• Title/Summary/Keyword: Hamstring tendon

Search Result 76, Processing Time 0.03 seconds

Comparative Study of Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Four-Stranded Semitendinosus-Gracilis Tendon (관절경적 전방십자인대 재건술시에 골-슬개건-골과 네가닥 반건양건-박건을 이용한 방법의 비교연구)

  • Kim, Jin Goo;Lim, Young;Kim, Byung Jik;Ko, Han Suk;Moon, Hyung Tae
    • Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
    • /
    • v.2 no.2
    • /
    • pp.107-113
    • /
    • 1998
  • This study is retrospective analysis of 31 patients treated by arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction, from September 1995 to September 1996. ACL reconstructions using autogenous bone patellar tendon bone (B-PT-B) were done in 18 patients, and using hamstring tendon were done in 13 patients. We used four-stranded hamstring tendon grafts and fixed the grafts using Endobutton and screw. The mean postoperative Lysholm knee score was 87.2 points in B-PT-B. group, and 89.0 points in hamstring tendon group. There were no clinically significant results between two groups in Telos test, quadriceps atrophy, Lachman test, anterior drawer test and pivot shift test, but the incidences of anterior knee pain were lower in hamstring group. Four-stranded hamstring tendon graft showed enough stability and good functional outcome similar to that of patellar tendon graft, and had an advantage of quicker return of quadriceps function and less donor site morbidity.

  • PDF

Comparison of ACL Reconstructions using Quadrupled Hamstring tendon Autograft and Tibialis tendon Allograft (자가 슬괵건과 동종 경골건을 이용한 전방십자인대 재건술의 비교)

  • Lee, Kwang-Won;Lee, Seung-Hun;Yang, Dong-Hyun;Kang, Sung-Il;Choy, Won-Sik
    • Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
    • /
    • v.12 no.1
    • /
    • pp.7-11
    • /
    • 2008
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction using autogenous hamstring tendon and allo-tibialis tendon. Materials and Methods: Between March 2002 and March 2005, We performed 30 ACL reconstuructions using hamstring autograft and 20 ACL reconstuructions using tibialis tendon allograft. The average follow up period was 22 months in auto-hamstring tendon and 18 months in allo-tibialis tendon. For the clinical evaluation, we measured the Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee(IKDC) score and anterior laxity by KT-2000 arthrometer at final follow up and compare the results between two groups. Results: The Lysholm score improved from 69.5 preoperatively, to 95.3 at final follow-up in the hamstring autograft groups and from 69.0 to 90.4 in the tibialis allograft groups. According to the IKDC evaluation form, 80% of autogenous hamstring tendon group and 73% of allograft group were good results, higher than B(almost normal)(p>0.05). The average KT-2000 arthrometer side-to-side difference, decreased from 7.1mm preoperatively, to 1.8mm at final follow-up in the hamstring autograft groups and from 7.4 mm to 2.4mm in the tibialis allograft groups. Conclusion: The clinical results of ACL reconstruction using auto-hamstring tendon and allo-tibialis tendon showed no significant differences. The allo-tibialis tendon is an acceptable substitute for auto-hamstring tendon in ACL reconstruction.

  • PDF

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Bone-Patellar tendon-Bone Grafts with Hamstring Tendon Grafts (자가 슬개건과 자가 슬괵건을 이용한 전방십자인대 재건술의 비교)

  • Choi, Sung-Wook;Oh, In-Suk;Kim, Ryuh-Sup;Kim, Myung-Ku;Bae, Joo-Han;Park, Hae-Bong
    • Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
    • /
    • v.12 no.1
    • /
    • pp.1-6
    • /
    • 2008
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the results of the arthroscopic reconstruction of ACL using autologous hamstring tendon and autologous bone-patellar tendon-bone. Materials and Methods: From January, 2000 to December, 2004, 120 patients underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendon(60 cases) and autologous bone-patellar tendon-bone(BPTB)(60 cases). The mean followed up period of hamstring tendon group was 42 months(range $24{\sim}69$ months) and patellar tendon group was 52 months(range $24{\sim}84$ months). At the time of the final follow up, sixty patients in each group were evaluated the results of physical examination, activity level, patients' satisfaction, functional status, and objective anteriror stability using KT-2000 arthrometer. Results: At the time of the final follow up we compared the two groups who had ACL reconstruction using either autologous hamstring tendon or BPTB, and the final results of the Lachman test showed negative, or mildly positive in 85%(51 cases) of the hamstring tendon group and 90%(54 cases) of the BPTB group. Pivot shift test indicated positive in both groups, 8%(5 cases) and 5%(3 cases) respectively and showed no statistically significant difference. The evaluation of the anterior laxity using the KT-2000 arthrometer revealed no significant difference in the hamstring and BPTB groups: differences less than 3 mm compared to the healthy side were 85%(51 cases) and 90%(54 cases)(p>0.05). The Lysholm score improved from a preoperative score of 51 to a postoperative score of 79.1 in the hamstring groups and from 52 to 82.2 in the BPTB groups. According to the IKDC rating system, 87%(52 cases) were normal or near normal in the hamstring group. In the BPTB group, 83%(50 cases) were normal or near normal. The Tegner score for the hamstring groups was 4.8 preoperatively and 7.1 at the final follow up, and the Tegner score for the BPTB groups was 4.5 preoperatively and 7.3 after the last follow-up. The anterior knee pain was found in 7%(4 cases) in the hamstring tendon group and 10%(6 cases) in the patellar tendon group. Conclusion: Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using both the autologous hamstring tendon and the patellar tendon during their mid term follow up period demonstrated excellent results. However, the final results during their last follow up showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups.

