• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제32권
• /
• pp.59-91
• /
• 2006

The Arbitration Act of Korea was promulgated in 1966. Since the promulgation of Arbitration Act of Korea, consecutive amendments took place in 1973, 1993, 1997, 1999, 2001 and 2002. Among the various set of amendments, those of 1999 were designed to accommodate the UNCITRAL Model Law on international Commercial Arbitration of 1985. Korea has acceded to special international conventions on dispute settlement such as the New York Convention of 1958 and the Washington Convention of 1965. The Korean Commercial Arbitration Board(KCAB) administers the arbitration proceedings in accordance with its Arbitration Rules approved by the Korean Supreme Court. Since the establishment of the first Arbitration Rules in 1966. consecutive amendments took place in 1973, 1981, 1989, 1993, 1996, 2000 and 2004. The KCAB plans to enact the International Arbitration Rules, which will be available to disputing parties in addition to the KCAB Arbitration Rules. In 2005, arbitration applications received at KCAB recorded a historic high at 213 cases, an increase of 22% from 175 cases in 2000. But in 2005, the total amount involved in the arbitration cases decreases to US$ 129 million, a decline of 63% from US$ 346 million in 2000. The KCAB should take the following measures for activating the commercial arbitration system: the globalization of KCAB, the advertisement of arbitration system, the security of qualified arbitrators, and the enhancement of the secretariat service. In conclusion, the KCAB should make efforts for the development of the arbitration system and for the upgrade of customer satisfaction. Moreover the KCAB should make further efforts to grow into a global arbitration institution as well as strengthening relations with international arbitration institutions.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.73-87
• /
• 2016

Activation Plan for International Health Care through the Resolution of Medical Disputes with Foreign Patients. The field of international health care is currently being expanded and developed into the new industrial field of medical tourism through the convergence of medicine - a public sector - and tourism - a private sector. This study examines problems with medical law regarding the prevention of medical disputes that may occur when attracting foreign patients and the resolution of these disputes. It also introduces the current most ideal resolution plan for medical disputes. Advanced measures for the prevention of medical disputes with foreign patients are as follows: First, when conducting international health care, the obligation to explain a medical treatment should be applied at higher standards for foreign patients. Second, all medical treatment procedures, including appointments, treatments, discharge, post-operation consultations, and follow-up treatments of foreign patients should be charted and recorded. A checklist regarding precautions for each procedure along with a response manual for problems should also be established. These regulations can prevent unexpected conflicts in advance when medical disputes occur. If a medical dispute with a foreign patient occurs despite thorough advance prevention, it can be resolved through reconciliation, mediation, and arbitration. The government and the medical field along with its related industries and authorities should put their efforts into developing these priori/posteriori measures for the activation of international medical health care. The laws and technological/human capabilities in medicine should also be improved in order to activate international medical health care.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제12권
• /
• pp.615-641
• /
• 1999

Trade and the environment emerged as a major and complex issue for trade negotiators in the final stages of the Uruguay Round negotiations. The agreements and other international measures employing trade measures and trade sanctions for achieving global environmental objectives are Vienna Convention on the Protection of the Ozone Layer(1985), the Montreal Protocol on Substances that deplete the Ozone Layer(1987), The Framework Convention on Climate Change(1992), the Convention on Biological Diversity(1992), the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Waste and their Disposal(1992), the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Faunna and Flora(1975), the Rio Declaration, the Agenda 21, etc. The texts of the World Trade Organization(WTO) incorporated certain provisions which were designed to reflect some of the environmental concerns are Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Properity Rights(TRIPs), Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIMs), the General Agreement on Trade in Services(GATS), and Technical Barriers to Trade(TBT) There is the possibility of conflict between multilateral environmental agreements and WTO agreements granting waivers against trade measures and sanctions. This remains a possibility, especially between countries which are Member of WTO and which are not Members of the relevant multilateral environment agreements, and countries which are Members of both the WTO and the relevant MEAs. Measures taken under the trade-related provisions of MEAs could potentially give rise to conflicts under obligations arising in WTO texts. If the parties in dispute are WTO members while they are not members of MEAs, the WTO provisions can be granted a certain priority in terms of international norms and vice versa. When the parties concerned are both WTO members and MEAs, it will be rational to grant the WTO provisions a priority. However, such measures should neither constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination between countries where similar conditions prevail, nor create a disguised restriction on trade. Also any trade measures taken should be necessary to prevent developments in trade from endangering the effectiveness of an MEA and they should be proportional and least trade restrictive.

