• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제26권6호
• /
• pp.62-70
• /
• 2023

The purpose of this study is to derive implications for improving related policies and evaluation criteria in the future by analyzing trends of evaluation criteria for industry-university cooperation in Korea. For this purpose, five surveys on industry-university cooperation by government departments, major general university evaluations, and evaluation indicators of specialized industry-university evaluations by the Ministry of Education were analyzed. As a result, most of the evaluation criteria for domestic industry-university cooperation have been composed of quantitative indicators and have a limited character as quantitative performance management for government projects. Although the Ministry of Education's evaluation criteria for industry-university cooperation projects has gradually changed to a segmented index considering universities, industries, and regions, it needs to be supplemented for sustainability of industry-university cooperation. In order to promote sustainable industry-university cooperation in the future, it was suggested that first, it is necessary to supplementation of qualitative Indicators considering each university's characteristics, second, the composition of indicators related to reflect on demand in the process of the cooperation, and third, to build a virtuous cycle system for future operation of evaluation criteria.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제50권4호
• /
• pp.665-677
• /
• 2022

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the current status and investigate relevant indicators so that R&D performance evaluation suitable for government-funded research institutes can proceed. A suitable performance evaluation model was presented based on the surveyed indicators. Based on the presented performance evaluation model, the importance was analyzed to calculate the weight for each indicator of the performance evaluation model. Methods: The method applied in this study presented a performance evaluation model based on the organizational performance evaluation cases of advanced overseas countries. By using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) technique, the weight of each indicator of the performance evaluation model was studied. Results: As a result of examining the indicators necessary for the evaluation model, focusing on overseas cases, 13 evaluation items were derived. A weight was calculated for the importance of the study results. And the scientific/technical research results showed the highest excellence. Conclusion: Key indicators of performance evaluation suitable for government-funded research institutes were derived and presented through detailed modeling in three stages. A realistic model that can objectively evaluate the performance of government-funded research institutes was proposed using the AHP technique.

• International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.99-139
• /
• 2024

In this study, the library ESG evaluation indicators specialized for libraries were developed, and based on which, a survey was conducted targeting the actual libraries to evaluate the ESG level of libraries. As a result of the study, first, among the ESG evaluation indicators, the indicators of the social field and the governance field are demonstrating high in which field of the library's ESG evaluation indicators will appear the highest. The social area's high score of 3.70 seems to be because the protection of users' rights, occupational safety, and contribution to society and the local community are very closely related to the original role of the library. Second, it may be seen that there is a difference between the questions in the corporate governance part, while the averages are the same. In the case of library's cooperation, it turned out that it was 3.94 in the necessity evaluation of the evaluation indicators, but it was lowered to 3.61 in the actual library situation evaluation. Meanwhile, in connection with the activities of the director of library and the board of directors, it may be seen that the index evaluation increased from 3.32 to 3.58 in the actual evaluation.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.131-142
• /
• 2009

High-rise and high-density apartment complexes have been built and supplied on a large scale in the 1st period of the New Town project in metropolitan areas since the late 1980s. Now It has become necessary to improve those apartment complexes, which have serious deterioration problems for aging more than about 20 years accompanying simultaneity and a large scale. The purpose of this research is to develop the evaluating indicators to measure the level of deterioration of apartments inclusively and practically in order to regenerate apartments as sustainable residential environments. This study is composed of the following four parts; (a) establishing the conceptual model of evaluation of apartment deterioration, (b) selecting evaluation items, (c) constituting evaluation measurement, and（ｄ)weighting evaluation indicators. First, deterioration of apartments was conceptualized by physical. social, and economical aspects in terms of sustainable development and proposed the conceptual model of hierarchy structure of evaluation of apartment deterioration by literature reviews. Second, evaluating items were selected based on literature reviews of existing indicators and preceding studies about apartments of Korea and foreign countries. The evaluating indicators were identified as a total of 77 evaluating items which were composed of three dimensions and 9 attributes on the basis of the conceptual model. They cover comprehensive scope of the apartment such as unit, building, complex, and site. Third, as the measurement, the 5 point ordinal scale measure was suggested. The evaluating measurement including measure standards, measure methods, and measure contents were developed by each evaluating items. Lastly, the weighting of evaluating indicators was analyzed by AHP method conducted by survey on the expert group. Items were identified as high contributors or low contributors. The weighting of these items could suggest several evaluations according to the situation. The evaluation of the level of deterioration can be done by both total evaluation and a specific field of evaluation. In addition, it is easy to grasp deteriorated attributes or dimensions by providing a radar and bar chart showing evaluation results. These evaluating indicators could be a useful tool to grasp actual methods for the regeneration of apartments.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.131-143
• /
• 2008

Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop service quality indicators to evaluate structure and process of the nursing home service. Method: On the basis of literature review and analysis of existing quality indicators, the researcher made a preliminary service quality indicators and verified content validity twice. The final service quality indicators were applied in 30 nursing homes. Results: Preliminarily, 3 domains, 24 sub-domains, and 156 indicators were generated. Through two content validity testings, the indicators scoring over .80 CVI for each testing were adopted and modified by discussion with a panel of experts. The final indicators consisted of 3 domains, 15 sub-domains, and 128 indicators. These indicators were applied in 30 nursing homes. The result showed that they were easily applicable and suitable for a evaluation of service quality in nursing home. Conclusion: This 'service quality indicators in nursing home' was verified by the content validity. This tool will be able to be used for evaluation and improvement of nursing home service quality. However, repeated researches are needed for further validity and reliability.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제51권4호
• /
• pp.5-34
• /
• 2017

