• 제목/요약/키워드: Evaluation indicators

검색결과 1,515건 처리시간 0.032초

교원능력개발평가의 사서교사 평가지표 개선방향에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Improvement of Teacher Librarians' Evaluation Indicators in Korea)

  • 김정현;이병기;서경은;김성준
    • 한국도서관정보학회지
    • /
    • 제41권3호
    • /
    • pp.133-154
    • /
    • 2010
  • 교육과학기술부는 교원능력개발평가를 도입하면서 사서교사를 평가하기 위한 평가지표와 문항을 제시하였다. 이 연구는 교원능력개발평가에 제시된 사서교사의 평가지표와 문항의 타당성을 분석하고, 분석과정에서 제안된 문제점을 종합하여 새로운 평가지표를 개발하기 위한 목적으로 수행되었다. 연구결과 현 평가지표는 사서교사의 교육활동과 서비스 대신에 시설과 장서의 관리에 중점을 두고 사서교사를 평가하는 구조로 되어 있고, 제시된 지표의 대표성과 체계성에 있어서도 많은 문제점이 드러났다. 이 연구에서는 사서교사의 전문성을 타당하게 평가하기 위해 문헌연구, 전문가 검토, 실증연구의 과정을 거쳐서 12개 지표로 구성된 새로운 사서교사 평가지표와 새 지표에 적합한 동료교원, 학생, 학부모의 평가문항을 개발하였다.

  • PDF

농작업 및 생활환경 안전관리 평가지표 개발 (Development of Indicators for Safety Supervision on Farm Work and Life Environment of Farmer)

  • 박근상;김창한;이경숙;김경란;김효철
    • 대한인간공학회지
    • /
    • 제28권4호
    • /
    • pp.77-82
    • /
    • 2009
  • This paper objected which prevented the accident occurrence of the related farm work, and developed the evaluation indicators for safety supervision on life environment of farmer and farm work to evaluate the health of farm worker and a musculoskeletal disorders. We selected the evaluation item to 82 items for executing the secondary Delphi investigation and the literature research which composed the farm work relationship specialist conference. We applied the index production of the evaluation indicators to decide the detailed element weight from the element which is farm work, the farm machine and the organization, farm workshop, dangerous substance, and life environment through the AHP techniques. Through the result, we can apply other ergonomic evaluation instrument of farm work field, but also the evaluation indicators for safety supervision on farm work.

공동주택 단위주호의 공간구성유형에 따른 정량적 평가지표에 관한 연구 (A Study of Quantitative Evaluation Indicators on Residential Units in Multiple Stock Housing based on Space Composition Types)

  • 이병호;이건원;여영호
    • KIEAE Journal
    • /
    • 제10권5호
    • /
    • pp.43-55
    • /
    • 2010
  • This research investigated 162 residential unit plans which were located in Seoul and Gyonggi Province ranging from 58 to $118m^2$ unit net area recently. Through the investigation of unit plans, a matrix was developed based on the 5 criteria for space composition types. 5 criteria are building stock types, W/D ratio of units, unit net area, number of bay to the main orientation, and openness types. After review the matrix, 10 typical unit types were selected. At the same time, quantitative evaluation indicators were developed based on the 4 criteria such as efficiency, openness, flexibility, environmental sustainability. On each criterion, 3 indicators were developed, and measured on 162 residential unit plans. Firstly, correlation analysis were pursued on 5 criteria for space composition types and 12 quantitative evaluation indicators, and reviewed on each other. Finally, quantitative evaluation indicators of 10 typical unit types were displayed on radar charts in order to show the integrated evaluation on 4 criteria such as efficiency, openness, flexibility, environmental sustainability. From the reviews and radar chart analyses, advantages, disadvantages, and improvements on each typical unit type were presented as research results.

