• 한국철도학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국철도학회 2010년도 춘계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.282-291
• /
• 2010

In line with current speed-up of railroad, a slab track has been increasingly adopted in a bid to secure the safety of track structure as well as to reduce the maintenance cost, and furthermore, the need for commercialization of domestically-developed swing-nose crossing turnout on slab track has been on the rise. For commercialization of swing-nose crossing turnout on slab which was developed in Korea, a technical and systematic performance evaluation system, considering local environment, shall be established and then the performance evaluation shall be accordingly implemented. This paper was intended to summarize the performance evaluation system, referring to the data available at home and abroad and the results of performance evaluation for domestically-developed swing-nose crossing turnout on slab track carried out to date based on that system. A performance evaluation system comprises the technical requirement appropriateness evaluation(component performance evaluation and design verification), laboratory test and on-site test. For domestically-developed swing-nose crossing turnout on slab track, appropriateness evaluation and laboratory test have been completed and the on-site test of those installed on the 2nd phase of Kyung-Bu HSR is underway now.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.539-560
• /
• 2015

국가연구개발사업 성과평가제도는 성과와 예산의 유기적인 연계를 강화하고 있다. 본 연구는 국가연구개발사업에 관한 국회의 확정예산을 대상으로 상위평가결과에 영향을 미치는 선행요인을 예산규모, 사업수행기간, 사업의 지속성, 자체평가결과로 분류하고 이들 요인과 상위평가결과와 예산증감율의 관계를 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 예산규모, 사업수행기간, 자체평가 결과는 상위평가결과에 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 자체평가결과가 예산의 증감에 영향을 주는 상위평가 결과에 가장 큰 영향을 주었다. 본 연구의 결과는 국가연구개발성과평가제도가 국가연구개발예산의 관계를 실증분석을 통해 제시했다는 측면에서 의의를 가진다.

• 한국병원경영학회지
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.162-191
• /
• 1999

This study was conducted to establish finance performance evaluation model for physicians in each clinical department, by using factors which determines financial outcome(performance) in each clinical department The ultimate aim of study is to develop effective performance-based pay system for physicians. The system, by motivating physicians, should increase their productivity. To do so, it is critical to establish finance performance evaluation model to achieve final goal of this study. 232 private hospitals were chosen from 693 hospitals which were subject to hospital survey by the Korea Institute of Health Services Management and their revenue and expense-related data during 1997 were collected. By adopting multiple regression method, the study shows that the evaluation model for each clinical department was statistically significant. The study suggest the effective performance-based pay system based on financial performance of each clinical department. The pay system includes the level of compensation, the way of how to allocate profits to each department, and criteria whether the compensation should provide or not. In conclusion, the study has following implications. First, the study suggest finance performance evaluation model for each clinical department Second, the study suggest guidelines and plans to establish qualitative measure of financial performance in each clinical department. Third, the study suggest that adopting performance-based pay for physicians could be impetus to achieve organizational goal by motivating them with fair compensation.

• 한국조리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국조리학회 2006년도 제41차 정기하계학술세미나
• /
• pp.21-44
• /
• 2006

Measuring and evaluating the business performance plays a very important role in managing business. It is because business performance, in any types of industry, can be evaluated and managed properly only when the measurement of its performance is estimated, and because its performance can be improved through an efficient and effective management. Therefore it is essential to build up the performance evaluation system to raise management efficiency of the foodservice industry, to reinforce competitive power of the food service industry. This study tried to propose a novel point of prospective and method in which the performance evaluation in any family restaurant should be illuminated and be performed. In this study, BSC provided the main conceptional framework for evaluating the performance of a family restaurant, and evaluation items of BSC four prospectives - financial, customers, internal business process, and learning and growth-were adjusted so as to be fitted into the business field. Furthermore, this study verified the validity of the proposed performance evaluation method through specific case analyses and used AHP to quantify its validity objectively. Finally, this study found the fact that non-financial prospectives, compared to financial prospectives, should be more importantly considered as the performance evaluation index of the family restaurants. Especially, the study showed that the proportion of performance evaluation indexes related to Customers prospective and Learning and Growth prospective revealed very highly, therefore variables such as customer satisfaction index, per employee productivity, education and training, customer response rate, employee satisfaction index should be emphasized as key factors at the process of selecting indexes and measuring their performance evaluation of the food service industry.

• 시스템엔지니어링학술지
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.117-125
• /
• 2023

Systematic performance evaluation of the Defense Acquisition Program is very important, since they are directly related to national security. In this paper, we reviewed various performance evaluation models from a methodological perspective for pragmatic performance evaluation, and the limitations of each model. In order to evaluate the performance of the Defense acquisition program efficiently, especially for the Naval ship Projects and considering their unique characteristics, both various stakeholders' participation, standard indicators for performance measurement, and tailoring them considering the projects' circumstances are necessary. We also propose indicators, contents, and detailed criteria example for the Requirements management. This approach enables a pragmatic and consistent evaluation of defense projects, and through this, meaningful insights could be acquired with accumulate data.