본 연구에서는 도서관의 교육적 가치를 평가할 수 있는 평가지표를 개발하고자 하였으며, 이를 위해 1차적으로 도서관의 가치에 대해 연구한 60여 개의 국내 외 논문들을 총체적으로 분석하여 예비 평가지표를 도출하였다. 도출한 예비 평가지표를 토대로 10명의 전문가를 선정하여 3차에 걸친 델파이조사를 실시하여 최종평가지표를 개발하였다. 도서관의 교육적 가치의 최종평가지표는 크게 리터러시 개선, 학습 및 교육지원, 연구지원 및 정보자원제공, 교육환경 및 교육의 질 개선, 역량강화 등의 5가지 평가영역과, 13개 평가항목, 62개 평가지표로 구성된다. 향후에는 이를 기반으로 실제로 도서관의 교육적 가치를 측정하는 연구가 수행되어야 할 것으로 보인다.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.181-214
• /
• 2017

본 연구에서는 도서관의 사회적 가치를 평가할 수 있는 평가지표를 개발하고자 하였으며, 이를 위해 1차적으로 도서관의 가치에 대해 연구한 60여 개의 국내 외 논문들을 총체적으로 분석하여 예비 평가지표를 도출하였다. 도출한 예비 평가지표를 토대로 11명의 전문가를 선정하여 3차에 걸친 델파이조사를 실시하여 최종평가지표를 개발하였다. 최종평가지표는 공공도서관의 사회적 가치를 크게 지역 사회개발, 지역 사회의 연계, 지역 주민의 삶의 질 향상, 지역 주민의 평등화, 지역 사회에 필요한 정보제공서비스 등의 5가지 평가영역과, 13개 평가항목, 64개 평가지표로 구성된다. 향후에는 이를 기반으로 공공도서관의 사회적 가치를 측정하는 연구가 수행되어야 할 것으로 보인다.

• Journal of Information Processing Systems
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.916-925
• /
• 2018

The academic research performance is often quantitatively measured by means of using citation frequency. The citation frequency-based indicators, such as h-index and impact factor, are commonly used reflecting the citation quality to some extent. However, these frequency-based indicators are usually carried out based on the assumption that all citations are equal. This may lead to biased evaluations in that, the attributes of the citing objects and cited objects are significant. A high-accuracy evaluation method is needed. In this paper, we review various citation quality-based evaluation indicators, and categorize them considering the algorithms being applied. We discuss the pros and cons of these indicators, and compare them from four dimensions. The outcomes will be useful for our further research on distinguishing citation quality.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제45권3호
• /
• pp.5-26
• /
• 2011

이 연구는 전국 학교도서관을 동시평가하기 위한 객관적이며 정량적인 평가지표를 개발하기 위한 목적을 지니고 있다. 이를 위해 학교도서관 평가지표와 관련된 국내외의 7개 선행연구를 분석하여 일반성을 갖춘 평가지표를 추출하고, 추출된 평가지표를 계량화 가능성, 객관성, 자료확보 용이성에 따라 타당성을 검증하여 평가지표 초안을 개발하였다. 그리고 도서관정보정책위원회에서 적용한 학교도서관 평가지표에 대한 타당성을 조사하여 타당성이 부족한 평가기준과 척도를 수정 보완하고, 신규지표에 대한 평가기준을 개발하였다. 평가배점은 평가지표에 대한 사서교사와 전문가의 중요도 조사, 도서관정보정책위원회 평가지표의 배점체계에 대한 분석, 전문가의 집중검토 과정을 거쳐 설정하였다. 이상의 과정을 거쳐 경영일반, 장서, 시설 설비, 인적자원, 이용, 교육의 6개 영역과 30개 지표로 구성된 학교도서관 평가지표 개선안을 제안하였다.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.26-45
• /
• 2005

The purposes of this study were to Identify the .level of measurement on quality Indicators and evaluate the existing indicators in order to determine the priority of quality indicators' application in Korean general hospitals. A survey was conducted using a questionnaire. The subjects were quality managers working at general hospital having over 300 beds. The criteria were relevance, reliability, precision, impact, application, and preference to evaluate quality indicators. According to these six criteria, each indicator was evaluated on a five point scale(5: excellent, 1: poor). The response rate was $40.4\%$. The hospitals have monitored the average of 3.8 indicators(median 4). The indicators such as return to operating room, unplanned readmission, cancellation of booked operations, death, hospital infection, cesarean section rate, volume per disease or procedure, readmission, re-operation, blood transfusion, and post-procedural complications were frequently measured. The top ten quality indicators in the evaluation by its relevance, validity, reliability, impact, preference and application were decubitus ulcer, clean wound infection, fall, unplanned return to operation room, transfusion reactions, foreign body left In during procedure, unplanned readmission, wound infection after contaminated surgery, postoperative hemorrhage/hematoma, and cesarean section rate in order. The high priority quality indicators frequently measured could be used as primary national indicators. Standardized guidelines about monitoring indicators and the utilization will preliminarily be needed to compare and reuse the data for various purposes and improve the quality of care continuously.