• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.117-126
• /
• 2004

In this study an evaluation method is proposed, with the strong relationship between the ante and post audit works evaluation. The ante evaluation does in general and systematic ways, with past audit results and proposals. The criteria-based evaluation is used for the audit activities and outputs. The critical success factors for the projects applies to the activities evaluation and product evaluation framework to the output. The ante and post evaluation have the cross evaluation items to be the whole and continuous one. Eighteen common evaluation items are derived, with their own evaluation elements in detail, which have only differences of the actually done and expectations between the ante and post. The proposed evaluation makes the ante and post one to be related with each other in a systematic and objective ways, to enhance the reliability of audit results and effectiveness of the audit.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.59-78
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this longitudinal case study is to shed light on the reliability problems of IS performance evaluation by analyzing the discrepancy between ex ante evaluation in 2011 and ex post evaluation in 2012. Through an information system development project of a public enterprise, the gap between ex ante and ex post evaluation was ascertained and the causes as to why such gap occurs and the success factors that can solve the problems were derived. The ex ante evaluation of IS performance was performed based on both IS success model and BSC model and the ex post evaluation was carried out at the time after the target system has been built up by applying the evaluation measures and process that are similar to the ex ante evaluation. In the ex ante evaluation the business performance improved by the target system was estimated to 18.2%. On the other hand, it was seen as being low at 15.2% in the ex post evaluation and the differences were found to be statistically significant in 6 out of 10 measures. The reasons as to why such gap occurs were diagnosed as being of 2 types : (1) changes in the evaluation psychology according to the differences in the evaluation objectives; and (2) excessive expectation levels of the target system that is formed at the time of the ex ante evaluation. In other words, the users who have excessive expectations tend to overestimate in the ex ante evaluation and, in the ex post evaluation, tend to underestimate lower than the actual performance mainly due to disappointment on the results that do not meet the early expectations. As solutions to overcome the reliability problem of ex ante evaluation, 3 factors were derived : (1) the temperance of excessive expectation levels of the users; (2) a clear definition of the scope and functionality of the target system; and (3) actual commitments for the evaluations of IT performance.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.203-224
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation perspectives of IT business value and empirically analyze the differences of evaluation perspectives between ex ante evaluation and post implementation evaluation, and among various information system types. 4 evaluation perspectives which have been used in the previous studies and in the field of industry practices are financial, customer, internal process, and growth, which are based on the BSC model. Data of 98 information systems have been collected from 89 companies including manufacturers, banks, insurances, and stock trading companies. As results of multi-way MANOVA test, 3 out of 8 hypothesis have been accepted statistically. While the order of importance of 4 perspectives in ex ante evaluation is customer, financial, internal process, and growth, the order of post implementation evaluation appears to be much different : that is, internal process, customer, financial, and growth. These findings provide insights for both IT practitioners and researchers.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제41권1호
• /
• pp.1-24
• /
• 2010

The main goal of the study is to propose an objective and standardized evaluation system of stock enhancement programs. In order to achieve this goal, the study first suggested the need for stock enhancement program evaluation system through the review of current status and problems. Second, the study identified possible problems of the existing stock enhancement program evaluation by reviewing domestic and foreign evaluation systems. Finally the study proposed a new evaluation system and implementation plan of it. This study also classified the program evaluation criteria into ex-ante evaluation and ex-post evaluation according to the evaluation point in time, and applied the economic, political and technical feasibility tests into the evaluation of the stock enhancement program in order to solve the current problems of the evaluation. The evaluation process of the stock enhancement program is composed of an evaluation system design, estimation of weights using the analytical hierarchy process, design of estimation standard, conversion of scores and final summary of the evaluation. The central government takes the lead in the evaluation of the regional (metropolitan city or province) projects and the regional government is in charge of the evaluation of the local (city or county) projects. For the implementation of the ex-ante evaluation, either the regional or local governments ask for the evaluation and then submit an evaluation plan and other necessary documents to the upper level governments. The ex-post evaluation is then carried out by the upper level governments.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.49-63
• /
• 2006

The objective of the study is to verify the discriminatory power of technology innovation in predicting Early Stage Ventures' success or failure. To accomplish this objective, we test early stage ventures'(Firm's period is below 3 years)technology innovation and performance. The result of the study is expected to be useful in loan evaluation, investment decision, internal management decision making and business improvement. The results of study is as follows. First, Early Stage Ventures' technology innovation power is composed of 4 major indexes(technology, marketability, manufacturing infra and economic feasibility). Second, we find that thirty-seven minor indexes are significant ex-ante variable which are discriminating between firms' success and failure in Early Stage Ventures. Also thirty-seven minor indexes explain 57.2% of the total variance. This explainable power of these indexes is similar to that of the existing 58 index elements. Finally, we find that the most important technology innovation power of Early Stage Ventures' is economic feasibility.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.812-841
• /
• 2006

본 연구는 중소벤처평가지표의 개선을 위해 t-test, 요인분석, 로짓회귀분석을 이용하여 평가지표의 판별력을 분석하였다. 연구결과를 요약하면 하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 중소벤처평가지표의 분류정확도가 93%를 보이고 있어 기존 재무비율을 이용한 선행연구의 예측력과 비슷한 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 통상적으로 중소벤처지원기관의 평가지표는 기술성지표, 사업성지표, 시장성지표로 구성되어 있는데 본 연구의 요인분석 결과 6개의 평가지표로 구성되는 것이 바람직함을 보이고 있다. 셋째, 중소벤처성과에 영향을 미치는 요인들로, 기존 연구에서도 주장된 기업가정신(entrepreneurship)을 나타내는 경영자기술역량, 경영자경영역량 그리고 사업성인 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 이들의 비중(영향정도)는 비슷한 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국환경농학회지
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.303-313
• /
• 2005

