• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제35권2호
• /
• pp.113-123
• /
• 2012

In this paper, it is examined how the amount of review time per applicant to a college admission officer system is connected with the performance of the selected students after they enter the college. About five years ago, college admission officers system has been introduced to Korea as a government policy. Thus, for most Korean college, there is not enough number of admission officers, while it takes substantial time to find out whether an applicant has potential ability or not. Thus, it is required to find out some policy alternatives to solve this discrepancy. In this paper, a simulation model is built using System Dynamics theory and simulated to understand the relation between the amount of review time and the performance of the selected students. Finally, some implications and policy suggestions are derived from the simulation results.

• 대한인간공학회지
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.81-90
• /
• 2006

Despite the government promoting women's participation in the engineering field, some statistics show that it has yet to be achieved. Potential reasons for this phenomenon include lower level of applications by women, or inherent gender gap in the professional field. Therefore, this study attempted to find impact of gender on college admission from the Lens Model perspective and Signal Detection Theory. This study consisted of three phases: identifying the necessary cues used in the admission process, analyzing existing data, and conducting two experiments to identify the effect of gender on admission decisions. Although the college application consisted of many cues, only five cues, school ranking, GPA, SAT score, resident status, and gender, were used to capture the officers' judgment policies for engineering admissions. Two experiments were conducted to investigate the impact of the gender factor in college admission. The enrollment officers first were presented with the existing data without the gender and asked to make dichotomous judgments. Secondly, the officers were asked to perform the judgment task with the gender cue present. Results showed that the gender did not play an important role in the judgments as expected. However, ideographical analyses on judgment strategies revealed that there were significant differences between the admission officers. Possible training implications are discussed.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.4-11
• /
• 2016

Background: Hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs), which are widely used as an indicator of poor access to primary care, can be used as an efficiency indicator of healthcare use in countries providing good access to health care. Korea, which has a national health insurance (NHI) system and a good supply of health care resources, is one such country. To quantify admission rates of ACSC and identify characteristics influencing variation in Korean health care institutions. Methods: By using NHI claims data, we computed the mean ACSC admission rate for all institutions with ACSC admissions. Results: The average ACSC admission rate for 4,461 institutions was 1.45%. Hospitals and clinics with inpatient beds showed larger variations in the ACSC admission rate (0%-87.9% and 0%-99.6%, respectively) and a higher coefficient of variation (7.96 and 2.29) than general/tertiary care hospitals (0%-19.1%, 0.85). The regression analysis results indicate that the ACSC admission rate was significantly higher for hospitals than for clinics (${\beta}=0.986$, p<0.05), and for private corporate institutions than public institutions (${\beta}=0.271$, p<0.05). Conclusion: Substantial variations in ACSC admission rates could suggest the potential problem of inefficient use of healthcare resources. Since hospitals and private corporate institutions tend to increase ACSC admission rates, future health policy should focus on these types of institutions.

• 융합정보논문지
• /
• 제11권7호
• /
• pp.128-135
• /
• 2021

한국의 대학입시제도는 입학사정관전형에서 학생부종합전형으로 명칭을 바꾸고 학생선발방법의 한 형태로 안정된 시행을 보이고 있으나 교과 성적 외에 비교과 영역의 평가에 대한 공정성 논란은 시행 초반부터 현재까지 진행 중이다. 현재 시행중인 대학입시제도가 우리의 교육 환경에 적합한가를 비롯해 교육 환경 개선에 대한 문제도 지속적으로 제기되고 있다. 반면, 캐나다는 대학입시제도가 국민들의 주요 화두에 오르지는 않는다. 캐나다는 대학 간의 교육에 대한 전국적인 질적 수준의 보편성을 강조하며 대학입시제도를 유지하고 있다. 이에 본 연구의 목적은 캐나다의 교육체계와 대학입시제도의 특징을 캐나다에서 가장 높은 고등교육 이수율을 보이고 있는 퀘벡주를 중심으로 살펴보고 퀘벡주의 전반적인 교육제도 및 목적, 주요 대학의 실제적인 대학입시제도 분석을 통해 우리의 대학입시제도에 대한 시사점을 제시하는 데 있다.