  • PDF

Clinical Results after ACL Reconstruction using Tibialis Anterior Tendon Allograft and Hamstring Tendon Autograft (동종 전경골건과 자가 슬괵건을 이용한 관절경적 전방 십자 인대 재건술의 결과 비교)

  • Yoon, Kyoung-Ho;Bae, Dae-Kyung;So, Dong-Hyuk;Lee, Jeong-Hwan;Kim, Jeong-Weon;Park, Soo-Yeon
    • Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
    • /
    • v.11 no.2
    • /
    • pp.85-91
    • /
    • 2007
  • Purpose: To analyze the clinical results and second look arthroscopic findings of anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) reconstruction with a tibialis anterior tendon allograft and a hamstring tendon autograft. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the cases of athroscopic ACL reconstructions using allogenous tibialis anterior(TA) tendon and autogenous hamstring tendon done from March, 2002 to August, 2005 and followed-up more than 1 year. The 250 cases were included in this study and allogenous TA tendon was used in 150 cases and autogenous hamstring tendon in 100 cases. The mean follow-up period was 15 months and 14 months, respectively. The clinical evaluation was done by Lachman test, Pivot shift test, KT-1000 arthrometer and International Knee Documentation Committee(IKDC) knee score. Graft tension, synovial coverage were observed in cases of second look arthroscopy. Results: At final follow-up, there was no significance between the two groups in clinical examination. On second look arthroscopy, synovial coverage was better in autogenous hamstring tendon group than allogenous TA tendon group(p=0.005). But no difference was found in graft tension(p>0.05). Conclusion: There were no significant differences between the two groups in the clinical results. But autogenous hamstring tendon group had better synovial coverage than allogenous TA tendon group in second look arthroscopy.

  • PDF

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon Autograft : Advantage, Disadvantage, Hamstring Regeneration (자가 슬건을 이용한 재건술: 장점, 단점, 슬건의 재생)

  • Kim, Jin-Goo;Choi, Jeong-Yoon
    • Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
    • /
    • v.14 no.2
    • /
    • pp.92-101
    • /
    • 2010
  • The Hamstring autograft and the bone patellar bone tendon autograft have been widely used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. In recent years, use of hamstring autograft for ACL reconstrution has been increased. The reason seems to be the advantages of the hamstring tendon such as high ultimate tensile load, low donor site morbidity and development of graft fixation method. These theoretical advantages have been increased as studies have shown that hamstring tendons actually regenerate after harvesting for ACL reconstruction. However, the concerns have arisen regarding the disadvantages of hamstring harvest, which were weakness of tibial internal rotation, the loss of flexion strength. The flexion strength loss has been controversial, therefore it needs to study whether restoration of flexion strength after hamstring regeneration is or not. In this study, we reviewed the current research of concerns on the advantage and disadvantage of hamstring tendon autograft and the hamstring regeneration. Furthermore, we compared the earlier studies and experiences regarding Hamstring regeneration with our research.

