• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제46권4호
• /
• pp.209-217
• /
• 2023

In this study, the evaluation items related to the effectiveness evaluation of the LVC (Live, Virtual, Constructive) training system of the Air Force were derived and the weights of each item were analyzed. The LVC training system evaluation items for AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) analysis were divided into three layers, and according to the level, 3 items were derived at level 1, 11 items at level 2, and 33 items at level 3. For weight analysis of evaluation items, an AHP-based pairwise comparison questionnaire was conducted for Air Force experts related to the LVC training system. As a result of the survey, related items such as (1) Achievement of education and training goals (53.8%), (1.2) Large-scale mission and operational performance (25.5%), and (1.2.1) Teamwork among training participants (19.4%) was highly rated. Also, it was confirmed that the weights of evaluation items were not different for each expert group, that is, the priority for importance was evaluated in the same order between the policy department and the working department. Through these analysis results, it will be possible to use them as evaluation criteria for new LVC-related projects of the Air Force and selection of introduction systems.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.123-140
• /
• 2007

This study focuses on establishing theoretically-reasonable framework of evaluation areas and items for the informatization program and analyzing the weights for each area and item by means of the AHP. To obtain the goal of this research, firstly, based on broadly reviewing previous literature and logical reasoning, the evaluation criteria were Identified and conceptualized, which were 3 evaluation phases, 5 evaluation areas, and 22 evaluation items. Secondly, The data used for calculating the weight values for the evaluation criteria were collected from 48 academic and practical experts in the field of the informatization program promotion using internet survey. Thirdly, the relative weights among evaluation phases, evaluation areas, and its items were derived by AHP analysis. The findings of this study are thought not only to be useful as a practical guideline in performing evaluating the informatization program but also to provide significant basis for constructing the theoretical framework of evaluating method and management of the informatization program.

• 융합경영연구
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.57-68
• /
• 2023

Purpose: This study aims to improve the evaluation system for selecting supportive housing applicants, addressing inconsistency, lack of health and care evaluation, and the need for a quantitative evaluation tool. Proposed improvements include a consistent evaluation index and items for each resident type, selecting suitable residents for independent living and community integration. Research design, data and methodology: This study analyzed the supportive housing selection checklist provided by the Seoul Metropolitan Government, the supportive housing ordinance, and the SH Corporation's operation guidelines. Results: Study finds current supportive housing tenant selection system lacks consistency and proposes improvements. The same terms should be used for the same evaluation items, health and care evaluation items should be added for all tenants, and a quantitative evaluation tool should be used. Consistent evaluation index and items should be created for each resident type in the same evaluation area. The aim is to select suitable tenants with potential for independent living and community integration. Conclusions: This study improves the evaluation system for selecting supportive housing applicants by addressing inconsistencies and adding essential evaluation items related to health and care. While the study is significant, future research should focus on developing quantitative evaluation tools for all detailed items.

• 대한치과기공학회지
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.65-77
• /
• 2007

This study is for the purpose of studying the validity of the construction of items and grading of the evaluation table at clinical practice used as the method of evaluation when clinical practice of Dept. of Dental Technology. 205 dental technicians in 4 cities were questioned to analyze the relation between items of the evaluation table at clinical practice and its grading. The collected materials were inspected by SAS V8 for Windows. The results are as follows: 1. Making up all the items and grading seem to be appropriate because they had the marks more than midium(more than 3.28). 2. Making up detailed items and grading seem to be trusted because they had the marks more than 3.30. 3.The significance level of the relation between items of the evaluation at clinical practice and its grading by t-inspection is p<0.0001 and so it appears to be meaningful. 4. It proved to be meaningful in result of regression analysis of the influence on the construction of the evaluation at clinical practice and its grading. With this result, further study is needed for the better methods of the evaluation in its adjustment and graduated grading among the items.

