• 융합경영연구
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.53-64
• /
• 2024

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop a satisfaction evaluation survey tool that reflects the characteristics of the program for housing welfare supported in long-term public rental housing in Seoul. Research design, data and methodology: The main research methods of the study were review of previous studies, literature review, and expert consultation. Results: First, the characteristics of each housing welfare program being promoted by Seoul City were summarized, and the characteristics were reflected in the evaluation survey tool. Second, the SERVOUAL model, a service quality model, was used to measure satisfaction with the housing welfare program and modified to suit the characteristics of the program. Third, an evaluation survey tool was constructed by dividing the evaluation tool into common questions and individual questions, and for the operation and sustainability of the housing welfare program, rather than just evaluating satisfaction, program loyalty was used as a survey item. Fourth, through expert advice, more than 10 evaluation questions for each housing welfare program were revised. Conclusions: The results of future research are expected to be used to prepare practical operation plans through annual monitoring of housing welfare programs and comparative analysis between programs.

• 컴퓨터교육학회논문지
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.29-37
• /
• 2018

본 논문에서는 최근 3년 동안 시행된 정보 컴퓨터 표시과목 임용시험의 기출문항을 13개 기본이수과목으로 분류하고, 과목별 점수 및 문항수의 구성을 분석하였다. 이와 함께 기본이수과목 중에서 출제비율이 높은 6개 과목에 대해 평가영역별 점수 구성을 분석하였다. 그리고 교과내용학 분야에서 C언어를 사용한 문항들이 차지하는 점수 비중을 조사하였다. 분석 결과에 따르면, 첫째, 교과내용학 분야에서 과목별 점수 비율은 0~17.1%, 문항수 비율은 0~15.8%로 나타났다. 이와 함께 3개 과목은 연도별 점수 편차가 큰 것을 확인하였다. 둘째, 분석 대상 과목들의 평가영역별 점수 비율은 0~52%로 분포되어 영역별로 편차가 큰 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 최근 3년 동안의 임용시험에서 C언어를 사용한 문항의 점수 비율은 평균 33%로 매우 높게 나타났다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 분석 결과를 바탕으로 개선 방안을 제안하였다.

• Journal of Nutrition and Health
• /
• 제44권6호
• /
• pp.562-576
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to develop a reliable questionnaire to assess the effectiveness of the healthy restaurant program, which was implemented by Seocho-gu District in Seoul. Evaluation indices were deduced from the logic model of the healthy restaurant program. The questionnaires consisted of three sections (process evaluation, outcome evaluation, and general characteristics) for restaurateurs and customers who were participating in the program or not. To validate the questionnaire, 133 restaurateurs and 246 customers were sampled using convenient methods. Data were collected by interviews. Reliability was tested by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The alpha coefficient for restaurateurs was 0.75-0.99 for the process and 0.79-0.97 for the outcome evaluation questions. The alpha coefficients for customers were 0.76-0.92 for the outcome evaluation questions. Face and content validity were examined for all questions, and construct validity was tested for latent variables. We are confident that more accurate and significant information will be collected using this questionnaire.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제41권3호
• /
• pp.133-154
• /
• 2010

교육과학기술부는 교원능력개발평가를 도입하면서 사서교사를 평가하기 위한 평가지표와 문항을 제시하였다. 이 연구는 교원능력개발평가에 제시된 사서교사의 평가지표와 문항의 타당성을 분석하고, 분석과정에서 제안된 문제점을 종합하여 새로운 평가지표를 개발하기 위한 목적으로 수행되었다. 연구결과 현 평가지표는 사서교사의 교육활동과 서비스 대신에 시설과 장서의 관리에 중점을 두고 사서교사를 평가하는 구조로 되어 있고, 제시된 지표의 대표성과 체계성에 있어서도 많은 문제점이 드러났다. 이 연구에서는 사서교사의 전문성을 타당하게 평가하기 위해 문헌연구, 전문가 검토, 실증연구의 과정을 거쳐서 12개 지표로 구성된 새로운 사서교사 평가지표와 새 지표에 적합한 동료교원, 학생, 학부모의 평가문항을 개발하였다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.193-212
• /
• 2002