• 한국산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제22권6호
• /
• pp.71-84
• /
• 2017

Over the past decade, we have witnessed Serious Debates in MISQ and Other Journals Between Two Camps that have Differing Views on the use of Causal Indicators to Measure Constructs. There is the Camp that advocates Causal Indicators (ADVOCATE) and the Camp that opposes Their Usage (OPPONENT). The Debates have been primarily centered on the OPPONENT's Argument that the Meaning of a Latent Variable is determined by its Outcome Variables. However, Little Effort has been made to Validate the ADVOCATE's Dispute (Against the OPPONENT's Arguments) that the Meaning of a Latent Variable is decided by its Causal Indicators if there is no Misspecification. Our Study precisely examines the Integrity of the Argument. For this, we empirically examine how the two Primary Psychometric Properties-Comprehensiveness and Interrelationship-of Causal Indicators Influence Theory Testing between Latent Variables through Three Different Tests (i.e., Comprehensive Test, Interrelationship Test, and Mixed Test). Conducted on Two Different Datasets, Our Analysis Consistently Reveals that Structural Path Coefficients are Hardly Sensitive to the Changes (i.e., Misspecification) in the Properties of Causal Indicators. The Discovery offers Important Evidence that the Sound Theoretical Logic of a Causal Model is not in Sync with the Empirical Mechanism of Parameter Estimation. This Underscores that a Latent Variable Formed by Causal Indicators is empirically an elusive notion that is Difficult to Operationalize. As Our Results have Significant Implications on the Integrity of Numerous IS studies which have conducted Theory or Hypothesis Testing Using Causal Indicators, we strongly advocate Open Discussions among Methodologists regarding Our Findings and Their Implications for Both Published IS Research and Future Practices.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.149-172
• /
• 2002

1994년부터 2001년 11월까지 인터넷무역 연구논문들을 학위논문과 학술지(무역학회지, 무역상무연구, 통상정보연구, 국제상학)를 대상으로 연구주제별, 인터넷무역 거래단계별, 연구목적별로 분류 분석하였다. 조사대상논문은 총 180편으로 학위논문이 51편, 학술지 논문이 129편 조사되었다. 주제별분석에서 전체연구 중 인터넷무역전략이 19%, 무역정보시스템 14%, 국제운송과 보험 12%로 비교적 많은 연구가 있었으며, 대금결제와 무역금융 8%, 국제통상법 7%, 무역계약 관습 5%이며, 인터넷무역이론, 전자화폐, 무역분쟁해결이 각 1%로 상대적으로 미진한 연구분야로 파악되었다. 거래단계별 재분류한 결과, 인터넷무역의 국제상무, 인터넷무역 국제법규, 무역정보시스템, 현황 및 실태파악에 관한 연구인 지원적 활동에 대한 연구가 총 53%를 차지하여 가장 많았다. 그 다음으로 물류/운송/보험이 15%를 차지하였으며, 대금결제 8%, 홍보마케팅 6%, 거래협상 6%로 파악되었다. 거래 선발굴, 사후관리활동에 관한 연구든 1%로 미진하였다. 연구목적별로 71%가 탐색적 연구를 수행하였다. 따라서 본 고의 분류와 분석을 기초로 연구가 활발하게 진행된 분야를 파악하고 연구가 미진한 분야를 찾아서 시사정과 연구방향을 제시하였다.

