• Title/Summary/Keyword: Decision Hierarchy

Search Result 574, Processing Time 0.029 seconds

A Study on the Determinant Factor Analysis for the Characterization of Saemangeum New Port (새만금신항만 특화에 관한 결정요인 분석에 관한 연구)

  • Kim, Nam-Suk;Choe, Do-Won;Jeon, Young-Hwan
    • Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
    • /
    • v.28 no.1
    • /
    • pp.263-288
    • /
    • 2012
  • This study aims to define which factors will contribute to vitalization of Saemangeum New Port to secure international competitiveness in order to attract international shipping companies, shippers and forwarders in constructing Saemangeum New Port, and to propose subsequent implications. For research methods of the current study, a factor analysis and a decision making method of analytic hierarchy process(AHP) were used. Through precedent studies, total 11 measuring variables were selected including short entrance and exit channels, main infrastructure development project, tax cut and deregulation, and through a factor analysis, total 3 high rank evaluation factors including 'location and facilities', 'surrounding infrastructure and hydrophile property', and 'local policy and environment'. Analysis results summarizing a test of reliability of measuring variables in this study indicate that as Cronbach alpha coefficient of total 11 measuring variables were turned out to be over 0.8, it is surpassing general average 0.6, which means there is reliability.

An Application of Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS Methodology for Ranking the Factors Influencing FinTech Adoption Intention: A Comparative Study of China and Korea (FinTech 채택 의도에 영향을 미치는 요소의 순위 결정을 위한 Fuzzy AHP 및 TOPSIS 방법론의 적용 : 중국과 한국의 비교 연구)

  • Mu, Hong-Lei;Lee, Young-Chan
    • Journal of Service Research and Studies
    • /
    • v.7 no.4
    • /
    • pp.51-68
    • /
    • 2017
  • Financial technology (FinTech) is an emerging financial service sector include innovations in financial literacy and investment, retail banking, education, and crypto-currencies like bitcoin. One of the crucial branch of financial technology-third-party payment (TPP) is undergoing rapid growth, with online/mobile systems replacing offline financial systems. System quality and user attitudes are key perceptions driving third-party payment usage, the importance of these perceptions, however, may be different with countries as users' thinking varies from country to country. Thus, the purpose of this study is to elaborate how factors differ from China to Korea by drawing on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT2). Additionally, this study also aims to propose a multi-attribute evaluation of the third-party online payment system based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy sets and technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), to examine the relative importance of the perceptions influencing new technology adoption intention. The results showed that the price value has the most significant influence on Chinese perceptions, while the perceived credibility has the most significant effect on Korean perceptions. Sub-criteria also performs different results to Chinese and Korean third-party online payment system.

Safety Management Framework for Information Handover Effectiveness in the Construction Industry (건설 안전관리 개념적 틀 및 정보이양 효율성 분석)

  • JIN, Zhenhui;JUNG, Youngsoo
    • Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • /
    • v.21 no.4
    • /
    • pp.50-61
    • /
    • 2020
  • Safety management has been one of the most critical issues in the construction industry for a long time. Despite continuous efforts, it still shows a higher accident rate than other sectors. To reduce the accident rate, a lot of studies have been performed, mostly focused on contractors or construction phase. Although the initial stage of the construction project has the most significant impact on construction safety and decision-makers at the initial stage play an important role, the safety management system throughout the project entire life-cycle is still insufficient. In addition, although a great deal of information is generated in the construction project and the value is increasing, while it shows an inefficient aspect. This is believed to be due to insufficient information exchange and a lack of standards. In this context, this study aims to analyze the efficiency of information handover in construction safety. For this purpose, a safety management framework for systematically and efficiently managing and utilizing for construction safety information is referred to as 'safety business functions', 'project life-cycle', and 'industrial hierarchy'. The 'safety business functions' are classified into three levels. And then, in order to analyze the efficiency of safety information handover, 'importance of safety business function' and 'efficiency of safety information handover' were evaluated by interviewing with experts. This study can be used as reference data for implementing systematical and efficient safety management, and can also increase construction safety competency.

