• 한국습지학회지
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.403-411
• /
• 2014

본 논문은 농업용저수지의 수문학적 안전성을 평가하기 위하여 평가 항목 및 지표를 설정하여 제시하였으며, 이를 위하여 전문가 집단을 대상으로 AHP 기법을 통해 평가 항목의 계층화를 통한 상대적인 중요도를 파악하였다. 연구 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 첫째 평가항목의 계층구조는 2계층(상위, 하위)으로 구분하여 상위 평가항목은 6개(제체의 여유고, 여수로의 방류능력, 유지관리 상태, 하류하천 제방의 여유고, 잠재 홍수피해, 홍수량 산정 인자)를 선정하였고, 하위 평가항목 11개를 선정하였다. 둘째, 계층적의사결정법에 의하여 각 항목간 쌍대비교 설문과 일관성 검증을 통해 도출된 6개 상위 평가항목의 중요도는 유지관리 상태(상태평가 등급), 제체(비월류부)의 여유고, 여수로의 방류능력, 잠재 홍수피해, 홍수량 산정 인자, 하류하천 제방의 여유고 순으로 나타났다. 유지관리 상태(안전점검 상태평가 등급)가 농업용저수지 수문학적 안전성에 지배적인 영향을 미치고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 농업용저수지의 수문학적 안전성 확보를 위해서는 단기적 방안으로 신속한 개선이 가능한 안전점검 상태평가 등급의 개선이 유용하며, 장기적으로 여수로 방류능력과 제체의 여유고를 확보하는 방안이 필요할 것으로 판단된다.

• 한국생활과학회지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.69-78
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study was to investigate the application of fashion-related web sites and their evaluation. 76 college students major in fashion design were surveyed and the evaluation criteria were classified into five categories such as the accuracy/reliability, the design of a picture, the ease of application, the communication/security, and additional services. The results of this study were as follows: 1. College students used web sites mostly to search for fashion trend information from magazine and fashion information sites. 2. While the media site was excellent in the evaluation criteria such as the accuracy/reliability, the design of a picture and the communication/security, the fashion information site was excellent in the evaluation criteria such as the accuracy/reliability, communication/ security and additional services. 3. The media site and the fashion information site generally ranked high and the fashion brand site ranked low in most evaluation items. 4. By the results of ANOVA, 12 items showed significant differences out of the total 19 items. 5. Out of the total evaluation items, the design of a picture ranked highest and the external link function ranked lowest.

• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제39권6호
• /
• pp.913-921
• /
• 2019

정부는 최고 가치와 글로벌 스탠다드를 추구한다는 목표 아래 2016년 종합심사낙찰제도를 도입하였다. 하지만 종합심사낙잘체도에 반영되는 시공평가의 평가기준은 객관성 부족, 주관적 평가 항목 다수 포함, 평가 항목별 가중치 비합리성 등의 문제가 지속적으로 제기 되고 있으며 중앙부처, 지자체, 관련 업계, 전문가 집단 모두 그 인식을 같이하고 있으나 해결 방안을 도출하지 못하고 있는 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구는 시공평가의 객관성 확보를 위해 개선이 필요한 주요 평가항목을 도출하고 그 특성을 분석하였다. 분석 방법은 시공평가 평가기준이 모두 4점 척도(우수, 보통, 미흡, 불량)로 구성된 특성을 활용하여 표준편차, Fleiss Kappa 분석 방법을 활용하였으며, 그 결과 총 25개로 구성된 시공평가의 평가항목 중 10개의 평가항목이 개선이 필요한 평가항목으로 도출되었다. 도출된 평가 항목의 주요 특성을 분석한 결과 세부 평가지침에 '매우적정', '적정'과 같은 정성적 평가 기준이 공통으로 포함된 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 따라서, 향후 시공평가의 평가기준은 정성적 평가기준은 지양하고 객관성 확보가 가능한 정량적 평가기준 중심으로 개선되어야 할 것으로 판단된다.