• 한국태양에너지학회 논문집
• /
• 제39권6호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2019

With the adoption of the Paris Agreement, a new climate regime is intensifying the global interest in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In the meantime, Korea is preparing to introduce a new renewable energy carbon certification system in order to activate the use of renewable energy and to reduce carbon emissions in the entire life cycle of manufacturing and disposal of renewable energy facilities. Therefore, this study aims to identify the implications for the introduction of the carbon certification system and to establish a theoretical basis for the system design by examining the status of overseas carbon certification, international trade norms and trade disputes. As a result, carbon emissions certification is being implemented in developed countries such as EU, UK, France, USA and Japan, but only France, Germany and EU have adopted carbon certification for renewable energy sector. The analysis of the WTO TBT Agreement and GATT also confirmed the possibility of a violation of the international trade rules of the carbon certification system and derived nine international technical standards related to carbon certification. Finally, by examining the case of trade disputes related to environmental labeling, the minimum requirements to be considered at the institutional design stage were drawn to eliminate the possibility of trade disputes.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제44권1호
• /
• pp.177-191
• /
• 2019

Global trade protectionism has increased further and U.S. priorities and protectionism have strengthened since Trump took office in 2017. Trump administration is actively implementing tariff measures based on U.S. domestic trade laws rather than the WTO rules and regulations. In particular, the American government has recently been imposing high tariffs due to national security and imposing economic sanctions on other countries' imports. According to the U.S. Trade Expansion Act Section 232, the American government imposed additional tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to WTO member countries such as China, India, and EU etc. on march 15, 2018. Thus, this study aims to investigate whether the U.S. Trade Expansion Act Section 232 is consistent with GATT/WTO rules by comparing the legal basis of US / China / WTO regulations related to Section 232 of the U.S. Trade Expansion Act, and gives some suggestions for responding to the Section 232 measure. As the Section 232 measure exceeded the scope of GATT's Security Exceptions regulation and is very likely to be understood as a safeguard measure. If so, the American government is deemed to be in breach of WTO's regulations, such as the most-favored-nation treatment obligations and the duty reduction obligations. In addition, American government is deemed to be failed to meet the conditions of initiation of safeguard measure and violated the procedural requirements such as notification and consultation. In order to respond to these U.S. protection trade measures, all affected countries should actively use the WTO multilateral system to prevent unfair measures. Also, it is necessary to revise the standard jurisdiction of the dispute settlement body and to explore the balance of the WTO Exception clause so that it can be applied strictly. Finally, it would be necessary for Chinese exporters to take a counter-strategy under such trade pressure.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.223-258
• /
• 2013

