• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.91-99
• /
• 1990

By the comparative analysis of middle school Home Economics curricula in the U.S, Sweden, japan, Taiwan, and Korea, this study attempts to understand the current Home Economics education and to access its trends for each country. Based on the findings of the analysis, this study also seeks to get the major implications of the analysis for the betterment of the Korean Home Economics Education. The main sources of information and data analyzed here are :1)curricula for 10 School Districts in Pennsylvania state as representives of the U.S ; 2)Home Economics curriculum for middle school in Sweden ; 3) Home Economics Teaching Guidelines in Japan ;4)Home Economics curriculum in Taiwan ; and 5) Home Economics curriculum in Korea. Content Analysis technique is applied in this study. The major elements of contents include :1)structure of the curriculum ;2)subject name ; 3)time allotment; 4)goals and objectives ; 5)subject areas and content composition ; 6) other related characteristics for the implemention of the curriculum Summarized results of the study outline as follows; 1)Home Economics is offered as independently required subject without sex discrimination in all five countries. 2)Time allotment for Home Economics in Sweden is double that in the other countries. 3)The common goals of Home Economics courses is practical learning experiences closely related to reality. 4) In terms of subjects areas, Food and Nutrition, Clothing & Textiles, Housing Human Development, and Child care are offered in three of four countries, which is also similar to those of Korea. In addition Consumer Education is also covered in the U.S., Sweden and Korea. 5)Curriculum can be utilized as instructional planning materials due to the clear specification of instructional method, materials, and evaluation method on the curriculum, especially in the U,S, and Taiwan.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.356-370
• /
• 2008

The study aims to explore sequence of earth science content in elementary school science curriculum in Korea and the U.S.. The analysis is focused on a) general content structure of earth science part; b) concept relationship between grades in the specific field of 'geology'; c) longitudinal connection of concepts and content in 'geology.' The findings are as follows. First, earth science curriculum content in Korea is structured according to sub-scientific disciplines centering on not science concepts but topics or inquiry activities whereas the U.S. curricular content is organized through integrative earth science topics with basic concepts and sub-concepts. Second, it is a common feature that basic concepts are interrelated to sub-concepts in all grades in both countries. However, basic concepts are scattered all over the grades, presented in a linear pattern in Korea while those are provided together in 3rd grade and repeated with extended concepts in a spiral structure in the U.S.. Last, it is not clear how concepts and content are longitudinally connected between grades in Korean curriculum. On the contrary, concepts and content in the U.S. curriculum have a strong longitudinal connection between grades with conceptual hierarchy. Such results indicate that Korean elementary school science curriculum would limit students' comprehensive understanding of science concepts through grades. The study suggests Korean science content should strengthen interrelationship among concepts as well as longitudinal connection between grades, in order to achieve the ultimate goal of science education, 'scientific literacy'.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.64-73
• /
• 1984

This study aimed at identifying the characteristics of current science curriculum in several countries in terms of its format, aims and objectives, contents and guidelines and discussed about therm. The curricula were collected from 9 countries- The United States of America(5 states), Canada(4 Provinces), England, West Germany, France, Australia, Newzealand, Japan and the republic of China. Each country had her own characteristics of science curriculum, but there also common characteristics among several countries. First, the format of science curricula in eastern countries were very different from those of western countries. The western countries had the curriculum format which included characteristics and needs of science education, philosophy and background, aims and objectives, contents, characteristics of learners, teaching and learning strategy, teaching materials, guide of experiments, evaluation methods, and other concrete informations while eastern countries had the curriculum format which included only objectives, contents and guidelines. I think that the format of science curriculum in western countries is more recommendable than that of eastern countries. Second, the aims and objectives of science curricula in eastern countries focused on scientific knowledges and concepts, while those of countries emphasized scientific methods and attitudes. Third, the contents of science curricula were very similar regardless of eastern countries or western countries. In other words, all the countries in this study emphasized life science and earth science at lower grade level and physical science at upper grade level. Especially the observation and concrete learning activities were suggested at lower grade level and logical reasoning was emphasized at upper grade level. I think that the integrated (topic-centered) science curriculum is more recommendable than our current non-integrated science curriculum in lower grade levels. Finally, the guidelines of science curriculum in eastern countries did not suggest specific information about teaching contents, experimental methods, teaching-learning activities, evaluation methods, teaching and learning meterals, while those of western countries provided more specific information which teachers could utilize very effectively.

