• Title/Summary/Keyword: 2015 Revised Curriculum

Search Result 598, Processing Time 0.023 seconds

Comparative Analysis of Elementary School Computing Achievement Standards in the U.S. and Korea

  • Kim, Kapsu;Min, Meekyung;Rho, Jungkyu
    • International journal of advanced smart convergence
    • /
    • v.9 no.2
    • /
    • pp.147-156
    • /
    • 2020
  • ACM's CSTA has drafted standards for computing curricula and recommended them to schools in the United States. The five core concepts of the US elementary school computing curriculum are computing systems, network and the Internet, data and analysis, algorithms and programming, and impacts of computing. In 2005, Korea prepared ICT education guidelines, including five fields, their subfields, and achievement criteria for each subfield. In the 2015 revised curriculum, software education was introduced and five achievement standards were set. The ACM CSTA has 18 achievement criteria up to K-2 and 21 achievement criteria up to K-5. If we compare the 39 achievement standards of the US to Korea, Korea's 2005 ICT education guidelines include 25 of these, and the 2015 revised curriculum includes 5 of them. In this study, we aim to study the CSTA achievement criteria that second graders should know and the achievement criteria that fifth graders should know. This is compared and analyzed with Korea's 2005 ICT Guidelines and 2015 Software Curriculum. In comparison with the number of achievement standards, the US elementary school's computing achievement standards are much higher than in Korea. Comparing with each standard, there are many areas that are not covered in Korean curriculum, and we can see that the 2015 curriculum has rather receded from 2005.

Ways to Restructure Science Convergence Elective Courses in Preparation for the High School Credit System and the 2022 Revised Curriculum (고교학점제와 2022 개정 교육과정에 대비한 과학과 융합선택과목 재구조화 방안 탐색)

  • Kwak, Youngsun
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education
    • /
    • v.14 no.2
    • /
    • pp.112-122
    • /
    • 2021
  • The goal of this study is to explore ways to restructure Convergence Elective Courses in science in preparation for the high school credit system, ahead of the 2022 revised science curriculum. This study started from the problem that the 2015 revised science curriculum has not guaranteed science subject choice for students with non-science/engineering career aptitudes. To this end, a survey was conducted by randomly sampling high schools across the country. A total of 1,738 students responded to the questionnaire of 3 science elective courses such as Science History, Life & Science, Convergence Science. In addition, in-depth interviews with 12 science teachers were conducted to examine the field operation of these three courses, which will be classified and revised as Convergence Elective subjects in the 2022 revised curriculum. According to the results of the study, high school students perceive these three courses as science literacy courses, and find these difficult to learn due to lack of personal interest, and difficulties in content itself. The reason students choose these three courses is mainly because they have aptitude for science, or these courses have connection with their desired career path. Teachers explained that students mainly choose Life & Science, and both teachers and students avoid Science History because the course content is difficult. Based on the research results, we suggested ways to restructure Convergence Electives for the 2022 revised curriculum including developing convergence electives composed of interdisciplinary convergence core concepts with high content accessibility, developing convergence electives with core concepts related to AI or advanced science, developing module-based courses, and supporting professional development of teachers who will teach interdisciplinary convergence electives.

A Comparative Study of Physics Textbooks based on 2015 Revised National Curriculum and IB DP: Focused on the 'Relativity' Unit (2015 개정 교육과정과 IB DP에 따른 물리학 교과서 비교 연구: '상대성 이론' 단원을 중심으로)

  • Kwon, Munho
    • Journal of Science Education
    • /
    • v.44 no.1
    • /
    • pp.15-37
    • /
    • 2020
  • Unlike Korean science curriculum's continued push for "relevance of contents" to reduce the burden of learning on students, IB DP (International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme) is chosen in many countries and the number of IB world schools continues to grow, although it contains not only a large amount of learning but a substantial amount of content that requires quantitative calculations. Through this study, we suggest implications for Korean science curriculum and textbook, by comparing the constructions of chapters, the achievement standards, the learning contents, and the formulas of physics textbook, focusing on the 'relativity' unit of the 2015 revised national curriculum and IB DP, and by analyzing the questions of college scholastic ability test (CSAT) and external assessment (EA).