What is radical constructivism There were many questions arose related with radical constructivism in mathematics education. In this paper, the author put seven frequentlyasked questions on radical constructivism and described each question one by one in light with constructivists' point of views. The questions included types of constructivista, radical constructivism, trivial or weak constructivism, and social constructivism; representative people in radical constructivism; matter of ontological reality; evaluation of others' work; shared meaning; social influence; and teacher's roles from the perspectives of radical constructivism. The author added his opinions ell each Question.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.339-347
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 객관식 문항이 폐지된 이후인 2014년부터 2020년까지 7년간 체육 중등교사 임용시험의 교과교육학 문항을 한국교육과정평가원에서 제시한 평가내용요소를 근거로 분석하였다. 연구결과로 교과교육학 문항은 7년간 48문항이 출제되었으며, 83개의 하위질문이 발견되었다. 시사점으로는 첫째, 하위질문 개수의 빈도가 높아지면서 통합형 문제가 출제되고 있다. 둘째, 출제 문항 영역의 심각한 불균형 문제가 드러났다. 셋째, 체육교수학습 및 평가, 체육교육과정 영역에 지나친 출제 의존도를 보이고 있었다. 넷째, 교과내용학과 중복되는 평가 영역이 존재함에 따라 혼란이 가중되었다. 그러므로 한국교육과정평가원의 기존 평가 영역별 분류표를 기반으로 평가 내용 요소에 대한 정의가 명확하게 내려져야 하며 신뢰로운 교사시험을 위해 특정 학자와 이론에 의존에서 벗어나 학교현장에서 도움이 될 수 있는 문항들이 개발될 필요가 있다.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제4권3호
• /
• pp.275-290
• /
• 2001

The frameworks for evaluation of national R&D programs reflect their various political and administrative cultures(Gibbons & Georghiou, 1987), and the structure of national R&D system. In this research the core research questions are : what is god evaluation\ulcorner What is being evaluated, by whom, by which criteria, for whom and what purpose\ulcorner In order to examine these general aims and answer these questions, in detail several objectives can be proposed on the process of this research. In this research, the national R&D programs will be considered in terms of the interface between evaluation and the wider policy-making process. The programs for case study are the Alvey program(UK), the Advanced Technology Program (US) and the Framework program(EU) . One of the characteristics of these programs is the well established evaluation systems they have. From the comparative analysis, we can withdraw some useful implication for Korean evaluation practice for national R&D programs. Evaluation system is social process and the way in which it is organized is critical to its outcome.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제28권7호
• /
• pp.697-712
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study was to seek strengths and weaknesses from analyzing Korea and U.S. science textbooks in terms of general structural features, contents, cognitive levels of questions and the purpose of questions used in science textbooks. This provided insight into improvement of textbooks that can effectively assist teaching and learning. To investigate organization of unit in textbooks in-depth, the evolution unit was selected and scrutinized as one example. The results showed that the number of pages, activities, vocabulary words, and vocabulary lists are considerably different between Korean and the U.S. Commonly, U.S. textbooks were more laden with information and lacking in coherence than those of the Korean textbooks. The findings on the cognitive levels of questions showed that the majority of questions in both nations are concerned with knowledge. However, the difference between the two nations is great in the ratios of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation questions. Questions are concentrated in review section (45% of Korean and 60.6% of U.S.) in textbooks. It suggested that well-planned questions in a review section can provide the basic guidance for strength in a science classroom.

• Structural Engineering and Mechanics
• /
• 제51권6호
• /
• pp.973-988
• /
• 2014

This paper presents a factor-analysis based questionnaire categorization method to improve the reliability of the evaluation of working conditions without influencing the completeness of the questionnaire both in Taiwanese and Chinese construction enterprises for structural engineering applications. The proposed approach springs from the AI application and expert systems in structural engineering. Questions with a similar response pattern are grouped into or categorized as one factor. Questions that form a single factor usually have higher reliability than the entire questionnaire, especially in the case when the questionnaire is complex and inconsistent. By classifying questions based on the meanings of the words used in them and the responded scores, reliability could be increased. The principle for classification was that 90% of the questions in the same classified group must satisfy the proposed classification rule and consequently the lowest one was 92%. The results show that the question classification method could improve the reliability of the questionnaires for at least 0.7. Compared to the question deletion method using SPSS, 75% of the questions left were verified the same as the results obtained by applying the classification method.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.95-108
• /
• 2009

One of the learning difficulties for Korean learners of English is the intonation of English focused yes/no questions. Focused words in English yes/no questions are realized as low pitch accents which contrast with high pitch accents in Korean counterparts. In order to improve Korean students' intonation, direct and metalinguistic explanations on the intonation of English focused yes/no questions were given to Korean learners of English. In pre-tests and post-tests, students' perceptions on the target items were measured. The study results showed that phonetic explanation using intonation contour enhanced students' perception on English intonation. With respect to the position of focused words, sentence initial and medial focused questions were more difficult than sentence final focused questions. The perception was most improved in sentence initial focused questions. The study showed the immediate effects of the explicit instruction on perceptions of English intonation.