• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.90-109
• /
• 2002

The national nuclear R&D projects have been implemented for the purpose of supply of nuclear power which was proved to be safety and stability. Evaluating the national nuclear R&D projects has critical importance in nu-clear energy management aspect. This paper employs multi-attribute utility analysis as a basis for obtaining an evaluation index to assess the national nuclear R&D projects using a specific case study of Korea. To structure and quantify basic values for the evaluation, we elicited important attributes, then refined and structured them into a hierarchy. A multi-attribute index is constructed as a multi-attribute utility function, based on value judgments provided by a group of technical experts, policy makers, and faculties. As a result, the objective of attainment of a proposed object is given the highest priority, followed by appropriateness of project and research strategy, utilization of research output, within attribute ranges defined for the attributes. We found that the work and results of this study can provide valuable insights and decision opportunities for virtually all major decision making in evaluation of the national nuclear R&D projects in Korea.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.281-307
• /
• 2020

A variety of approaches are being applied to improve the existing ex-ante evaluation by expert panels in publicly funded R&D. While the objective evaluation criteria are constantly being improved to screen and select the superior projects, alternative approaches such as random prioritization and logical modeling are also underway to overcome the conservative bias of reviewers and to secure disruptive innovation. This study intends to find critical implications for ex-ante evaluation of public R&D system from the comparison of Indonesia and Korea. For the comparative analysis, literature review and expert in-depth interviews are conducted on the national R&D system and the selection evaluation process. In Korea, the selection criteria of projects are legally promulgated for establishing an objective evaluation system, and at the program level, the major considerations in the planning process are specified by Presidential Decree. On the other hand, while Indonesia conducts R&D in 47 strategic fields largely by public research institutes (PRI) based on the non-competitive government contributions. This study draws out implications of institutionalizing the planning process at the level of program, and of increasing the ratio of contract-based competitive funding at the level of project in the national R&D portfolio.

• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제36권2호
• /
• pp.285-295
• /
• 2016

건설공사 사후평가 제도는 공공건설사업의 계획단계에서 예측한 이용수요 사업비 사업기간 등에 대한 예측치를 준공 후에 평가함으로써, 차후 유사사업 추진 시 그 평가결과를 참고하여 발주청의 시행착오를 줄이기 위한 목적으로 2000년도에 도입되었다. 그러나 객관성 및 신뢰성이 결여된 평가 수행체계 및 부재한 활용주체로 인하여 건설공사 사후평가 제도 정착 및 활성화에 걸림돌이 되고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 선진외국의 건설사업 평가수행 및 관리 활용 체계를 벤치마킹하여 국내 사후평가 체계 개선을 위한 시사점을 도출하였고, 공공 발주청 사후평가 담당자 및 사후평가위원회 활동경험이 있는 전문가를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여 사후평가 전문기관 설치의 필요성 및 전문기관에서 담당해야 할 기능 및 업무내용 등을 도출하였다. 도출된 분석결과를 바탕으로 최종적으로 본 연구결과가 실효성이 확보될 수 있도록 관련 법령 및 지침 개정안을 마련하였다. 본 연구 결과를 통해 향후 전문기관이 설치된다면 대규모 건설사업 시행과정을 면밀히 분석하여 차후 유사사업 수행 시에 많은 시행착오를 줄일 수 있으며, 관행적 반복적으로 적용되는 건설사업 수행방식을 개선하여 기술경쟁력이 제고될 수 있다.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한산업공학회/한국경영과학회 1996년도 춘계공동학술대회논문집; 공군사관학교, 청주; 26-27 Apr. 1996
• /
• pp.225-229
• /
• 1996

In order to accomplish large-size information systems successfully, one of the most improtant factor is the system integration(SI) of individual software projects which consist of the systems. A developer of each project should consider aspects of SI through the development cycle, and a manager of the entire system should manage, control, and evaluate each from a SI point of view. In this research, management models for the system managers, development models for the developers of unit projects, and standardized output documents for the management and evaluation purpose are presented based on the SI concepts.

• 정보화정책
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.23-40
• /
• 2023

1997년 정보화평가 시작 이후 평가 주관부처 및 평가방식 등의 많은 변화를 겪으며 현재 중앙행정기관 정보화사업에 대한 성과평가는 기획재정부의 재정사업자율평가가 시행되고 있다. 최근 정보화사업은 디지털뉴딜을 거쳐 디지털플랫폼정부 구현을 위해 예산이 큰 폭으로 증가하고 있으며 이에 따라 성과에 대한 관심도 높아지고 있다. 본 연구는 선행연구를 통해 성과 관련 특성을 선정하여 이에 따라 실제로 정보화사업 성과 차이가 있는지 실증 분석하였다. 분석 결과 신규사업, 처나 청에서 수행하는 사업은 최종평가점수에 통계적으로 유의미한 양의 영향을 미쳤다. 반면, 정보화지원사업과 기금사업은 최종평가점수에 통계적으로 유의미한 음의 영향을 미쳤다. 본 연구는 향후 새 정부의 디지털정부플랫폼 정부 구현, 공공데이터 개방 사업 등 정보화사업을 추진하고 이에 대한 성과를 평가할 때 사업의 고유한 특성에 따라 성과 차이가 발생할 수 있다는 점을 시사한다.

