• Journal of Technologic Dentistry
• /
• v.23 no.2
• /
• pp.17-47
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study was to examine the 2001 curricula in 17 departments of dental technology across the nation in an attempt to find out the educational realities of the departments by term and school year and serve as a basis for the development of more advanced, efficient dental technology curriculum and common educational objectives. For that purpose, the 2001 curricula of the three-year dental laboratory technology departments were analyzed by school year and term to calculate the amount of required credit, the number of subjects, and the weekly classes for electives and major. The findings of this study could be listed as below: 1. The departments of dental laboratory technology nationwide investigated require students to get 120 to 135 credits in total. Out of the credits, 10 to 25 credits are assigned to the electives, and 106 to 11 8 credits are given to the major. 2. There are 50 to 68 subjects in the departments of dental technology. 5 to 16 subjects are the electives, and 41 to 59 are the major. 3. There are 150 to 196 classes per week, which consist of 10 to 30 ones for the electives and 137 to In for the major. 4. The curricula for the first semester of the first year are as follows: 1) 20 to 24 credits are required. 4 to 11 credits are alloted to the electives, and 9 to 19 credits are assigned to the major. 2) The number of subject is 9 to 13, which are composed of 2 to 7 for the electives and 4 to 9 for the major. 3) The weekly classes are 22 to 29. The classes for the electives range from 4 to 14 per week, and 10 to 20 classes a week are for the major. 5. The curricula for the second semester of the first year are as below: 1) There are 20 to 25 credits. 3 to 12 credits are assigned to the electives, and 12 to 19 credits are for the major. 2) The number of subject is 10 to 14, which consist of 2 to 6 for the electives and 6 to 10 for the major. 3) The weekly classes are 22 to 29. and 3 to 12 classes a week are for the electives, and 15 to 24 classes are for the major. 6. The curricula for the first semester of the second year are as below: 1) The number of credits ranges from 20 to 24. Only six colleges offer 2 credits for the electives and the major account for 18 to 24 ones. 2) There are 8 to 12 subjects. Only six colleges offer one or two electives, and 8 to 12 are the major. 3) The weekly classes are 23 to 33. Only six colleges offer 2 or 3 classes a week for the electives, and 21 to 33 classes are for the major. 7. The curricula for the second semester of the second year are as below: 1) The number of credits ranges from 19 to 24. Only two colleges offer 2 credits for the electives and the major account for 18 to 24 ones. 2) There are 7 to 12 subjects. Only two colleges offer one or two electives, and 8 to 12 are the major. 3) The weekly classes are 24 to 36. Only two colleges offer 2 classes a week for the electives, and 24 to 36 classes are for the major. 8. The curricula for the first semester Of the third year are as below: 1) There are 16 to 24 credits. Just a college assigns 2 credits to the electives, and 16 to 24 credits are given to the major. 2) The number of subject is 5 to 12. Only a college offers one elective for optional course, and 5 to 12 are the major. 3) The weekly classes range from 18 to 39. Just a college offer 2 classes a week for the electives, and 18 to 39 classes are for the major. 9. The curricula for the second semester of the third year are as below: 1) There are 16 to 23 credits. Just a college assigns 2 credits to the electives, and 16 to 23 credits are given to the major. 2) The number of subject is 5 to 12. Only a college offers one elective for optional course, and 5 to 12 are the major. 3) The weekly classes range from 18 to 39. Just a college offer 2 classes a week for the electives, and 18 to 39 classes are for the major.

• Journal of the Korean earth science society
• /
• v.43 no.4
• /
• pp.557-566
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this study was to examine the status of the field application of the Science II career electives with the application of the 2015 revised curriculum up to the 3rd year of high school. This study focused on examining high school science teachers' perceptions of the student-participatory class and process-centered assessment in Science II subjects, which are career-intensive high school science electives. A total of 192 science teachers responded to the survey questionnaire, and 12 teachers participated in interviews. In the in-depth interviews conducted to supplement the survey results, questions were asked about changes in the overall class, the status of student-participatory classes, and changes in the assessment of Science II subjects due to the emphasis on process-centered assessment. The main research results included teachers' perceptions of changes in teaching and assessment methods with the application of the revised curriculum, the degree to which the eight skills used in Science II classes develop the key competencies of science, and the teaching and assessment methods commonly used in Science II classes. Science teachers generally agreed with the purpose and necessity of introducing student-participatory classes and process-centered assessment, which are the core purpose of the 2015 revised curriculum. However, they had difficulties in practice due to the excessive content of Science II subjects. Problems were also encountered with securing objectivity and fairness during assessments and the operation of online science classes due to COVID-19.

