• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.18 no.2 s.19
• /
• pp.143-154
• /
• 2004

학교에서 실시되는 평가의 주체는 교사이므로, 교사는 '좋은 평가 도구'를 개발 ${\cdot}$ 제작 할 수 있어야 한다. 좋은 평가 도구를 제작하기 위해서는 이에 대한 직접적인 훈련이 필수적인 동시에 교사 교육의 첫 단계부터 좋은 평가 도구로 평가를 받는 간접 경험도 중요하다. 이 논문에서는 문항반응이론을 적용하여 수학교사 양성기관에서 사용되는 지필고사 문항에 대하여 신뢰도, 타당도, 난이도 및 변별도를 측정하였다. 이 결과는 평가 문항을 개발할 때에 기초자료로 사용될 수 있다.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.16 no.4
• /
• pp.637-654
• /
• 2013

This study aims to suggest a Guide-Line for Assessment Items Development in Middle and High School Mathematics that was included in the plan for advancement of mathematics education(2012). Consequently, we categorized a Guide-Line for Assessment Items Development as three process: 'Lesson content analysis process', 'Assessment items making process', 'Assessment items completed process'. This study will contribute to improve teacher's assessment professionalism and can be used as self-diagnosis tools.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.24 no.2
• /
• pp.253-267
• /
• 2014

This study aims to analyse the effectiveness of the mathematics teacher's training program: whether the training program is effective to improve mathematics teachers' professional competency of the developing assessment instrument (including items) or not. The teachers who were attendee of the program did pre-test before the program and post-test after the program. They wrote the opinions on the pre-developed items which had many errors in the beginning and discussed their opinions each others in the middle of program. The differences between pre-test and post-test and between opinions in the beginning and in the middle were analysed. The first result of the study is that the teacher's professional competency which is evaluated as self-perceived points is improved with regard to understanding the standardized test, item difficulty and item discrimination. Secondly, the proportion of the opinion with concrete reasons is increased as the program progressed. Thirdly, the effective elements of the program are the discussion in the group, discussion between groups, and feedback from the instructor. But the ineffective element of the program is the insufficient time for practicing.

• Proceedings of The KACE
• /
• 2018.08a
• /
• pp.103-106
• /
• 2018

2015 개정 교육과정에서 컴퓨팅 사고력의 함양을 강조하고 있지만 컴퓨팅 사고력을 평가하기 위한 도구에 대한 개발이 미흡하다. 비버 챌린지 문항은 전 세계 60여개국의 정보 교육 전문가 집단이 약 1년 동안 공동 출제 및 검토를 통해 개발되는 문항이므로 문항의 타당도가 높다고 볼 수 있다. 다만 초기의 개발 목적이 평가도구로써 사용하기 위함이 아니었기 때문에 과연 컴퓨팅 사고력의 평가 도구로 사용할 수 있는 신뢰도를 가진 문항인가를 검증하기 위해 본 연구에서는 비버 챌린지 2017 그룹 III의 문항을 대상으로 문항내 적일관성신뢰도를 통계적으로 검증하였으며 그 결과 Cronbach ${\alpha}=.784$로 신뢰도가 높게 나타났다.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.15 no.3
• /
• pp.619-640
• /
• 2011

The study aims the introducing the items for the assessment of mathematical thinking including mathematical reasoning, problem solving, and communication and the analyzing on the responses of the 5th grade pupils. We categorized the area of mathematical reasoning into deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, and analogy; problem solving into external problem solving and internal one; and communication into speaking, reading, writing, and listening. And we proposed the examples of our items for each area and the 5th grade pupils' responses. When we assess on pupil's mathematical reasoning, we need to develop very appropriate items needing the very ability of each kind of mathematical reasoning. When pupils solve items requesting communication, the impact of the form of each communication seem to be smaller than that of the mathematical situation or sturucture of the item. We suggested that we need to continue the studies on mathematical assessment and on the constitution and utilization of cognitive areas, and we also need to in-service teacher education on the development of mathematical assessments, based on this study.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.81-100
• /
• 2006