• 한국유기농업학회지
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.437-452
• /
• 2019

소규모 식육포장처리장은 일반규모 작업장에 비해 종업원의 숫자가 적기 때문에 전반적인 위생상태 개선 및 HACCP System의 적용을 위해서 일반 규모 작업장에 비해 간단히 적용할 수 있도록 해야 할 필요가 있는 것은 사실이다. 하지만 여전히 축산식품 안전사고가 많이 나타나고 있는 시점에 국민건강 안전을 위해서라도 식육포장처리장에서 많이 발생하는 문제점, 그리고 그 위해의 심각도가 커서 사회·경제적으로 파급 여파가 큰 중요 관리항목에 대해서는 규모가 작은 업소에서도 철저히 준수해야 할 필요가 있다고 판단되며, 이는 HACCP 심사에도 연계하여 그에 대한 평가를 진행할 필요가 있다고 사료된다. 본 연구결과 도출을 위해 지난 3년간의 HACCP 심사 시 지적사항 발생빈도를 분석하고, 기존 논문자료 등을 참고하여 중요도를 결정하여 새로운 소규모 HACCP 평가항목을 도출하였다. 다만, 본 연구에서 개발된 소규모 식육포장처리업 HACCP 평가항목은 통계적, 문헌적 자료를 검토하여 도출한 것으로 실제 소규모 식육포장처리장 작업 현장에서 꼭 평가가 필요한 항목인지에 대해서는 추후 현장적용을 통해 추가적인 검토가 필요할 것으로 사료되고, 현행 『식품 및 축산물 안전관리인증기준』 고시에 따른 일반규모 축산물 HACCP 평가는 업종별 특성에 맞추어 평가항목이 다르게 적용되어 있으나, 소규모의 경우에는 식육판매업 및 식용란수집 판매업을 제외한 다른 업종은 전부 동일한 평가표를 이용하여 평가를 하도록 되어 있어 해당 업종의 특성에 맞도록 평가항목을 분리하는 등의 연구도 필요할 것으로 판단된다. 아울러 인력 부족 등으로 인하여 소규모 식육포장처리장에서 쉽게 적용하기 어려운 위해분석 등 HACCP 관리 평가항목에 대해서는 정부에서 쉽게 적용할 수 있는 모델 개발 등을 통해 소규모 식육포장처리장에서 무리 없이 HACCP을 적용할 수 있도록 유도하는 것이 중요한 것으로 판단된다.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제13권11호
• /
• pp.5033-5043
• /
• 2012

본 연구의 목적은 현행 A대학의 강의평가 문항의 문제점을 보완하고 강의의 질 제고라는 강의평가의 본래 목적에 부합하도록 강의평가 문항을 개선하는 것이다. 이를 위하여, 대학 교육에서의 좋은 수업의 의미, 선행 연구의 강의평가 영역 및 요소, A대학의 현행 강의평가 도구의 내용 및 문제점을 살펴보았으며, 이를 토대로 개선안을 제시하였다. 연구 결과로 제안된 개선안의 주요한 특징은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 평가 영역, 평가 항목, 평가 문항의 구성 체계를 재구성하였다. 둘째, 강의 개선에 중요한 정보를 제공하기 위해 대학에서의 좋은 강의의 특징을 토대로 문항을 개발하였다. 셋째, 선행 연구의 강의평가 도구들이 공통적으로 제시하고 있는 평가 요소 등과 관련한 문항을 개발하였다. 넷째, 강의의 질 제고를 위해 필요한 정보가 있다면, 산술평균으로 결과를 제시할 수 없더라도 관련 문항을 개발하였다. 다섯째, 현행 강의평가 문항의 문제점으로 지적된 부분을 수정 보완하였다.

• 한국농공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국농공학회 2002년도 학술발표회 발표논문집
• /
• pp.101-104
• /
• 2002

Recent years have been widely discussed rural amenity as well as ecological restoration, green tourism, friendly nature, environmental preservation and so on as a way of addressing the various issues in sustainable rural development. This paper explores what the evaluation items on rural amenity is to sustain the identity of rural villages. After a review of the related preceding researches we suggested two alternatives of the amenity evaluation items in rural village's level. The one is the amenity evaluation items which consists of 3 factors and 17 items on basis of three functional space such as a living place, a working place, and a protected and enjoying place in rural villages. The other's amenity evaluation items has 6 factors and 14 items from a viewpoint of the functional integrated space in rural villages.