  • PDF

Reconstruction of Coraco-clavicular Ligament with Hamstring Tendon after a Failed Weaver-Dunn′s Operation - A Case Report - (Weaver-Dunn 수술 실패 후 슬근 건을 이용한 오구쇄골인대 재건술 - 증례보고 -)

  • Tae Suk-Kee;Jung Yonug Bok;Yoo Tae Yeul
    • Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
    • /
    • v.3 no.1
    • /
    • pp.44-48
    • /
    • 2000
  • Weaver-Dunn's operation for acromioclavicular injury yields satisfactory results in most cases. Although clavicular prominence can recur, it is not frequently symtomatic, but it can cause serious impairment of shoulder function in young and active patients. The authors performed reconstruction of coracoclavicular ligament with an autogenous hamstring tendon graft in a 31 years old electrician with recurrence of clavicular prominence accompanied by pain and limitation of overhead activity. The hamstring tendon and two coracoclavicular sutures looped under the coracoid process were passed through holes in the clavicle and around the clavicle in overreduced position. Even though clavicular prominence recurred somewhat, the modified UCLA score by Rockwood improved to 17 from 11/20 at 2 years after operation and the patient had no restriction in working as an electrician. Symptomatic patient with recurrent clavicular prominence after Weaver-Dunn's operation can benefit from reconstruction of coracoclavicular ligament with a hamstring tendon.

  • PDF

Rupture of the ischial origin of the hamstring tendon - A case report - (좌골 결절부위 기시부에서 내측 슬괵건 파열 - 증례 보고 -)

  • Kim, Hyung Kan;Hwang, Sun Chul
    • Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
    • /
    • v.10 no.2
    • /
    • pp.129-132
    • /
    • 2011
  • A complete rupture of hamstring tendon originated from ischial tuberosity is a uncommon sports injury in adults. We present successful outcome obtained by attachment on ischial tuberosity using suture anchor in relatively rare case of the proximal rupture of the medial hamstring tendon sustained during landing with the review of literatures.

  • PDF

Modified technique for harvesting the hamstring tendons -Technical note- (슬괵건 채취를 위한 변형된 방식 -수술 수기-)

  • Kim Jin-Goo;Moon Hyung-Tae;Kim Ji-Yeong
    • Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
    • /
    • v.3 no.1
    • /
    • pp.56-59
    • /
    • 2004
  • The hamstring tendons are popular for autografts in a variety of reconstructive procedures. The hamstring autografts are used widely for its potential advantages over the patella bone-tendon-bone(BTB) autograft, including lower graft site morbidity and easier harvesting technique. However, the use of hamstrings has potential disadvantages such as the damage of infrapatellar branches of the saphenous nerve, premature tendon amputation, and tendon split following inadequate hamstring identifications. In our studies, we used modified technique for harvesting the hamstring to decrease potential disadvantages. Reflected hamstring flap method seems to be easy and safe in avoiding nerve damage and tendon splitting. We recommend the reflected hamstring flap method for harvesting hamstring tendons.

  • PDF

Endoscopic ACL Reconstruction Using A Quadrupled Semitendinosus Graft (4겹의 반건양근 건을 이용한 전방십자인대 재건술)

  • Lee, Kwang-Won
    • Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
    • /
    • v.1 no.1
    • /
    • pp.72-80
    • /
    • 1997
  • Numerous techniques of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have been described in literature. All have inherent advantages and disadvantages. The central one-third patellar tendon and hamstring tendons are the most commonly used autogenous tissues for replacement of a torn anterior cruciate ligament. Although the central one-third patellar tendon is considered to be 'the gold standard' for replacement of torn ACL. equivalent results have been reported using hamstring tendon grafts. Autogenous hamstring grafts provide adequate strength while avoiding donor site morbidity associated with bone-tendon-bone harvest. $EndoButton^{\circledR}$ femoral fixation allows precise femoral tunnel placement without a second incison. The purpose of this article is to describe surgical techniques using a quadrupled semitendinosus tendon and $EndoButton^{\circledR}$ fixation, and review the results of replacement of ACL.

  • PDF

Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Autogenous Hamstring Tendon Graft Without Detachment of the Tibial Insertion (경골 종지부를 분리하지 않은 자가슬괵건을 이용한 관절경적 전방십자인대 재건술)

  • Kim Sung-Jae;Lee Yun-Tae;Kim Hyun-Kon
    • Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
    • /
    • v.1 no.1
    • /
    • pp.81-85
    • /
    • 1997
  • This article describes a modified arthroscopic technique of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using quadrupled hamstring tendon graft. The autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis grafts are harvested without detachment of the tibial insertion. To obtain longer graft, the accessory tibial insertions of the hamstring tendons are dissected. The EndoButton(Acupex Microsurgical, Andover, MA) is used for femoral fixation and two spiked staples are used for tibial fixation in a belt buckle fashion. Then the residual anterior laxity is restored by additional absorbable interference screw fixations. In this technique. more viable graft is obtained and firmer distal fixation is achieved by preservation of the tibial insertion of hamstring tendons.

  • PDF