• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.53-73
• /
• 2002

The launch of a new business is crucial to the future growth and profitability of a company. A new business project typically requires a large amount of resources while it has a high possibility of failure. The evaluation of new business opportunities is therefore quite a critical decision-making to companies. This evaluation includes screening of a large number of criteria at a time which often makes desision-making very complicated. Management should evaluate the business alternatives in a sound and consistent manner that is hard to achieve because the new business evaluation is a typical semi/unstructured decision-making problem. The difficulty in such an evaluation will increase if it is required for management to consider both quantitative and qualitative criteria simultaneously. Under these circumstances, this study has proposed a decision-making framework that utilizes analytical hierarchy process(AHP). This study has identified a set of criteria essential to the new business evaluation and suggested a systematic framework for it. Both qualitative and quantitative evaluations are incorporated into the single framework in this study.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.95-112
• /
• 2011

This paper proposes a new registry model for systematically referencing standards in e-Business field. We have many systems that provide standards and additional information. However, there are several problems such as inefficient standard information, dependency on a standard type, high standard information acquisition cost, no relations between standard information, and so on. In this paper, a new registry model and its prototype implementation are described. The proposed model is defined based on ISO/IEC 11179-Metadata registries, which is one of the international standards for interoperability between data. The proposed model provides an integrated- systematic standard information support, and also considers technology stack and business processes for e-Business systems. This paper develops a prototype for the proposed model and implementation result. Finally, to show the contribution of our proposal, this paper shows the comparative evaluation between previous systems and our proposal with various comparative items.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제35권2호
• /
• pp.53-62
• /
• 2007

Until now, Capitalism Problem have been reported by many literature and are recognized which problem cannot be solved this matter. Global organization have been suggested Business ethics to solve Capitalism Problem. Nowadays, Global Excellence Enterprise who already use Business ethics, who well know Business ethics are powerful Competitive factor for Enterprise to survive. It is necessary to apply Business ethics which is Appraisal Model for Business ethics. In this paper, we suggest Appraisal Model for Business Ethics Evaluation and apply to real fields.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권11호
• /
• pp.549-556
• /
• 2020

Real estate markets play an essential role in the economic development of both developed and developing countries. Investment decisions in private real estate demand the consideration of several qualitative and quantitative criteria. Especially in Vietnam, demand for housing, apartments are rising which has resulted because of the migration from rural to urban areas. This study aims to determine the influencing factors of the real estate purchasing behavior and then recommend a grey Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) support model to evaluate real estate alternatives based on a numerical example in Vietnam. A set of essential criteria are identified based on experts' opinion, and the proposed determinants are initial investment, maintenance cost, prestige location, distance to interesting places, parking lot, public transportation, property condition, total area size, number of rooms, and neighbors. The subjective weights were obtained by using the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) model, and the Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) technique is employed to prioritize and rank real estate alternatives. The results reveal that this approach can be useful to make purchasing decisions for many kinds of real estate property under uncertain business environments. These findings indicate that the presented hybrid model has advantages in granting flexibility to the preferences of decision makers.

• 디지털산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.113-125
• /
• 2017

In today's highly competitive environment, the importance of technology protection cannot be overemphasized. To evaluate technology protection competency of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises(SMEs), Government has conducted surveys every year but its effectiveness is still in question. To enhance the effectiveness of technology protection for SMEs, a customized evaluation model of technology protection competency has been suggested in this study. Surveys are conducted to measure the relative importance of evaluation areas that can be influenced by the size and type of business. The analysis shows that there exists significant differences between evaluation areas. This study suggests that the effectiveness of technology protection can be enhanced by utilizing a customized evaluation model depending on the size and type of business. Also, the proposed model can be used for SMEs to identify and enhance their weakness in technology protection. Overall, it is expected that the proposed model can be effectively used to protect valuable technologies in various SMEs.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.63-71
• /
• 2010

The existing reliability evaluation models which have already developed by the corporations are so various because of using Maximum Likelihood Method. The existing models are very complicated owing to using system designing methods. Therefore, it is very difficult to utilize the existing models in business fields of many corporations. The purposes of this paper are as follows: The first purpose is to study the simple estimated Parameter to be easily utilized in the business fields of the corporations. The second purpose is to testify the simplification of the developed Parameter of estimated method by comparing the developed reliability evaluation model with the existing reliability evaluation models which are used in the business fields of the corporations.

