• 대한한의학회지
• /
• 제38권3호
• /
• pp.103-110
• /
• 2017

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine trends in duplicate publication in Korean medical articles indexed in the Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System(OASIS). Methods: We searched the list of papers published in Korean medical journals by using OASIS. We randomly extracted 10% of total articles (n=1,162). We searched using OASIS by entering keywords from the title and names of the first and last authors of each indexed article. After the librarian selected the candidates of duplicate publication, three authors reviewed the full texts of the articles independently. When their opinions were not in agreement, reconciliation was made by discussion. The patterns of duplicate publication, such as copy, salami slicing (fragmentation), and aggregation (imalas), were also determined. Results: A total of 1162 articles were evaluated, 24 (2.1%) index articles of which were duplicate articles. Among 24 index articles, Two were triple publications and 22 were double publications. The patterns of duplication publication were as follows; (1) copy (n=8, 33.3%); (2) salami (9, 37.5%), (3) imalas (5, 20.8%) (4) others (2, 8.3%). Conclusion: Duplicate publications have appeared in Korean medical journals in a small proportion. Education on publication ethics and authors'ethical awareness is needed.

• Applied Microscopy
• /
• 제46권2호
• /
• pp.67-70
• /
• 2016

Research ethics are mainly of two fields; research integrity and publication ethics. Research misconducts can occur at both areas. Examples of the research integrity violations are falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism; and those of the publication ethics violations are duplicate publication including self-plagiarism, and improper authorship. In this paper, concepts of research misconducts defined in Research Misconduct-related Rules of The Korean Society of Microscopy are explained and discussed.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.241-242
• /
• 2023

As part of efforts to internally strengthen the research ethics capacity of the Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management, we have compiled research ethics issues that are frequently encountered in public health researches. Firstly, when reusing research reports or dissertations as papers, efforts should be made to avoid unfair duplicate publication. Compliance with the institutional review board exemption process is required, and additional efforts should be devoted during the text recycling process to prevent self-plagiarism or unjust duplicate publication.

• Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics
• /
• 제51권5호
• /
• pp.447-451
• /
• 2008

It is fair to say that there are many ethical issues concerning the publication of medical papers. To define the best practice in the ethics of scientific publishing and a proper understanding of appropriate reporting in medical papers, this review should be useful for authors dealing with ethical issues which involve the protection of human and animal rights, the protection of confidentiality and informed consent, fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, author and authorship, copy right transfer, duplicate publication, conflict of interest, and dealing with misconduct cases.

• Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics
• /
• 제64권5호
• /
• pp.208-222
• /
• 2021

The publication of genetic epidemiology meta-analyses has increased rapidly, but it has been suggested that many of the statistically significant results are false positive. In addition, most such meta-analyses have been redundant, duplicate, and erroneous, leading to research waste. In addition, since most claimed candidate gene associations were false-positives, correctly interpreting the published results is important. In this review, we emphasize the importance of interpreting the results of genetic epidemiology meta-analyses using Bayesian statistics and gene network analysis, which could be applied in other diseases.

• 연구윤리
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.1-6
• /
• 2021

The aims of this study were to examine the causes and types of the most common and serious fraudulent authors among research misconduct, and to examine ways to reduce the mass production of unjust authors. In scientific research, it is universal and efficient to have multiple authors participate. This is because each author group consisting of a team has its own expertise, and most of them participate in research in a complementary way to maximize the research effect. However, the competition for achievements between researchers, the quantitative evaluation system of universities, and the social atmosphere of performance-oriented are tempting researchers to abandon research ethics. In this study, in relation to the research ethics of existing researchers, the contents of research ethics by a few countries such as United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Australia etc. and the situation in Korea was examined as well. In addition, the types and causes of domestic unfair authors in Korea were investigated intensively. In conclusion, in order to no longer produce unfair authors such as compulsory authors, honorary authors, mutually supported authors, and duplicate authors, which researchers unknowingly recognize as co-authors, reinforcement of research ethics education and national organization and system should be supported.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제12권6호
• /
• pp.15-20
• /
• 2014

Purpose - In general, researchers try to abide by the code of research ethics, but many of them are not fully aware of plagiarism, unintentionally committing the research misconduct when they write a research paper. This research aims to introduce researchers a clear and easy guideline at a conference, which helps researchers avoid accidental plagiarism by addressing the issue. This research is expected to contribute building a climate and encouraging creative research among scholars. Research design, data, methodology & Results - Plagiarism is considered a sort of research misconduct along with fabrication and falsification. It is defined as an improper usage of another author's ideas, language, process, or results without giving appropriate credit. Plagiarism has nothing to do with examining the truth or accessing value of research data, process, or results. Plagiarism is determined based on whether a research corresponds to widely-used research ethics, containing proper citations. Within academia, plagiarism goes beyond the legal boundary, encompassing any kind of intentional wrongful appropriation of a research, which was created by another researchers. In summary, the definition of plagiarism is to steal other people's creative idea, research model, hypotheses, methods, definition, variables, images, tables and graphs, and use them without reasonable attribution to their true sources. There are various types of plagiarism. Some people assort plagiarism into idea plagiarism, text plagiarism, mosaic plagiarism, and idea distortion. Others view that plagiarism includes uncredited usage of another person's work without appropriate citations, self-plagiarism (using a part of a researcher's own previous research without proper citations), duplicate publication (publishing a researcher's own previous work with a different title), unethical citation (using quoted parts of another person's research without proper citations as if the parts are being cited by the current author). When an author wants to cite a part that was previously drawn from another source the author is supposed to reveal that the part is re-cited. If it is hard to state all the sources the author is allowed to mention the original source only. Today, various disciplines are developing their own measures to address these plagiarism issues, especially duplicate publications, by requiring researchers to clearly reveal true sources when they refer to any other research. Conclusions - Research misconducts including plagiarism have broad and unclear boundaries which allow ambiguous definitions and diverse interpretations. It seems difficult for researchers to have clear understandings of ways to avoid plagiarism and how to cite other's works properly. However, if guidelines are developed to detect and avoid plagiarism considering characteristics of each discipline (For example, social science and natural sciences might be able to have different standards on plagiarism.) and shared among researchers they will likely have a consensus and understanding regarding the issue. Particularly, since duplicate publications has frequently appeared more than plagiarism, academic institutions will need to provide pre-warning and screening in evaluation processes in order to reduce mistakes of researchers and to prevent duplicate publications. What is critical for researchers is to clearly reveal the true sources based on the common citation rules and to only borrow necessary amounts of others' research.