(A) Study on the Priority Selection for business development of the Defense Education and Training System Based on Virtual Reality (가상현실 기반 국방 교육훈련체계 사업화 우선순위 선정에 관한 연구)

  • Lee, Se-Ho;Han, Seung-Jo
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.20 no.3
    • /
    • pp.201-209
    • /
    • 2022
  • In order for the military to review the introduction of virtual reality technology into various education and training systems and fully utilize it, it is important to reflect the characteristics of the technology and education system and to accurately identify and selectively apply the characteristics of commercialization. In this study, the evaluation criteria were selected through the Analitic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method for factors to be considered when commercializing a virtual reality-based education and training system, and the priorities of the projects were determined. Based on previous studies, an initial AHP model was constructed and the relative importance of six factors, including reality, was analyzed as the level 1 evaluation criteria. Next, for Level 2, each evaluation criterion was evaluated to confirm the importance of each of the 11 tasks in the six evaluation criteria, and priorities were selected for each task. As a result of the analysis, level 1 showed that reality and ripple had higher importance than other factors. As a result of evaluating the final relative importance, the priority was shown in the order of ① flight training, ② disaster training, ③ shooting Training, and ④ driving a vehicle. Based on the relative priorities determined in Levels 1 and 2 of the model presented in this study, the importance of each project necessary for final decision-making of the research priorities for the defense virtual reality project was presented. It is expected that this study can be used as a reference material for prioritizing the commercialization of education and training systems in the defense sector.

Graphical Expression Method for Decision Process Support (의사결정을 돕는 실감가시화 방안에 관한 연구)

  • Park, Ji-Hyung;Lee, Joong-Ho;Yeom, Ki-Won;Lee, Seung-Soo;Eom, Ju-Il
    • 한국HCI학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 2006.02a
    • /
    • pp.865-870
    • /
    • 2006
  • HCI 연구의 주된 주제는 인간중심의 상호작용 환경의 개발이다. 이러한 개발과정에서 새로운 인터페이스 환경이 실생활에 어떠한 기능적 효용가치를 가져다 줄 것인가에 관한 문제가 중요하게 고려되어야 한다. 이를 위해 실질적인 적용사례 구축을 통해 효용성을 입증하는 것이 필요하다. 또한, 최근의 HCI는 기존의 인터페이스 수단을 대체하는 것을 목적으로 개발되어 왔으나, 보다 발전된 접근방법으로서 기존의 인터페이스가 소화할 수 없었던 상호작용의 의미론적 요소들을 다루는 것이 필요할 것이다. 이러한 맥락에서 기존 컴퓨팅 환경에서의 문제해결 프로세스의 한 예를 고찰하고 이것이 새로운 HCI환경에서 효과적인 방법으로 어떻게 구현될 수 있는가에 대한 구체적인 사례를 연구하였다. 본 논문은 문제해결의 한 예로서, '복수개의 결정사안 중 최선의 방안을 도출하는 의사결정과정'에서 HCI를 접목한 효과적인 의사결정 프로세스를 제안하고 이의 효용성을 검증한다. 이러한 의사결정 방법론으로 기존에 사용되는 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process)가 대표적이다. 일반적으로 AHP는 각 고려인자간 쌍대비교(pairwise comparisons)를 통해 중요도를 평가하는 과정을 포함한다. 이 과정을 통해 각각의 인자간의 쌍대비교치를 결정한 후 일련의 계산과정을 거쳐 그 결과를 도출한다. 이 작업은 통상적인 데스크탑 컴퓨터 환경에서 이루어진다. 본 논문에서는 각 인자간의 쌍대비교를 통한 우선순위를 결정하는 과정에서 새로운 인터페이스 환경의 적용을 위한 효과적인 연산 알고리즘을 제안하고 이의 효용성을 검증한다. 또한 의사결정 과정의 직관적 가시화를 위해 기본적인 프리미티므 도형으로 이루어진 그래픽 인터페이스를 구현하고, 기존의 의사결정 과정과 그 효용성을 비교한다.