• (The)Korea Educational Review
• /
• v.23 no.4
• /
• pp.79-99
• /
• 2017

This study aims at analyzing the course selecting standards of college students including Electives and Major courses. For the purpose of this study, we developed a survey through analyzing previous related-research and conducting interviews and pilot study. Using our survey questions, on- and off-line survey was conducted for 301 college students from November 1st to December 5th. As a result of the survey, college student's course selecting standards consist of five factors including 'convenience in learning', 'characteristics of instructors', 'practicality of courses', 'expectations of and interests in learning', and 'external factors.' With the result of factor analysis, we analyzed course selecting standards of college students divided into Electives and Major courses. For electives, 'convenience in learning' was most considered among five factors, followed by 'expectations of and interests in learning', 'external factors', 'characteristics of instructors' and 'practicality of courses.' On the other hand, 'characteristics of instructors' was the highest consideration of college students when selecting courses in Major subjects, followed by 'convenience in learning', 'expectations of and interests in learning', 'external factors' and 'practicality of courses.' This study examined what standards affect college student's course selection, considering Electives and Major courses respectively. We suggested further study on how college students select their courses and how this affect their satisfaction with college education.

• International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.31-63
• /
• 2013

The goal of this study is to improve the competitiveness of professional librarians in society. To this end, we analyzed domestic and international LIS curriculum, determined demand from field librarians through a survey, carried out job analysis by library types, and developed an operating model for LIS curriculum by synthesizing all of these results. Finally, we suggested a course of study for civil service librarians based on this model. As a result, the six required courses for civil service librarians are: Introduction to Library and Information Science, Information Organization, Information Services (Reference and Information Services), Library Management, Information Retrieval, and Field Work. The four core courses for the civil service concentration are: Collection Development, Information Sources by Subjects, Public Library Management, and Digital Libraries. Suggested electives best suited to this career path include Using Web Resources, Information Literacy, Information Services in Culturally Diverse Communities, Library Marketing, Libraries and Cultural Programs, Reading Guidance, Library History, Small Library Management, Studies in Library Buildings, Library Cooperation, Managing Digital Collections, and Information and Communication in a Digital Age.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.40-52
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study is to explore ways to change high school earth science elective courses with the introduction of the high school credit system in 2025, and ways to restructure them in preparation for the next curriculum revision. For this purpose, Delphi surveys with earth science education experts, a survey with in-service earth science teachers, and in-depth interviews with experts were conducted. According to the results, we need to consider four keywords such as cultivation of earth science literacy, connection with student career paths, emphasis on the fun of earth science itself, and student selection rate and college entrance exam in restructuring Earth science electives. Based on this direction, we composed four subjects: Earth System Science emphasizing earth science literacy, and three such subjects reinforcing career connection as Solid Earth Science, Atmospheric and Ocean Science, and Space Science. To resolve concerns about falling selection rate of earth science courses with the introduction of the high school credit system, it is necessary to re-establish the status of the earth science subjects including enhancing the career connection of the earth science electives. Follow-up studies are necessary to elaborate and publicize the titles and core concepts of Earth science electives.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.112-122
• /
• 2021

The goal of this study is to explore ways to restructure Convergence Elective Courses in science in preparation for the high school credit system, ahead of the 2022 revised science curriculum. This study started from the problem that the 2015 revised science curriculum has not guaranteed science subject choice for students with non-science/engineering career aptitudes. To this end, a survey was conducted by randomly sampling high schools across the country. A total of 1,738 students responded to the questionnaire of 3 science elective courses such as Science History, Life & Science, Convergence Science. In addition, in-depth interviews with 12 science teachers were conducted to examine the field operation of these three courses, which will be classified and revised as Convergence Elective subjects in the 2022 revised curriculum. According to the results of the study, high school students perceive these three courses as science literacy courses, and find these difficult to learn due to lack of personal interest, and difficulties in content itself. The reason students choose these three courses is mainly because they have aptitude for science, or these courses have connection with their desired career path. Teachers explained that students mainly choose Life & Science, and both teachers and students avoid Science History because the course content is difficult. Based on the research results, we suggested ways to restructure Convergence Electives for the 2022 revised curriculum including developing convergence electives composed of interdisciplinary convergence core concepts with high content accessibility, developing convergence electives with core concepts related to AI or advanced science, developing module-based courses, and supporting professional development of teachers who will teach interdisciplinary convergence electives.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.15
• /
• pp.45-72
• /
• 1988

