• Title/Summary/Keyword: 2009개정교육과정

Search Result 412, Processing Time 0.026 seconds

On the Mathematics Amended Curriculum and College Scholastic Ability Test(CSAT) (수학과 개정교육과정과 대학수학능력시험 체제 개편에 관한 고찰)

  • Lee, Jin-Ho
    • Journal for History of Mathematics
    • /
    • v.22 no.1
    • /
    • pp.111-124
    • /
    • 2009
  • In this paper we check over some problems in College Scholastic Ability Test(CSAT) Mathematics section and propose some methods to improve the CSAT Mathematics section. CSAT has been changed several times with the change of the school curriculum. A Mathematics amended curriculum will apply in 2009 and we have to reorganize the system of CSAT. We investigate the changes in school curriculum and system of CSAT. Also we make a comparative study of the range of possible questions of CSAT with those of SAT and foreign national entrance exam for college.

  • PDF

Achievement Standards of Geometry According to the 2011 Revision of the National Mathematics Curriculum (2009 개정 교육과정에 따른 중학교 수학과 교육과정의 기하 성취기준에 대한 논의)

  • Lee, Hwan Cheal;Kim, Sun Hee;Ko, Ho Kyoung
    • Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
    • /
    • v.22 no.4
    • /
    • pp.603-617
    • /
    • 2012
  • The 2011 Revision of the National Mathematics Curriculum, amended based on the 2009 Curriculum version, focuses on three important issues: 1) 20% reduction of the previous curriculum contents; 2) improvement of students' creativity through mathematical processes; 3) flexible management of curriculum. Despite the importance in applications, it has not provided a manual for textbook authors and teachers. Consequently, they are likely to encounter difficulties in interpreting goals of learning achievements. This paper identifies the purposes and contents of achievement standards, and discusses how to implement it at school.

  • PDF

An effective management on the new math curriculum according to 'General Guidelines of Curriculum Revised in 2009' (2009 개정 교육과정 총론 변화에 따른 수학과 초등학교와 중학교 교육과정의 적용 방안)

  • Choe, Seung Hyun;Hwang, Hye Jeang
    • School Mathematics
    • /
    • v.14 no.4
    • /
    • pp.531-552
    • /
    • 2012
  • In December of 2009, General Guidelines of Curriculum Revised in 2009 was announced and research on corresponding mathematics curriculum revision has been initiated from that period. Finally, in August 2011, Mathematics Curriculum Revised in 2009 was announced. Based on the examination the backgrounds and the basic directions of revision newly reformed mathematics curriculum should be applied in math class effectively and efficiently. According to this purpose, this paper first of all finds out what are the major points or difficulties to be caused by managing 'Mathematics Curriculum Revised in 2009' according to the change of 'General Guidelines of Curriculum Revised in 2009'. They are i) the implementation of grade band system, ii) management of differentiated class, and iii) increasing or decreasing of 20% in math class hour. According to those three points to be changed and reinforced newly in new curriculum, this paper investigates the alternatives and policy of dealing with smoothly and efficiently those issues while solving the difficulties.

  • PDF

Trend of Home Economics Curriculum Research by the Curriculum Period and Journals (교육과정 시기 및 학술지별 가정과교육과정 연구의 동향)

  • Kwon, Boeun;Bae, Jinhee;Choi, Kyeongeun;Song, Yeo Min;Yu, Nan Sook;Baek, Hee Yeon
    • Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
    • /
    • v.36 no.2
    • /
    • pp.33-50
    • /
    • 2024
  • This study examined the trends in home economics education research across different curriculum periods and journals. A total of 374 papers related to the 2009, 2015, and 2022 revised curricula were selected and analyzed using network analysis from four journals. First, research trends were analyzed by curriculum period. Keyword frequency analysis revealed that articles on the 2009 and 2015 revised curricula primarily focused on analyzing the curriculum to develop textbooks or programs. In contrast, papers on the 2022 revised curriculum explored broader directions. Topic modeling results highlighted the prominent topics for each period: 'environmental education' in the 2009 revised curriculum, 'safety and health education' in the 2015 revised curriculum, and 'ecological transition' in the 2022 revised curriculum. Second, research trends were analyzed by journal. Keyword frequency analysis by journal exposed specific research tendencies. For example, in the Journal of Home Economics Research, 'perceptions of practical classes' and 'analysis of safety textbooks' were major topics for the 2009 revised curriculum, while 'teaching and learning plans for competence development' dominated research on the 2015 revised curriculum. This study demonstrates that the concepts and goals emphasized in curriculum revisions are reflected in the corresponding research.