• 기본간호학회지
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.487-497
• /
• 2010

Purpose: This study examined the validity and reliability to develop a lifestyle evaluation tool for metabolic syndrome patients. Methods: A methodological research design was used. The construct factors and preliminary items were identified by reviewing previous researches and tools related to lifestyle and reviewed by ten experts. It was tested with 195 patients with metabolic syndrome in a university hospital. The data were analyzed with SPSS/WIN 14.0. Results: To test the validity, principal component analyses were used and resulted in the extraction of six components. The convergent validity resulted r= .72 (p<.001) with Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile. The discriminant validity with Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale resulted r= -.15 (p=.004). The Internal consistency of the tool had an Cronbach's a of .92. The self-report format Lifestyle Evaluation Tool for the patients with metabolic syndrome was developed with 36 items and four-rating scales:'physical activity and weight control' eight items, 'dietary habits' sixteen items, 'drinking and smoking' three items, 'sleep and rest' two items, 'stress' three items, 'drug and health management' four items. Conclusion: This Tool will evaluate health behaviors in patients with metabolic syndrome. Also, it will contribute to the development of nursing intervention to improve the metabolic syndrome patients' lifestyle.

• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제31권2D호
• /
• pp.315-322
• /
• 2011

정부는 대규모 사회간접자본시설에 대한 무분별한 추진을 막기 위해 사업의 타당성조사 뿐만 아니라 설계, 시공, 완공 시점에 사후평가를 실시하고 있다. 하지만 이러한 사후평가는 사전사후평가를 위한 평가항목과 분석방법이 모호하여 실효를 거두지 못하고 있다. 특히 철도사업은 철도사업의 종류와 철도의 종류에 따라 평가항목이 상이하여 사후평가항목과 분석절차가 차별화되어야 한다. 본 논문은 철도건설사업의 사후평가항목을 도출하고 데이터 수집 및 분석방법을 표준화하는 방안을 제시하고 있다. 구체적으로는 철도사업별로 공통평가항목과 특수평가항목을 도출하였고 이를 분석하는 방법으로 GIS기법을 제시하였다.

• Journal of Nutrition and Health
• /
• 제57권2호
• /
• pp.244-260
• /
• 2024

본 연구에서 개정된 한국인을 위한 식생활 지침을 기반으로 식품 및 영양소 섭취, 식생활 습관, 환경을 고려한 식생활 문화를 평가할 수 있는 항목을 개발하였다. 예비 문항을 확보하기 위하여 국내·외 평가도구 및 최신 문헌을 조사하여 항목을 조사하였고, 전문가 11명 대상 타당도 평가를 통해 70개의 항목을 선정하였다. 선정된 후보 항목 평가를 위해 서울·수도권 지역 중심으로 성인 332명을 대상으로 온·오프라인 조사를 시행하였고, 하루 총 에너지 섭취가 500 kcal 미만 또는 5,000 kcal 이상으로 섭취한 대상자 2명을 제외한 330명의 조사 자료를 활용하여 수렴타당도 분석 및 탐색적 요인분석을 진행하였다. 분석 결과 최종 선정된 문항은 총 34개로 식품 및 영양소 섭취 영역 11개, 식생활 습관 영역 9개, 식생활 문화 영역 14개로 구성되었다. 본 연구에서 개발한 평가 항목은 2021년 개정된 식생활지침을 기반으로 영역별로 성인의 전반적인 식사의 질과 지속가능한 식생활을 동시에 평가하는 데 용이하다는 점에서 건강한 식생활 개선을 위한 평가 도구로써 활용이 기대된다.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.63-84
• /
• 2020

