• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.79-89
• /
• 2007

This study suggests the applicability of an AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) to improve the validity and fairness of evaluation index to assess the defense core-technology R&D projects. This study focused on the design of the proposal and performance evaluation index to structure them into a hierarchy using AHP which can be applicable to take the opinion of the defense R&D experts. Using the refined evaluation index, we propose a technique to enhance the reliability of the defense R&D projects evaluation system.

• Management Science and Financial Engineering
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.17-46
• /
• 2010

This paper studies six different AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) approaches and suggests that the features of the approaches are classified by application circumstances in order to contribute to the applicability and quality usage of the AHP. Our study investigates the hierarchical principles and characteristics of the AHP, and historical debates on the AHP evaluation in which the six approaches have been involved. One of six approaches is an ANP (Analytic Network Process) application that is directly connected to AHP usage. The application differences among the six approaches are validated with a plain example. Then, the four circumstances of AHP applications are classified by two dimensions: the first dimension is whether or not the importance (weights) of criteria is independent of restrictively setting alternatives, and the second dimension is whether or not preference (priorities) of alternatives is independent of adding alternative(s) to or removing alternative(s) from the considering set of alternatives. Then featuring way of weighting criteria is classified. We suggest the distinguishing manners and describe the implications of the AHP application. Finally, we discuss rank reversal and multiplicative AHP.

• 한국식품영양학회지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.470-477
• /
• 2010

The purposes of this study were to identify the evaluation categories, areas, attributes of the hospital food service and to define the relative importance of the evaluation categories, areas, attributes of the hospital food service using analytic hierarchy process. A survey was conducted from January 8th to 25th in 2007. Questionnaires were mailed to the 310 directors of dietetic departments of hospitals that included 160 primary hospitals, 107 secondary hospitals, and 43 tertiary hospitals. The result of the analytic hierarchy process indicated that relative importance of evaluation category was 0.5259 for food service management and 0.3407 for nutrition care. The food service management consisted of four subcategories, which are equipment standard, sanitation, production, and delivery service. Sanitation(relative importance: 0.2652) was the most important area among the subcategories and it was followed by equipment standard(0.2067), delivery service(0.1864) and production(0.1848). The nutrition care has two subcategories, menu management and meal management. The relative importance of menu management(0.4174) was higher than that of meal management(0.3555). The quality of food service and nutrition care to inpatients can be improved by the evaluation system based on appropriate applications of the developed evaluation indicators for hospital food service systems.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제38권3호
• /
• pp.103-118
• /
• 2004

인터넷 서비스가 안정화 위주로 옮겨가면서 웹서비스의 품질 향상을 위해 보다 많은 투자가 이루어지고 있다. 대규모의 다양한 정보를 제공하고있는 전자도서관 웹 사이트가 객관적인 평가 시스템을 개발하여 적용하므로써 이용자들에게 서비스의 만족도를 높일 수 있는 기준을 마련할 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서는 검색성, 개인화로 기준을 도출하였다. 구축된 사용성 평가 모델을 계층적 분석방법(Analytic Hierarchy Process AHP)을 이용하여 평가하고 검증하였다. 평가지침으로 설정된 항목을 설문조사를 하여 계층적 분석방법에 기초한 디지털 도서관 웹 사이트 평가 모델을 개발하였다.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제49권1호
• /
• pp.113-123
• /
• 2017

In human reliability analysis, dependence assessment is an important issue in risky large complex systems, such as operation of a nuclear power plant. Many existing methods depend on an expert's judgment, which contributes to the subjectivity and restrictions of results. Recently, a computational method, based on the Dempster-Shafer evidence theory and analytic hierarchy process, has been proposed to handle the dependence in human reliability analysis. The model can deal with uncertainty in an analyst's judgment and reduce the subjectivity in the evaluation process. However, the computation is heavy and complicated to some degree. The most important issue is that the existing method is in a positive aspect, which may cause an underestimation of the risk. In this study, a new evidential analytic hierarchy process dependence assessment methodology, based on the improvement of existing methods, has been proposed, which is expected to be easier and more effective.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제18권8호
• /
• pp.9-15
• /
• 2013

클라우드 컴퓨팅을 구성하는 자원은 이질적인 자원으로 구성되므로 다양한 요구사항의 작업을 이질적인 자원에 할당하는 것은 중요한 문제이다. 이는 다수의 판단 기준하에 다수의 선택 문제로 정의할 수 있는데 본 연구에서는 AHP (Analytic hierarchy process) 기법을 통해 이 문제를 해결하고자 한다. 본 연구에서는 작업의 특성을 고려한 우선순위기반 스케줄링 기법을 제안하는데 1단계에서는 작업의 중요도에 의해 우선순위를 부여하고 2단계에서는 응답시간, 시스템 이용율, 그리고 비용을 판단기준으로 하여 AHP알고리즘에 의해 최적의 자원에 작업을 할당한다. 제안하는 알고리즘의 분석과 실험을 통해 제안 기법의 효율성을 제시하고자 한다.

