• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제7권4호
• /
• pp.164-176
• /
• 2006

Conflict may occur during teamwork activities. Conflict is the incompatibility of interest of participants; hence, it is more common in a wide varied activities involved construction field. Goals and values involve positive or negative features and are therefore common sources of conflict in construction field. Excessive conflict is a major hindrance to the effective operation of a team. If the conflict is not managed timely and properly, it could be transformed into a big dispute, thus to avoid these situation, it is necessary to augment working together culture. This paper aims to identify project team working factors and to uncover underlying relationships between these factors. A questionnaire survey was used to collect data from professionals. Factor analysis was employed to categorize twenty-one teamwork items evaluated by 169 respondents working in three major construction parties namely, owners, consultants and contractors. Factor analysis uncover that these team work factors can be grouped under three categories titled as: integrative working culture, relationship building and trust building. Multiple regression analysis however, showed that relationship building factor does not influence job satisfaction of project participants. Results of this study can be used as a tool to strengthening relationship between project participants in the construction industry.

• 대한기관윤리심의기구협의회지
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.23-31
• /
• 2020

Purpose: To obtain opinions from Korean Institutional Review Board (IRB) members' self-evaluation on ability to conduct fairness review of clinical trial protocol with presence of conflict of interest and from investigators and IRB members on financial conflict of interest through surveying. Methods: IRB members and researchers in 9 different hospitals were asked to answer survey questions via email. Results: Responders were 115 personnel (IRB Chair/vice 18, medical member 30, non-medical member 28, and researcher 39) from 9 centers. Compared to IRB medical members, IRB chair/vice respondents scored higher with statistically significance on 10 point scale (8.44±1.381 vs. 7.30±1.685, p=0.005) when asked to self-evaluate fairness reviewing a protocol proposed by an investigator from the same department and a protocol from the company that supports the scientific committee of responders. When reviewing a protocol proposed by a hospital director, non-medical members scored statistically significantly higher than medical-members (7.47±1.76 vs. 8.07±2.70, p=0.034). When asked about the limitation of labor fee for principal investigator on phase 3 Human clinical trials of the Investigational new drug, while the responses range was wide, 60% answered that labor cost of principal investigator should be less than 30% of total budget for clinical trials with a budget of 100 million won. 51.3% answered that there is no need to disclose the labor cost of the principal investigator in the consent form. Since every investigator can be influenced unconsciously by conflict of interest, the answer that 'responder agrees that there is need for management' was the most chosen answer (IRB member 61.8%, investigator 64.1%, multiple answers allowed). Conclusion: Considering scores on questions of fairness by IRB members were between 7.23-8.56 on scale of 0 to 10 point when IRB members were asked about reviewing a clinical trial protocol, it cannot be said with absolute certainty that there is no issue regarding fairness in the review process. Therefore, there should be more ways to safeguard fairness for these issues. There is a need that the disclosure amount of honorarium from sponsor should be lower than 100 million Korean won. Considering the results of the survey in which respondents expressed their thoughts, it is likely that more education on the concept of conflict of interest is needed.

• 한국발생생물학회지:발생과생식
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.477-482
• /
• 2013

Science in the 21st century does not consider participants' welfare, safety and human rights in clinical studies, but modern science puts economic profits in its priority. This leads to a growing concern about social responsibility and professionalism ethics of companies, sponsors and scientists. Specifically, there is no way to control conflicts of participants' welfare with economic profits, leading to simply relying on individual ethics, social responsibilities and audit. This paper helps relevant agencies and people involved understand conflict of interest. Also this study presents the guidelines as well as independence, autonomy, ethical imagination and phronesis required for scientists.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.2495-2504
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 도시정비사업의 효율적 추진에 영향을 미치는 갈등요인을 구축하고, 사업기간과 사업비용에 영향을 미치는 갈등요인을 PLS 회귀분석을 통해 도출하고자 한다. 자료 구축은 도시정비가 완료된 사업지역에 거주하고 있는 조합원, 세입자, 상인 등을 중심으로 하였다. 분석결과 사업기간의 경우 조합설립신청 및 인가, 철거 및 멸실신고, 사업시행계획 및 승인, 용역관련 이익집단의 사업지연 방해 등의 순으로 갈등요인이 중요한 것으로 도출되었으며, 사업비용의 경우 조합설립신청 및 인가, 매도청구, 이주, 철거 및 멸실신고, 관리처분계획 및 인가 등의 순으로 갈등요인이 중요한 것으로 나타났다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제78권
• /
• pp.31-51
• /
• 2018