In this paper, it conducted the following works to develop the selective test for the gifted of information science in elementary schools. First, it presented the discrete mathematical thinking as an essential competence of elementary information science gifted, through theoretical research with many expert's studies, in order to investigate the definition and characteristics of information science gifted. Second, it developed a test to measure the discrete mathematical thinking, according to the results of analysis of discrete mathematical elements, appeared in the 7th national mathematics curriculum, in order to extract the characteristics of selective test for elementary information science gifted. Third, regarding the verification of items in a newly developed test, it adjusted the difficulty and discrimination by conducting 2 sessions of preliminary test, and then finally confirmed that the standards of items in the test, by testifying sufficient level of validity after the application to a main experiment.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.157-175
• /
• 2015

This study was conducted with the aim to develop and improve the assessment literacy of teachers which enables it to develop and utilize the assessment items using a wide range of contexts on the basis of an understanding of math contents and mathematical process specified in the math curriculum and to analyze the results in an effective way. To analyze the changes in the development and improvement of the assessment literacy of preservice math teachers, the author of this study, using PISA items and assessment framework, analyzed the changes through the 1st and 2nd development of assessment items. The results showed the assessment literacy of preservice math teachers and their ability have been improved, implying that there is the necessity to develop a wide range of programs to improve the assessment literacy of preservice math teachers and provide such programs on a regular basis, which will facilitate effective math teaching and learning.

• Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
• /
• v.23 no.3
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to develop the evaluation questions to enhance the higher-thinking skills such as decision-making, creative thinking, critical thinking, problem-solving skills and metacognition in the housing area of middle school home economics. Two steps, selection of contents, development of questions and check the validity were adapted to develop the questions. The total of 28 evaluation elements were selected from the validity of contents and questions related to housing in the 9 textbooks based on the 2007 revised curriculum and in the three on-line question banks operated by public institutions. Four guidelines such as using multi-classified table, various materials, question types, and question structures were applied to develop the evaluation questions. The 80 evaluation questions with 175 associated sub questions related to housing were reviewed two times by two professionals to finalize. The five home economics teachers with various teaching experience have evaluated the validity of each 80 questions. The 57(71.3%) questions got 5 point with average of 4,9 out of 5 point-Likert validity scale. The result of high validity of the evaluation questions developed in this study examined by 5 teachers need to apply to students' test in the class.

• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.31 no.3
• /
• pp.171-199
• /
• 2023

The purpose of this study was to develop an evaluation tool for selecting new projects for R&D project planning level of K Research Institute. For this purpose, items and questions for R&D project selection evaluation were developed based on the CIPP model and previous studies on selection evaluation and evaluation indicators for research project evaluation, and then two Delphi surveys were conducted. The developed evaluation tool was surveyed by 13 experts to verify contents validity ratio, convergence and consensus. The finally selected evaluation tool for R&D project planning consisted of 21 questions in 8 items, including 5 questions for context evaluation, 2 questions for input evaluation, 8 questions for process evaluation, and 6 questions for product evaluation. The evaluation tool developed will contribute to the solution of problems in the bottom-up planning process and to the improvement of the planning competence of the researchers. It will also contribute to improve the consistency and efficiency of evaluation during the selection process.

• 한국정보교육학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2010.01a
• /
• pp.149-156
• /
• 2010

컴퓨터와 인터넷이 보편화된 지금 학교현장에서는 효율적인 통계 분석이 가능하고, 공간적 시간적 제약을 극복한 웹 기반 교원능력개발평가 시스템이 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 현재 웹 기반으로 이루어지고 있고 교원평가 시스템을 비교 분석하여 그 특징을 알아본 후 그 제한점을 극복하고 사용자의 사용성 향상을 위한 웹 기반 교원능력개발평가 시스템을 제안하고 설계한다. 본 논문에서 제안하고 설계한 교원능력개발평가 시스템의 사용성 향상 요소는 크게 세 가지이다. 첫 번째는 평가문항별 키워드를 레이어 방식으로 설명하여 평가자의 평가문항 이해를 돕는 것이다. 두 번째는 평가자를 위해 평가보조자료를 첨부하여 공정하고 객관적인 교원능력개발평가가 이루어지도록 하는 것이다. 세 번째는 통계 처리가 힘든 서술형 문항에 키워드별 분류 기능을 추가하여 교원의 자기 발전의 자료로 활용하도록 하는 것이다. 이러한 웹 기반 교원능력개발평가 시스템은 학교 교육의 질 향상 및 공교육에 대한 신뢰를 제고하는데 기여할 수 있다.