• Title/Summary/Keyword: 중재원(仲裁員)

Search Result 346, Processing Time 0.022 seconds

The Effect of Hours in Child Care Centers on Children's Daily Stress and the Moderating Effects of Child Care Quality (어린이집 재원시간에 따른 유아의 일상적 스트레스와 어린이집 질적수준의 중재효과)

  • Kim, Jeong Wha;Lee, Jae Yeon
    • Korean Journal of Childcare and Education
    • /
    • v.9 no.2
    • /
    • pp.357-377
    • /
    • 2013
  • This study aims to look for care quality factors reduce the daily stress of young children placed in care centers for long hours. Therefore, the research questions look into how the hours and care quality factors in child care centers affect young children's daily stress, and whether the care quality factor moderates the impact of the hours children spent in centers. The subjects in this study were 380 children from 3 to 5 years old from 10 child care centers. The Korean Preschool Daily Stress Scale(KPDSS) for children's daily stress and Early Childhood Environmental Rating Scale-Revised(ECERS-R) for quality of each classroom of centers were implemented. The main findings were summarized as following: (1) The more hours he/she spent in the center, the more stress he/she had. Children who spent 9 hours or more had more stress than children with 7 hours or less. (2) Among the 7 quality factors including space and furnishings, personal care routines, language reasoning, activities, interaction, program structure, parents staff, the interaction level between a teacher and a child and the level of parents and staff had the most impact on children's daily stress. (3) The qualitative factors of child care, language reasoning level, interaction level, parental support, and level of teachers reduced children's daily stress which was affected by the hours they spent in centers. Thus in order to reduce the daily stress of children who attend more than 9 hours a day, it is crucial to promote language reasoning activities and interaction between teachers and children and to improve parental support and teachers' professionalism.

V+Special_기업이 알아야할 언론보도 대응법 (II) - 인터넷과 기업의 명예훼손

  • Jang, Seong-Won
    • Venture DIGEST
    • /
    • s.135
    • /
    • pp.38-39
    • /
    • 2009
  • 지난 호에는 부정적인 언론사 오보의 경우에 명예훼손의 판단기준은 어떠하며 피해자들에게 어떤 권리와 절차가 있는지를 살펴보았다. 요약하면 공익적이지 못한 보도(진실 여부와 상관없이), 공익적이지만 진실하지 못한 보도, 공익적이지만 언론의 주의의무(상당성)를 다하지 못한 보도는 손해배상책임을 지는 불법적 보도이며, 손해배상 정정보도 등 보도로 인한 피해 구제를 법원보다 간편하고 신속하게 받을 수 있는 기관으로 언론중재위원회(이하 중재위)가 있다는 것이다. 이번 호에는 이어서 포털 뉴스 및 근거 없는 게시글에 대해서 대응하는 방법과 최근에 나온 판례에 대해 설명하고자 한다.

  • PDF

Systematic Review of Educational Programs for Multicultural Families in South Korea (다문화가정 구성원 대상 교육프로그램 중재에 대한 체계적 고찰)

  • Lee, sang hun;Park, Kyung Min;Shon, Soonyoung
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.19 no.4
    • /
    • pp.457-466
    • /
    • 2021
  • This study was a systematic review that aimed to assess the effectiveness of educational programs for members of multicultural families. Therefore, 21 studies from domestic databases - RISS, KISS, NDSL, DBia, and nanet - were analyzed and the data were compiled and encoded by three researchers. Regarding the characteristics of the educational programs for multicultural families, 12 programs were developed for children, eight, for parents, and one, for both parents and children. While most intervention programs included topics on health, responsive care, and early education, none included topics on nutrition and safe space or targeted all members of multicultural families. This study identified the need for developing educational programs for all members of multicultural families and for developing and evaluating programs that can address, on a theoretical basis, the problems encountered by multicultural families.

A Study on Improving a Method of the Appointment of Arbitrators in Inter-Korean Commercial Arbitration (남북상사중재에 있어 중재인 선정방식에 관한 연구)

  • Lee, Joo-Won
    • Journal of Arbitration Studies
    • /
    • v.18 no.1
    • /
    • pp.147-165
    • /
    • 2008
  • Appointment of arbitrators is very important in arbitration. As it has been a long laps since Korean peninsula was devided into two parts, South and North, it has come to be too much gaps between South and North in the law, social system, commercial practice and etc.. South Korea is familar to international commercial practice and capitalistic legal system generalized internationally in modern times. On the other hand as North Korea was closed society for a long time, they are not familar to international commercial practice and market economy. In this connection, commercial disputes arising from the transactions between South and North will occur frequently and it will be very difficult to select governing law or commercial practice referred to the disputes. Under the circumstances, when and if an arbitrator from South or North will be appointed as presiding arbitrator in the tribunal composed by three arbitrators, the part from which the presiding arbitrator come will be a majority, and it will be advantageous to the parties came from the part of which the presiding arbitrator come from. Such being the case, sole arbitrator or presiding arbitrator needs to be appointed among foreigner. Otherwise I recommend the tribunal composed by two arbitrators and umpire system. As to arbitrator's fee, as there is a big gap in its economic aspects between South and North, I supposed to need establishing the fund made by corporation with South and North in order to compensate arbitrators from South or abroad for their fee. Finally it is more important to prevent disputes arising from transactions between South and North. In order to prevent the disputes, education for North Korean about international commercial practice and skill to make a contract of international sale of goods and investment are needed.