As International arbitration has increased in popularity, there has been an expansion in the pool of arbitrators, and a commensurate diversification of not only the legal backgrounds but cultural backgrounds among themand among parties. As a result, there has been increased attention on the standards used to evaluate arbitrators' conduct and ethics, especially among them, 'Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrator' which is a precondition for an acceptable awards. There is no international treaty or code governing these issues. But the International Bar Association(IBA) seems to be leading the way such as establishing practical guidelines regarding to impartiality and independence of arbitrator. This article will review some theories, cases about impartiality and independence of arbitrator, and practical standards through the IBA guidelines. It is intended to provide specific guidance and criteria to the arbitrators, parties and counsels. And also it is expected to prevent unnecessary delays in arbitration proceedings in advance and filing for the annulment of arbitral awards because of lack of impartiality and independence of arbitrator as well.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.354-365
• /
• 2007

이 연구는 작용 반작용 과제와 전기회로 과제에서 인지갈등 정도와 실험결과 예측에 따른 대학생의 인지갈등 특성을 알아보는 데 목적이 있다. 연구대상은 일반물리실험을 수강중인 공과 대학 학생 147명이었다. 인지갈등 정도와, 예측이 실험결과와 일치하는가를 기준으로 학생들을 네 집단으로 나누어 학생들의 응답을 분석하였다. 첫째, 작용 반작용 과제에서는 실험결과를 의심하고 오류를 찾아내려고 하는 경향을 나타내었으나, 전기회로 과제에서는 현상을 그대로 인정하는 경향이 나타났다. 둘째, 인지갈등 정도에 따라 인지갈등 요인별 응답 원인이 다르다. 학생의 인지갈등은 학생의 과거 지식, 경험, 학습습관, 학습동기, 인식론적 신념 등의 영향을 받는다. 인지갈등 점수가 높은 학생은 불일치 상황을 잘 인식하고 자신이 모르는 것을 지각하고 있었고, 재평가의 의지가 높았다. 반면에 인지갈등 점수가 낮은 학생들은 상황을 의심 없이 받아들이는 경향이 있었고 물리에 대한 관심이 적었다. 결론적으로, 이 연구는 이러한 응답특성을 근거로 학생과 과제의 특성을 파악하고 그에 따른 적절한 인지갈등 전략이 마련될 필요가 있음을 제안하였다.

• 한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.541-562
• /
• 2018

메시지 제시는 개인의 태도 및 의사결정 행동 변화를 설득하는 대표적인 방법으로, 실용성과 효과성 간 균형을 고려할 때 이익충돌 상황에서 발생 가능한 여러 문제에 대한 효율적인 해결 방안 중 하나이다. 메시지의 프레이밍과 반복은 메시지의 설득 효과에 영향을 주는 두 주요한 변인이나, 이를 이익충돌과 도덕적 의사결정에 적용하여 탐색한 연구는 부재한다. 본 연구에서는 도덕성 점화 설득 메시지의 프레이밍 유형과 도덕성을 점화하는 설득 메시지의 반복 횟수에 따른 사익추구행동의 차이가 있는지 검증하였다. 이를 위해, 대학생 63명(남: 35명, 여: 28명)을 메시지 프레이밍 유형에 따라 세 가지 조건(긍정적 프레이밍 조건, 부정적 프레이밍 조건, 비점화 조건)으로 무선할당한 뒤, 이익충돌 상황에서 가상의 파트너에게 자문을 하는 웹 기반 컴퓨터 실험을 통해 각 조건에서 도덕성 점화 설득 메시지를 4회 반복 제시하였다. 연구 결과, 메시지 반복 횟수와 메시지 프레이밍 유형 간 상호작용이 유의하지 않았으나, 메시지 프레이밍 유형의 주효과 및 반복 횟수의 주효과는 모두 유의한 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 긍정적 프레이밍 집단이 비점화 집단에 비해 낮은 수준의 사익추구행동을 보였으며, 메시지 반복과 사익추구행동 간 U자 형태의 이차 함수 관계가 확인되었다. 이 같은 결과를 바탕으로 본 연구의 함의와 의의에 더불어 한계점 및 후속 연구를 위한 제언을 논의하였다.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제44권4호
• /
• pp.312-318
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 마리나 개발 결정요인을 실증적으로 분석하여 마리나 개발을 활성화하고, '2차 마리나 항만 기본계획'의 효과적인 이행과 마리나 산업발전을 위한 기초자료를 제공하기 위해 수행되었다. 연구목적을 달성하기 위해 3개 권역 5곳의 마리나 개발지역에 거주하는 지역민 356명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 마리나 개발 결정요인으로는 일반적 특성인 연령, 소득수준, 이해집단, 거주지역 그리고 갈등원인인 집단 이기주의, 개발과정 배제, 환경문제 요인이 포함되었으며, 종속변수로는 마리나 개발 찬/반 여부(찬성/반대)와 마리나 개발 갈등유형(이익갈등, 가치갈등)으로 이분화된 데이터를 활용하였다. 수집된 유효표본은 SPSS 25.0 통계프로그램을 활용하여 기술통계, 요인분석, 신뢰도분석 그리고 로지스틱 회귀분석을 실시하여 다음과 같은 결과를 도출하였다. 첫째, 마리나 개발 찬/반 결정요인 분석결과 인구통계학적 특성 중 연령, 소득수준, 이해집단, 거주지역, 거주기간 요인이 마리나 개발 찬/반 여부에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 마리나 개발 찬/반 결정요인 분석결과 갈등원인에서는 집단이기주의 요인과 개발과정 배제 요인이 마리나 개발 찬/반 여부에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 마리나 개발 갈등유형 결정요인 분석결과 인구통계학적 특성 중 연령, 소득수준, 거주지역 요인이 마리나 개발 갈등유형에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