With the recent announcement of the WCAG2.2 Work Draft of the W3C, revision of the WCAG2.2 guidelines will be made soon. Consequently, the revision of KWCAG2.1 in response to changes in the domestic and international environment of web accessibility is urgent. The revision primarily involves development and selection of web accessibility evaluation items. In this study, the efficient procedures and useful methodologies for developing and selecting the evaluation items are to be presented. FGI (Focus Group Interview) has been devised to reflect every stakeholders opinion fairly. GT (Group Technology) has been applied to expedite the revision processes particularly in the FGI. QFD (Quality Function Deployment) method plays an important role in investigating the relationship between evaluation items and its characteristics, and in analyzing the importance and priorities of each item. This study proposes 5 principles, 17 guidelines and 39 evaluation items which can be used for the revision of KWCAG 2.1. This study is expected to be of great help in establishing the KWCAG 2.2 in the near future.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.43-55
• /
• 2011

The purpose this study is to develop indicators that measure the healthy housing condition of multi-family housing. The major findings are as follow: first, healthy housing was defined by physical, mental, social, and management aspects and proposed the conceptual model of hierarchy structure of evaluation of healthy housing by literature reviews. Second, evaluating items were selected based on literature reviews of existing indicators and preceding studies about both domestic and overseas multi-family housing. The evaluating indicators were identified as a total of 87 evaluating items which were composed of four dimensions and 16 attributes on the basis of the conceptual model. They cover comprehensive scope of the multi-family housing such as unit, building, complex, and site. Third, as the measurement, the 5-point ordinal scale measure was suggested. The evaluating measurement including measure standards, measure methods, and measure contents were developed by each evaluating items. Lastly, the weighting of evaluating indicators was developed by AHP method conducted by survey of an expert group. Items were identified as high contributors or low contributors. The weighting of these items could suggest several evaluations according to the situation. The level of healthy housing condition may be evaluated by both total evaluation and a specific field of evaluation.

• 한국식품조리과학회지
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.247-255
• /
• 2004

The foodservice industry is changing more and more from on-site foodservice management to contract foodservice management. However there are differences according to the level of management and operation of contract foodservice management company (CFMC). The necessity of certification on CFMC is increasing to enable fair discrimination of CFMC among most clients that want to contract with CFMC. This study was performed to identify the foodservice operation evaluation model's criteria items for certifying CFMC. The analysis research methods included literature review, content analysis, individual interview, Delphi technique, and brain storming. First, the following infrastructure items were prepared in the contractor's viewpoint: procurement, transparency of operation, menu development and operation system, nutrition service system, professional employee education, sanitation andsafety management system, customer satisfaction system, facility system, management information system (MIS), business and economics. Second, the evaluation criteria required by the contractor on the client's view point was similar to school foodservice, hospitalfoodservice, and business andindustry foodservice except extraordinary items of field. Third, evaluation criteria and detail categories and items were identified such as financial focus, customer focus, process focus, human focus, and renewal and development by grafting on intellectual capital evaluation methodology for CFMC.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제37권6호
• /
• pp.119-132
• /
• 2016

Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the operation and personal information management of public and private kindergarten homepages. Methods: A total of 2,846 kindergartens were selected from the I-Sarang portal service for analyzing operation, and 217 self-operating homepages were selected for evaluating management. Seven evaluation items from three domains (information gathering procedures and scope, information security, and management of file exposure protection) were used. Wireshark and Google were used for analyzing some evaluation items. Results: The operating ratio of kindergarten homepages was low and most of the kindergartens self-operated their homepages. The evaluation of the information gathering procedures and scope showed that the rule of consent process was not rigidly followed but that the rule of legality for information gathering was followed. Items related to information security were followed at very low levels. As for the management of file exposure protection, the evaluation of items related to the prevention of attachment disclosure showed that the rule of protecting personal information included in an attached file was followed but that the notice regarding information protection was not. Across all evaluation items, the level of personal information management was higher in public (vs. private) kindergartens. Conclusion: These results indicate methods to more securely and effectively manage personal information on kindergarten homepages.