  • PDF

Recognition or Enforcement of Domestic Arbitral Awards Under the German Civil Procedure Act (독일민사소송법상 국내중재판정의 승인 및 집행 -「독일민사소송법」 제1060조 규정의 내용을 중심으로-)

  • Sung, Joon-Ho
    • Journal of Arbitration Studies
    • /
    • v.30 no.2
    • /
    • pp.43-68
    • /
    • 2020
  • The "arbitration" system resolves disputes through judgments on rights relations or claims between disputed parties by judging by private trial, but it does not have organizational and material bases to execute the contents of these judgments. Therefore, unless the parties succeed in voluntarily surrendering to the results of the arbitration award, the implementation of the award will be accomplished by the enforcement of the assistance of the National Court. However, unlike the court's ruling, the arbitration tribunal does not generate enforcement power from the judgment itself, and it must be filed with the court for execution. In this regard, Germany provides for arbitration proceedings in the Civil Procedure Act Volume 10. In particular, Article 1060 governs the approval and enforcement of domestic arbitral awards. Accordingly, the procedure for declaring the feasibility of domestic arbitration proceedings and the execution of forced execution are commenced. Regarding the enforceable declaration of a domestic arbitral award, it differs from the simpler process requirements compared to the procedure in a foreign arbitral award, and usually has the same effect as a final judgment between the parties without a separate approval procedure. However, the arbitration award does not constitute an enforceable power that can be implemented, but is enforced through the national court's declaration procedure. However, if there is a ground for cancellation as provided for in Article 1059 (2) of the German Civil Procedure Act, the arbitral award is canceled and the application for enforcement is dismissed.

Review of U.S. Courts' Procedural and Substantive Unconscionability Doctrine Regarding Mandatory Arbitration Agreement in the Nursing Home Contracts (미국 요양원 입소계약상의 강제적 중재 조항에 관한 미국 법원의 절차적, 실체적 비양심성 법리 고찰)

  • Shin, Seungnam
    • Journal of Arbitration Studies
    • /
    • v.31 no.1
    • /
    • pp.83-105
    • /
    • 2021
  • If aggrieving consumers or employees cannot prove both substantive and procedural unconscionability, many U.S. state courts will enforce arbitration agreements. Additionally, U.S. courts weigh a variety of factors to determine whether an arbitration agreement is substantively unconscionable. For example, U.S. courts have considered one or a combination of the following factors: (1) the fairness of contractual terms; (2) the severity of contractual terms' deviation from prevailing standards, customs, or practices within a particular industry; (3) the reasonableness of goods-and-services contract prices; (4) the commercial reasonableness of the contract terms; (5) the purpose and effect of the terms and (6) "the allocation of risks between the parties." Further, procedural unconscionability characterized by surprise or lack of knowledge focuses on terms that are deceptively hidden in a mass of contract language, the object of another concealment, or imposed in the circumstances involving haste or high-pressure tactics so that they are not likely to be read or understood. This unconscionability doctrine can be applied to a situation where an alcoholic dementia-afflicted older adult is admitted to a nursing home. At that time, because she had alcoholic dementia, which precluded her reading, comprehending, writing, negotiating, or signing of any legal document, her son, who did not understand the adhesion contract, signed the standardized residential contract and the arbitration agreement.

Effects of non-pharmacological intervention on depressive symptoms in the older adults with mild cognitive impairment : A systematic review and meta-analysis (비약물 중재프로그램이 경도인지장애 노인의 우울 증상에 미치는 효과: 체계적 문헌고찰과 메타분석)

  • Pang, Yanghee;Cho, Mijung
    • The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
    • /
    • v.8 no.5
    • /
    • pp.71-80
    • /
    • 2022
  • The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the non-pharmacological intervention on depressive symptoms in the older adults with mild cognitive impairment. A total of 1,147 studies were retrieved from PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Science direct, KISS, RISS, and DBPia. Twenty-one studies which met the criteria were selected and the quality assessment was conducted independently by two investigators. The effect size of non-pharmacological intervention was estimated using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 3.0. The overall effect size turned out to be the medium effect size (Hedges' g=-0.68, 95% CI=-1.01~-0.36). As a result of the subgroup analysis, the intervention type was statistically significant. The effect size of cognitive intervention (Hedges' g=-1.03, 95% CI=-1.43~-0.61) and multi component intervention (Hedges' g=-0.97, 95% CI=-1.63~-0.33) was greater than excise intervention (Hedges' g=-0.53, 95% CI=-1.16~0.03). This study shows that non-pharmacological intervention was also effective in reducing depressive symptoms in the older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Based on the research results, it is expected that various non-pharmacological intervention studies will be attempted to improve cognitive function and depressive symptoms of the older adults with mild cognitive impairment.

Authenticated Quantum Secret Sharing using GHZ state swapping (GHZ 상태 교환을 이용한 인증된 양자 비밀 공유)

  • Lee, Duk-Jin;Lee, Hwa-Yean;Hong, Chang-Ho;Lim, Jong-In;Yang, Hyoung-Jin
    • Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
    • /
    • v.16 no.6
    • /
    • pp.123-134
    • /
    • 2006
  • We propose a quantum secret sharing protocol which can authenticate more than half of members using GHZ state swapping. The Trusted Third Party, Trent can authenticate all members using previously shared ID among Trent distributing his message and the members wanting to reconstruct the message. Authenticated members can reconstruct a secret message through GHZ swapping. Moreover, this protocol is efficient to expand the number of members to arbitrary number n, so it is a close quantum secret sharing protocol to classical secret sharing protocol.