• Perspectives in Nursing Science
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.50-65
• /
• 2004

Despite the new wave of diverse philosophical thoughts in nursing, the criteria for theory evaluation rarely incorporate the new thoughts in its realm. Especially, feminist thoughts, which have contributed to the development of nursing knowledge through incorporating diversities and complexities of nursing phenomenon and reflecting social, cultural, and historical contexts surrounding nursing encounters, were rarely incorporated into the evaluation criteria. In this paper, a feminist approach to theory evaluation is proposed based on a critical analysis of the existing evaluation criteria. First, a historical review of feminist thoughts is provided, and feminist principles across diverse groups of thinking within feminism are discussed. Then, theory evaluation criteria are historically analyzed and critiqued while considering the feminist principles. The critical points found in the currently available theory evaluation criteria include: (a) the evaluation criteria are based on objectivity, (b) they are ignoring gender differences; (c) cultural differences tend not to be seriously considered; and (d) contexts surrounding nursing phenomenon are rarely considered. Based on the critical points, four additional components for theory evaluation are proposed. The components are: (a) respect for subjectivity; (b) historical and sociopolitical contextual considerations; (c) gender sensitivity; (d) cultural competence; and (e) blueprint for action.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.63-78
• /
• 1998

Recently, to use the evaluated firewall is recognized as a solution to achieve the security and reliability for government and organizarions in Korea. Results of firewall evaluation using ITSEC(Information Technology Security Evaluation Criteria) and CCPP(Common Criteria Protection Peofile)have been announced. Because there are problems to apply ITSECor CCPP for the firewall evaluation in korea environment, korea government and korea Information security Agency (KISA) decided to develop our own security dvaluation critrtia fir firewalls.As a result of the efforts, Korea firewall security evaluation criteria has been published on Feb. 1998. In this paper, we introduce Korea security evaluation criteria for firewalls. The ceiteria consists of functional and assurance requirements that are compatible with CC Evaluation Assurance Levels(EALs)

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.28-41
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study was to develop the Meta-Evaluation Criteria which can comprehensively and systematically evaluate and improve the Accreditation Evaluation System for Engineering Education. This will provide useful implications for establishing value, direction, and improvement remedy for Engineering Educations Accreditation System of Korea. In order to achieve the purpose of this study, Meta-Evaluation Criteria was developed to comprehensively and systematically assess and analyze the Accreditation Evaluation System of Engineering Education. The research methodology used to study these subjects: literature review, interviews with experts, Delphi survey (three times), survey, analysis of narrative opinion and secondary source. The results and conclusions of this study can be summarized as follows: First, the final Meta-Evaluation Criteria were developed so as to comprehensively and systematically assess and analyze the Accreditation Evaluation System of Engineering Education. The criteria's validity and reliability were also identified. Specific details are as follows: In a draft plan of the Meta-Evaluation Criteria, Meta-Evaluation concept was defined as evaluation on the whole range of Accreditation Evaluation System of Engineering Education. Meta-Evaluation Criteria was designed to be based on a systematic approach and applies the phased approach to the lower component to reflect evaluation's characteristics. Then validity and reliability of the developed draft plan was verified by calculating Content Validity Ratio (CVR), Degree of Consensus, Degree of Convergence and Cronbach's alpha. The final developed Meta-Evaluation Criteria obtaining validity and reliability were composed of 5 evaluation areas (environment, input, performance, result, utilization), 15 evaluation items, 68 evaluation indicators.

• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제27권7호
• /
• pp.789-799
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study was to find out clothing evaluation criteria and purchase intention according to consumers' shopping orientation and demographic factors when they shop online. The subjects were 240 men and women living in the metropolitan area. For data analysis, factor analysis, cluster analysis, ANOVA, t-test, Duncan test and descriptive statistics were conducted. The results are as follows: 1. Important clothing evaluation criteria were considered in order of price, style, fit, size and product guarantee etc. Purchase intention was showed more highly when products are related to low involvement than high involvement. 2. Consumers with high hedonic and utilitarian shopping orientation considered clothing evaluation criteria more importantly but showed low level of purchase intention in cyber shopping. And consumers with low hedonic and utilitarian shopping orientation considered clothing evaluation criteria less importantly but showed high level of purchase intention in cyber shopping. 3. There were significant differences in evaluation criteria and purchase intention according to demographic variables. Especially women considered evaluation criteria more importantly and had higher level of purchase intention than men.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.100-112
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this study is to construct the evaluation criteria based on the relative importance and various combination of each evaluation index and then to evaluate urban biotope in terms of conservation of species and habitat. After the standard of evaluation had been developed through the literature review, the relative importance of the evaluation index through expert survey was found out, and the evaluation model of biotope value has been established. The results of this study are as follows; 1) We have constructed the nineteen evaluation criteria through literature reviews, and have provided relative importance to each evaluation index of the diversity of typical species in biotope, afforestation rate, stratification, Hemeroby grads, and the diversity of landscape patterns based on the results of expert survey. and then we have constructed the evaluation system using the relative importance criteria. 2) To evluate urban biotope using the evaluation system constructed, we selected 14 sites. The final evaluation results of each site is as follows; The III grade areas are Seohan and Hwasung high-rise apartment at Beummul-Dong, Korea Men Power /Agency in Sungs 대 industrial zone, the adjacent area of St. Tongil, and Hyomyung elementary school. The II grade areas are the farm land behind the third Anshim Jugong apartment, and Ehyun park. The I grade areas are swampy land in front of Kangchon and Anshim construction site, water space with semi-natural style in front of Gangchon Woobang apartment, forest zone near page Temple at mt. Palgong, the edge area of Jisan and Gosan, and the tendril yard against Anshim middle school. The only grade IV area is the commercial zone near Taegu Department 3) It is highly useful to evaluate urban biotope using the evaluation criteria constructed for this research, the evaluation criteria we developed may be difficult to guarantee the ability for reproduction and recovery, the appearance-number of the rare and endangered species are difficult to estimate urban biotopes. In the future, it is highly useful to evaluate biotope in terms of conservation of species and habitat through its valuation criteria developed in this research and it is necessary to develop the evaluation criteria applicable to estimation of biotope inventory and reproduction of biotope.

• 한국지반공학회논문집
• /
• 제36권4호
• /
• pp.17-30
• /
• 2020

본 연구의 목적은 2017년 포항지진 시 액상화가 관측되었거나 액상화 가능성이 높은 부지 5곳에 대하여, 국내에서 통상적으로 적용해 왔던 액상화 평가 기준과 최근 개정된 평가 기준을 적용하여 액상화 평가를 실시하고, 이러한 이론적인 액상화 평가 결과와 대상 부지에서의 실제 액상화 발현여부를 비교·검토함으로써, 개정된 액상화 평가 기준의 타당성을 검토하는 데에 있다. 액상화 평가를 위한 해석지진은 기존 국내에서 통상적으로 사용해 온 지진파와 포항 실지진파를 사용하였고, 해석지진의 최대지반가속도 크기는 0.097g~0.2713g 범위의 값을 적용하였다. 해석결과로부터, 기존 국내에서 통상적으로 적용해 왔던 구조물기초설계기준(2016)에 제시된 액상화 평가 기준의 개선점을 제시하고, 2018년에 개정된 내진설계일반에 제시된 액상화평가 기준의 기존 기준대비 개정 사항의 상대적 타당성을 평가해 보았다.

• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제32권5D호
• /
• pp.429-435
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 통근 통학시 자전거 이용환경 평가할 수 있는 평가모형을 개발하여 평가지표를 통해서 현재 자전거 이용환경을 평가하고 향후 개선사항 및 시사점을 제시하고자 하였다. 평가지표 개발방향은 자전거 이용자들의 필요성, 새로운 정책 반영, 종합 평가지표 구축, 관련연구 검토와 같이 크게 4가지 측면에서 통근 통학 자전거 이용환경 평가지표 개발방향을 정립한 후 기존 평가지표 검토 및 FGI를 통해 1차 평가항목을 선정하고, 평가지표의 적합성 검증을 통해 최종평가지표를 도출하였다. 본 연구 결과를 간략히 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째 자전거 이용평가에서 존별 평가를 적용하여 존 단위의 개선점 제시, 둘째 GIS를 이용한 시설물 현황 및 모형분석 결과 제시, 셋째 스파이더 맵을 이용한 각 존별 주요항목 결과의 비교를 명확히 하였다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.69-85
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study was to develop criteria for evaluating final reports of free inquiry activity and to apply developed evaluation criteria to free inquiry activity reports. 323 inquiry reports submitted to internal contests in the elementary schools as well as 189 award-winning ones from the inquiry competition for students in Seoul were collected. Nine categories and 18 sub-categories of evaluation criteria were derived by collecting reports analysis, literature reviews and interviews with 15 elementary school teachers. Criteria for each sub-category were organized into three steps and 12 elementary school teachers assigned scores for each sub-category, which were averaged. 132 including both award-winning and general reports were evaluated based on the developed evaluation criteria. The content validity and the reliability across scorers were significant. Furthermore, award-winning and general reports were significantly distinguished by the developed criteria in terms of all sub-category scores. The developed evaluation criteria will be an effective tool to asses student's free inquiry activity.

• 한국유통학회지:유통연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.61-77
• /
• 2008

본 연구는 소비자가 처음으로 접하는 신규 패션 브랜드에 대해 적용시키는 평가기준을 밝히는데 그 목적이 있다. 브랜드 평가기준에 대한 연구로서 다음의 세가지 논점을 강조함으로써 선행연구와 구별되는 차별점을 가진다. 첫 번째로는 본 연구가 개별 제품이나 점포를 포함하는 패션브랜드 수준에 대한 통합적인 평가기준을 밝힌다는 점이다. 두 번째로는 이미 형성된 태도에 의해 영향을 받는 기존 브랜드에 대한 평가기준이 아닌 새로운 브랜드에 대한 최초의 평가기준을 밝히며 본 연구에서의 "신규 브랜드"는 소비자가 처음으로 점포내를 둘러보고 충분한 직접적 정보를 바탕으로 평가를 한다는 점에서 소비자의 관점에서의 새로운 브랜드로 조작적 정의가 되고 있다는 점이다. 마지막으로 전국적으로 유통되는 대부분의 패션 브랜드가 백화점 내에 입점되는 국내의 현실을 고려하여 소비자가 지각하는 백화점과의 관제의 질과 입점되어 있는 신규 패션 브랜드 평가와의 관련성을 분석하였다 오백 삼십 칠 명의 여성 소비자에 대한 온라인 조사를 통해 신규 패션브랜드를 평가하는 평가기준 요인 (상품 파워, 점포 내 커뮤니케이션, 브랜드 및 회사 이미지, 판매원, VMD, 구색의 다양성)을 도출하고 이들이 브랜드 태도에 미치는 영향을 회귀모형을 통해 검증하였다. 또한 백화점 관제질의 차이에 따른 신규브랜드 평가 기준과 브랜드 태도의 관련성도 분석하였다.

• 한국지역사회생활과학회지
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.373-382
• /
• 2014

This study was explored the relationship of fit-related factors and, clothing evaluation criteria to clothing satisfaction. A total of 247 completed responses were obtained from a convenient sample of female students in their twenties. The statistical analysis methods included factor analysis, an ANOVA, and a multiple regression analysis. First, clothing evaluation criteria included practicality, product trait, and symbolism. Second, a comparison of clothing evaluation criteria and clothing satisfaction in groups divided by fit-related factors showed significant differences. In particular, the fat body type group showed higher level of the product trait and the thin body type group showed lower level of clothing satisfaction. The high activity group showed higher levels of clothing evaluation criteria and lower level of clothing satisfaction. Third, body type perception (-) and activity importance (-), fit-related factors, and practicality (+), clothing evaluation criterion had significant effects on clothing satisfaction. Therefore, These results suggest that fashion firms should make efficient use of fit-related factors and clothing evaluation criteria to enhance consumers' clothing satisfaction and to stimulate their purchase intention toward fashion goods.