Browse > Article

Analysis of Relationship between Teamwork Attitude and the Job Satisfaction of Project Participants  

Acharya Nirmal Kumar (부경대학교 대학원 토목공학과)
Kim Hyung-Soo (부경대학교 대학원 건설관리공학협동과정)
Lee Young-Dai (부경대학교 건설공학부)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management / v.7, no.4, 2006 , pp. 164-176 More about this Journal
Abstract
Conflict may occur during teamwork activities. Conflict is the incompatibility of interest of participants; hence, it is more common in a wide varied activities involved construction field. Goals and values involve positive or negative features and are therefore common sources of conflict in construction field. Excessive conflict is a major hindrance to the effective operation of a team. If the conflict is not managed timely and properly, it could be transformed into a big dispute, thus to avoid these situation, it is necessary to augment working together culture. This paper aims to identify project team working factors and to uncover underlying relationships between these factors. A questionnaire survey was used to collect data from professionals. Factor analysis was employed to categorize twenty-one teamwork items evaluated by 169 respondents working in three major construction parties namely, owners, consultants and contractors. Factor analysis uncover that these team work factors can be grouped under three categories titled as: integrative working culture, relationship building and trust building. Multiple regression analysis however, showed that relationship building factor does not influence job satisfaction of project participants. Results of this study can be used as a tool to strengthening relationship between project participants in the construction industry.
Keywords
Teamwork; Culture; Construction field; Project participants; Job satisfaction;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Mandell, M.P. and Steelman, T.A. (2003), 'Understanding what can be accomplished through interorganizational innovations: The importance of typologies, context and management strategies', Public Management Review (Routledge), Vol. 5(2), 197-224   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Mavondo, F.T. and Rodrigo, E.M. (2001), 'The effect of relationship dimensions on interpersonal and interorganizational commitment in organizations conducting business between Australia and China', Journal of Business Research (Elsevier), Vol. 52, 111-121   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Rahman, M.M. and Kumaraswamy, M.M., (2004). 'Contracting Relationship trends and Transitions,' Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 20(4), 147-161   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Phua, F.T.T., and Rowlinson, S. (2004), 'How important is cooperation to construction project success? A grounded empirical quantification', Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 11(1), 45-54   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Bresnen, M. and Marshall, N. (2000), 'Building partnerships: case studies of client-contractor collaboration in the UK construction industry', Construction Management and Economics (Taylor and Francis), Vol. 18, 819-832   DOI
6 Leung, M.Y., Liu, A.M.M., and Ng, S.T. (2005), 'Is there a relationship between construction conflicts and participants' satisfaction?' Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, (Emerald), Vol. 12(2), 149-167   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Thevendran, V. and Mawdesley, M.J. (2004), 'Perception of human risk factors in construction projects: an exploratory study,' International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 22, 131-137   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Staneart, D. (2005), 'Workplace conflict resolution tips', URL: (October 14, 2005)
9 Chan, A.P.C., Ho, D.C.K., and Tam, C.M. (2001), 'Effect of interorganizational teamwork on project outcome', Journal of Management in Engineering (ASCE), Vol. 17(1), 34-40   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Hausman, A. (2001), 'Variations in relationship strength and its impact on performance and satisfaction in business relationships,' Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing (Emerald), Vol. 16(7), 600-616   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Stanek, M. B., (2004). 'Measuring alliance value and risk: A model approach to prioritizing alliance projects,' Management Decision (Emerald), Vol. 42(2), 182-204   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Nguyen, L.D., Ogunlana, S.O., and Lan, D.T.X. (2004), 'A study on project success factor in large construction projects in Vietnam,' Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 11(6), 404-413   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Rokkan, A.I. and Haugland, S.A. (2002), 'Developing relational exchange Effectiveness and power,' European Journal of Marketing (Emerald), Vol. 36(1/2), 211-230   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Uher, T.E. and Toakley, A.R. (1999), 'Risk management in the conceptual phase of a project.' International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 17(3), 161-169   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Field, A. (2005), 'Factor analysis using SPSS,' C8057 (Research Methods II): Factor Analysis on SPSS, URL address:
16 Coetzee, M. (2005), 'The fairness of affirmative action: an organizational justice perspective,'PhD. thesis, University of Pretoria, South Africa, URL address:
17 Munns, A.K. (1995), 'Potential influence of trust on the successful completion of a project', International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 13(1), 19-24   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Drexler Jr. J.A., and Larson, E.W. (2000), 'Partnering: Why project owner-contractor relationships change', Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, (ASCE), Vol. 126(4), 293-297   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Muhmin, A.G.A. (2005), 'Instrumental and interpersonal determinants of relationship satisfaction and commitment in industrial markets,' Journal of Business Research (Elsevier), Vol. 58, 619-628   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Ayas, K. (1996), 'Professional project management: a shift towards learning and a knowledge creating structure', International Journal of Project Management, (Elseiver), Vol. 14(3), 131-136   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Slater, T. S. (1998). 'Feature: Partnering: Agreeing to agree', Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 14(6), 48-50
22 Cheung, S.O. (1999), 'Critical factors affecting the use of alternative dispute resolution processes in construction,' International Journal of Project Management (Elsevier), Vol. 17(3), 189-194   DOI   ScienceOn