• East Asian mathematical journal
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.235-255
• /
• 2017

This study focuses on the teaching of fraction related to curriculum, introducing time of fraction, the meaning of fractions in textbook, material of teaching of fraction concept, teaching model of introducing time of fraction concept, special cases of teaching fraction and common points of representation of fraction among Korea, New Zealand and Singapore. For this study, Korea's mathematics textbooks(3-1, 3-2, 4-1, 5-1, 6-1) and New National Curriculum Mathematics(3, 4, 5. 6. 7)of New Zealand and New Syllabus Primary Mathematics(2B, 3B, 4A, 4B, 5A, 6A)of Singapore were selected for comparison and analysis. As a results we will suggest a reference to the development of mathematical curriculum, teaching fraction and improving the quality of the textbook through a method of comparative analysis of Korea, New Zealand and Singapore.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.41-55
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the curricula of kindergarten and elementary school and to present a plan for connecting the two curricula. The curricula emphasized mathematical thinking and problem solving instead of fragmentary knowledge and adopted the streamed curriculum based on children’s ability and interest. And both of them consisted of number and operation, geometry, measurement, statistics, and put emphasis on activity such as real life experience, play, manipulation of concrete objects, and communication. However, there are some kinds of differences between them, because the kindergarten curriculum is not included in the common curriculum, from 1st grade to 10th grade. Thus, this study recommended several ideas based. Thus, this study recommended several ideas based on theories to connect the mathematics curricula of kindergarten and elementary school.

• East Asian mathematical journal
• /
• 제37권2호
• /
• pp.265-288
• /
• 2021

In the 2015 revised mathematics curriculum, the system of equations is first introduced in 'Variables and Expressions' of [Middle School Grades 1-3]. Then, It is constructed that after learning the linear function in 'Functions', the relationship between the graphs of two linear functions and the systems of linear equations are learned so that students could improve the geometric representation of the systems of equations. However, in of Elective-Centered Curriculum Common Courses, Instruction is limited to algebraic manipulation when teaching and learning systems of quadratic equations. This paper presented the teaching and learning method that can improve students' mathematical connection through various representations by providing geometric representations in parallel using GeoGebra, a mathematics learning software, with algebraic solutions in the teaching and learning situation of simultaneous quadratic equations.

• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제39권2호
• /
• pp.239-254
• /
• 2015

이 연구에서는 제7차, 2007 개정, 2009 개정 교육과정의 초등학교 및 중학교 과학과 내용 진술에 사용된 서술어를 분석하고 교육과정에 따른 특징을 알아보고자 하였다. 성취기준 및 탐구 활동 진술에 사용된 문장의 마지막 서술어 1383개를 대상으로 종류 및 빈도 등을 조사한 결과, 초등학교에서는 평균적으로 '안다'(15.0 %)가, 중학교에서는 '이해한다'(24.2 %)가 가장 많이 사용되었다. 교육과정별로 살펴보면, 제7차 교육과정에서는 '이해한다'의 비중이 가장 높았지만 초등학교에서 관찰, 조사와 같은 탐구 활동을 뜻하는 동사가 상대적으로 자주 등장하였다. 2007 개정 과학과 교육과정을 살펴보면 초 중학교를 합쳐 '설명한다'가 최빈 동사로 나타났다. 2009 개정 교육과정에서는 '안다'와 '이해한다'가 각각 1, 2 순위를 차지하였다. 세 교육과정을 비교하면, '이해한다'와 '관찰한다'는 비교적 고르게 사용된 반면에 '안다'는 교육과정이 개정되면서 빈도가 점점 증가하는 경향이 나타났다. 아울러 이러한 결과들이 지니는 의미와 시사점을 논의하고, 차기 교육과정 개정과 관련하여 후속 연구의 필요성을 제안하였다.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.141-157
• /
• 2020