• 대한교통학회지
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.133-142
• /
• 2006

본 연구에서는 항공이용객이 접하게 되는 일련의 항공사 선택 속성요인을 세부적으로 살펴보아 체계적인 서비스 요인의 분석을 하고자 하며, 이 세부적인 선택속성 중에서 어느 부분이 가장 중요한 요인이며 가장 이용자의 요구수준이 높은지를 측정하고자 했다 즉, 계층화 분석기법 (Analytic Hierarchy Process ; AHP)을 활용하여 국내선 항공사를 선택하는 항공이용객의 항공사선택에 영향을 미치는 요인을 분석하였다. 선택속성의 설정은 선행연구 및 국내선 항공시장의 특성을 고려하여 마케팅, 예매서비스, 공항서비스, 기내서비스, 부대서비스의 5개의 상위선택기준과 상위선택기준의 하위단계인 17가지 세부적인 선택요인을 결정하였다. 하위단계의 선택속성은 1) 프로모션/이벤트, 2) 홍보/광고, 3) 신속하고 안정적인 예매, 4) 예매의 편리성, 5) 예매의 신축성, 6) 선호좌석배정 7) 수하물처리서비스, 8) 비정상운항시 후속조치, 9) 탑승라운지 운영, 10) 기내분위기, 11) 음료서비스. 12) 읽을거리 13) 좌석공간. 14) 비즈니스석 운영, 15) 다양한 제휴사, 16) 마일리지제도 운영, 17) IT 서비스이다. 분석결과 첫째, 국내선 항공사 이용객의 선택속성 중 상위단계의 5가지 선택기준에서 공항서비스가 국내선 항공교통 이용객에게 중요한 선택기준이 되고 있으나, 예매서비스 및 기내서비스도 상당히 중요한 기준임을 알 수 있었다. 소득수준별 상위단계 선택기준 및 하위단계 선택속성의 중요도 분석에서는 저소득자와 중소득자 그리고 고소득자 간에는 선택속성의 중요도의 차이가 나타났으며, 항공사는 이러한 차이를 반영한 고객지향적인 경쟁우위 방안이 요구된다 하겠다.

• Journal of Nutrition and Health
• /
• 제39권1호
• /
• pp.74-83
• /
• 2006

The purposes of this study were to (1) identify the evaluation categories, areas, attributes, and criteria of the school food service program using both a qualitative and a quantitative analyses, (2) define the relative importance of the evaluation categories, areas, attributes, and criteria of the school food service program using analytic hierarchy process, (3) organize the evaluation system to improve quality of the school food service in Korea. A survey was conducted from August to October 2004 to collect data from 172 dietitians, 15 school food service officials at the educational board, 10 professionals of school food service. Statistical analyses were performed on the data utilizing the SPSS 12.0 for Windows and Excel, such as Descriptive statistics and analytic hierarchy process was performed. The result of the analytic hierarchy process indicated that relative importance of evaluation category was 0.4319 (food service manage ment), 0.2369 (nutrition education), 0.1455 (satisfaction) and 0.0912 (parent involvement program). 'Sanitation, safety and facility (0.1739)' was the most important area among the subcategories of food service management, followed by nutrition management (0.1581), procurement (0.1375), production (0.1345), organization and personnel management (0.0662), planning (0.0644), food service evaluation (0.0585), financial accountability (0.0555), and information management (0.0554). There existed a relative importance on the three areas of the nutrition program and satisfaction evaluation category: students (0.5281, 0.6221), parents (0.1812, 0.1491), and teachers (0.1838, 0.1618). In the parent involvement program evaluation category, relative importance of committee and monitoring management was 0.4658 and information communication was 0.3724. The quality of food and service to school children can be improved by the appropriate application of the developed evaluation tool for the school food service program.

• 농업과학연구
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.183-190
• /
• 2011

The paper is to analyze multi-attributes for expanding new renewable energy in agricultural sectors which have environmental, technical, economic, and social factors consisting of 15 attributes which have both positive and negative impacts. We applied the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to data from opinion polls. As a result of the AHP survey, the overall results indicate that the respondents more weight on economical factor than environmental, technical, and social factors for expanding new renewable energy. At the lowest level, a comparison of individual 15 attributes within three factors shows that fixed cost highest in multi-attributes, followed by operating cost, technical superiority. To achieve the public acceptance about expanding new renewable energy in agricultural sectors, the policy-makers should take all relevant factors into account through the decision-making process by the public opinions.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.73-82
• /
• 2011

Basel II advanced measurement approaches for operational risk need to estimate the frequency and severity distribution of operational losses. Due to lack of internal loss data, the estimation is impossible in many cases and so external loss data might be used by scaling on asset or gross income. To get around lack of loss data, scenario analysis combined with loss distribution approach can be useful in calculating the capital charge of operational risk. However, scenario based loss distribution approach requires much time and effort. Instead we may apply the analytic hierarchy process to measure operational risk of financial institutions. The analytic hierarchy process combined with loss distribution approach is to estimate the capital charge of operational risk in other areas based on the operational VaR in an area with sufficient loss data. AHP provides a tool for timely measurement of operational risk in this rapidly changing global environment.