A study has been made prior to the emphatic research to see how the curriculum of the Library Science Departments, in general, has developed to date. In the principles of the composition of the curriculum of library science, research has been conducted to determine what decisions will be the most appropriate for the changing trend of the society, regarding the matters of general specialization versus subject specialization education, the definition, change and operation of the core subject, the expansion of the elective specialized subjects and the composition of the curriculum by types of the library, and the curriculum composition in terms of subject specilization. The curriculum should consist of a unified series of courses and other educational experiences, designed to meet specific program objectives. Principles and concepts should be emphasized, over routines and techniques. All students should study certain fundamental 'core' subjects, as well as more specialized electives. General education (studies outside of librarianship) should be a major component of the total education of the librarian. Fundamental core subjects should be treated as introductory courses covering deep studies that can provide the most inclusive information related to the library science field. They should be offered as pre-requisites required of all the students entering the Department of Library Science. Specialized subjects and interdisciplinary courses comprising subject concentration should be offered as electives at the advanced level.

• Journal of Science Education
• /
• v.46 no.1
• /
• pp.80-92
• /
• 2022

We fitted latent growth models of attitude towards science using the Korea Education & Employment Panel 2004-2007 data with 343 high school students. The growth model show better fit indices compared to the no growth model. The intercept and slope showed significant variances, and thus, we added control variables of the number, ratio of advanced courses, and variety in science elective subjects, and the achievement percentile for middle school. In the conditional growth model, the previous achievement has significant positive effects on the intercept and the ratio of the advanced courses and variety of science subjects show significantly positive effects on the slope. Based on the results, it supports the 2022 Revised Science Curricular that high school credit system should provide students with basic 'Physics,' 'Chemistry,' 'Biology,' and 'Earth Science,' credits in 'general electives', various integrated subjects in 'converged electives', and highly advanced subjects in 'career electives.'

• Archives of design research
• /
• v.20 no.2 s.70
• /
• pp.29-40
• /
• 2007

Human factors engineering has been taught in the design fields and considered as a necessary course for design students, We, ergonomists working with a design department, analyzed the current status of ergonomics curricula in the Korean design colleges. Sixty one percent of schools with design departments were offering ergonomics courses and most courses were electives. Comparatively more ergonomic courses were offered in industrial design and digital media departments. Ergonomic and human factors knowledge might not properly be acquired with this current status of the design curricula and systematic solutions should be considered and prepared for the future Korean designers.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.10
• /
• pp.71-120
• /
• 1983

In this study, a model curriculum for the Library and Information Science programs in Junior Colleges is presented by comparing those curricula of the Republic of Korea, the United States of America, England and Japan. In Korea, 80 credits are required for graduate of Junior College and 60 credits of that total credits are for major courses. At Toshokan Danki Daikagu in Japan, 73 credits are opened for the Department of Library Science and 87 credits for the Department of Library and Information Science respectively. In the United States of America, 30 credits for major courses out of 90 total credits are opened at Lansing Community College and 24 credits for major courses out of 60-64 credits at Mesa Community College distinctively. On the basis of the various analyses, the following principles are applied in designning the model curriculum; (1) Possibly 3 credits per subject are assigned, (2) Major credits for graduate are 60-64 credits including possible optional subjects, (3) 20 percents of those 60-64 credits shall be applied for electives, so that 72-78 credits are assigned for major, (4) In order to combine theory and practice, and to select practice areas as required major, the ratio between required and elective must be adjusted, (5) In order to avoid duplication of subject, adequate individuality must be provided, (6) The Information Science areas must be dealt with in Library Science since computer systems are being rapidly adopted in libraries and the education for resources of materials and foreign languages are also important for successful fulfillment of mediator's roles between materials and users. Therefore the following model curriculum is suggested; 31 credits in 11 subjects for required major, 46 credits in 18 subjects for electives in major, total 77 credits for 29 subjects are established, and it includes such areas as material organization, foreign languages, resources of materials, library management, information science, fundamental studies, services and practice.