• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제32권1호
• /
• pp.81-97
• /
• 2001

The main objective of this research is to identify the evaluation criteria of the local governments' projects for the fisheries industry development (LGPFID) and to develop the evaluation software prototype applicable to LGPFID. This research does not try to develop the whole evaluation processes and programs for LGPFID, but just to outline the approach to managing LGPFID. The evaluation processes and programs developed in this study is based on the group decision support systems(GDSS), which is a collaborative, system-oriented, and objective system useful in evaluating LGPFID. Specifically the goals of the programs are to : (1) enhance the quality of evaluation process for LGPFID; (2) provide the local government decision makers' and interest groups' access to comprehensive evaluation information; (3) support private-public collaboration in government's decision making. We used analytic hierarchy process model as a group decision making model and programmed the application software prototype with Visual Basic language.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.19-45
• /
• 2007

There have not been many studies which considered both quantitative and qualitative location factors on the issues of site selection problems for a fish farm. This study develops AHP(analytic hierarchy process) model to resolve site selection problem for a fish raising farm by using quantitative and qualitative factors. In order to evaluate the validity of the location factors found in the literature review, the study used advice from fish raising farmers and related academic experts. Four major factors have been selected as economic factors, social factors, natural environmental factors and infrastructures. An AHP structural diagram has developed by considering the factors and potential sites proposed for fish farming. Through the survey on the preference of factors and potential sites, pairwise comparison matrices have been estimated and used to calculated the relative weights of each potential site. The AHP model process shown in the study can be applied to resolve site selection problems for fish raising farmers.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2012년도 추계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.127-128
• /
• 2012

Recently, Construction industry has been trying to reduce environmental loads reflecting the global trend 'Green Growth'. Internal and External countries are provided 'green building certification', 'relevant law/regulations', 'guideline to life cycle', however, construction phase has been overlooked though environmental loads occurred intensively in this phase. Therefore, this study intend to deduct components reflected the guideline in construction phase and assess them quantitatively. The basis data is collected through survey targeting construction managers and related researchers and analyze these data using Analytic Hierarchy Process.

• 한국경영정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영정보학회 2008년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.114-120
• /
• 2008

While ubiquitous healthcare (u-health) services were expected to propagate along with conventional healthcare services, recent progress indicated rather limited market acceptance. In this paper, we investigated the fundamental causes of why the consumer acceptance level of u-health services has been low. We draw upon innovation adoption theories to analyze the consumer readiness of the typical u-health services. The comparative analysis between innovative u-health services and conventional services was performed using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Subsequently, policy and business implications including technological breakthrough insights were discussed based on the customer perspective comparative adoption analysis. The propositions captured through this study provide useful insight to further studies on u-health services.

• 한국산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제7권5호
• /
• pp.112-120
• /
• 2002

최근 많은 기업들이 비즈니스 프로세스 자동화를 위한 새로운 정보기술로 워크플로우를 도입하고 있다. 워크플로우 소프트웨어는 여러 벤더 제품과 고려해야할 선정기준이 많다는 점 때문에 도입 기업은 복잡한 의사결정 문제에 직면하게 된다 벤더들로부터 제공되는 제품은 서로 다른 특징들을 가지고 있어 충분한 경험과 전문지식이 없는 경우 어려움을 겪기 마련이다 본 연구에서는 워크플로우 소프트웨어 제품 평가와 선정을 위한 의사결정 방법으로 계층적분석과정(Analytic Hierarchy Process: AHP)을 제시한다. 우리는 AHP 구현도구인 Expert Choice를 사용하여 워크플로우 유형 및 상업용 제품의 중요도를 도출한다.