Development of Content Structure Focusing on Three Systems of Action for the 2009 Revised Current Home Economics Curriculum (2009 개정 현행 가정과 교육과정을 위한 세 행동체계 중심의 내용체계 개발)

  • Ju, Sueun;Yoo, Taemyung
    • Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
    • /
    • v.28 no.2
    • /
    • pp.1-19
    • /
    • 2016
  • The purpose of this study was to design curriculum content structure integrating three systems of actions for 2009 revised current home economics curriculum. For the development of content structure and content elements, a development team of two home economics scholars, a cooperating team of three home economics teachers, and an expert team of 15 home economics teachers and professors were organized. Phase 1 of curriculum development was developed by integrating three systems of actions with traditional home economics content areas of clothing, food, housing, consumption, and family by the development team. It is examined by the cooperating team and in phase 2 is recommended to build matrix of units of the current curriculum and the three systems of actions. The final phase of curriculum development illustrated a content structure integrating the sub-units of 2009 revised current curriculum and the three systems of action following the expert group's professional opinion.

An Analysis the Contents Related to a Subject 'Earth and Moon' from Elementary Science Textbooks of the 2009 Revised Curriculum and 2015 Revised Curriculum ('지구와 달' 주제와 관련된 초등학교 2009 개정 과학교과서와 2015 개정 과학교과서 내용 분석)

  • Lim, Cheonghwan;Chae, Donghyun
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education
    • /
    • v.11 no.3
    • /
    • pp.237-243
    • /
    • 2018
  • The purpose of this study is to analyze the contents related to a subject 'Earth and Mooon' from elementary science textbooks of the 2009 revised curriculum and elementary science textbooks of the 2015 revised curriculum. For the research, the team selected and analyzed the contents of the 'Earth and Moon' unit in the elementary science textbooks of the 2009 revised curriculum and 2015 revised curriculum. As a result of the research, first, there has been no significant change in achievement standards of the curriculum as the science textbook revised from 2009 curriculum to 2015 curriculum. Second, the two curriculum did not differ much in specific textbook contents statement or development, but they showed much change in presentation of exploration activities in curriculum as well as the specific exploration activities presented in the textbooks. Third, compared to science textbooks of the 2009 revision the 2015 revision used more pictures and illustrations. Forth, there have been few changes related to experimental observation, but the activities to organize the unit in 2015 revision have been strengthened compared to the 2009 revision.

Analysis of Contents related to Models in the Chemistry Textbooks of the 2009 & 2015 Revised Curricula: Focusing on the Electrolysis of Aqueous Solutions (2009 및 2015 개정 교육과정의 화학 교과서에서 모델 관련 내용 분석: 수용액 전기 분해를 중심으로)

  • Kim, Kihyang;Chang, Hasok;Paik, Seoung-Hey
    • Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
    • /
    • v.63 no.4
    • /
    • pp.289-306
    • /
    • 2019
  • The purpose of this study is to compare the contents of chemistry textbooks developed according to the 2015 revised curriculum with the contents of the 2009 revised curriculum to research the change in "the development and use of models". To do this, we analyzed 8 kinds of Chemistry I textbooks and 6 kinds of Chemistry II textbooks from the 2015 revised curriculum and compared them with 4 kinds of Chemistry I textbooks and 4 kinds of Chemistry II textbooks from the 2009 revised curriculum. The scope of the analysis was the explanations of the textbooks related to aqueous electrolysis experiments. In order to compare the contents regarding electrolytes when the same experiments are interpreted with different models, we analyzed contents of 4 kinds of middle school science textbooks from the 2015 revised curriculum and 9 kinds of middle school science textbooks from the 2009 revised curriculum. As a result of the analysis, the same experiment was explained by different models according to the grade level and unit, and all explanations were limited to a single model. Also, the tendency to limit the kinds of electrolytes for controlled experimental results is more pronounced in the 2015 revised curriculum than in the 2009 revised curriculum. From this results, we suggest that efforts are needed to reflect the "development and use of models" in chemistry textbooks developed according to the 2015 revised curriculum.

