Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2021.31.4.396

Status of Government Funded Projects for "Laboratory Safety"  

Suh, Jiyoung (Division of R&D Strategy Research, Science & Technology Policy Institute)
Kim, Hyemin (Division of Chemistry and bio-Environmental Science, Seoul Women's University)
Bae, Sunyoung (Division of Chemistry and bio-Environmental Science, Seoul Women's University)
Park, Jeongim (Department of Environmental Health Science, Soonchunhyang University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene / v.31, no.4, 2021 , pp. 396-416 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: This study was conducted to analyze the trends of government R&D (R&D) projects related to laboratory safety over the past 20 years. Methods: We collected publications from various databases(DBs) with words such as laboratory(ies), lab(s), researcher(s), laboratory worker(s), safety, environment, hazard(s), risk(s), and so on. Selected publications were analyzed by the research funds and the number of projects according to the investment subject and research characteristics. Results: About 93% of the total R&D budget went to government policy projects, not scientific research. Second, from the perspective of 'safety management activities', most of the research is related to management and inspection at the organizational level. Issues that need to be discussed at the national level like policy governance are not included. Third, focusing on the 'safety management cycle', there were few studies related to 'prediction' or 'post-response'. Fourth, when an analysis framework combining the perspectives of 'safety management activities' and 'safety management cycle' is applied, most of the budget is spent on infrastructure such as digital management systems, whereas basic knowledge for prevention and production of evidence was very few. Conclusions: In order to prevent policy planning without policy evaluation, implementation without strategy, and evaluation without evidence, it is necessary to expand investment in empirical research on risks, research on the effectiveness of current application methods, and research on theory development. The government budget for laboratory safety-related projects should be managed separately from the R&D budget for scientific research. Although less than 5% of the budget allocated to scientific research is the total budget, an optical illusion occurs because both the project budget and the scientific research budget are counted as R&D budgets.
Keywords
government; hazard assessment; lab safety; R&D; safety management;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 World Health Organization(WHO). Laboratory quality management system: handbook. 2011. p. 1-244
2 Park JI, Byun HJ. A review on chemical exposure and related health risks in laboratory workers. J. Env. Hlth. Sci 2010;36(6):441-455 (https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2010.36.6.441)   DOI
3 Lee JY, Choi SM. A study on the disaster management R&D of the US and Japan. Journal of the KOSOS 2016;31(3):123-129 (http://dx.doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2016.31.3.123)   DOI
4 Suh JY, Park JI, Park HJ. Institutional improvement for laboratory safety. Sejong; Science and Technology Policy Institute. 2015. p. 1-159
5 Ministry of Science and Information and Communications Technology(MSIT). Korea research safety 2.0 promotion plan. 2017a. p. 1-22
6 Science & Technology Policy Institute. Research on the 2nd plan for the establishment of a safe laboratory environment and infrastructure. 2012. p. 1-128
7 Suh JY. Laboratory safety policy for people, environment and facilities. Sejong; Science and Technology Policy Institute. 2012. p. 1-30
8 Kim DH, Oh KW, Park SJ. Initial adoption and convergence of accounting system under the k-ifrs by the quasi-government entity : a case of National Research Foundation of Korea. Journal of Digital Convergence 2015 Sep;13(9):57-75(http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.9.57)   DOI
9 Kim TH. Disaster Management Theory. Baeksan publishing corporation. 2010. p. 1-476
10 Keckler MS, Anderson K, Mcallister S, Rasheed JK, Wang JN. Development and implementation of evidence- based laboratory safety management tools for a public health laboratory. Safety Science 2019;117: 205-216 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.003)   DOI
11 Nichols JH. Laboratory quality control based on risk management. Ann Saudi Med 2011; 31(3): 223-228 (https://doi.org/10.4103/0256-4947.81526)   DOI
12 Ministry of Science and Information and Communications Technology(MSIT). Implementation plan for laboratory safety environment establishment sup-port project. 2017b. p. 1-21