• 농촌계획
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.67-76
• /
• 2010

The objective of this study is to investigate a priority and selection of agricultural specialization items from Daegu and Gyeongbuk region by using analytical tools such as, the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) and the Scoring Method. The results of this study are as follows; 1) Five major items were selected for each region based on Daegu and Gyeongbuk regional agricultural performances. 2) The results of AHP analysis, Daegu and Gyeongbuk's agricultural experts evaluated the weight of three decision-elements(objectiveness 0.35, efficiency 0.341, identity 0.309) and seven decision-elements. 3) Results of AHP and Scoring Method analysis, Investigated a priority of agricultural specialization 3 items in 25 cities and districts Daegu and Gyeongbuk regional agricultural performances. 4) Finally, The results of this study will provide basic information on agricultural specialization policy in Daegu and Gyeongbuk region.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.77-88
• /
• 2007

This study is to apply of AHP to the performance management of university organization. Especially, in the present study, the authors modeled performance evaluations for S university administration hierarchically and analyzed the weights of those. The domains of performance evaluations were divided in five domains: strategy, resource management, process, finance management, and customer management, referred to the viewpoints of BSC. The results of analysis revealed that strategy was the most important element of evaluation in the first stage and except for strategy and finance management which consist of the single element of evaluation respectively in the second stage, the efficiency of administration supporting service was the important element of evaluation. The weights of performance evaluations, however, revealed in different as the class of position. Finally this study showed that the weights of performance evaluations computed in the present study can be used as those of evaluation indices for S university administration.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한산업공학회/한국경영과학회 2004년도 춘계공동학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.189-192
• /
• 2004

최근 국내외적으로 성과측정/ 관리(Performance Measurement/ Management)와 관련하여 BSC(Balanced Scorecard)를 도입 ${\cdot}$ 운용하거나, 도입 ${\cdot}$ 운용을 검토하고 있는 기업이나 조직의 수가 크게 증가하고 있다. 그런데 BSC는 중대한 한계를 가지고 있다. 즉 성과를 측정하는 4가지 관점, 즉 '재무적 관점', '고객 관점', '내부업무 관점', 그리고 '혁신 및 학습 관점'과 각 관점의 측정 기준들 간의 중요도 산출이 매우 중요함에도 불구하고 합리적, 체계적 산출 방법을 결하고 있어 그 효용성을 크게 감소시키고 있다. 이의 극복은 BSC의 효용성을 제고하기 위해 긴요한 바, AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process)의 적용이 매우 유력한 해결책이 될 것으로 판단된다.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회/대한산업공학회 2005년도 춘계공동학술대회 발표논문
• /
• pp.545-553
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this study is to analyse consumer injury and to find current status of industrial consumer injury in the field of consumer product. Also the subject under analysis is to develop a design guidance for the consumer product safety. we used consulting data of Korea Consumer Protection Board, Korea Product Liability Consulting Center and referred to statistic data of Korea National Statistical Office. Consumer injury data of Korea is insufficient comparing with leading industrialized nations. Therefore, we categorized hazard factors based on current injury data in Korea instead of analysing injury data statistically. And we analyse the hazard factors using the analytic hierarchy process in this study. Through the results, we defined the Consumer Injury Index(CII) to develop a design guidance for the consumer product safety.

• 한국정밀공학회지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.159-171
• /
• 2003

In this paper, same parts of a domestic automobiles and foreign automobiles are disassembled fur the evaluation of disassemblability, especially door trim and bumper. Influencing factors of disassembly are determined by the classification of bottleneck process in disassembly process. On the bases of disassembly sequence and structure of parts and subassembly, disassemblability is classified into aye categories. The influencing factors, which are related with the five categories are determined. By these relations, the checklist for disassembly evaluation is draw up and score tables of checked factors are established. For the establishing the disassembly score tables, the weighting values of each five categories are calculated by the disassembly test of automobiles and then, the weighting values of each influencing factors of five categories are calculated by the method of AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). And the last, the weighting values are modified and recalculated from the disassembly test. Using these weighting values, the score of influencing factors are determined and then, the score tables are established based on the score of influencing factors.