• 한국발생생물학회지:발생과생식
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.71-76
• /
• 2011

연구윤리(혹은 연구진실성)는 과학 사회의 건강성을 유지시키는 역할 때문에 학계, 정부는 물론 과학계에 종사하지 않는 일반인들로부터 주목 받고 있다. 이 논문에서는 대표적인 연구부정인 표절을 다룬 유용한 논문들을 소개하고자 한다. 일반적으로, 연구 결과는 독창성(originality), 정확성(accuracy), 재현성(reproducibility), 정밀성(precision) 그리고 연구윤리(research ethics)가 보장되어야 한다. 표절의 정의는 "적절한 언급이나 인정 없이 다른 사람의 말이나 글, 또는 아이디어를 도용하는 것이다." 표절은 간혹 데이터의 위조와 변조보다는 경미한 연구부정으로 고려되기도 하지만, 본질적으로 그 속성은 지적 산물의 절도에 해당한다. 표절은 논문 출판 단계에만 국한해서 일어나는 것이 아니라, 연구제안과 연구수행 그리고 종설 논문 작성과정으로 확장될 수 있다. 표절의 정의를 확대하면, 중복 출판은 자기표절로 간주할 수 있다. 표절을 방지하기 위해서는 과학 사회 모든 구성원들의 정직한 노력이 요구된다. 먼저, 연구자들은 자신들의 과학적인 작업수행에 있어서 투명성(transparency)과 진실성 내지 고결성(integrity)을 유지해야 한다. 편집위원회 구성원들과 심사자들은 임무 수행과정에서 공평함과 충분한 자격을 유지해야 한다. 정부와 연구 재단들은 과학 사회에 표절 방지를 위한 재정적, 정책적 지원을 아낌없이 해야 한다. 향상된 편집 서비스, 표절 방지 프로그램 활용, 그리고 정직한 과학논문을 쓰는 방법에 대한 철저한 교육은 과학 사회의 건전한 기반을 구축하는데 기여할 것이다.

• 대한예방한의학회지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.75-87
• /
• 2016

Objectives : This study aims to classify and analyze literature related to moire topography, as a diagnostic device of Korean medicine, discuss research trends and major results, and demonstrate the value of moire topography. Methods : To investigate moire topography research trends, Korean keywords that signify 'moire' were searched in a Korean journal search engine. Initially, 2,988 papers were found in the research, and, after classifying them and removing those that are duplicate in other databases, only 37 papers were applicable for the literature review in this study. To analyze research trends, the 37 papers were analyzed based on the publication year, research field, journal, and research type, and, clinical articles were classified based on the diagnosis purpose, subject characteristics, diagnosis method, test method, and test result, for analysis. Results : Moire topography research in South Korea was first conducted in 1995 and most active in 2003, mostly in the field of Korean medicine. In the journal analysis, The Journal of Korea CHUNA Manual Medicine for Spine & Nerves published the highest number of papers, most of which were clinical articles and the rest were literature review. And, in the analysis of clinical papers, based on the diagnosis purpose, muscle somatotype measurement was most common, followed by diagnosis of scoliosis. In terms of subjects, most studies focused on elementary, middle, and high school students, and, in terms of the diagnosis method, other tests were used in most studies. The analysis of moire topography methods showed that most studies measured the shoulder, back, and hip, and the most common measurement method in the studies measured the difference in contour lines on the left and right by designating a central line of the body. In terms of the result, most moire topography brought about significant diagnosis results, and many studies demonstrated its use for musculoskeletal diseases in particular. Conclusions : Moire topography is believed to be highly significant for diagnosis and treatment of musculoskeletal diseases and further research will be needed to support it.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제41권1호
• /
• pp.313-338
• /
• 2024

이 연구에서는 국내 문헌정보학 학술지 논문의 사사표기 유형을 파악하고, 유형에 따라 학술지 논문의 계량서지적 특성에 차이가 있는지를 알아보고자 하였다. 분석을 위해서 국내 문헌정보학 분야 대표 학술지 4종에 2013년부터 2021년까지 9년간 게재된 논문 2,143편의 사사표기와 참고문헌, 인용횟수를 데이터로 확보하였다. 전체 논문 중에서 61.2%인 1,311편에 실린 사사표기 1,433건의 내용을 분석하여 유형을 나눈 다음, 각 유형에 해당하는 논문의 계량서지적 특성을 살펴보았다. 사사표기 유형은 크게 '윤리(중복게재회피)'와 '감사' 유형으로 양분되었으며, 각각 9가지와 10가지로 세분할 수 있었다. 계량서지적 특성으로 참고문헌 수, 참고문헌의 최신성, 인용도를 살펴본 결과 모든 특성이 사사표기 유형별로 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다.