Journal of Engineering Education Research (공학교육연구)

Korean Society for Engineering Education (한국공학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Trends of Evaluation Criteria for Industry-University Cooperation in Korea

국내의 대학 산학협력 평가준거 동향에 대한 연구

  • Kwak, Jin-young (Department of Vocational Education & Workforce Development, Seoul National University)
  • 곽진영 (서울대학교 농산업교육과)
  • Received : 2023.09.05
  • Accepted : 2023.10.26
  • Published : 2023.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to derive implications for improving related policies and evaluation criteria in the future by analyzing trends of evaluation criteria for industry-university cooperation in Korea. For this purpose, five surveys on industry-university cooperation by government departments, major general university evaluations, and evaluation indicators of specialized industry-university evaluations by the Ministry of Education were analyzed. As a result, most of the evaluation criteria for domestic industry-university cooperation have been composed of quantitative indicators and have a limited character as quantitative performance management for government projects. Although the Ministry of Education's evaluation criteria for industry-university cooperation projects has gradually changed to a segmented index considering universities, industries, and regions, it needs to be supplemented for sustainability of industry-university cooperation. In order to promote sustainable industry-university cooperation in the future, it was suggested that first, it is necessary to supplementation of qualitative Indicators considering each university's characteristics, second, the composition of indicators related to reflect on demand in the process of the cooperation, and third, to build a virtuous cycle system for future operation of evaluation criteria.

Keywords

References

  1. 과학기술정보통신부.한국과학기술기획평가원(2020). 2020년도 연구개발활동조사보고서.
  2. 교육과학기술부.한국연구재단(2011). 2010 대학산학협력백서.
  3. 교육부(2021). 3단계 산학협력 선도대학 육성사업 추진방향(안).
  4. 김남희 외(2020). 국가연구개발 연구성과 관리.활용 실태조사. 한국과학기술기획평가원.
  5. 김진용 외(2019). 2019년 산학연협력 스코어보드.
  6. 김태영 외(2019). 신산학협력 활성화 방안 연구. 디지털융복합학회지, 17(12), 77-82.
  7. 김홍규(2021). 산학협력 활성화를 통한 대학의 성장방안 연구, 디자인리서치, 4(2), 50-63.
  8. 민재웅.김희성(2018). 해외 주요 대학의 산학협력 체계 및 사례 조사.
  9. 박종렬.배호순.이영호(2019). 대학평가 이론과 실제. 학지사.
  10. 송완흡(2006). 산학협력 활성화 방안-산학협력 선순환구조 구축을 중심으로.
  11. 신현석.김상철.장아름(2020). 한국의 대학평가. 학지사.
  12. 임효정.강경남.김혜정(2020). 2020년도 지식재산활동 실태조사. 특허청.
  13. 전국대학연구.산학연구관리자협의회(2015). 산학협력 업무매뉴얼 1. 교육부.한국연구재단.
  14. 정동덕(2020). 산학협력 활성화를 위해 대학차원에서 어떻게 개선해야 하는가. (주)동진문화사.
  15. 조윤애 외(2016). 기업의 산학연협력과 정책과제. 산업연구원.
  16. 한국대학평가원(2022). 대학기관평가인증편람.
  17. Adela, G. A., Silvia, M., & Leandro S, A.(2021). Students' Perceptions of Their Preparedness for Transition to Work after Graduation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418791026
  18. Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. J.(2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-1
  19. Costa, A. C. F., Santos, V. H. M., & Oliveira, O. J.(2022). Towards the Revolution and Democratization of Education: A Framework to Overcome Challenges and Explore Opportunities through Industry 4.0. Informatics in Education, 21(1), 1-32.
  20. Etzkowitz, H. & Leyesdorff, L.,(2010). The dynamics of innovation: from national sytems and mode 2 to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, pp.109-123.
  21. Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C.(2017). The Triple Helix : University-Industry-Government Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Taylor & Francis Group.
  22. Koul, S., & Nayar, B.(2021). The holistic learning educational ecosystem: A classroom 4.0 perspective. Higher Education Quarterly, 75(1), 98-112.
  23. Oyugi, J. L.(2021). From Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial University: Agenda for Sustainable Job Creation among University Graduates in Uganda. Journal of Education and Learning, 15(1), 127-134. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i1.15982