• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Disaster Information Conference
• /
• 2017.11a
• /
• pp.317-318
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 사전재해영향성 평가제도의 개선 방안을 제안하기 위해 환경영향성평가의 연혁 변화 및 DB 구축 시스템에 대해 살펴보았다. 또한 재해 사전 분석의 이론적 개념을 분석하여 사전재해영향성 평가제도의 이론적 개념을 살펴보았다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 사전재해영향성 평가의 문제점을 도출하고 개선방안을 제안하였다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 사전재해영향성 평가의 문제점을 도출하고 개선방안을 제안하였고, 또한 사전재해영향성평가 문제점을 환경영향성평가 비교 분석을 통해서 사전재해 영향성평가 개선방안을 제안하였다. 개선방안으로 첫째 정책적 개선안으로 행정계획 지침 분리, 소규모 개발 사업 간소화 등을 제안하였다. 둘째 기술적 개선안으로 통합관리시스템 개발, 사후재해영향성검토제 도입을 제안하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Disaster Information Conference
• /
• 2022.10a
• /
• pp.101-102
• /
• 2022

본 논문에서는 도시 개발현장의 재해저감시설 중 하나인 침사지겸 저류지의 효과평가를 위한 모니터링 방안을 제시하였다. 전 지구적으로 기온이 급격히 상승하고 있으며 이상 자연현상이 지속적으로 증가하고 있다. 특히 우리나라는 매년 태풍에 영향을 받고 여름에 강수량이 집중되고 있다. 개발 중 지표면이 침식에 노출되고 불투수면적의 증가로 홍수위험이 높아져 재해영향평가제도에 따라 침사지겸 저류지를 설치하여 토사의 하천 유출을 방지하고, 첨두유출을 완화시키고 있다. 설치 시 외국의 경험식과 재해영향평가서 기준 기상청 관측대의 30년 빈도 강우량을 사용하고 있으나, 유형 및 제원의 적절성의 효과평가 방안이 부재하다. 향후 이상기후로 강하고 잦은 폭우가 예상되며, 이로 인한 홍수 피해를 예방하기 위한 침사지겸 저류지에 대한 효과 평가 방안이 필요하다. 이에 침사지겸 저류지의 재해저감 효과평가를 위해 타 재해저감시설 모니터링 체계 분석을 통해 수위값과 퇴사위 계측을 활용한 침사지 겸 저류지의 모니터링 방안을 도출하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2011.05a
• /
• pp.299-303
• /
• 2011

사전재해영향성검토 협의제도는 개발로 인해 발생할 수 있는 재해유발 요인을 사전에 검토하여 이를 사전에 제거하는 것이 목적이다. 사전재해영향성 검토는 1996년부터 시행한 재해영향평가의 한계점을 보완하기 위하여, 2005년 개정된 자연재해대책법에서는 사전재해영향성 검토협의제도를 포함하였으며, 2005년 8월 17일 동법 시행령을 개정 공포하여 사전재해영향성검토 협의제도를 본격적으로 시행하게 되었다. 본고에서는 사업 대상 지구를 "부산장안지구 택지개발사업(1단계)"로 선정하였으며, 개발에 따른 재해 발생요인, 즉 유출량 증가에 따른 하류부의 홍수피해 가중, 토공 공사에 따른 토사유출량 증가, 절 성토계획 따라 유발되는 사면의 불안정에 대한 사전검토를 목적으로 하였다. 사업시행에 따른 개발중 토사유출량의 증가와, 개발후 홍수유출량의 증가로 재해의 위험이 예상되어 개발 중의 임시저류지 겸 침사지 2개소와 개발 후의 영구저류지 1개소를 계획하여 홍수유출량을 $2.48m^3/sec$을 줄이고, 토사유출을 90% 포착하였다.

• Water for future
• /
• v.41 no.6
• /
• pp.90-95
• /
• 2008

• Water for future
• /
• v.52 no.8
• /
• pp.101-115
• /
• 2019

• Water for future
• /
• v.55 no.8
• /
• pp.78-88
• /
• 2022

• Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers
• /
• v.36 no.2
• /
• pp.87-93
• /
• 2024

Recently, the impact of climate change with sea levels rise, abnormal high waves, and continuous construction of artificial structures such as ports and harbors, has led to an increasing trend in coastal erosion. In this study, the scope and method of Environmental Impact Assessment, Utilization of Sea Areas, Disaster Impact Assessment, and Risk Assessment of Coastal Disasters System, which are carried out during development projects and erosion reduction projects carried out on the coast, are analyzed to identify each problem. , we proposed a plan to introduce the Impact Assessment System for Coastal Erosion, which can minimize the impact of coastal erosion by deriving improvement measures.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.20 no.9
• /
• pp.372-381
• /
• 2019

In this study, the National Disaster Management System (NDMS) was analyzed to evaluate the disaster impact assessment standards for steep slopes. Problems in the assessment methods and systems were discovered, which could be reasons for poor reliability. The disaster-risk evaluation index needs improvement to evaluate various types of retaining walls, such as concrete/reinforced soil walls and reinforcing stone masonry. Additionally, using the same score for overturning, bulging, and efflorescence could be reasons for poor reliability, and different weighting factors are needed. Assessment methods are needed to subdivide the social influence evaluation index while considering environmental conditions of steep slopes, such as railroads and reservoirs. For the evaluation of steep slopes, standards for start and end points of steep slopes should be created for effective management, and disaster impact assessment needs to be performed after redevelopment from an advanced index for protection and reinforcement. These problems were derived from a current evaluation system, so a disaster impact assessment is necessary to supplement the results of this study.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety
• /
• v.27 no.7
• /
• pp.995-1003
• /
• 2021

Coastal compound disasters are becoming more extreme and more frequent due to climate change. Thus, appropriate and systematic disaster management is necessary to reduce potential losses. One solution to this is the creation of a coastal compound disaster management area. However, Korea's "Countermeasures against Natural Disasters Act" needs to be reformed to introduce this coastal compound disaster management area. In this study, we tried to find the appropriate direction for reforming the Act in order to establish a basis for implementing regulations on the Coastal Compound Disaster Management Area with regard to three aspects: science-based management, cooperative management, and adaptive management. The study was on the premise that the system would be operated based on the provisions of the "Countermeasures against Natural Disasters Act". Consequently for effective science-based management, it is necessary to introduce a disaster risk assessment framework. Based on the results obtained through the implementation of this framework, the management areas should be set with differential measures. Next, cooperation among the various ministries is essential to successfully respond to disasters. This study recommends the establishment of an advisory council composed of the related government departments as a pragmatic solution. Finally, in terms of adaptive management, we found that parallelly utilizing non-structural measures could compensate for the limitations of structural measures.

• Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment
• /
• v.26 no.3
• /
• pp.171-180
• /
• 2017

The vulnerability analysis of climate change driven disaster has been used as institutional framework for the urban policies of disaster prevention since 2012. However, some problems have occurred due to the structure of vulnerability analysis, such as overweighted variables and duplicated application of variables of similar meaning. The goal of this study is to examine the differences of results between the method of current guideline and the method of weight equalization. For this, we examines the current structural framework of the vulnerability analysis, and performs empirical analysis. As a result, the extent and magnitude of vulnerability showed different spatial patterns depending on the weighting methods. Standardized weighting method relatively represented wider vulnerable areas compared to the pre-existing method which follows the current instruction manual. To apply the results of vulnerability analysis to urban planning process for disaster prevention, this study suggests that the reliability of the results should be ensured by improving analytical framework and detailed review of the results.