• 벤처창업연구
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.133-147
• /
• 2011

본 연구에서는 최근 꾸준한 성장세를 보이고 있는 의료산업의 국내벤처기업에 대한 신용 평가를 위해 먼저 기업의 재무 요인과 비재무 요인을 구분하여 평가지표를 개발한 다음 Saaty(1980)의 계층분석과정(Analytic Hierarchy Process; AHP)방법론을 적용하여 각 지표의 중요도(가중치)를 산출함으로써 의료벤처기업의 신용평가모형을 제시한다. 재무요인의 상위지표로는 수익성, 안전성, 활동성, 성장성, 생산성을 선택하였고, 각 상위지표에 대해서는 2개씩의 하위지표를 정하여 모두 10개의 지표를 설정하였다. 또 비재무적 요인의 상위지표로는 경영자 능력, 기술성, 시장성, 사업성, 신뢰성의 5개 영역을 정하고, 각 영역에 대해 2-5개의 하위지표를 정하여 모두 17개의 지표를 설정하였다. 신용평가지표에 대한 평가를 위해 원주의료기기클러스터 내 소재하고 있는 금융기관 및 보증기관의 심사역을 대상으로 설문조사를 한 후 이를 분석하여 평가지표에 대한 가중치를 산출하였다.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제4권3호
• /
• pp.289-295
• /
• 2003

본 논문은 벤처기업을 합리적으로 평가할 수 있는 평가모형과 방법을 제시할 목적으로 코스닥 등록기업 중 무작위 추출에 의해 선정된 99개 벤처기업을 분석표본으로 삼았으며 기업별 시장주가로 2000년 1월부터 2001년12월까지의 최고, 최저, 평균주가를 추출하였다. 본 논문에서는 벤처기업가치평가 모형으로 실물옵션 평가모형 중 성장옵션모형을 이용하여 각 기업의 현재가격, 행사가격, 변동성, 행사기간, 무위험이자율의 5개 변수로 벤처기업의 옵션가치를 산출하고 여기에 잔존가치를 현금흐름 할인 법으로 할인 산출하여 그 값을 합하여 기업 가치를 평가하였고 또한 현금흐름 할인 법(DCF)을 이용하여 기업 가치를 평가하였다. 여기에 사용된 각종 파라미터 값은 우리나라 벤처기업과 산업의 자료를 중심으로 추출하여 본 모형에 적용, 기업의 가치를 실증적으로 평가하였다.

• 한국전자거래학회지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.1-16
• /
• 2004

본 연구는 Kano모형을 이용하여 전자상거래 웹사이트 요인을 평가하였다. 특히 기존 기업과 소비자간(B2C) 웹사이트를 위주로 한 연구의 한계를 극복하기 위해서 기업과 기업간(B2B) 웹사이트에 대해 동시에 적용하여 각 요인이 B2C및 B2B웹사이트에서 어떻게 평가되는가를 규명하였다. 이와 함께 웹사이트에서 제공되는 제품의 종류에 따라 각 요인들을 평가하였으며 이를 통해 제공되는 제품특성별 웹사이트의 차이를 규명하였다. 본 연구는 B2B웹사이트에 대한 평가와 함께 제품의 특성에 따라 물리적 제품 및 서비스 제품에 따른 웹사이트 평가에 대한 연구를 수행했다. 또한 B2B 전자상거래에 대해 연구가 많지 않은 상황에서 B2B 전자상거래에 대한 이론적인 고찰이 이루어졌다는 점을 들 수 있다.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제35권4호
• /
• pp.101-110
• /
• 2007

This study developed a new model for evaluating activities related to PL(Product Liability), with which our domestic enterprises can more easily assess the actual status of the management of PL than as they could do before. In addition, this model was designed to make the evaluation can be done focusing on the Product safety management cycle, unlike the other PL evaluation models. This model consists of 3 evaluation domains such as evaluations of planning, implementation, and assessment and taking action regarding product safety management. In order to verify that this evaluation model meets its objectives, the researcher directly conducted evaluations of activities related to PL in 3 companies specializing in electric home appliances through visiting them.