• 대한약침학회지
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.59-67
• /
• 2021

Objectives: We aimed to compare the external herbal dispensary (EHD) evaluation criteria for pharmacopuncture and the Korea Good Manufacturing Practice (KGMP) sterile medicine standards to contribute to the establishment of quality control criteria for pharmacopuncture. Methods: We obtained the KGMP standards from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety and the pharmacopuncture certification criteria from the Ministry of Health and Welfare of South Korea. The EHD evaluation items were classified into three categories: facilities, quality control, and validation. The evaluation items were compared with the KGMP sterile medicine criteria to determine their conformance with each other, followed by a discussion among the committee of six experts and their consensus to suggest the items to complement the EHD evaluation criteria. Results: Among the KGMP sterile medicine criteria, 44 were related to the management of the facilities, and 32 pharmacopuncture evaluation items corresponded to these KGMP items (66.7%). Fifty-eight KGMP criteria were related to quality management, and 42 pharmacopuncture evaluation items corresponded to these KGMP items (72.4%). Twentyfive KGMP sterile medicine criteria were related to validation, and 11 pharmacopuncture evaluation items corresponded to these KGMP items (44.0%). Sixteen items under the pharmacopuncture EHD criteria corresponded to the KGMP sterile medicine criteria based on the consent of the experts. Among these, 4 were related to facility management, 6 were related to quality control, and 6 were related to validation. Conclusion: For the safety and quality control of pharmacopuncture, there is a need to select the criteria for the mandatory items among the proposed pharmacopuncture-EHD criteria laws and systems to ensure that the pharmacopuncture materials are produced under the pharmacopuncture-EHD in compliance with the relevant requirements. More studies are needed to secure the safety level of pharmacopuncture materials corresponding to that of conventional medicine.

• 농촌계획
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.17-26
• /
• 2007

This study aims to develop a rational evaluation system which consists of the selection of evaluation items and the estimation of its weight for the Enhancement Program of the Quality of Life for Farmers and Fishermen and Rural Development. This system has two hierarchical steps. The first step shows the evaluation goals which are relevance, efficiency and effectiveness of the program. The second step stands for the evaluation items which have 11 sub-items such as necessity and externalization for the program, rationality of procedures, feedback and monitoring system, budgetary allocations, information activities, impacts on the program, achievements of the goals and so on. A tentative evaluation system was proposed by brainstorming and Delphi method of expert-group. Weighting values of evaluation items were calculated through pair-comparison works of expert group using stepwise matrix sheets by AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process).

• Child Health Nursing Research
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.334-343
• /
• 2002

This study was aimed at primarily to develop a tool to evaluate sexuality education and secondarily to test effectiveness through application of developed evaluation tools in elementary school. The results from this study were summarized below: 1. On the basis of targeting the lower grades (1st- 3th year) and the higher grades (4th-6th year) elementary school students' sexuality education guidebooks published by Korea Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development, 71 preliminary items targeting the lower grades, 90 preliminary items targeting the higher grades were developed. 2. Through the validity test about the contents of the preliminary items three times, the items were regulated to 65 items targeting the lower grads and 57 items targeting the higher grades. And then, the preliminary items were re-regulated to 40 items separately. Then, pre-test which targeting each 30 students was enforced. 3.Finally, the evaluation tools for sexuality education that consisted of 40 items targeting the lower grades and the higher grades were developed. 4. eliability test of the developed tools, sexuality education evaluation tools showed alpha coefficient of internal consistency were 0.8355 (for the use of the lower grades) and 0.8881 (for the use of the higher grades). 5. o apply the developed sexuality education evaluation tools, 10-times sexuality education were carried out class unit and pre-post test were done using same questionnaire, which contains developed tool, there were significant difference in low grade (t=16.548, p=0.000), high grade (t=14.773, p=0.000). The results of this study suggest that the evaluation tool for sexuality education in elementary school may be a useful tool with a high degree of reliability and validity. In this sense, the evaluation tool for sexuality education developed by this study can be effectively utilized in Korea elementary schools.