• 비교교육연구
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.1-30
• /
• 2016

이 논문은 프랑스 대학입학제도의 주요 특징을 분석하고 우리나라의 대학입학제도 개선을 위한 시사점을 도출하는 데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 이 논문은 문헌연구 방법을 주된 연구방법으로 사용하였으며, 문헌 자료의 확인과 자료 분석 해석의 보완을 위해 면담조사를 활용하였다. 분석 결과, 프랑스 대학입학제도의 주요 특징은 첫째, 프랑스에서 대학 진학을 위해서는 기본적으로 대학입학자격시험(바깔로레아)에 '합격'해야 한다. 바깔로레아는 고교졸업자격시험이자 대학입학자격시험이라는 이중적 성격을 갖고 있으며, 절대평가에 의해 합격 여부를 판정한다. 둘째, 학생 선발권이 없는 대학(모두 국립)은 개방입학제를 채택하고 있으며 학생 선발권이 있는 고등교육기관은 고교 내신 성적(20점 만점의 점수제), 지원서를 토대로 학생을 선발한다. 셋째, 대학별 시험은 학생을 선발하는 고등교육기관에 한해 제한적으로 실시되며 여러 전형요소 중 내신 성적이 가장 중시된다. 넷째, 대학지원은 정부가 운영하는 온라인 사이트(APB)를 통해 체계적으로 이루어지며, 대학지원 관련 다양한 정보가 제공된다. 프랑스 대학입학제도 분석을 통한 시사점으로 우리나라 대학수학능력시험의 성격 재검토(고교 졸업자격시험의 성격 강화), 학생의 부담, 진로를 고려한 시험체제 개발, 시험 출제 관리에서 고교 교사 역할 확대, 서술형 시험 확대 등을 제시하였다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제16권12호
• /
• pp.562-573
• /
• 2016

우리나라의 대학입시제도가 근래 다양화되면서 제도의 공정성 문제가 꾸준히 제기되어오고 있다. 대학입시의 공정성에 대한 선행연구는 일반적인 정책대안 혹은 교사집단의 인식을 중심으로 이루어졌으나 이 연구는 대학입시제도의 가장 직접적인 당사자라고 할 수 있는 학생들이 대학입학전형제도의 공정성에 대해 느끼는 인식을 분석하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이 연구는 대학생 11명의 인터뷰자료를 이용하여 근거이론(Grounded Theory) 방법을 적용하였다. 분석결과는 다음과 같다. 인과적 조건은 수능시험위주에서 벗어난 대입전형의 다양화과정에서 일어난 잦은 제도의 변경이며, 중심현상은 절차적 측면과 분배적 측면에서의 근본적인 대입제도의 불공정성으로 나타났다. 또한 맥락적 조건으로는 서울과 지방의 차이를 중심으로 한 대학입학에 관한 정보와 인프라의 격차로 분석되었으며 중재적 조건으로는 정보화기술의 발전과 개인 혹은 집단 차원의 노력으로 분석되었다. 결론적으로 대학생들은 대학입학전형의 불공정성이 일회적 처방으로 해결할 수 없는 사회구조적인 문제를 배경으로 하고 있는 것으로 인식하고 있었다.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.391-398
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 고등학교 교사들의 인식을 통해 입학사정관제의 면접영역에 대한 평가와 입학사정관제도 전반의 개선방안에 대해 검토하였다. 대전지역 인문계 고교 교사들의 응답을 대상으로 기술통계분석을 실시한 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 교사들은 잠재력 평가와 관련하여 학생들의 가치관과 도전정신, 적극성 등을 중요한 요소로 평가하였고, 인성 평가와 관련하여 책임감과 공동체 의식, 갈등극복의 유연성을 중요하게 평가하였다. 이외에 입학사정관 전형에서 보강되어야 할 면접문항은 학생들의 의욕과 인생관, 창의성 등이었다. 둘째, 입학사정관제에 대한 만족도는 총 15점 중 9.34점으로 다소 높은 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 입학사정관제의 운영 개선을 위한 방안으로는 선발과정의 공정성 확보를 가장 중요하게 인식하고 있었다. 이에 본 연구를 통해 입학사정관의 전문성을 보장하고, 입학사정관제도의 개선방안을 위한 정책적 대안을 제시하였다.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.413-428
• /
• 1992