• Asian Journal of Business Environment
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.1-6
• /
• 2023

Purpose: To explore the application prospect of support vector machine (SVM) in supply chain management and its practical application in supply chain performance evaluation practice. Research design, data and methodology: This paper establishes the performance evaluation index system of supply chain management according to the balanced scorecard (BSC) theory, and establishes the SVM model of supply chain management performance evaluation based on the SVM principle. Results: The performance evaluation results of the supply chain of an electric power equipment Co., Ltd. in Harbin established by using the model are consistent with the actual situation, which indicates the nature and accuracy of the possible reflection of the established supply chain performance evaluation model. Conclusions: The results show that SVM model can be used to evaluate enterprise supply chain management performance indicators, and can improve enterprise supply chain management performance, thus demonstrating the effectiveness of the model.

• 정보처리학회논문지D
• /
• 제15D권3호
• /
• pp.387-398
• /
• 2008

최근 정보화에 대한 성과평가는 투자성과에 미치는 효과를 정량적, 정성적으로 분석하여, 전통적인 투자 수익률에 근거한 가치평가방법의 한계를 극복하기 위한 다양한 성과평가방법이 응용되고 있다. 하지만 공공분야의 성과평가는 평가영역에 대한 정성적 평가 중심의 성과여부를 도출하는데 머무를 뿐, 정보화 품질을 향상시키는 데까지는 이르지 못하는 단점이 있다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 기존 공공분야 성과평가의 한계점을 개선하고 품질평가와 정량적 평가를 반영함으로써, 정보화 품질 향상과 평가결과의 객관성 및 신뢰성을 보장하는 통합성과평가모델을 제안한다. 그리고 정보화사업으로 추진된 행정정보DB구축사업을 대상으로 사업목적을 고려한 평가영역별 반영비율 및 가중치를 적용한 평가결과를 도출하였다.

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.41-48
• /
• 2008

현재 과학과 수행평가는 교사평가가 주를 이루고 있기 때문에 평가 결과의 피드백이 신속하게 이루어지지 못하고, 시 공간적 제약으로 인하여 동료평가가 거의 이루어지지 않는다. 또한 과학과 수행평가에서 주로 시행되는 보고서 수행평가의 경우 체계적인 형식 없이 실험관찰에 기록된 내용으로 평가되는 경우가 많다. 이러한 수행평가 방법은 수행 기준의 공유를 통한 성취의욕 향상, 평가결과의 즉각적인 피드백을 통한 자기조정이라는 수행평가의 기대에 부응하지 못할 수밖에 없다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 웹을 기반으로 동료학습자 간의 자료공유와 토의를 통해서 실험 및 조사 보고서를 완성하고 이를 동료평가, 교사평가에 활용하며 그 결과를 통해 학습자의 요구 수준을 파악하고 학습자에게 적절한 피드백을 제공하는 수행평가 시스템을 개발하였다.

• 한국터널지하공간학회 논문집
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.107-120
• /
• 2020

공용중인 시설물의 성능기반 평가에서 보유 성능은 성능별 평가지표를 유목화 한 후 각 성능에 대한 평가지표의 중요도를 고려하여 가중평균하여 평가한다. 본 연구에서는 NATM 터널의 성능기반 평가기법을 제시하기 위해 이전 연구에서 도출된 평가지표의 지표별 특성과 유사성 등을 분석하여 최종 평가지표를 도출하였다. 평가지표별로 상대적 중요도를 산출하여 평가지표의 가중치를 도출하였다. 정량적인 평가모형을 개발하기 위하여 지표별 성능등급 평가기준을 관련 문헌 및 선행연구 분석을 통해 도출하고, 도로 및 철도 터널의 유지관리 시 적용할 수 있는 성능평가표를 제시하였다. 제시된 성능평가 모형의 유의미함을 제시된 평가표를 실제 공용중인 터널에서 정밀안전진단을 통하여 측정된 조사자료에 적용하여 각 평가지표와 최종 평가결과와의 상관분석을 실시함으로써 검증하였다. 본 연구에서 제시된 공용중인 터널의 성능평가를 위한 평가지표, 가중치, 그리고 용도별 평가모형은 추후 터널의 성능중심 유지관리 체계에 적용되어 유지관리 전략 수립 시 활용될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제42권3호
• /
• pp.15-29
• /
• 2011

The Fish Stock Rebuilding Plan (FSRP) is evaluated as one of the most effective fisheries policies domestically and internationally. FSRP is a comprehensive fisheries policy, including target stock size, rebuilding period, application of management measures, and participation of fishermen. The performance outcomes of FSRPs have been partially evaluated for recommendation for stock rebuilding in Korea, while they are fully evaluated in other countries that have implemented FSRPs. The performance evaluation system for FSRP is very needed to enhance its effectiveness as one of fisheries policies. That is, the system where problems can be reconsidered, achieving targets can be evaluated, and the plan can be modified should be implemented. This study classified the performance evaluation of FSRP into the economic evaluation as a quantitative analysis and the policy evaluation as a qualitative analysis. In the economic evaluation, the sustainability of fishery resources, the stability of fishing business, the efficiency of fishery production, and efficient utilization of fishery resources can be considered. As analytical methods for the economic evaluation, the bioeconomic model, efficiency estimation model, the dynamic MEY model can be utilized. The qualitative evaluation is to assess the qualitative performances of FSRPs, including interviews and surveys with fishermen and fisheries experts. In the survey, many different items can be included by evaluation factors which are related to policies such as timeliness, transparency, effectiveness, etc. In addition, the study suggested the performance evaluation system and procedures for objective and efficient evaluation of FSRPs. In order to practically apply the developed performance evaluation model, the pilot project is needed. That is, from the application of pilot project, detailed research methods, effective procedures, and evaluation factors can be investigated.