• 한국항만학회지
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.17-29
• /
• 1996

It is required to consider pricing and non-pricing factors and external economy in order to achieve the objects of physical distribution system in a port. Recently, among the three factors, much attention has been paid to non-pricing factor in the system. Although physical distribution service in a port(PDSP)has been frequently mentioned in documents and literature related to port and shipping studies, few study on it has not been systematically and scientifically made due to the following problems; $\circ$ there are not proper criteria to evaluate level and quality of PDSP and as a result it is difficult to set up a unified standard for doing so. $\circ$ algorithms to evaluate problems with complex and ambiguous attributes and multiple levels in PDSP are not available. This thesis aims to establish a paradigm to evaluate PDSP and to abvance existing decision making methods to deal with complex and ambiguous problems in PDSP. To tackle the first purpose, extensive and thorough literature survey was carried out on general physical distribution service, which is a corner stone to handle PDSp. In addition, through interviews and questionnaire to the expert, it have extracted 82 factors of physical distribution service in a port. They have been classified into 6 groups by KJ method and each group defined by the expert's advice as follows; a. Potentiality b. Exactness c. safety d. Speediness e. Convenience f. Linkage Prior to the service evaluation, many kinds of its attributes must be identified on the basis of rational decision owing to complexity and ambiguity inherent in PDSP. An analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is a method to evaluate them but it is not applicable to PDSP that have property of non-additivity and overlapped attributes. Therefore, probablility measure can not be used to evaluate PDSP but fuzzy measure is required. Hierarchical fuzzy integral method, which is merged AHP with fuzzy measure, is also not effective method to evaluate attributes because it has vary complicated way to calculate fuzzy measure identification coefficient of attributes. A new evaluation algorithm has been introduced to solve problems with multi-attribute and multi-level hierarchy, which is called hierarchy fuzzy process(HFP).Analysis on ambiguous aspects of PDSP under study which is not easy to be defined is prerequisite to evaluate it. HFP is different from algorithm existed in that it clarified the relationship between fuzzy measure and probability measure adopted in AHP and that it directly calculates the family of fuzzy measure from overlapping coefficient and probability measure to treat and evaluate ambiguous and complex aspects of PDSP. A new evaluation algorithm HFP was applied to evaluate level of physical distribution service in the biggest twenty container port in the world. The ranks of the ports are as follows; 1. Rotterdam Port, 2. Hamburg Port, 3. Singapore Port, 4. Seattle Port, 5. Yokohama Port, 6. Long beach Port, 7. Oakland Port, 8. Tokyo Port, 9. Hongkong Port, 10. Kobe Port, 11. Los Angeles Port, 12. New york Port, 13. Antwerp Port, 14. Felixstowe Port, 15. Bremerhaven Port, 16. Le'Havre Port, 17. Kaoshung Port, 18. Killung Port, 19. Bangkok Port, 20. Pusan Port

• 한국항만학회지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.13-24
• /
• 1993

The rapid progress of the intermodal freight transportation in recent years has induced fierce competition among the adjacent hub ports for container transport. This brings increased attention to the evaluation of the port competitive ability. But it is not easy to evaluate the port competitive ability because this belongs to ill-defined system which is composed of ambiguous interacting attributes. Paying attention to this point, this paper deals the competitive ability of container port in Far-East Asia by fuzzy integral evaluation which is adequate to interacting ambiguous attribute problem. For this, the proposed fuzzy evaluation algorithm is applied to the real problem, based on the factors such as cargo volumes, costs, services, infrastructure and geographical sites These are extracted from the precedent study of port competitive ability, etc. The results show that the port evaluation factors come in following order ; services, costs, infrastructure, geographical sites and cargo volumes. There are some interactions(interaction coefficient, ${\lambda}=-0.664$ between evaluation attributes. The port competitive ability comes in following order : Singapore, Hongkong, Kobe, Kaoshiung and Busan. According to the sensitivity analysis, the rank between Busan and Kaoshiung changes when ${\lambda}=0.7$. From the analysis of the results, we confirmed that the proposed fuzzy evaluation algorithm is very effective in the complex-fuzzy problem which is composed of hierarchical structure with interacting attributes.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.172-182
• /
• 2006

The aims of this study is to suggest how the port specialists think the priority of container feeder port development in Korea. To illustrate the ideas regarding a container feeder port development, 56 detailed attributes were identified both from the previous studies and from brainstorming port professionals. And these were grouped into 5 criteria by 'KJ method' and made into 4 levels hierarchy structure. AHP technique identifies the relative weights of each levels and trends of the preference of port specialists from 6 alternatives. As a result, a feeder port development priority in Korea has been proposed.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제35권5호
• /
• pp.429-437
• /
• 2011

최근 들어 도시 재개발 과정에서 중요시되는 도시 워터프런트를 다각적으로 이해하고자 하는 여러 시도들이 이루어지고 있다. 본 고에서는 수(水)문화 개념에 입각하여 항구도시 워터프런트를 문화론적으로 해석하고자 시도했다. 본 논문은 안과 밖을 허물고 경계를 희석시키는 물의 속성에 기반하여 바다의 역동성과 집합성, 개방성 속성에 기초하여 워터프런트가 가진 속성을 밝혔다. 그리하여 항구도시 워터프런트가 지닌 경계성, 개방성, 혼종성, 통로적 성격이라는 문화론적 속성이 도시 거주민의 문화정체성 형성에 깊은 영향을 미친다는 점을 부산의 사례를 통해 강조하였다. 이를 통해 항구도시 워터프런트와 거주민들의 문화정체성간의 상관관계를 분명히 하였다. 나아가 이런 상관관계에 대한 이해가 항구도시 워터프런트 개발의 방향성에 반영되어야 한다고 제안한다.