A STATISTICAL APPROACH FOR DERIVING KEY NFC EVALUATION CRITERIA

  • Kim, S.K.;Kang, G.B.;Ko, W.I.;Youn, S.R.;Gao, R.X.
    • Nuclear Engineering and Technology
    • /
    • 제46권1호
    • /
    • pp.81-92
    • /
    • 2014
  • This study suggests 5 evaluation criteria (safety and technology, environmental impact, economic feasibility, social factors, and institutional factors) and 24 evaluation indicators for a NFC (nuclear fuel cycle) derived using factor analysis. To do so, a survey using 1 on 1 interview was given to nuclear energy experts and local residents who live near nuclear power plants. In addition, by conducting a factor analysis, homogeneous evaluation indicators were grouped with the same evaluation criteria, and unnecessary evaluation criteria and evaluation indicators were dropped out. As a result of analyzing the weight of evaluation criteria with the sample of nuclear power experts and the general public, both sides recognized safety as the most important evaluation criterion, and the social factors such as public acceptance appeared to be ranked as more important evaluation criteria by the nuclear energy experts than the general public.

읍.면 소재지 종합정비사업 평가지표 체계의 개선방안 -기존 소도읍 육성 사업의 평가지표 체계 분석을 바탕으로- (An Improvement of Evaluation Indicator System Geared towards Comprehensive Rearrangement Projects in Seats of Township and Town Offices -Based on the Existing Evaluation Indicator System of Small Town Promotion Projects-)

  • 김은정;안유정;이만형
    • 한국농촌건축학회논문집
    • /
    • 제14권1호
    • /
    • pp.45-56
    • /
    • 2012
  • This study focuses on design of supplementary evaluation indicator system geared towards comprehensive rearrangement projects in seats of township and town offices. In the first phase, it tries to reveal major problems and issues related to evaluation of the existing small town promotion projects. In terms of analytical tools, this study depends on the Delphi and AHP techniques. In specific, after three rounds of the Delphi methods, it extracts a series of alternative evaluation indicators derived from the AHP methods. It covers 5 major evaluation criteria, under which 18 independent items are hierarchically interconnected. It expects that these alternative evaluation indicators would contribute to selecting appropriate small town promotion projects. Next, applying these evaluation indicators, we examine couples of comprehensive rearrangement projects in seats of township and town offices. From the comparative contexts, we believe that the proposed alternative evaluation criteria would improve the general satisfaction level of key stakeholders in deciding the priority order of the small town promotion projects.

의료기관 대상 평가통합 및 효율화 방안 (Integration and Efficiency Strategies of Evaluations for Medical Institutions)

  • 김경숙
    • 한국의료질향상학회지
    • /
    • 제24권1호
    • /
    • pp.30-39
    • /
    • 2018
  • Objectives: In Korea, there are many kinds of evaluations for medical institutions. However, evaluations are increasingly burdensome for medical institutions because evaluation agencies, evaluation timing, and evaluation methods are different. The purpose of this study is to improve the efficiency of evaluation for medical institutions and ultimately to provide quality medical services to patients. Methods: In this study, 2,310 indicators of 19 kinds of evaluation for medical institutions were analyzed. Results: 1,424 indicators were available for on-site surveys and 886 indicators were not available for on-site surveys. There were 4 kinds of evaluation that can be integrated in total, 12 kinds of evaluation that can be integrated partially, and 3 kinds of evaluation that need to maintain the current evaluation system. Conclusion: In order to provide patient-centered quality medical services through reduction of burden due to the evaluation for medical institutions, it is necessary to deeply discuss the efficiency of evaluation integration and result utilization.

주거환경의 사회적 지속가능성 평가항목 체계와 가중치에 관한 연구 (The Study on the System and Weight about Evaluation Indicators of Social Sustainability in Residential Environment)

  • 조인숙;신화경
    • 한국주거학회논문집
    • /
    • 제28권2호
    • /
    • pp.47-56
    • /
    • 2017
  • Sustainable development is one of the important concept of the 21st century. Especially, Social sustainability is an important factor in today's society with the weakened community, and is needed exploring social sustainability in the residential environment as a container of human life. The purpose of this study was to develop the evaluation indicators and evaluation system of social sustainability in residential environment. In order to develop evaluation indicators first, the delphi expert survey was conducted to assess the adequacy of selected the evaluation indicators in previous studies. Second, expert survey using the method of AHP was progressed in order to analyze importance and weight of evaluation indicators and was analyzed using Expert Choice. The findings of this study are as followings; the evaluation system was composed of locality, communality and organisms. The communality is the most important. The locality was composed of historical and cultural, reflection of regional identity and homogeneous of regions. Reflection of local identity is the most important in locality area. The communality was composed of social integration environment, community activities and the community space. The community activities are the most important in communality area. The organism was composed of employment, self-sufficiency, welfare, population, safety and housing. Safety is the most important in the organism area.