  • PDF

Activating Strategy of Free Trade Zone in Pyeongtaek Port (평택항 자유무역지역의 활성화 방안 연구)

  • Jung, Hyun-Jae;Lee, Dong-Hyon
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.16 no.9
    • /
    • pp.115-123
    • /
    • 2018
  • This study aims to analyze the importance of activating factors in the companies operating in the free trade zone of Pyeongtaek Port by using hierarchical analytical decision making method and suggest implications according to the analysis results. As a result of analyzing the importance of the five factors, it was found that most of the companies in the free trade zone of Pyeongtaek Port were aware of the infrastructure factor (0.330), finance and budget (0.223), organization and operation (0.188), manpower (0.119) in order of importance. In detail, the expansion of the route was recognized as the most important improvement. and Manufacturing companies were judged to be a more important factor in improving the entry conditions of manufacturers and strengthening the distribution of value added. In logistics companies, the importance of manpower is higher than manufacturing companies. The implications for the results of the analysis are diversification of route in Pyeongtaek Port, improvement of the infrastructure near the free trade zone, and The need for institutional improvements. Also, in the future, we suggest the necessity of activation research for non - residents.

Methodology for Prioritizing Sidewalk Construction among 100 Candidate Sites on Rural National Highways (지방부 국도에서의 보도설치 우선순위 결정을 위한 방법론 개발 (일반국도 적용사례 중심으로))

  • Jeon, Woo Hoon;Yang, Choong Heon;Yoon, Jung Eun;Yang, Inchul
    • International Journal of Highway Engineering
    • /
    • v.17 no.4
    • /
    • pp.127-133
    • /
    • 2015
  • PURPOSES: The purpose of this study is to develop a methodology to prioritize sidewalk construction on rural national highways. METHODS : In order to determine an appropriate prioritization for sidewalk construction, we developed a specific methodology. The proposed methodology includes three main steps: 1) Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods, 2) Subjective evaluation of relevant road agencies for the candidate sidewalks along rural national highways, and 3) Field study conduction. Each step has four phases. The primary feature of this methodology is the addition of expert consultation and survey data, as well as a field study. In addition, the method could guarantee flexibility in selection for evaluation criteria. As a result, the proposed methodology could be used as a general procedure for application to other roadway classifications when considering sidewalk construction. RESULTS: In order to demonstrate the reasonableness of the proposed methodology, a case study was performed for exactly 100 candidate sites for sidewalk construction on rural national highways. All required evaluation scores were properly produced for each candidate site. By doing so, decision-makers can determine the priority for sidewalk construction at these sites by reviewing quantitatively and qualitatively considered data. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the case study can be applied to a long-term fundamental plan for sidewalk construction on rural national highways. Furthermore, this methodology could be employed to prioritize a small-scale SOC project(e. g. bicycle or pedestrian roads).

On the Consideration of Logistics Network Establishment and Priority Evaluation between Korea and China Using AHP method (AHP법을 이용한 한중간 물류네트워크 구축에 따른 우선과제 평가에 관한 연구)