• 농촌계획
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.41-52
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study is to identify the conflict between residents and governments in partnership arising from the designation of National Important Agricultural Heritage for Damyang Samdari village and to suggest directions for improvement. To this end, residents of Samdari Village in Damyang, designated as an important national agricultural heritage, were interviewed. Interviews were analyzed through grounded theory, categorized into open coding, axial coding, and selective coding, and a paradigm model was constructed. Through this, the central phenomena of resident participation patterns currently appearing in the village were identified, and causal, contextual, and intervening conditions were analyzed. Causal conditions were analyzed as one-sided administrative treatment, assortment matching project, one-time plan, excessive dependence of residents and economic damages of residents at the beginning of the designation of national important agricultural heritage. As a result, conflict between residents and local governments occurred as a central phenomenon, and contextual conditions such as decline in the competitive of bamboo resources and frequent change in managers were also affecting the central phenomenon. As intervening conditions to alleviate the central phenomenon, there are local government's purchase of bamboo fields and fragmentary business effects. The action taken by the residents and officials in response to a fixed conflict is called an action-interaction strategy. Residents refused to change and settled in reality, and local governments avoided conflict. From the beginning of the designation to the present, the villagers gradually lost interest in the National Important Agricultural Heritage due to problems and conflicts that occurred in the process of forming a partnership in the National Important Agricultural Heritage project. Based on the analyzed model, a plan to build the partnership standards on Damyang bamboo field to secure the sustainability of the field and increase the practicality of resident participation, that is partnership, was suggested.

• 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국디지털정책학회 2006년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.39-44
• /
• 2006

The purport of this paper is to deduce political implication and significance of the proposed redress scheme of 'Consumer Collective Lawsuit (hereinunder "CCL")' under way to be introduced by the Korean government via various assessments per each phase of policy implementation process. To this end, the paper classifies the subject policy (referring to CCL) implementation process into 4 phases: policy origination, policy enactment, policy advertisement, and policy execution. Based on the said classification, assessments per each phase together with pros and cons analysis have been conducted. Through the aforementioned analysis, the paper concludes the following political implication and significance of CCL under way of introduction: - 1. In the case of policy origination led by external parties, a social consensus by and from involved parties with various interests is the most critical; 2. Prior feasibility and/or suitability study is also crucial in the policy implementation procedure; 3. To mitigate inter-ministerial conflicts that might arise from the due policy making procedure, democratization of conflict settlement mechanism, and institutionalization of participation in and disclosure of policy making process are cal led upon; and 4. Prior planning wi th respect to the public relation and advertisements of the subject policy on the table poses substantial significance.