이 연구는 우리나라의 초등학교 및 중등학교에서 전개되고 있는 학교 인구교육을 전반적으로 검토하기 위해 국가수준의 총론 및 각론 수준의 교육과정 문서에 대한 내용분석을 실시하였고, 그 결과에 터하여 학교 인구교육의 미래 방향을 도출하는데 연구의 목적을 두었다. 그 결과, 2007 개정 교육과정과 2009 개정 교육과정에는 총론 교육과정의 '범교과학습주제'로 저출산·고령사회 대응의 인구교육 내용이 반영되어 있었으나, 현행의 2015 개정 교육과정에는 반영되어 있지 않았다. 각론 교육과정 분석의 결과(제7차 교육과정에서 제안한 '국민공통기본교육과정'에 해당하는 10개의 공통 교과 교육과정 문서 분석함), 중등의 기술·가정교과의 가정과 교육과정, 그리고 초등 및 중등의 사회과 교육과정에서만 교과의 성격이나 목표, 또는 내용요소나 성취기준에 저출산·고령사회 대응의 인구교육 내용이 반영되어 있었다. 교육과정 분석 결과를 바탕으로 다음의 5가지 학교 인구교육의 방향을 도출하였다. 첫째, 학교 인구교육의 목적은 출산에 개입하는 것이 아님을 분명하게 확인하며, '저출생·초고령사회 대응'의 양성평등한 용어를 적용한다. 둘째, 인구교육을 교과의 목표와 내용요소, 그리고 성취기준으로 직접 다루는 교과에 인구교육의 주도교과로서 사명을 부여한다. 셋째, 융합학문적 특성의 인구교육을 융합교육의 적극적 소재로 활용한다. 넷째, 선택중심의 교육과정이 적용되는 고등학교에서는 인구교육의 주요 내용을 다루는 주도교과의 선택을 정책적으로 지원해준다. 다섯째, 교원의 인구 인식을 향상시키기 위한 교사교육을 강화한다. 민주시민의 역량은 사회의 기본적 집단인 가족의 사회화를 통해 출발한다는 점을 고려하면, 삶을 기반으로 하는 가정과교육에서 인구교육을 주도하여 삶, 즉 생활과 연계된 실천적 인구교육으로 학교 사회에 인구교육이 확대되는 데 기여할 수 있을 것이다. 이처럼 학교 인구교육의 주도교과로서의 사명을 가정과교육에 맡겨서 이를 잘 수행해 내도록 하기 위해서는, 우리나라의 전체 교육과정에서 가정과교육의 이수를 강화시키는 교육정책이 뒷받침되어야 할 것이다.

• Educational Technology International
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.47-68
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study was to analyze majors trends and issues of e-Learning curriculum for human resource development in the corporate context. The e-Learning curriculum was chosen as the subject of research consists of 2,710 lectures that were given from 2007 to July 2009 for the recent three years by providing at Ministry of Labor and Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education & Training. In order to investigate trends and issues, it was employed theme analysis which is one of the types of document analysis that approach a qualitative research methodology. As a result of this research, 7 major trends and issues in e-Learning curriculum for HRD in the field of corporate education were drawn; ① Strengthening expertise through learning of job related professional knowledge, ② Cultivation of common & essential knowledge for a job to increase work performance efficiency ③ Organizational management strategy for improving performance, ④ Organizational management and operational strategy for actively responding to environmental changes, ⑤ Leadership as a strategy for cultivating core personnel and field-centered practical leadership. ⑥ Creating a happy workplace through the work-life balance, ⑦ Strengthening global communication skill. Based on these analysis, practicals and theoretical implications of e-Learning professionals and HR researchers for HRD were suggested.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.53-63
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 2019년도에 적용 2년차를 맞이한 고등학교 과학과 공통과목인 통합과학과 과학탐구실험의 2차 년도 적용 현황을 분석하고 이를 토대로 향후 과학과 고등학교 교육과정 개발을 위한 제언을 도출하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 총244개의 과학중점고와 일반고를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시한 결과를 2018년도 1차 년도 조사결과와 양적으로 비교하였다. 또한 초점집단을 구성하는 9명의 과학교사들과 심층면담을 실시하여 2차 년도 적용현황에 대한 심층 답변을 논의하였다. 연구결과에 따르면, 1차 년도와 마찬가지로 적용 2년차에도 통합과학은 대부분 6~8단위로 운영하고 있었으며, 학급당 통합과학을 담당하는 교사는 3~4명이 대부분인 것으로 나타났다. 교사 초점집단 면담에서 현장교사들은 통합과학이 통합적 지도를 필요로 하며 학생의 흥미와 관심 유발에도 좋지만, 평가공정성 확보 등의 문제로 과정중심 평가 등을 구현하기는 어렵다고 주장하였다. 과학탐구실험의 경우 대부분 학기당 1단위로 2개 학기로 운영하고 있었으며, 가르치는 사람이 달라서 통합과학과 과학탐구실험을 거의 연계하지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 2019년도부터 과학탐구실험의 학교생활기록 기재 방식이 절대평가로 변경되어서 상대평가로 성적산출을 하지 않아도 되므로 학생들의 만족도나 수업의 흐름이 기대한 것보다 훨씬 좋고, 부담없이 가르칠 수 있다고 교사들은 말하였다. 연구결과를 토대로 과학과 공통과목인 통합과학과 과학탐구실험 교육과정 안착을 위한 지원방안, 차기 과학과 교육과정 개정에서 통합과학과 과학탐구실험 과목의 개선 방안 등을 제안하였다.