• Title/Summary/Keyword: 평가항목별 중요도

Search Result 1,083, Processing Time 0.027 seconds

A Study on the Field Application through the Improvement of Scoring System for HACCP Evaluation Items of Cattle Farm (소 농장 HACCP 평가항목의 점수부여 체계 개선을 통한 현장 적용 연구)

  • Baek, Seung-Hee;Nam, In-Sik
    • Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture
    • /
    • v.26 no.4
    • /
    • pp.759-774
    • /
    • 2018
  • This study was conducted to establish scores according to the importance levels of each HACCP evaluation item in cattle farm. The importance levels and score of each HACCP evaluation item was derived through the non-compliance rate and severity levels of hazard. In order to change the score criteria according to the importance of each HACCP evaluation item, we analyzed the importance of each HACCP evaluation item by using the portfolio mapping method according to the occurrence frequency and severity levels of hazard. The scores were classified into 3 point, 2 point, and 1 point, respectively, by classifying the importance of each category as 'high', 'middle' and 'lower'. Accordingly, we have established a now scoring system of each HACCP evaluation item through this study. Through the result of this study, the objectivity of the comparative evaluation was verified by implementing the currently used HACCP evaluation item to the cattle farm. In conclusion, Implementation of the result of this study to cattle farm may help to increase the objectivity and also improve more safety and hygienic cattle management and raw milk production.

항만보안 효율성 제고를 위한 우선순위 평가에 관한 연구

  • Gang, Min-Gu;Kim, Hwa-Yeong
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
    • /
    • 2018.11a
    • /
    • pp.355-356
    • /
    • 2018
  • 본 연구에서는 국내 항만보안 효율성을 측정하기 위한 사전연구로 항만보안에 있어서 중요 평가항목을 선정하고 평가하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 문헌조사 및 관계자들의 인터뷰를 통해 평가항목을 선정하였고, 이들 항목을 4개의 대분류와 12개의 중분류로 분류하였다. 다음으로 해양수산부 공무원, 항만공사 직원, 학계 관계자들로 구성된 전문가들의 설문조사를 통해 평가항목에 대하여 AHP 기법을 이용하여 중요도를 산출하였다. 상위 수준의 중요도 산출결과, 해양수산부 공무원 그룹과 항만공사 직원 그룹은 시설 지원 항목의 중요도가 높았으며 학계 관계자 그룹의 경우 인력예산 지원 항목의 중요도가 높았다. 하위 수준 항목의 종합중요도 분석 결과, 해양수산부 공무원 그룹과 항만공사 직원 그룹에서는 항만 내 통합시스템 구축 및 유관기관 간의 협조를 통한 운영시스템 강화의 순위가 가장 높았으나, 학계 관계자 그룹의 경우 보안인력들의 처우개선이 가장 높은 순위로 나타났다.

  • PDF

A Study on Importance and Score Setting of HACCP Evaluation Items on Pig Farm (돼지농장 HACCP 평가항목의 중요도 및 점수 설정에 관한 연구)

  • Nam, In-Sik
    • Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture
    • /
    • v.25 no.1
    • /
    • pp.233-246
    • /
    • 2017
  • This study was conducted to improve the score of HACCP evaluation items in pig farm. The importance and score of each HACCP evaluation item was derived through the non-compliance rate and severity of hazard. The total score of evaluation items of the pre-requisite section was 200 points and the HACCP section was developed to have a total of 100 points. Implementation of the result of this study to pig farm may help to improve more safety and hygienic pig production. With the result of this study, it is expected that the propose of HACCP system implementation in pig farm will be achieved.

An Analysis on the Pre-Feasibility Evaluation Factors of Activation for Welfare Facilities for the Residents in Apartment Building (공동주택 주민복지시설의 활성화를 위한 사전 타당성 평가요인 분석)

  • Kim, Young-Hoon;Kang, Hyun-Wook;Won, Yoo-Man;Kim, Yong-Su
    • Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • /
    • v.12 no.6
    • /
    • pp.160-167
    • /
    • 2011
  • An Analysis on the Pre-Feasibility Evaluation Factors of Activation for Welfare Facilities for the Residents in Apartment Building. The adapted research method of selected case five apartment building in D new town and carried out questionnaire survey to residents and user for draw items of feasibility evaluation. Drew items of feasibility evaluation classify as Plan section, Design section, and Operation section and evaluate the weight of each section utilizing analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Depending on the purpose and methods. The results of this study are as follows: Such as Plan section, Composition of Program Facility, User Charge Survey, Arrangement of Program Room were analyzed highest. Such as Design section, Arrangement of Program Room, Circulation planning, Educational Equipment were analyzed highest. And such as Operation section, Operation costs, Operation Plan, Review of Program Facility were analyzed highest.