• 한국산업보건학회지
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.396-416
• /
• 2021

Objectives: This study was conducted to analyze the trends of government R&D (R&D) projects related to laboratory safety over the past 20 years. Methods: We collected publications from various databases(DBs) with words such as laboratory(ies), lab(s), researcher(s), laboratory worker(s), safety, environment, hazard(s), risk(s), and so on. Selected publications were analyzed by the research funds and the number of projects according to the investment subject and research characteristics. Results: About 93% of the total R&D budget went to government policy projects, not scientific research. Second, from the perspective of 'safety management activities', most of the research is related to management and inspection at the organizational level. Issues that need to be discussed at the national level like policy governance are not included. Third, focusing on the 'safety management cycle', there were few studies related to 'prediction' or 'post-response'. Fourth, when an analysis framework combining the perspectives of 'safety management activities' and 'safety management cycle' is applied, most of the budget is spent on infrastructure such as digital management systems, whereas basic knowledge for prevention and production of evidence was very few. Conclusions: In order to prevent policy planning without policy evaluation, implementation without strategy, and evaluation without evidence, it is necessary to expand investment in empirical research on risks, research on the effectiveness of current application methods, and research on theory development. The government budget for laboratory safety-related projects should be managed separately from the R&D budget for scientific research. Although less than 5% of the budget allocated to scientific research is the total budget, an optical illusion occurs because both the project budget and the scientific research budget are counted as R&D budgets.

• 한국인터넷방송통신학회논문지
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.157-169
• /
• 2021

공공 정보통신기술(ICT)사업의 투자 평가 체계를 세우는 것은 궁극적으로 정부 재정이 투자되는 공공 ICT사업의 성공률을 높이고 사업의 활성화를 꾀함으로써 국가 경제 성장 기반 구축 및 글로벌 ICT산업 경쟁력을 제고 하는 것이다. 본 연구에서는 기존 평가 체계에 따라 수립된 공공 ICT사업 투자 평가 요인이 실제 사업 성공에 미치는 영향을 실증적으로 검증하고, 향후 투자 평가 요인에 대한 방향을 제시하고자 하였다. 선행 연구를 통해 공익성, 경제성, 기술성, 정책성 및 예산효율성 등 다섯 개의 평가 요인을 도출하였고, 이를 실제 사업에 직접 참여했던 전문가들의 설문을 통해 이러한 평가 기준이 실제 사업 성공에 미치는 영향을 검증하였다. 또한 ICT사업의 투자 평가 요인과 사업성공 사이에서 정부의 지원제도에 대한 조절 작용 여부도 확인하였다. 측정 도구의 신뢰도 및 타당도, 구조 모형 분석, 경로 분석 등을 실증분석하고, 기존 ICT 투자 평가 요인의 유의성을 검증하였다.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.16-27
• /
• 1999

This paper intends to clear up the conte31t of the interdisciplinary nature of individual researches. First, the interdisciplinary character of individual research was analyzed. Approximately 40% of individual research projects supported by Korea Science and Engineering Foundation has the interdisciplinary nature. Second, there are close connections among research fields in individual research projects. Every research field needs the inflow of knowledge from other fields and supports other research fields as well. The interrelation among various research fields indicates the importance of the balanced development in all science and engineering fields.

• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.106-123
• /
• 2019

Demand for performance analysis is increasing for efficient use of limited budgets such as improving investment efficiency and strategic budget allocation in accordance with the continuous increase demand of R&D budget for developing advanced weapon systems in the future battlefields. In accordance with the Act on the Performance Evaluation and Performance Management of the National R&D Projects established in March 2006, the performance analysis has been conducted for the systematic management and utilization of the R&D project performance. It was recognized as a project to achieve self-defense through strengthening the weapons system development capability, however, efficiency evaluation of Defense R&D projects was not much emphasized. Research on the efficiency analysis of defense R&D projects has been conducted in recent years, but most studies focused on corporate efficiency and productivity of defense companies. In this study, we analyzed the three-stage performance of defence R&D projects based on the logical model using the data envelope analysis(DEA) model. We also analyzed performance analysis from various perspectives through R&D type, technology classification and performance model. This study is expected to help defense department improve defense R&D projects and make decision.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.297-305
• /
• 2021

A contractor or a main contractor is a company with full capacity to construct all project's works for the owner. A subcontractor is an organization that works with the main contractor to execute and complete work packages for the project. Selecting an effective subcontractor will help the efficiency and success of any projects in the construction industry. Therefore, this study identified subcontractor evaluation factors in Vietnam by collecting questionnaire survey data from engineers and staffs in the construction industry project environment. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was then performed to identify the critical factors when evaluating and selecting the subcontractor in construction projects. Moreover, when considering the impact level in terms of the average value, the research results showed that the most critical concern was the subcontractor's reputation. Furthermore, the top five factors affecting the sub-contractor evaluation and selection are (i) reputation, (ii) price, (iii) construction techniques, (iv) ability to implement projects according to commitments, and (v) subcontractor competence (the team of workers, technician staff, engineers with full capacity according to regulations). These research results provide an overall perspective that will help main contractors develop suitable subcontractors' evaluation and selection factors in their projects in the construction industry.