• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제54권4호
• /
• pp.379-386
• /
• 2016

목적: 본 연구에서는 전통적 인상채득과 디지털 인상채득을 모두 경험한 환자들의 만족도를 조사하여 다양한 항목에 대하여 비교 분석하고자 하였다. 재료 및 방법: 구강 내 디지털 인상채득의 방법을 사용하는 5개의 치과병원에서, 보철 치료를 위해 기존의 인상재를 이용한 방법과 디지털 인상채득을 모두 경험한 만 20세 이상의 성인 환자 170명을 대상으로, 2015년 10월부터 2016년 4월까지 설문조사를 실시하였다. 총128부의 설문지를 분석 자료로 이용하였으며, 빈도분석, 다중응답 빈도분석, 기술통계, 비모수 검정, 교차 분석을 시행하였고, 유의수준은 0.05로 설정하였다. 결과: 디지털 인상채득의 이유는 '임플란트치료'(43.8%), '크라운치료'(30.5%), '인레이치료'(15.6%) 순서로 나타났다. 전통적 인상채득의 평균 만족도보다 디지털 인상채득의 평균 만족도가 유의하게 더 높았다 (P<.05). 재선택하고 싶은 인상채득 방법으로는 전통적 인상채득(11.7%) 보다 디지털 인상채득(60.2%)이 더 높게 나타났다. 디지털 인상채득을 재선택한 이유로는 '구토반사가 없어서'(35.1%), '3D디지털 스캔이라 신뢰가 가서'(33.8%), '시간이짧아서'(33.8%) 순으로 나타났다. 결론: 환자 만족도 및 다시 선택하고 싶은 인상채득의 방법으로 전통적 인상채득 보다 디지털 인상채득의 선택이 더 높게 나타났다.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.117-123
• /
• 2011

총의치 환자의 치료 시 인상 채득 과정은 의치의 지지, 유지, 그리고 안정을 위해 매우 중요하며, 의치의 성공여부를 좌우한다. 총의치 인상 채득을 위한 여러 가지 재료와 방법들이 이용되어 왔으며, 그 중 조직 양화재 (tissue conditioner)를 이용한 동적 인상법 (dynamic impression method)은 보다 생리적이고 기능적인 방법이다. 본 증례들에서는 무치악 환자에서 조직 양화재인 Coe-comfort$^{(R)}$ (GC America, IL, USA)를 이용한 동적 인상법으로 변형된 연조직의 회복과 하께 가장 생리적인 상태로 인상을 채득하여 의치의 제작 및 첨상을 시행하였으며, 만족스런 결과를 얻었다.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.195-203
• /
• 2018

본 연구에서는 우리나라 치과임상에서 사용되고 있는 치과인상재의 종류 및 채득 방법에 대해 조사해보기 위해 실시되었으며, 설문조사는 전국치과병(의)원 치과의사를 대상으로 기관당 1부씩 자기기입식 방법을 통해 조사하였으며, 수집된 자료는 SPSS 20.0을 사용하여 통계 처리하여 분석하였다. 그 결과 인상재의 종류별 진료 내용에서는 대부분의 진료에서 부가중합형 인상재의 사용빈도가 가장 높았다. 인상채득방법은 점도에 분류에 의한 light body와 heavy body를 사용하는 흐름성이 다른 인상재를 한번에 채득하는 방법을 가장 선호하는 것을 확인할 수 있었고, 임플란트 인상채득방법에는 직접법과 간접법 모두 흐름성이 다른 두 가지 고무인상재를 한번에 채득하는 방법이 가장 선호되었다. 일반적인 특성에 따른 주조수복재와 보철물의 인상채득방법에서는 각각 연령과 임상경력에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다. 본 연구결과는 임상에서 주로 사용되고 있는 인상재의 종류를 파악해보고 치과전문가에게 요구되는 인상재의 선호도에 따른 이론과 실무에 대한 업무개발에 도움이 될 수 있으리라 판단된다.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제40권4호
• /
• pp.406-413
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this article is the consolidation of several methods in fabrication of Konus denture. It is different Konus denture from traditional Clasped removable partial denture in the procedures of construction. There are multiple procedures of fabrications of inner and outer crowns in the construction of Konus denture. It is important to fabricate the inner crown, the outer crown and the denture framework in construction of Konus denture. Each procedure should be performed exactly. However, there are many procedures in fabrications of them, and thus, the operator and technician bear trial and error. This article consolidate the multiple methods of fabrications of components of Konus denture. The first method is completion of inner crown, outer crown and denture after one impression taking. The second method is the procedures of cementation of inner crown, impression taking of edentulous area, and completion of outer crown and denture. The third method is the procedures or pick up impression taking of inner crown and completion of outer crown and denture on the inner crown of working cast. Each method is acceptable, but operater and technician should be accustomed with their own systemic procedures and minimize the errors in the construction of denture.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제37권5호
• /
• pp.567-580
• /
• 1999