Analysis of Problems in the Submicro Representations of Acid·Base Models in Chemistry I and II Textbooks of the 2009 & 2015 Revised Curricula (2009 개정교육과정과 2015 개정교육과정의 화학 I 및 화학 II 교과서에서 산·염기 모델의 준미시적 표상에 대한 문제점 분석)

  • Park, Chul-Yong;Won, Jeong-Ae;Kim, Sungki;Choi, Hee;Paik, Seoung-Hey
    • Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
    • /
    • v.64 no.1
    • /
    • pp.19-29
    • /
    • 2020
  • We analyzed the representations of acid-base models in 4 kinds of Chemistry I and 4 kinds of Chemistry II textbooks of the 2009 revised curriculum, and 9 kinds of Chemistry I textbooks and 6 kinds of chemistry II textbooks of the 2015 revised curriculum in this study. The problems of the textbook were divided into the problems of definitions and the representations of the logical thinking. As a result of the study, the lack of the concept of chemical equilibrium had a problem with the representation of reversible reactions in the definition of the Brønsted-Lowry model in the Chemistry I textbooks of 2009 revised curriculum, it also appeared to persist in Chemistry I textbooks of 2015 revised curriculum which contains the concept of chemical equilibrium. The representations of logical thinking were related to particle kinds of conservation logic, combinational logic, particle number conservation logic, and proportion logic. There were few problems related to representation of logical thinking in Chemistry I textbook in 2009 revision curriculum, but more problems of representations related to logics are presented in Chemistry I textbooks in 2015 revision curriculum. Therefore, as the curriculum is revised, the representations of chemistry textbooks related to acid and base models need to be changed in a way that can help students' understanding.

A Comparative Analysis of the 2009 Revised Curriculum for Mathematics in Korea and the Common Core State Standard for Mathematics(CCSSM) in the U.S. -Focus on the Number and Operation Strand in Elementary School - (한국의 2009 개정 수학과 교육과정과 미국의 수학과 교육과정 규준 CCSSM의 비교.분석 -초등학교 수와 연산 영역을 중심으로-)

  • Ahn, Ji-Young;Jeon, Young-Ju;Youn, Ma-Boung;Lee, Jong-Hak
    • Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
    • /
    • v.17 no.4
    • /
    • pp.437-464
    • /
    • 2014
  • Curriculum for mathematic sis the system that selects and organizes the contents which have to be taught in school. Ultimately it can be the whole plan of school mathematical education. The study about curriculum for mathematics is the basic study field of the mathematical education, so curriculum-related studies have been continuously promoted in terms of character, organization and implement of the curriculum, learning contents contained by the curriculum, the connection between school levels, and comparison and analysis of domestic and foreign curricula. Thus, this paper investigated the 2009 Revised Curriculum for Mathematics, which is the curriculum of Korea and the CCSSM which is the curriculum of the U.S. Both have been adopted in schools recently. The purpose of this study is to understand the curricula for mathematics in elementary school of Korea and the U.S. in depth and obtain the implication for the further curriculum revision, by comparing and analyzing the curricula of two countries.

  • PDF

Analysis on Elementary Mathematics Textbooks Based on Comparison between Mathematical Processes in 2009 Revised National Curriculum and Mathematical Practices in CCSSM (2009 개정 교육과정의 수학적 과정과 CCSSM의 수학적 실천의 비교에 따른 초등 수학 교과서 분석)

  • Lim, Miin;Chang, Hyewon
    • School Mathematics
    • /
    • v.17 no.1
    • /
    • pp.1-18
    • /
    • 2015
  • The mathematical processes are strongly emphasized in 2009 revised national curriculum for mathematics and are expected to be complemented and extended in 2015 revised one. This study aims to investigate how much the processes are being implemented in mathematics classroom and select some elements which need complementation. To do this, we selected the mathematical practices of CCSSM as a reference, because it plays the corresponding role in the United States to the mathematical processes in Korea. We recognized common elements and different elements between the two and analyzed. Considering those, we searched the possibility of newer mathematical process and analyzed the 4th grade mathematics textbooks in relation to questions for mathematical practices. We provided the results of analyses and several suggestions for revising mathematics curriculum and textbooks.