민간 중심 디지털 공공 서비스 적합성 평가 프레임워크 개발 및 시범 적용 연구: AHP를 중심으로 (Development and Application of Private-focused Digital Public Service Evaluation Framework: Focused on AHP Analysis)

  • 이상준;이대철
    • 한국IT서비스학회지
    • /
    • 제22권2호
    • /
    • pp.71-92
    • /
    • 2023
  • Globally, under the leadership of advanced ICT countries, the private sector is promoting various policies to promote the digital transformation of public services. Looking at the research trend, design of public service indicators, development of evaluation system, and empirical research are being carried out steadily, but there are insufficient research cases on models in which the private sector participates in the planning, development, and operation of public services. In this study, Private-centric digital public service suitability evaluation indicators were discovered through interviews with experts in various fields, and weights for each indicator were analyzed through AHP evaluation. In addition, by applying the analysis results to 18 digital public services on a trial basis, the importance and priority of evaluation indicators for each service were derived, and at the same time, the evaluation framework was designed and applied to diagnose implications. As a result of the study, 'social utility', 'corporate acceptability', and 'public acceptability' were selected as the top three indicators of suitability evaluation. At this time, it was analyzed that the weight of the 'company acceptability' index, which includes sub-indices such as 'service profitability', 'service scalability', and 'private initiative possibility', was the highest among the three top indicators. As a result of the demonstration for public services, "IoT facility unmanned remote monitoring service", "blockchain real estate transaction service", and "digital twin disaster prediction service" were evaluated as the most suitable public services for the transition to the private sector.

통합가정방문급여 평가지표 개발 (Development of Evaluation Indicators for Integrated Home Care)

  • 박종덕;정덕유
    • 성인간호학회지
    • /
    • 제26권5호
    • /
    • pp.543-552
    • /
    • 2014
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop integrated evaluation indicators of home care services in the hope that the increasing group of long-term home care patients could receive quality care services. Methods: The development involves a methodological study on a development phase and a verification phase. The main survey at a verification stage was conducted by the staffs at 146 institutions who agreed to participate on this study. Results: The evaluation index for the integrated home visit care consisted of five categories and 57 indicators including Managing Institution (12), Environment and Safety (3), Right and Responsibility (7), Process of Care (31) and Results of Care (4). The criterion-related validity was verified in regard to the participation in the 2010 evaluation of long-term home-care institutions by the National Health Insurance Corporation. Conclusion: The evaluation index of the integrated home visiting care developed in this study is considered suitable to utilize as evaluating indicators in managing and evaluating the way of how institutions integrate and provide home visit care services as well as home nursing care services.

공동주택의 건강성능 평가지표 개발에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Evaluation Indicators of Healthy Housing Quality of Multi-Family Housing)

  • 조성희;강나나
    • 한국주거학회논문집
    • /
    • 제22권1호
    • /
    • pp.43-55
    • /
    • 2011
  • The purpose this study is to develop indicators that measure the healthy housing condition of multi-family housing. The major findings are as follow: first, healthy housing was defined by physical, mental, social, and management aspects and proposed the conceptual model of hierarchy structure of evaluation of healthy housing by literature reviews. Second, evaluating items were selected based on literature reviews of existing indicators and preceding studies about both domestic and overseas multi-family housing. The evaluating indicators were identified as a total of 87 evaluating items which were composed of four dimensions and 16 attributes on the basis of the conceptual model. They cover comprehensive scope of the multi-family housing such as unit, building, complex, and site. Third, as the measurement, the 5-point ordinal scale measure was suggested. The evaluating measurement including measure standards, measure methods, and measure contents were developed by each evaluating items. Lastly, the weighting of evaluating indicators was developed by AHP method conducted by survey of an expert group. Items were identified as high contributors or low contributors. The weighting of these items could suggest several evaluations according to the situation. The level of healthy housing condition may be evaluated by both total evaluation and a specific field of evaluation.