필자는 우주조약의 국제법적 의미에 관하여 첫째, 우주활동의 법원칙선언조항, 둘째, 세부조약으로 발전한 조항 그리고 마지막으로 우주조약의 보완사항에 관한 최근 동향으로 분류하여 설명하였다. 1963년 12월 13일 UN총회의 '우주법선언'을 반영한 우주조약은 그 세부조약으로 1968년 구조협정, 1972년 책임협약, 1975년 등록협약을 제정하였다. 2013년 5월 기준으로 102개국이 가입하고 27개국이 서명한 우주조약은 그야말로 우주법의 '마그나 카르타'(Magna Carta) 내지는 우주의 헌법이라고 불릴 정도로 우주법의 가장 기본이 되는 원칙을 담고 있고, 특히 달과 다른 천체를 포함한 우주를 비전유원칙인 '국제공역'(res extra commercium)으로 선언함으로서 우주에 대한 영유권 문제를 종식시켰다는 점에서 큰 의미를 찾을 수 있다. 우주조약이 제정된지 반세기가 되어가는 시점에서 우주조약에서 규정하고 있는 조항 중 우주활동은 모든 국가들의 이익을 위한다는 원칙(제1조), 외기권 우주의 자유로운 탐사와 이용(제1조), 전유화금지(제2조)와 타국의 권리존중(제9조)은 조약법은 물론 모든 국가들을 구속하는 국제관습법과 '강행규범'(jus cogens)으로까지 발전된 조항이라고 할 수 있다. 특히 우주조약은 투명성과 개방성을 규범적으로 요구하고 있다. 이것은 우주활동이 '전세계적 공공 이익'(global public interest)과 관련되어 있음을 시사하고 있다. 이러한 우주에서의 '전세계적 공공이익'에 대한 원리는 국제공동체에게 '대세적 의무'(obligation erga omnes)를 부과하고 있는데, 우주를 모든 인류의 영역이라고 선언한 점, 우주에서의 협력의 의무, 우주비행사를 인류의 사절이라고 한 점, 우주활동에서 해로운 오염을 피하라고 한 점, 우주활동을 국가, 사적 실체 그리고 정부간 조직체(IGOs)로 제한한 점, 우주활동으로 인한 손해배상에 대한 절대책임원칙, 우주에서의 핵무기 및 대량파괴무기 배치 금지, 우주활동의 공개성과 투명성 그리고 국제우주제도의 보편적 적용 등이 이를 뒷받침 해주고 있다. 현재 우주조약의 해석을 두고 많은 논란이 있는 조항들이 있고 제정당시 예상 못했던 우주기술의 발달과 상업화로 인해 보충해야 할 주제도 많이 생겨나서 현재 COPUOS 내에서 1979년 달조약을 포함한 현행 우주관련 5개 조약의 지위검토를 법률소위원회에 의제로 포함시킬 것을 제의하여 1998년 제37차 법률소위원회부터 정식으로 승인받아 현재까지 논의되고 있다. 그러나 필자는 '우주법선언'의 내용들이 이미 국제관습법으로 굳어 졌으며, 이를 거의 반영한 우주조약의 상당부분 조항들이 이제는 국제관습법화 되었고, 심지어는 강행규범(jus cogens)이 된 조항들도 있다는 면에서 우주조약의 성과는 국제법상 매우 큰 의미를 지녔다고 평가하고 싶다. 앞으로 우주조약 이외에 우주관련세부조약들로도 해결하지 못하는 분야들은 COPUOS나 UN을 통하여 보완적인 결의와 선언들로 계속 반영되어야 할 것이며 만일 별도의 조약제정이 불가능하다면 적당한 시기에 우주조약을 포함하여 세부조약의 개정을 통하여 또는 추가의정서를 만들어 보완하면 좋을 것이라고 생각한다. 우주조약은 그 개념들의 모호성 때문에 수많은 학자들로부터 비난을 받아왔지만 그럼에도 불구하고 계속 존속해 왔다는 사실을 간과해서는 안 될 것이다. 현재 우주폐기물과 관련하여 "IADC 우주폐기물 경감 가이드라인", COPUOS의 "우주폐기물감축 가이드라인", 세계국제법협회(ILA)의 "우주폐기물로 인한 피해로부터 환경을 보호하기 위한 국제협약 초안" 등이 우주조약을 보완하고 있고, 분쟁해결에 관하여 세계국제법협회(ILA)가 1998년 타이페이(Taipei) 회의에서 채택한 "우주법분쟁해결에 관한 협약안"을 제시한 바 있고, 2011년 중재재판소(PCA)가 "우주활동관련 분쟁의 중재재판에 관한 선택규칙"을 제정하고, 2012년 우주활동관련 분쟁의 중재재판관을 새롭게 임명하였다는 점은 우주법이 계속 발전되어 가고 있다는 모습을 보여주고 있다. 한편 UNIDROIT(국제사법통일기구)에서는 우주자산의 구입 및 조달에 필요한 담보금 거래시 국제적으로 통일된 담보거래 규칙을 위한 "이동장비국제담보권협약에 대한 우주자산의정서"는 우주조약이 해결하지 못하고 있는 분야는 별도의 조약체결을 통하여도 보완되고 있다는 가능성을 보여주고 있는 것이다.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.249-273
• /
• 2016