  • Yeo, Gi-Tae;Park, Chang-Ho;Seo, Su-Wan
    • Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
    • /
    • v.20 no.2
    • /
    • pp.169-185
    • /
    • 2004
  • It is an urgent problem that Korea logistics enteprises' expansion of advance into China market and the logistics network establishment between Korea and China to back up the former are to be solved. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to deduce the subjects to establish the logistics network between Korea and China, and to evaluate the priority order. The results of this research are as follows: First, we conducted face-to-face interviews on the advisery group in China and Korean enterprises which advanced into China, and drew out 6 promoting subjects to build the logistics network between the two. Second, the AHP model was adopted, which is a multi-criteria?multi-hierarchical decision making method, to draw out the weight and priority order of the deduced 6 promoting items. Third, the resultant priority order of the promoting subjects is as follows: No.1 - to establish the distribution & logistics support center by region(0.3900); No.2 - to support various taxes in investing the logistics business abroad(0.1980) ; No.3 - to improve the management of CIQ(0.1958); No.4 - to back up the joint-venture of logistics firms(0.1169); No.5 - to enhance trade and foreign policies to deregulate the entry into logistics markets(0.0536); No.6 - to construct the logistics information system of China(Northest Ssia)(0.0458). This paper resulted in finding out Korea logistics enterprises that have not secured their own inland-transport network in China and the actual difficulties of Korean enterprises with using the inferior network that advanced into China. These problems were developed into the analysis adopting the AHP method, and the significancy of this paper is to present the priority order of promoting problems using a sophisticated technique.

  • PDF

Evidence based practice within the complementary medicine context

  • McLean, Lisa;Micalos, Peter Steve;McClean, Rhett;Pak, Sok Cheon
    • CELLMED
    • /
    • v.6 no.3
    • /
    • pp.15.1-15.4
    • /
    • 2016
  • Evidence based practice (EBP) is a system of applying the most current and valid high quality evidence to support clinical decision making in a healthcare setting. In the twenty five years since its inception, EBP has become the accepted benchmark for excellence in healthcare. Although the system emerged within the biomedical sciences, in the years since EBP has become normative across all healthcare modalities from dentistry, allied health to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Practicing evidence based medicine within any modality potentially offers the patient the best available care based on high quality evidence. Yet it is the nature of the evidence that provokes some questions about the suitability of EBP across all modalities of healthcare. The meta analysis of randomized controlled trial (RCT) stands at the pinnacle of the hierarchy of evidence in EBP. This forms a challenge to CAM due to the difficulty in reducing the elementals of a holistic naturopathic assessment of a patient into an answerable question to be tested within a RCT. On one level this makes EBP paradigmatically incompatible with CAM, yet on another level it presents the opportunity to redefine the parameters of what is considered high level evidence. EBP has become a tool, and at times a weapon wielded by governments and health insurance companies to direct healthcare funding and policy. The implications of the nature of accepted evidence are becoming far reaching. The pursuit of the best available healthcare for each individual is the focus of EBP. However, the injudicious use of this system to direct health policy is fraught with biomedical bias and dominance. This issue raises the challenge to CAM to present high level evidence according to the rules of evidence, or face the annihilation of centuries of empirical knowledge.

The Method of Value System Management to support decision-making of Urban Regeneration Project (도시재생사업의 의사결정 지원을 위한 가치체계 관리 방안)

  • Kang, Hyun-Koo;Yu, Jung-Ho;Kim, Chang-Duk;Son, Bo-Sik
    • Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • /
    • v.10 no.4
    • /
    • pp.139-150
    • /
    • 2009
  • Objective of Urban regeneration is a recovery of urban utilities through a physical, environmental, cultural, industrial and economic regeneration. The current paradigm of urban regeneration is not a simple redevelopment as physical redevelopment or improvement. This study is proposed that value system management applied the benefit management, value system, Quality Function deployment for a value conflict of urban regeneration. There is a reason to conflict value that value system is unstructured. Because this study is proposed to establish the process of value system, and applied this process to Se-woon 4th area urban regeneration project. This study is analyzed to divide value system of urban regeneration program into city level, district level, zone level in district. An analysis of value system obtained through '2020 urban master plan', 'the downtown recreate a comprehensive plan', 'Se-woon New town plan'. It is proposed that value system management method through Between values correlation analysis and the order of priority deduction. These are obtained to use Delphi technique and Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)