Accurate reproduction of intraoral tissue is essential in the fabrication of fixed prosthesis. This selection of impression material and method is very important. In this study, vinyl polysiloxane type impression material $Panasil^{(R)}$ was used. Three impression methods ; one-step technique, individual tray technique, and individual tooth tray technique using the vinyl polysiloxane type bite registration material $Futar^{(R)}$ Occlusion, were used to take horizontal and vertical impression. Improved stone models were fabricated. The amount of occlusal surface discrepaneies, interabutment distance discrepancies, amount of marginal defect were evaluated with the $X-PLAN360d^{(R)}$ and photoscanning. The results were as follows. 1. There was no significant difference in occlusal surface according to the directions and techniques of impression taking. 2. There was no significant difference in interabutment distance discrepancies according to the directions and techniques of impression taking 3. There was no significant difference in marginal discrepancies according to the direction of impression taking but there was significant difference between one-step technique and individual tray technique, individual tooth tray technique (P<0.05). Taken together, these results suggest that individual tray technique and individual tooth tray technique are more accurate for impression taking than one-step technique.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.11-20
• /
• 2004

Problem : The several studies were reported to the effects of individual tooth tray with the parallel tooth, but not reported to the effect of individual tooth tray with severe undercut in impression making. Purpose : The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of individual tooth tray; 1) the accuracy of impression in terms of distance. 2) reproducibility of pocket. Material and methods : In this study, a metal model with 3 teeth including tooth prepared 30-degree undercut and gingival crevice of the depth 5mm, width 0.4mm was cast. Impressions of the metal model were taken in 5 times used 4 kinds of impression materials with individual tooth tray and another impression taking were made with conventional method without individual tooth, used same materials, procedure. The stone models were made. Distances between abutments were measured with a Micromeasurescoup-mm. Result : The following results were obtained ; 1. In the comparisonof inter-abutment distance between parallel tooth without individual tooth tray, 4elastomeric materials have not significant difference to the metal model(p>0.05). 2. In the comparisonof inter-abutment distance with undercut tooth without individual tooth tray, 4elastomeric materials have a significant difference to the metal model(p<0.05), especially polyether's dimensional change is large. 3. If individual tooth tray was used to take impression in abutment teeth with severe undercut, more stable results was achieved easily than conventional method. (p>0.05). 4. It is not true that the pressure of impression material with individual tooth tray increased to gingival sulcus. Conclusion : By the results, I knew the fact that individual tooth tray was useful impression method on the teeth with severe undercut for the dimensional stability. Also, I could not confirm the fact that individual tooth tray would increase the penetrating pressure into cervice.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제45권3호
• /
• pp.389-400
• /
• 2007

Statement of problem. Use of the conventional dental impression procedure is problematic in patients who have difficulty opening their mouth, difficulty breathing through their nose or tendency to gag. Purpose. It is necessary to make individual trays more comfortable for patients during impression taking procedure. It was reported at the KAP Annual Meeting 2001 Seoul that an improved impression technique was suitable for this purpose. In this study, the accuracy of the improved dental impression method for implant was compared with the conventional dental impression method. Material and methods. An oral simulator was made from clear acrylic resin block which had similar form of edentulous ridge. For setting up the standard, five fixtures were installed on it. Study casts were made using two kinds of impression techniques. One was the conventional method that was taken using silicone impression material and an individual resin tray under connection of inter-fixture relation. The other was the improved method in which was the connection of the impression coping and the thermoformed polymethyl methacrylate tray. In addition, two different study casts were made from the improved impression body. The coordinates of the fixture on the study model were measured by three-dimensional coordinate measuring equipment. Then the distances between each fixture were calculated and compared with that of oral simulator. Accuracy of the each impression method was also assessed. Results. The differences of inter-fixture dimension between study casts and simulator in the improved impression technique showed $0.014{\pm}0.016mm$ and $0.017{\pm}0.022mm$, respectively and that of the conventional method was $0.017{\pm}0.014mm$. There was no significant difference between the improved impression technique and conventional method. Conclusion. The improved impression technique is useful for multiple support implants.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제43권5호
• /
• pp.622-632
• /
• 2005