Comparison of The Importance of Evaluation Items for Landscape Performance and Sustainability Using Analytic Network Process (ANP) (ANP기법을 이용한 조경성능 및 친환경 평가항목 중요도 비교)

  • Ryu, Myeung-Ji;Lee, Hyung-Sook
    • Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
    • /
    • v.47 no.6
    • /
    • pp.45-52
    • /
    • 2019
  • As international criteria and standards are required in the fields of design and construction, landscape performance must also be considered not only for the value of the landscape but also for providing quality assurance and sustainability. Given the lack of research on landscape performance, the present research was purposed to analyze the importance of potential assessment categories and items using an analytical network process. A list of assessment items, which is composed of 20 items and 6 categories, was derived through a literature review and a preliminary survey of 11 landscape professionals. An ANP model was established and a survey was conducted among 30 landscape practitioners to determine the weight of priorities considering the criteria. The results of ANP showed that the categories of site selection, preservation and health, and convenience had high priorities while materials had the lowest importance score. For the assessment items, a monitoring plan was the highest importance, followed by cultural/ historic preservation, management cost reduction, and natural ground areas. Despite the difficulties in quantifying landscape achievements, most respondents agreed that there needs to be an evaluation system for landscape performance in order to assure the quality and sustainability of landscape development. More research and discussion are needed to develop an assessment system for landscape performance that is applicable to Korean context.

Fuzzy Set Theory와 AHP를 적용한 CFMS 화면설계의 인간공학적 평가

  • 정광태;이용희
    • Proceedings of the ESK Conference
    • /
    • 1996.04a
    • /
    • pp.76-81
    • /
    • 1996
  • CFMS(Critical Function Monitering System)는 원자력발전소에서 비상시 제어실 운전원에게 원전의 안전상태에 대한 정보를 제공하는 기능을 갖는데, 원전의 안전성을 위해 인간공학적 확인 및 검증(V&V)이 요구된다. 본 연구에서는 CFMS 화면설계의 인간공학적 평가를 위하여, 원전의 안전성에 대한 평가항목들의 상대적 중요도를 구하고 최종적으로 설계의 적합성을 평 가하는 방법론을 제시하고자 한다. 본 연구에서는 CFMS 화면설계의 평가항목 및 평가기준 확립, 원전에서 인적오류발생 가능성에 대한 평가항목의 상대적 중요도 결정, 분석하고자 하는 CFMS 화면에 대한 각 평가항목들의 인간공학적 설계의 적합성 평가로구성된다. CFMS의 인간공학적 평가를 위한 방법론으로 Fuzzy Set Theory와 AHP(Analytic Hierarchical Process) 기법을 적용 한 방법론을 제시하였다. 최종적으로는 전문가의 평가를 통하여 국내 건설되는 원전의 실제적인 문제에 적용하고자 한다.

  • PDF

A Framework for Evaluating Ubiquitous Services using Fuzzy AHP (Fuzzy AHP를 이용한 유비쿼터스 서비스 평가 프레임워크)

  • Kim, Su-Yeon;Hwang, Hyun-Seok
    • Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems
    • /
    • v.13 no.5
    • /
    • pp.158-167
    • /
    • 2008
  • In recent years, various information technologies including ubiquitous computing technology have been developed and deployed. The more ubiquitous services based on ubiquitous technology have widely been spread, the more evaluation methods of those services are required. In this study, we suggest a framework for evaluating ubiquitous services by identifying evaluation factors and their relative importances. Combining review of related works and experts' opinions on the evaluation, we calculate the factors affecting ubiquitous service evaluation and relative importances among those factors using fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). We conduct a case study to illustrate the applicability and feasibility of the suggested framework.