The aim of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of some kinds of surgery and admission, such as cesarean section (C/S), cholecystectomy, and pediatric pneumonia. For appropriateness evaluation, we ourselves developed some criteria, which were included in the category of explicit and linear criteria, with the assistance of specialists of relevant clinical field. The evaluation of appropriateness was performed by two family physicians. The major findings were as follows: 1. For cesarean section, 77.6% of deliveries were determined to be 'appropriate', but the level of appropriateness was not significantly different among hospitals and between hospital groups by size. The most freqeunt indication of C/S was repeated operation, followed by cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD). The labor trials for vaginal delivery among repeated C/S and CPD cases were performed in 24.5% of pertinent deliveries. 2. About 73.8% of cholecystectomy cases was appropriate to one of the surgical indications, without significant differences among hospitals. Of surgical indications, 'sufficiently frequent and intense symptom recurrence' was the most frequent, and 'confirmed acute cholecystitis' was the second. 3. Of children admitted due to pneumonia, only 57.4% of cases satisfied admission criteria, and the level of appropriateness of admission was different among hospitals. The common reasons fur admission were 'failure to initial treatment', 'suspected bacterial pneumonia', 'young infant', etc. We could find that there were differences of quality among hospitals in some procedures, especially in the pediatric pneumonia and labor trial before C/S, which suggested that the implementation of quality assurance activiteis would be necessary in this country. In this study, we used some simple and primitive research tools and the numbers of subjects and tracer procedures were limited. So advanced studios with plentiful subjects and more representative diseases or procedures should be tried.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.228-236
• /
• 2019

Background: This study investigates the impact of weekend admission with a patient safety indicator (PSI) on 30-day mortality among long-term insurance beneficiaries. Methods: Data were obtained from the National Health Insurance Service-Senior claim database from 2002 to 2013. To obtain unbiased estimates of odds ratio, we used a nested case-control study design. The cases were individuals who had a 30-day mortality event after their last medical utilization, while controls were selected by incidence density sampling based on age and sex. We examined the interaction between the main independent variables of weekend admission and PSI by categorizing cases into four groups: weekend admission/PSI, weekend admission/non-PSI, weekday admission/PSI, and weekday admission/non-PSI. Results: Of the 83,400 individuals in the database, there were 20,854 cases (25.0%) and 62,546 controls (75.0%). After adjusting for socioeconomic, health status, seasonality, and hospital-level factors, the odds ratios (ORs) of 30-day mortality for weekend admission/PSI (OR, 1.484; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.371-1.606) and weekday admission/PSI (OR, 1.357; 95% CI, 1.298-1.419) were greater than for patients with weekday admission/non-PSI. Conclusion: This study indicated that there is an increased risk of mortality after weekend admission among patients with PSI as compared with patients admitted during the weekday without a PSI. Therefore, our findings suggest that recognizing these different patterns is important to identify at-risk diagnosis to minimize the excess mortality associated with weekend admission in those with PSI.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.41-48
• /
• 2007

Yonsei University College of Medicine is about to adopt a new admission system in 2009 for postgraduate medical school. in which 4-year college graduates apply to it, instead of applying of high school graduates to undergraduate medical school. For preparing the new system, now, an admission policy is being intensively investigated. In the present admission system in Yonsei College of Medicine, college or university graduates with diverse majors such as pharmacy, biochemistry, engineering, social science and so on other than a medical major can be transferred into the undergraduate medical course when vacancy for enrollment is available. This study was performed to analyze the academic achievement of the transferred students for establishing a new admission system. In this study, the GPAs of 94 medical students transferred for 1998 to 2006 years were analyzed regarding academic and personal background, and compared with those of untrans- ferred medical students. The results showed some features. Particularly, the GPAs of transferred students with t he majors of art and social sciences were not lower than those with the major of natural sciences while transferred students with majors of pharmacy. veterinary science, nursing science, and biotechnology had their high academic achievements during the undergraduate medical courses.