과거 산업경제의 기업 경쟁력은 생산력에서 비롯되었다면, 최근에는 무형자산인 특허의 확보력이 기업의 글로벌경제 성공요인의 중요한 조건이 되고 있다. 특히 기술의 변화가 빠르고, 국제적 특허분쟁이 심한 IT산업에서는 국내외 특허의 전략적 확보 및 관리의 중요성이 대두되고 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 코스닥기업 중 하드웨어와 소프트웨어 217개 IT기업들의 특허활동을 양적인 요인인 생산성과 질적인 요인인 효율성 및 고급성으로 구분하고, 기업의 재무성과와의 영향관계를 검증하고 시사점을 도출하였다. 본 연구는 자원기반이론을 기반으로 선행연구를 실시하여 개념적 연구모형과 연구가설을 도출하고, 데이터 자료를 다중회귀모델로 실증 분석하여 다음과 같은 연구결과를 얻었다. 첫째, IT기업의 총자산 증가율에 대해 특허의 효율성과 고급성이 유의한 양(+)의 영향을 미쳤다. 둘째, IT기업의 평균매출 증가율에 대해서는 특허의 세 가지 활동요인 모두 유의한 결과를 가져오지 못했다. 셋째, IT기업의 평균 순이익 증가율에 대해서는 특허의 고급성만이 양(+)의 영향을 가져왔다. 본 연구의 선행연구와의 차별성으로 특허활동을 양적인 요인과 질적인 요인으로 구분하여 재무성과와의 영향관계에 대한 연구를 진행하였고, 실무적 기여도에서는 국제적 특허분쟁이 심각한 IT기업들의 특허활동에 대해 전략적인 방향성을 제시하였다는데 의의가 있다.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권43호
• /
• pp.29-55
• /
• 2018

Arctic sea ice has been retreating as a result of the global warming. Arctic sea ice extent for April 2018 averaged 13.71 million square kilometers. This figure shows far less sea ice compared to the average extent from 1981 to 2010. Meanwhile, 287 times of maritime transits through the Northwest Passage have been made during the 2017 and the first ship traversed the Northern Sea Route without the assistant of ice-breaker in August 2017. Commercialization of the Arctic Passage means significant economic and strategic advantages by shortening the distance. In this article, 'Arctic Passage' means Northern Sea Route along the Arctic coast of Russia and Northwest Passage crossing Canadian Arctic Ocean. As climate changes, the potential feasibility of the Arctic Passage has been drawing international attention. Since navigation in this area remains hazardous in some aspects, IMO adopted Polar Code to promote safe, secure and sustainable shipping through the Arctic Passage. Futhermore, Russia and Canada regulate foreign vessels over the maritime zones with the authority to unilaterally exercise jurisdiction pursuant to the Article 234 of UNCLOS. The dispute over the navigation regime of the arctic passage materialized with Russia proclaimed Dmitrii Laptev and Sannikov Straits as historically belong to U.S.S.R. in the mid 1960s and Canada declared that the waters of the passage are historic internal waters in 1973 for the first time. So as to support their claims, In 1985, Russia and Canada established straight baseline including Northern Sea Route and Northwest Passage. The United States has consistently protested that the Northern Sea Route and Northwest Passage are straits used for international navigation which are subject to the regime of transit passage. Firstly, it seems that Russia and Canada do not meet the basic requirements for acquiring a historic title. Secondly, since the Law of the Sea had adopted before the establishment of straight baseline over the Russian Arctic Archipelago and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, Ships can exercise at least the right of innocent passage. Lastly, Northern Sea Route and Northwest Passage have fulfilled the both geographical and functional criteria pertaining to the strait used for international navigation under the international law. Especially, should the arctic passage become commercially viable, it can be expected to accumulate the functional criterion. Russia and Canada regulate the ships navigate in their maritime zones by adopting the higher degree of an environmental standard than generally accepted international rules and standard mainly under the Article 234 of UNCLOS. However, the Article 234 must be interpreted restrictively as this contains constraint on the freedom of navigation. Thus, it is reasonable to consider that the Article 234 is limited only to the EEZ of coastal states. Therefore, ships navigating in the Arctic Passage with the legal status of the territorial sea and the international straits under the law of the sea have the right of innocent passage and transit passage as usual.