  • PDF

Weighting assessment on evaluation indicators of dam rehabilitation using the AHP analysis (AHP분석을 통한 댐 재개발 평가항목 중요도 평가)

  • Choi, Ji-Hyeok;Kim, Jong-Suk;Kwon, Ji-Hye;Moon, Young-Il
    • Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
    • /
    • v.49 no.5
    • /
    • pp.381-389
    • /
    • 2016
  • In this study, we developed evaluation indicators of dam rehabilitation considering climate change in order to prepare for safety of aging dam facilities in accordance with changes in rainfall intensity. The validity and appropriateness of each indicator, and the evaluation criteria were selected for quantitative indicators for each detail through domestic and international case studies, literature review, and expert advice. The survey was carried out to estimate the importance of each indicator for dam rehabilitation. The subjective assessment of the respondents was rearranged using pairwise comparison from the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The reliability of the survey results was evaluated through consistent verification. In addition, a comparative assessment was carried out which evaluated the reliability importance estimation result to refine the criteria to distinguish rating scales between expert and non-expert groups on dam-related fields.

A Basic Study on the Establishment of Evaluation Items for the Resiliency of Planting Landscape in Hahoe and Yangdong of World Cultural Heritage (세계문화유산 하회와 양동의 식생경관 진정성 유지를 위한 평가항목 설정 기초 연구)

  • Lee, Chang-Hun;Shin, Hyun-Sil
    • Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture
    • /
    • v.36 no.2
    • /
    • pp.21-29
    • /
    • 2018
  • This study was wanted to select a value evaluation item to maintain the authenticity of the Planting Landscape in Hahoe and Yangdong villages. Above all, after checking the suitability of the 43 selected items by the Focus Group Interview, the weight was calculated in the Analytic Hierarchy Process expert questionnaire to establish the importance of the indicators for the development of the assessment items. The expert analysis analyzed the importance of 2 sections, 6 divisions and 11 detailed categories, and summarized the results of the study as follows : First, the comparative importance of each category and selection of the assessment items for the stabilization of the Planting Landscape of Hahoe and Yangdong indicated that cultural values are more important than biological values. In particular, details of the biological values of trees were derived with relatively low estimates, except for the specific characteristics of species and items of type of tree. Second, as a result of verification of the suitability of the 43 items selected by the Focus Group Interview, the source diameter, the collection width, reception, flushing, supersonality, records, memorials, 11 items were selected, Third, the results of the importance evaluation of the value properties for maintaining the resistance of vegetation through the Analytic Hierarchy Process were : specific in biological values (0.187), steady (0.094), and water pipe width (2007). There was relatively little difference in the highest weights, the width of the pipe except for the lowest value received, and the source diameter flushing. Fourth, the results of an evaluation of the importance of a value property aimed at historical values were whether or not the cultural asset was designated (0.134), the record value (0.092), the time (0.088), and the monument (0.063). In terms of the importance of evaluating the historical values of Planting sites consisting of Hahoe and Yangdong, the importance of designation of cultural properties was considered to be relative to the maintenance of the Planting Landscape including culture and history. Based on the assessment items and weighted values of the Planting Landscape of Yangdong Village and the World Cultural Heritage below and below, this study's Analytic Hierarchy Process can be applied to actual criteria for the assessment of the authenticity of trees in the village. Based on the assessment items and weighted values of the Planting Landscape in Hahoe and Yangdong villages, a follow-up study on the assessment standards for the authenticity of trees in the village will be left as a future task.

Analysis of Relative Importance on Evaluation Elements of Library Discovery (도서관 디스커버리의 평가요소에 대한 상대적 중요도 분석)

  • Kim, Seonghee
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
    • /
    • v.54 no.2
    • /
    • pp.399-417
    • /
    • 2020
  • In this study, we tried to analyze the relative importance of features for various functions provided by Discovery. We identified a total of 36 assessment items in five categories including contents, search function, serendipity, interactivity, and ease of use based on literature review. In order to objectively evaluate the relative importance of each evaluation element, an AHP technique was adopted. As a result, 'Easy of use' received the highest weighted value among the five categories, followed by 'contents', 'search function', 'interactivity', and 'serendipity'. In addition, among all the 36 assessment items, 'Quality of data for central index' had higher weighted value. These findings can be used as basic data to adopt a discovery tool for libraries.