Statement of problem: Silicone Index Tooth Tray impression system which does not use gingicord has a shortcoming. It takes time to remove internal wall of Silicone Index Tooth Tray for space of wash impression material. Purpose: This study was to evaluate whether providing certain space to impression body can prevent from doing complicated laboratory work. Material and methods: After mounting metal dies with shoulder and chamfer margins arbiturarily, SITT was produced using $Blu-mousse^(R)$. In one experimental group, wash impression was taken using $Fit-tester^(R)$ without removing interior surface of SITT and in the other group, wash impression was taken using $Fit-tester^(R)$ providing 0.5mm space in the SITT and then compared the differences in two groups. Results: 1. There was no significant difference between a group which did not allow space and a group which granted equal 0.5mm space. 2. There was no significant difference between gingival diameter, occlusal diameter of metal die that has shoulder margin and gingival diameter, occlusal diameter of metal die that has chamfer margin. 3. There was no significant difference between a group which did not take pick-up impression and a group which took pick-up impression through relining method using SITT 4. There was no significant difference between a group that poured immediately after taking primary impression and a group that poured after removing poured stone die. Conclusions: When taking an impression of an abutment using SITT impression system, it is considered to obtain clinically identical results between a group that did not grant a 0.5mm space within SITT for wash impression and a group which invest a space. Furthermore, it is considered possible to produce an individual die through secondary pouring.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제39권1호
• /
• pp.9-20
• /
• 2023

목적: 하악 부분 무치악 모형에서 pick-up type 인상용 코핑을 사용한 개방형 인상 채득법과 transfer type 인상용 코핑을 사용한 폐쇄형 인상 채득법, 개방형 인상 채득법에서 pick-up type 인상용 코핑 고정 재료에 따른 인상 채득 정확성을 비교 하고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 하악 부분 무치악 모형의 좌측 구치부에 직경 4.5 mm, 길이 11.5 mm의 임플란트 고정체 두 개 식립 후 3D 프린터를 이용하여 개방형 개인 트레이 30개 폐쇄형 개인 트레이 10개를 제작하였다. 제작한 개인 트레이를 이용하여 PN군: 개방형 인상 채득법(non-splint), PG군: 개방형 인상 채득법(splint GC pattern resin), PH군: 개방형 인상 채득법(splint Herifix), TN군: 폐쇄형 인상 채득법으로 나누어 각 군당 10회씩 총 40회의 인상 채득을 진행하였다. 인상채득 후 석고 모형을 제작하여 모델 스캐너로 스캔 후 역설계 프로그램으로 스캔오차를 측정하여 95% 유의수준으로 평가 하였다. 결과: 폐쇄형 인상 채득법 TN군이 개방형 인상 채득법 PN군 보다 더 낮은 오차값을 보였다. 개방형 인상 채득법(splint)에 사용된 인상용 코핑 고정 재료 간의 비교 결과에서는 PH군에서 가장 낮은 오차값을 보였으며 PN군, PG군 순으로 정확한 인상 채득 정확성을 보여주었다. 결론: 임플란트 인상 채득 방법이나 인상용 코핑의 연결 고정 유무에 따른 각 군 간의 정확성에 유의한 차이는 없다.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제34권4호
• /
• pp.850-868
• /
• 1996

The accuracy and dimensional stability of impression materials are one of the most important factors for successful prosthodontic treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of several dental elastomeric impression materials used widely and clinically : Impregum-$F^{(R)},\;Permlastic^{(R)},\;Silascon^{(R)},\;Perfect^{(R)},\;Xantopren^{(R)}$. There have been many studies to evaluate the accuracy of impression materials. But it has not been decided yet, which method was most suitable for the evaluation of the accuracy. In this study, two resin teeth, #15 & 25, were prepared with rounded shoulder margin and 90 degree cavosurface angle. For the polysulfide rubber and polyether, the custom tray was made at least 24 hours prior to impression taking. For the silicone rubber materials, putty/wash impression technique was applied in taking impressions. Marginal openings of the castings on the master dies and prepared resin teeth were measured under stereomicroscope. The results were statistically analyzed and compared between tested impression materials. The results were as follows ; 1. In the overall accuracy of impression materials, polyether was the most accurate one, followed by polysulfide, additional silicone and condensation silicone. 2. On the first model pouring, condensation silicone had the largest discrepancies and there was significant difference compared to the other impression materials. 3. Polysulfide had the least discrepancies in the first model pouring, but showed larger discrepancies in the immediate second pouring than the first pouring. 4. On the immediate second pouring, the discrepancy of polyether was shown to be the smallest, while the largest one was additional silicone. 5. Polyether and polysulfide rubber using custom impression trays showed superior accuracy to silicone rubber, putty/wash impression technique.