outcome of World Summit on the Information Society(WSIS) Tunis Agenda, has played an important role as a representative mulitistakeholder - based governance model, which puts emphasis on wide range participation of stakeholders. Notwithstanding multistakeholderism materialized in IGF has been challenged, IGF itself is a unique place for participation to broad internet governance discourse, as all voices get hearing grounded on openness, inclusion, and transparency, quite distinct from the multilateral negotiation based model such as 'Conference on Cyberspace.' Therefore civil society which represents end-users' interest, as a crucial stakeholder of internet governance, should establish more strategic and coordinated approach to IGF itself as well as reformation discourse of internet governance. In this regard, civil society groups of Korea, began with hosting workshops and Open Forum at the 2013 IGF in Bali, Indonesia. This report also describes the detailed activities of Korean civil society group in 2013 IGF.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권11호
• /
• pp.853-866
• /
• 2020

The purposes of this research were: 1) to investigate the effect of participatory management on financial information asymmetry, 2) to investigate the effect of corporate governance on financial information asymmetry, 3) to examine the influences of benefits incentives on financial information asymmetry, and 4) to test the mediating effects of benefits incentive that influences the relationship between participatory management, corporate governance, and financial information asymmetry. The research sample consisted of 388 Thai-listed firms. Data were collected through a survey questionnaire. Descriptive analysis, Multiple Regression Analysis, and Structural Equation Modeling were used for the data analysis. The results revealed: 1) participatory management and participation in evaluation had a negative influence on financial information asymmetry. 2) Corporate governance and the rights of shareholders had a negative influence on financial information asymmetry. 3) Benefits incentive was negatively associated with financial information asymmetry. 4) The model's influences of participatory management, corporate governance on the reduction of financial information asymmetry through benefits incentive as mediator fit the empirical data (Chi-square = 104.459, df = 84, p = 0.065, GFI = 0.967, RMSEA = 0.025). The variables in the model explained 78.00% and 4.70 % of the variance of benefits incentive and financial information asymmetry, respectively.

• 경영정보학연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.97-114
• /
• 2011

본 연구는 IT 거버넌스 개념을 설정하는데 있어서 제기되는 두 개의 개념적 난제를 다루었다. 먼저 엔터프라이즈 IT 활동의 내용을 살펴서 이를 토대로 거버넌스와 비 거버넌스를 나누고자 하는 전통적 IT 거버넌스 개념 설정이 가진 자의성과 비논리성 문제를 지적하고, 이를 해결하는 방안으로서 목적기반 거버넌스 개념을 제시하였다. 다음으로 이러한 목적 기반 거버넌스 개념이 기존 엔터프라이즈 IT 활동과 가지는 개념적 충돌 문제를 지적하고, 이를 해결하기 위하여 IT 거버넌스 개념을 엔터프라이즈 IT 활동에 내재된 효과성 투명성 책임성 요소를 명시적으로 드러내고 이를 공식화, 외부화 하는 노력으로 새롭게 정의할 것을 제안하였다. 본 연구는 상기 논의를 전개하는데 있어서 IT 활동축이라는 개념적 장치를 도입하여 이를 일관되게 적용함으로써 IT 거버넌스 개념이 개념적 통일성과 논리적 일관성을 가지고 전개될 수 있음을 제시하였다. 끝으로 본 연구가 제시한 IT 거버넌스 개념이 가진 시사점과 향후 과제를 논의하였다.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.327-333
• /
• 2010

This study examines the impact different proxies of agency costs have on companies under different governance approaches. The two specific proxies of agency costs used include: (i) the ratio of operating expenses to annual sales; and (ii) the ratio of annual sales to total assets. Our study is based on earlier works of Ang et al. (2000) and Fleming et al. (2005). A comparison of results for small unlisted companies both in US and Australia indicate that agency cost measures have statistically: (1) different result under rule-based governance mechanisms; and (2) the same results under principle-based governance mechanisms. Our findings support the view that the effectiveness different measures of agency cost is dependent on country specific governance facto as well as on the governance approaches adopted. Our results offer insights to both practitioners and policy makers regarding the usefulness of different proxies of agency costs when companies adopt principle-based corporate governance approaches versus rule-based approaches.

• Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.176-198
• /
• 2018

Environmental issues are among the most critical issues nowadays. These issues are no longer confined to individual countries, and international society has been progressing in building global dialogues since the early 1970s. Within these international efforts, Germany and Japan have played essential roles in global environmental governance. However, there are major differences in nation-level environmental policies in both countries. Governance based on network structure is more efficient than that based on hierarchy for solving complex problems. The network structure is formed through horizontal cooperation among various autonomous actors, and the relationship intensity among actors is one of the key concepts in the governance. Using social network analysis as a framework to explain complicated societal structures explains how interaction among actors creates networks, and these networks further affect their interactions. The purpose of this study is to investigate the structure of environmental policy governance as collaborative governance in Germany and Japan. To address this goal, this paper analyzes the relationship between the informational dimension of governance networks and its complement resource-sharing networks in both countries. The results show that the information-sharing networks have lower-level network influence on the resource-sharing networks as higher-level networks even if not all of the information factors have singular influences. The results suggest that the information-sharing networks may be one of the pieces of the puzzle for explaining this phenomenon in environmental governance in Germany and Japan.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권7호
• /
• pp.149-158
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of corporate governance index on the cost of equity in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. This study collects data from 975 observations during the period 2012 to 2018 to test the hypotheses using multiple linear regression model for the panel data. In this research, the independent variable of corporate governance index comprises of 27 specific corporate governance attributes. The results of hypothesis testing showed that corporate governance has a negative and significant effect on the rate of capital cost. In other words, the quality of corporate governance can lower the rate of capital cost. This result suggests that, by using a powerful corporate governance system and by declining the information asymmetry (increasing transparency) and agency conflict, we would be able to enhance the quality of financial reports. It would strengthen the capital market, attract financial suppliers and investors, and absorb the required financial resources of the firm by a lower rate. The findings of the study suggest that companies are able to reduce the cost of equity by establishing strong corporate governance. This conclusion suggests the importance and effectiveness of corporate governance in the cost of equity.

• 인터넷정보학회지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.68-77
• /
• 2013

This article consists of 3 parts. Part I is multi stakeholder approach on Internet governance system. Part II is analysis of the Korean Internet governance system. In this part, I explain relevant laws in Korea, including Korean Internet Address Resources Act. Part III is my suggestion on Korean Internet governance system using a multi stakeholder approach. First of all, the keyword of the Internet governance system is decision making process: that is, consensus based versus top-down approach. Then who are major players in Internet governance in national level? Government, or Private sectors such as business and civil society. Korean legal system for Internet governance shows a top-down decision making process. Major players are the government (that is, Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning) and KISA affiliated with the government. Other players include Internet Address Policy Committee, Korea Internet Governance Alliance, and NGOs. The key statute for Internet governance in Korea is Internet Address Resources Act of 2004. Articles 3 and 5 require the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning to take a proactive role in Internet governance. The government shall consult with the Internet Address Policy Deliberation Committee for Internet governance. Yet this Committee is established under the control of the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning. All members of this Committee are also commissioned or nominated by the Chairman of the Ministry. Meanwhile, there are also non-official organizations, including Sub-committee on Address & Infrastructure of Korea Internet Governance Alliance. I suggest to reform decision making process of Korean Internet governance system based on BOTTOM-UP process for CONSENSUS BASED DECISION. My suggested system includes the following: (1) The government hands over a major role in Internet governance to INDEPENDENT Internet policy organization. And the government participates in such organization as ONE of the players. (2) Nomination of this committee member must be bottom-up process for a genuine multi-stakeholder model including civil society, commercial organization, end-users and experts. (3) The government should establish plan for supporting the private sector's international activity on the long-term basis.