• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.175-196
• /
• 2005

This Paper examines analytic studies of the evaluation system used for evaluating government-supported R&D Institutes (GSRIs), and designs a new model for analyzing the evaluation system's effectiveness. The analytic models in existing studies use the meta evaluation and balanced scorecard (BSC) models. However, theses studies focused on the structure and elements of the evaluation system for examples, the appropriateness of the elements within the evaluation system and the balance of the evaluation index. Accordingly, the effectiveness of the GSRI evaluation system, that is, the evaluation's influence on GSRI performance improvement was not analyzed. This study uses the institution theory and contingency theory perspectives as related to government organization management to develop an analytical model of GSRI evaluation system effectiveness. The new model proposes an analytical approach for improving the effectiveness of the GSRI evaluation system in an institutionalized environment.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.76-84
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to develop an evaluation criteria for students' portfolios in an annual intramural contest. To accomplish the purpose, evaluation categories and their questions were developed after previous literature, ABEEK's evaluation guidelines, and eight Universities' evaluation forms were analyzed. Furthermore, experts' validity tests were completed by showing that the evaluation criteria form was validated with a mean score of 4.24. Also, the inter-rater reliability was turned out with a high score of .86. The interview results by evaluators of students' portfolios made the final version of evaluation criteria form include five evaluation criteria categories and their allotted score portions: overall organization(40), personal information(15), certificates and awards(5), curriculum(15), and extra-curriculum(15). The importance of overall organization was discussed from the perspectives of teachers as well as students.

• Perspectives in Nursing Science
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.50-65
• /
• 2004

Despite the new wave of diverse philosophical thoughts in nursing, the criteria for theory evaluation rarely incorporate the new thoughts in its realm. Especially, feminist thoughts, which have contributed to the development of nursing knowledge through incorporating diversities and complexities of nursing phenomenon and reflecting social, cultural, and historical contexts surrounding nursing encounters, were rarely incorporated into the evaluation criteria. In this paper, a feminist approach to theory evaluation is proposed based on a critical analysis of the existing evaluation criteria. First, a historical review of feminist thoughts is provided, and feminist principles across diverse groups of thinking within feminism are discussed. Then, theory evaluation criteria are historically analyzed and critiqued while considering the feminist principles. The critical points found in the currently available theory evaluation criteria include: (a) the evaluation criteria are based on objectivity, (b) they are ignoring gender differences; (c) cultural differences tend not to be seriously considered; and (d) contexts surrounding nursing phenomenon are rarely considered. Based on the critical points, four additional components for theory evaluation are proposed. The components are: (a) respect for subjectivity; (b) historical and sociopolitical contextual considerations; (c) gender sensitivity; (d) cultural competence; and (e) blueprint for action.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제48권1호
• /
• pp.31-49
• /
• 2017

This study focuses on developing a theoretical framework for evaluating Operational Performance of the Marine Forest Creation project on a balanced and comprehensive perspective by using BSC, AHP, and IPA. Also, the purpose of this study is empirically to analyze operational performance of the project and to suggest the future improvement plan. For this purpose, We will first determine the critical success factors(CSF) and key performance indicators(KPI) required for evaluating the performance of the Marine Forest Creation project from the four perspectives of BSC. And, After determining the weight for each of CSF, KPI, and four perspectives of BSC by using AHP, we will measure the project performance. We will also conduct IPA analysis to propose the direction of improvement of the Marine Forest Creation project. The results of this study are as follows. First, this study has drawn 8 critical success factors and 16 key performance indicators for four BSC perspectives based on the theoretical considerations and expert interview survey. Second, as a result of deriving relative importance of BSC perspectives using AHP, customer perspective was the highest, followed by financial perspective, learning and growth perspective, and internal process perspective. Third, as the results of analyzing the importance and performance of BSC perspectives using IPA, customer perspective was the maintenance reinforcement category, financial perspective was the key improvement category, internal process perspective and learning and growth perspective were gradual improvement category. This study has a great academic significance in terms of BSC first tried to evaluate the performance of the Marine Forest Creation project. The results of this study are expected to lead to various discussions for a balanced and comprehensive verification of Marine Forest Creation project performance.

• Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives
• /
• 제9권6호
• /
• pp.363-363
• /
• 2018

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.541-548
• /
• 2014

본 연구의 목적은 초등 교육현장에서 활용되는 로봇수업에서 학생들이 배양할 수 있는 역량으로 컴퓨팅 사고(Computational Thinking) 능력에 초점을 맞추고 이를 평가할 수 있는 평가 방안을 제안하는 것이다. 또한 지금까지 로봇수업의 평가로 개인 역량에만 치중하였던 것을 사회문화적 관점에서 조명하여 대인관계적 역량 및 협력의 경험을 평가할 수 있는 방안을 제안하였다. 이를 위해 초등학교 5학년 로봇수업에서 한 학기 동안 운영할 수 있는 프로그램을 고안하고 컴퓨팅 사고 능력 평가 설문 및 학습과정 모니터링 루브릭을 개발하여 평가를 실시하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 최근 이론적으로 주목받고 있고 컴퓨팅 사고 개념을 로봇교육과 연계한 평가 방안을 고안하고 사회문화적 관점인 대인간의 관계를 평가에 포함시킴으로써 그 범위를 확장하였다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

• 한국통신학회논문지
• /
• 제41권10호
• /
• pp.1301-1308
• /
• 2016

인터넷 속도의 증가와 다양한 응용의 개발로 인해 인터넷 사용자와 이들이 발생시키는 인터넷 트래픽의 양이 급격히 증가하고 있다. 트래픽 분석에 있어서 트래픽 응용 식별 방법은 페이로드 시그니쳐에 의존적이기 때문에 시그니쳐의 구성이나 개수에 따라 높은 부하와 처리 속도가 느린 단점을 갖는다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 응용 식별을 위한 페이로드 시그니쳐의 중요도를 평가하는 방법과 이를 바탕으로 높은 효율의 시그니쳐를 탐색하는 방법을 제안한다. 각 시그니쳐 별로 3가지 기준을 바탕으로 가중치를 계산하고 계산된 가중치와 시그니쳐 맵을 통해 고효율의 시그니쳐 세트를 탐색한다. 제안하는 방법을 실제 트래픽에 적용했을 때 기존 대비 약 4배의 응용 식별 능력을 가진 높은 효율의 시그니쳐들을 정의할 수 있었다.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제38권5호
• /
• pp.1-14
• /
• 2000

The purpose of this study is to develop and evaluate a remarriage preparation program. Based on the system theory, strong family perspective, care & justice perspectives, and empirical research in this field,4 session remarriage preparation program is developed. Target population of this program is persons who remarry and persons who marry with remarried partner This program is evaluated in terms of the level of remarriage preparation and level of changing attitude after education in terms of self-esteem, cognition & knowledge of parent behavior in the remarried family, object evaluation of their future remarriage life. Future research, theoretical and practical implications are added.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.401-409
• /
• 2007

This paper addresses a performance evaluation model for ERP system's implementation using Analytic Network Process (ANP) technique. In this study, the performance variables are identified as the perspectives of cost, business process, systems operation, and change management, respectively. The empirical study also investigated factors that affect the performance variables to find out the causal relationship between them using the ANP approach. The data for the empirical analysis were collected from manufacturing companies that have implemented ERP systems. The research findings indicate the proposed model is powerful in proposing that the indirect relationship between influencing factors and managerial effectiveness, mediated by employee satisfaction, is an important one.

• 인터넷정보학회논문지
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.159-172
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 학습자의 측면에서 대학 e-러닝 콘텐츠의 질에 영향을 미치는 요인을 밝히고, 대학 e-러닝 콘텐츠의 질을 향상시키기 위한 구체적인 방안을 모색해 보는 데 있다. 이를 위한 구체적인 연구문제들은 다음과 같다: 1) 대학 e-러닝 콘텐츠의 질에 영향을 미치는 요인은 무엇이며, 각 요인에 대한 학습자의 인식(중요도 만족도)은 어떠한가? 2) 대학 e-러닝 콘텐츠의 질에 영향을 미치는 요인별 중요도와 만족도 사이에는 차이가 있는가? 3) 대학 e-러닝 콘텐츠의 질을 향상시키기 위한 구체적인 방안은 무엇인가? 연구대상은 대학에서 e-러닝 강좌를 수강한 경험이 있는 수도권 지역 대학생 543명이었으며, 조사도구는 선행 연구를 토대로 개발된 38개의 문항으로 구성된 설문지를 사용하였다. 자료 분석을 위해 요인분석과 대응표본 t-검증이 사용되었다. 연구 결과, 학습자의 측면에서 본 대학 e-러닝 콘텐츠의 질에 영향을 미치는 요인은 교수전략, 학습내용, 사용성, 평가/피드백, 인터페이스의 다섯 가지로 나타났으며, 모든 요인에서 중요도와 만족도 간에 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 있었다. 또한 요인별 중요도-만족도 매트릭스 분석 결과, 1) 학습내용은 최소한 현 상태를 지속적으로 유지해야 할 요인으로, 2) 사용성, 교수 전략, 평가/피드백은 상대적으로 중요성은 떨어지지만 여전히 만족도를 높여야 할 요인으로, 그리고 3) 인터페이스는 중요하지만 만족도가 낮아 만족도를 높이기 위한 방안이 시급히 강구되어야 할 요인으로 나타났다. 이러한 연구결과에 기초하여 학습자의 측면에서 대학 e-러닝 콘텐츠의 질을 향상시키기 위한 몇 가지 시사점을 제시하였다.