Analysis of the issues derived from the implementation of the 2015 revised mathematics curriculum in 1st and 2nd grade (2015 개정 수학과 교육과정 초등학교 1~2학년 적용에서의 쟁점 분석)

  • Kim, Seong-Kyeong;Oh, Taek-Keun
    • The Mathematical Education
    • /
    • v.58 no.2
    • /
    • pp.263-282
    • /
    • 2019
  • The purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of 2015 revised mathematics curriculum. This study focused on issues raised from the implementation. The teaching-learning methods for enhancing mathematical competencies, the amount and difficulty of mathematics in the 1st and 2nd grade, the level of vocabulary and sentence for students in the textbooks, and the support for successful implementation of the curriculum were collected and analyzed through questionnaires and interviews. As a result of the research, most of the teachers tried to improve the teaching and learning method considering mathematical competencies, but had difficulty in connecting contents and competencies. They also recognized that the amount and difficulty in the 1st and 2nd grade math, and the level of vocabulary and sentences presented in math textbooks were generally appropriate. However, they pointed out that the textbooks were over-emphasized in various ways out of basic calculation methods, and that the long sentences, which are not easy to read and understand by students who are not familiar with reading Korean, are included in the . They recognised that there is a large difference in level of reading Korean and understanding math among students. So we suggest that more active support is needed for the students who are learning slowly and the students who are having difficulty in reading Korean.

Analysis of the democratic civic competencies of activity tasks in middle school Home Economics textbooks according to 2015 revised national curriculum (2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 중학교 가정 교과서 활동과제의 민주시민역량 분석)

  • Han, Ju
    • Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
    • /
    • v.30 no.1
    • /
    • pp.79-97
    • /
    • 2018
  • The purpose of this study was to analyze the democratic civic competencies of the activity tasks in 'the Family Life' part in Middle School Technology Home Economics textbooks according to the 2015 revised national curriculum. In order to achieve the purpose of this study, the activity tasks of six types of middle school Home Economics textbooks (for a total 12 of volumes) were analyzed. As a result, the use of the citizenship competency group was the most often recorded out of the three democratic civic competency groups and the subset of trust and value competencies also were frequently observed. Additionally, democratic civic competency was the seen most within the 'human development and family' area by the national curriculum, and showed the highest frequency in big idea, 'the relationship'. Activity tasks in the 'KH' textbooks were dealing with democratic civic competency the most. Based on the relationship between Home Economics education and democratic civic competencies, it is necessary to study the practice of classroom instruction so that students can develop democratic civic competence in 'the Family Life' by means of a Home Economics curriculum.

A Comparative Analysis on High School's National Travel Geography Curriculum in Korea and China (한국의 여행지리와 중국의 관광지리 교육과정 비교)

  • Kang, Chang-Sook
    • Journal of the Korean association of regional geographers
    • /
    • v.22 no.1
    • /
    • pp.267-285
    • /
    • 2016
  • This study presents a comparative analysis of newly developed curriculum of Travel Geography as the career elective subject in high school for the 2015 revised curriculum in Korea and Tourism Geography in China. Travel Geography Curriculum comprises subject objectives, the contents organization, and achievement standards which reflect the core concept of geography. It utilizes travel as the topic and frame to raise the availability, interest and empathy in the geography classroom. The main research contents are comparative analysis on the similarities and differences of the subject character, goal, content, teaching-learning method and assessment of the national geography curriculum in Korea and China. Practical implications are presented for textbook compilation of the Travel Geography and its Practice classroom teaching-learning.

  • PDF

An analysis of the 2016 government guidelines for teaching of Japan and the outline of the 2015 revised curriculum of Korea (2016년에 공표한 일본의 학습지도요령과 2015 개정 교육과정 총론의 구성 분석)

  • Kim, JaMee;Lee, WonGyu
    • The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education
    • /
    • v.20 no.4
    • /
    • pp.1-14
    • /
    • 2017
  • The purpose of this study was to compare the composition of the government guidelines for the educational curriculum of Japan announced in 2016 with the outline of the 2015 revised educational curriculum of Korea. To compare the composition of the national level curricula of the two countries, the composition systems and content details were analyzed along with the trends of emphasis placed on informatics education. The analysis indicated that as for the Japanese government's guidelines, it was suggested that the causes of revisions, and purposes and methods of fulfilling goals be added, and thus the appropriateness of the guidelines was emphasized. As for Korea's revised curriculum, a gap caused by segmental development of the outline and details of the curriculum were found in addition to errors in curricular composition and direction setting which were carried out without consideration to the transition time required or changes of subjects. To ensure sufficiency of the curricular contents and education reflecting the situations of each time phase, the necessity to improve the overall curricular framework was suggested. This study holds significance as it provides the introspective insight that the goals and directions of education cannot be set properly when the curricular framework is established without recognition of the contents.

