• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.27 no.10
• /
• pp.255-265
• /
• 2022

We compared and analyzed the factors affecting the lecture evaluation of IT subjects, which are mandatory for all students of H University. The purpose of this study is to determine whether lecture satisfaction has a significant correlation with academic achievement, attendance rate, and categories of courses. In this study, we check whether the lecture satisfaction of IT liberal arts subjects that require a lot of computer-based practice differs from that of other liberal arts subjects. We used the 2,149 evaluation data of 12 lectures submitted by 2,322 students in the first and second semesters of year 2019 at University H. As for the lecture evaluation results, in addition to the evaluation scores of the multiple choice questions, the subjective questions were also quantified by classifying the statements submitted by the students into positive and negative types to make the results of the lecture evaluation objective. Our research results show that student group who have the higher attendance rates and academic achievements have higher level of lecture satisfaction and they also use more positive words than negative words in subjective evaluation questions. Students with the lower score use the more negative words, but the ratio between positive and negative words does not differ between groups. Higher attendance rates groups in the basic programming courses and software applications courses have higher lecture satisfaction ratio. But in the intermediate programming courses, the higher attendances rate and the lecture satisfaction do not have any significant relationship. Also students in the intermediate programming courses use more negative words than those in the basic programming courses.

• Proceedings of the KAIS Fall Conference
• /
• 2011.05b
• /
• pp.645-647
• /
• 2011

본 논문에서는 좋은 수업에 대한 전문대학 현장에서 학습자들 인식을 살펴봄으로써 전문대학 교육에 주는 시사점을 찾아보고자 하였다. 특히 강의평가의 주관식 문항을 분석하여 좋은 강의의 개념과 가이드 라인을 제시하고자 하였다. 질적 분석을 통하여 나타나 결과를 정리해 보면 첫째, 몰입할 수 있는 수업, 둘째, 공정한 평가로 동기유발을 할 수 있는 수업, 셋째, 교수와 학생, 학생과 학생의 원활한 상호작용이 있는 수업, 넷째, 교수자의 열정을 느낄 수 있는 수업을 좋은 강의로 인식하고 있었다. 이와 같은 연구 결과는 강의개선안 및 강의평가 방안 개발에 실질적으로 기여할 수 있다는데 의의가 있다.

• Journal of Service Research and Studies
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.91-101
• /
• 2011

A lecture evaluation is an important factor to validate student's level and improve a reformation of the college evaluation as well. Therefore, this paper researches into the lecture evaluation to apply a better objective method and a fair assessment of all lectures. These researches are analyzed by each subject, based on the lecture assessment performed in K College. First, if a student absent more than 4 weeks, they cannot be participated in the lecture evaluation. Second, the lecture evaluation date takes place when the next class registrations start. Third, the connection between the number of students and the teaching assessment should be considered. Finally, various types of the teaching assessment tools, including the lecture evaluation method such as multiple choices or writing questions need to be applied. Finally lecture evaluation results must be reflected in the next lesson.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.200-213
• /
• 2000

This study is to examine how common science, which was selected as a required subject in high schools with the reorganization of the 6th national science curriculum by the Ministry of Education, is taught in high schools these days. The results show that only one teacher is teaching common science in 3.2% of schools or the teachers divide and teach units according to their majors. In this situation, there are many problems because there are too many integrated contents in each unit and they are too short to solve the study subject during the unit time of 50 minutes. Another problem is that there is no special laboratory for common science. For the knowledge part of common science, lecture-learning is used as a method of teaching and for the inquiry part, inquiry-learning is used. Evaluation is conducted using subjective or objective paper-tests for the knowledge part, and reports are used for evaluation in the inquiry part. Therefore, this study shows that students' response to common science is below the general level and this subject missed the original intent introduced to raise students' interests about science.