Agricultural environmental indicators (AEIs) are useful tool for evaluating environmental performance induced by agri-environmental policy measures. General and specific criteria have been set to assess the linkages between policy measures and environmental states. In addition, a number of specific AEIs such as nutrient balance indicators and farm management indicators have been posit to review environmental performance associated with agri-environmental policy measures. The proposed environmental subjects encompass soil quality, qualities of underground and surface water, water resource preservation, species and genetic diversity, diversity for wildlife habitats, and agricultural landscapes. The developed AEIs may contribute to establishment or adjustment of environmental targets and ex-ante or ex-post evaluation for environmental performance associated with policy measures. In addition, the AEIs may be useful to consider introduction of new agri-environmental measures and enhance policy efficiency by assessing environmental performance, considering specific locality, and harmonizing support measures.

• East Asian Economic Review
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.33-71
• /
• 2021

Many different approaches and databases have been developed for the evaluation of non-tariff measures (NTMs) and free trade agreements (FTAs). This paper is devoted to the EU-South Korea agreement, which is the first 'second-generation' FTA of the EU, addressing a wide array of non-tariff policies. We review the evolution of NTM types applicable to the EU-South Korea trade relationship and the role of NTMs in ex-ante and ex-post analyses of the agreement. Subsequently a structural gravity model is employed to assess the value added of information on different aspects of FTAs and types of NTMs by evaluating their ability to predict the trade effects of the EU-South Korea FTA. Our results show that, when accounting for information on the components common in modern deep trade agreements, no additional trade effect is attributable to the EU-South Korea FTA. The evolution of NTMs differs considerably across indicators used, but trade predictions are hardly affected. Most specifications point towards a negative effect of bilateral differences in the number of technical barriers to trade (TBT) applied and sanitary and phytosanitary measures (SPS) against which trading partners issued complaints at the WTO.

• 한국통신학회논문지
• /
• 제29권11B
• /
• pp.1001-1011
• /
• 2004

EU가 2003년 7월에 채택한 $\ulcorner$2003년 프레임워크$\lrcorner$ 는 종래의 수직 통합형 산업구조가 인터넷 기술발전에 따라 물리적인 네트워크, 전송서비스, 컨텐츠로 정보통신산업이 층별로 세분화되어 가고 있다는 사실을 반영한 새로운 규제체계로 평가할 수 있다. 과도기적 현실을 반영한 이 규제의 틀은 경쟁이 미진한 분야에는 사전적 규제, 경쟁이 활성화된 분야에는 사후적 규제를 가한다는 방향성을 지니고 있다. $\ulcorner$2003년 프레임워크$\lrcorner$ 의 특징은 미디어 횡단적인 규제체계, 일반인증에 입각한 진입규제의 완화 및 사전규제로부터 사후규제로의 이행으로 요약할 수 있다.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.51-73
• /
• 2014

이 연구의 목적은 결혼이주여성을 대상으로 가정생활의 향상 및 실천 능력의 증진을 위하여 가정생활문화교육 프로그램을 개발하고 그 효과성을 검증하는 것이다. 가정생활문화교육 프로그램 내용은 가정교과서의 가정생활문화 단원을 바탕으로 구성되었다. 프로그램 내용의 타당성은 2명의 전문가에게 검증받았다. 연구대상자는 서울시 J구에 거주하는 14명의 결혼이주여성이며, 프로그램은 서울 J다문화가족지원센터에서 2014. 9.16-10.7일까지 총 3일에 걸쳐 진행되었다. 프로그램의 평가는 객관적 평가와 주관적 평가(반구조화된 면접 및 설문조사)를 통해 실시하였으며, 객관적 평가 문항은 선행연구 및 가정교과서를 바탕으로 연구자가 구성하였고, 그 내용은 전문가 2인으로부터 검증받았다. 이 연구의 주요한 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 고등학교 가정교과서 '가족이 여는 행복한 가정생활문화 단원'을 중심으로 총 8회기로 구성된 가정생활문화교육프로그램을 개발하였다. 둘째, 결혼이주여성을 위한 가정생활문화교육 프로그램은 우리나라 전통문화의 이해 및 자신들 모국의 가족문화의 이해를 도모할 수 있도록 하였고, 나아가 가족생활문화의 다양성을 존중하는 태도를 기르고자 하였다. 셋째, 프로그램 효과성 결과를 살펴보면, 사전-사후 검사를 통한 객관적 평가에서 프로그램의 효과성이 통계적으로 유의한 것으로 나타났다. 또 주관적 평가 결과, 모든 참여자가 프로그램 목표달성, 프로그램 내용과 활동의 적절성, 운영만족도에서 4.0점 이상의 높은 만족도를 보였다. 반구조화된 면접을 통한 주관적 평가의 결과, 결혼이주여성들은 가정생활문화와 관련 심화된 내용을 지속적으로 배우고 싶다는 의지에서 가정생활문화교육에 대한 높은 욕구를 확인할 수 있었다. 이상의 연구결과는 가정교과를 활용한 가정생활문화교육 프로그램이 결혼이주여성의 건강한 가정생활문화 구현에 주요한 역할을 할 수 있음을 시사한다.