Exploring Research Trends in Curriculum through Keyword Network Analysis (키워드 네트워크 분석을 통한 교육과정 연구 동향 탐색)

  • Jang, Bong Seok
    • Journal of Industrial Convergence
    • /
    • v.18 no.2
    • /
    • pp.45-50
    • /
    • 2020
  • The purpose of this study is to analyze relationships among essential keywords in curriculum. The number of 1,935 keyword was collected from 644 manuscripts published between 2002 and 2019. For data analysis, this study selected softwares of KrKwic and KrTitle to compose a 1-mode network matrix and UCINET 6 and NetDraw to implement network analysis and visualization. Results are as follows. First, the frequency of keyword was curriculum, curriculum development, national curriculum, competency-based curriculum, 2015 revised national curriculum, curriculum implementation, understanding by design, competency, teacher education, school curriculum, and IBDP from highest to lowest. Second, degree centrality was curriculum development, curriculum, competency-based curriculum, national curriculum, 2015 revised national curriculum, understanding by design, competency, key competency, high school curriculum, textbook, curriculum implementation, teacher education, and IBDP from highest to lowest.

Analysis of the 2015 Revised and 2022 Revised Elementary School Science Achievement Standards Using the TIMSS 2023 Scientific Cognitive Domain Analysis Framework (TIMSS 2023 과학 인지 영역 분석틀을 활용한 2015 개정 및 2022 개정 초등 과학과 성취 기준 분석)

  • Sungchan Shin
    • Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
    • /
    • v.44 no.3
    • /
    • pp.249-262
    • /
    • 2024
  • The purpose of this study is to analyze the achievement standards of the 2015 revision and 2022 revision of the science curriculum using the TIMSS 2023 science cognitive domain analysis framework. The subject of the study is the achievement standards for all elementary school areas in the 2015 and 2022 revised science curriculum. Three field teachers and one elementary science education expert who majored in elementary science education participated in the research analysis. The results of this study are as follows. First, in the 2022 revised movement and energy field, the ratio of the 'knowing' area was about 16% higher than the 2015 revision, and the ratio of the 'reasoning' area also increased by about 5.8%. Second, in the material field, the proportion of TIMSS 2023 cognitive domains was in the order of 'knowing', 'applying', and 'reasoning' regardless of grade group and curriculum revision period. Third, in the field of life sciences, the proportion of TIMSS 2023 cognitive domains differed depending on grade group and curriculum revision period. Fourth, in the Earth and Space field of the 2022 revision, similar to the other three fields, the proportion of the 'Knowing' field increased and while the 'Applying' field decreased. However, in the 2022 revision, the 'reasoning' area in all three other fields increased, but decreased only in the earth and space fields. Fifth, the 2015 revised integrated unit and the 2022 revised science and society field only covered the elements of 'recognizing' and 'presenting examples' in the 'knowing' area, 'making relationships' and 'explaining' in the 'applying' area and 'Synthesize' in the 'reasoning' area. In the 2022 revised elementary school science field, the proportion of the 'knowing' section was 52.5%, the proportion of the 'applying' section was 33.8%, and the proportion of the 'reasoning' section was 13.7%. In conclusion, in the 2022 revised elementary science achievement standards, the ratio of the 'applying' and 'reasoning' areas was low because the reliance on the 'knowing' area was too high.

Informatics Teacher Competency Improvement Strategies in The 2015 Revised National Curriculum (2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 정보과 교사 역량 개선 방안)

  • Lee, Eunkyoung;Kim, Kyung Hoon;Jeon, Seongkyun
    • Proceedings of The KACE
    • /
    • 2017.08a
    • /
    • pp.89-92
    • /
    • 2017
  • 2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 정보과 교사 역량 개선 연구의 필요성이 제기되었다. 본 연구에서는 정보과 관련 교사자격증 표시과목 제구조화 방안과 함께 개선된 재구조화 방안에 따른 현직교사의 교육 요구도를 산출하고 이를 바탕으로 구체적인 교원 연수 방안을 제안하였다. 또한 정보과 관련 표시과목 재구조화 방안에 따른 관련 법령 개정의 필요성을 제시하였다.

  • PDF