• 한국항만학회지
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.57-64
• /
• 2000

For composing the structure model of national maritime power system by system structural modeling, in this study, the 50 basic factors are selected by survey of the extensive and through literatures on maritime, sea, maritime power and sea power. And the basic factors are classified into 36 component factors by cluster method. The 9 attributes are extracted by the application of the principle component analysis method, one of the factor analysis method in system engineering, to component factors. In this study, we define the attributes composing the national maritime power system by integrating the result of this study and existed our studies relating to this topic. Which are showed in Table 2. and we show the structure model of national maritime power system in Fig. 3. In Table 2, the 9 attributes are as follows : the fundamental power of maritime, shipping and port power, naval power, fishing power, shipbuilding power, the power of ocean research and development, dependency on seaborne trade, the protection power of ocean environment and the will and inclination of govemment. Also, in the case of evaluating this system, we conform the importance of considering the interactions among the attributes which have strong interactions in structure model of national maritime power system.

• 한국항만학회지
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.295-304
• /
• 1997

For evaluation of maritime power, the attributes of sea power are identified in this paper by system analysis method. A many fundmental factors of sea power are selected by survey of the extensive and thorough literatures on maritime power. And the factors are classified into 11 standard attributes by cluster method. The 11 standard attributes are as follows: geographical condition, character of territory, character of the people, maritime will of the government, shipping power, navel power, shipbuilding power, fishing power, ocean research and development, dependence on seaborne trade, number of ocean population. As the sub-attributes of the standard attributes, 37 composite factors and some basic factors are defined through careful survey and discussion with some experts. As the result of this study, the maritime power is systematically identified as maritime power system. And it is realized that the evalution of maritime power system is the hybrid MADM problem with both quantitative and qualitative factors.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.37-58
• /
• 2017

설문조사 및 응답자의 지각을 바탕으로 하는 항만선택연구의 암묵적인 가정은 항만선택속성들의 선호크기가 선택행위에 비례적이라는 것이다. 그러나 항만선택 속성들도 직선만이 아닌 비선형적 특성을 갖을 수 있다. 본 연구는 항만선택연구에 성격이 유사한 카노모형을 원용하여 항만선택속성의 비선형적 특성을 확인 하였다. 연구결과 선사의 항만선택속성들중 복합운송연계성과 항만규모 등이 당연특성으로 평가되는 등 여러 속성들이 비선형적 특성으로 평가되었다. 따라서 항만공사와 운영사 등의 항만 서비스제공자들은 선사들의 비선형적 항만선택특성을 반영한 항만운영전략을 구축해야 할 것이다. 본 연구가 항만선택 특성을 탐색적으로 분석하였기 때문에 추후 국내외 항만 및 이해당사자들을 대상으로 한 추가적인 검증연구가 필요하다. 또한 분석 및 전략수립에 활용한 카노모형 및 중요도 선택분석방법도 명확한 특성의 파악과 전략지침의 제시가 가능하도록 개선할 필요가 있다.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제29권8호
• /
• pp.701-707
• /
• 2005

본 연구의 목적은 항만전문가들의 의견을 통해서 우리나라의 항만개발 우선순위를 선정하는데 있다. 이를 위해 선행 연구들과 항만관련 전문가들로부터 브레인스토밍(brainstorming)을 수행하여 87개의 세부속성을 도출하였다. 그리고 KJ기법을 통해 6개의 평가기준으로 그룹핑하여 계층분석구조를 구축하고, AHP 기법을 통해 각 계층의 상대적 중요도, 항만 전문가들의 선호 경향 및 대안들의 종합 중요도를 평가하였다. 이 연구를 통해 우리나라의 항만개발 우선순위를 선정하고 이어 따른 우리나라 항만개발에 대한 발전 방향을 제시하고자 한다.

• 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항해항만학회 1999년도 추계학술대회논문집
• /
• pp.153-161
• /
• 1999

For composing the structure model of national maritime power system by system structural modelling, in this study, the 50 basic factors are selected by survey of the extensive and thorough literatures on maritime, sea, maritime power and sea power. And the basic factors are classified into 36 component factors by cluster method. The 9 attributes are extracted by the application of the principle component analysis method, one of the factor analysis method in system engineering, to component factors. We defined the attributes composing the national maritime power system by integration the result of this study and existed our studies relate to this topic. Which are showed in table 8. and we showed the structure model of national maritime power system in figure 3. In table 8, the 9 attributes are as follows: the fundamental power of maritime, shipping and port power, naval power, fishing power, shipbuilding power, the power of ocean research and development, dependency on seaborne trade, the protection power of ocean environment and the will and inclination of government.

• 한국항만경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항만경제학회 2006년도 국제학술대회
• /
• pp.291-309
• /
• 2006

In order to obtain and maintain competitive advantage, under rapidly changing maritime environment, liners should make efforts to reinforce their logistics service capabilities. Most of all, for this, shipping lines should accurately recognize and evaluate their logistics service attributes. In the present research, various logistics service attributes for ocean carriers were selected from previous studies and the observed data for 6 main service attributes were collected through a questionnaire survey to 31 maritime experts. Moreover, shipping lines' relative logistics service capabilities were measured by an additional survey process. The comparative gravity between core evaluation factors were measured by AHP technique and the relative capability levels of 2 Korean liners and 5 foreign shipping companies were assessed by utilizing a fuzzy model. The empirical result presents that Korean liners are superior at customer service capability but inferior at freight rate competitiveness. This research shows that Korean liners are ranked at high position for overall logistics service capabilities and focusing on the differentiation strategy but not on the cost related strategy.