• Proceedings of the Korea Inteligent Information System Society Conference
• /
• 2002.11a
• /
• pp.523-528
• /
• 2002

기존의 자기 주도적 학습 평가들은 대부분의 선다형 또는 단답형 문항에 대해서 학습평가가 시험 점수로 제공되고, 학습 평가의 정도를 객관적으로 평가 할 수 얼어 학습의 효율성에 대해서 부정적인 시각도 있다. 본 논문에서는 학습자 스스로가 학습 능력 평가를 객관적으로 평가하기 위해 퍼지 이론의 삼각형 타입 소속 함수를 이용한 자기 주도적 학습 평가 방법을 제안한다. 제안된 자기 주도적 학습 평가 방법은 학습에 대해 시험 결과를 세 개의 퍼지 등급으로 분류하여 소속도를 계산하고 퍼지 등급표를 적용하여 최종 퍼지 등급도에 따라 시험 결과를 평가하는 방법을 제시한다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.487-494
• /
• 2011

This paper is to investigate the efficacy of cyber education by self-assessment strategy. Self-assessment strategy contains self-monitoring function and self-control function. 202 students of online university attended and analyzed with frequency, correlation, t-test, Paired t-test. The major findings were as follows. The learners who experienced self-assessment in the initial stage of class had higher changes in social distance to the mentally disabled people positively than the learners who didn't experienced that. This self-assessment strategy can be assumed that it is effective strategy to improve e-learning efficacy and it will contribute to self-directed education for enhancement of on-line education.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.18 no.7
• /
• pp.275-283
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation scores among various evaluators such as tutor, peer, and self evaluation, the lenience and central tendency among these various evaluators, and the correlation between evaluation scores among the various evaluators and the paper test score in the Problem-Based Learning (PBL). For the research, tutor, peer, and self evaluations were carried out with PBL effectiveness evaluation tool for the 105 nursing students taking classes using PBL, and paper test was conducted after the PBL class ended. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS WIN (V. 12.0). The study results showed that peer and self evaluation scores were higher than tutor evaluation score. Also lenience and central tendency were higher and stronger in peer and self evaluation than in tutor evaluation. Paper test score had a significant correlation with tutor evaluation score, but not with peer or self evaluation scores.

• Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
• /
• v.46 no.3
• /
• pp.287-295
• /
• 2002

In this study, the effects of a self-assessment on the students' science concept understanding and science-related attitudes were investigated. Student's perceptions towards the self-assessment were also examined. Five classes from a middle school in Gyunggi Province were chosen. Two of those classes were assigned to the control group that no self-assesment tool was applied to and the other 3 classes were assigned to the experimental group which a self-assess-ment tool developed for this study was applied to. The experimental group was further divided into two groups for imple-ment of two kinds of programs. One experimental group was provided some feedback such as solutions to problems and the other was not provided any type of feedback. The tests of science-related attitudes were administered before and after the instruction period. The science concepts understanding test was done only after the instruction. The results of this study were as follows. There were significant differences between the experimental group and control group in under-standing of scientific concepts. The enhancement of science-related attitudes was also higher for the experimental group. Providing feedback to students was more effective in the improvement of students' science-related attitudes. However, there were no significant differences in understanding of scientific concepts in relation to the feedback in experiment groups. From the above results, it was acknowledged thet self-assessment applied to the middle school science class showed considerably positive influences on the improvements of the understanding of scientific concepts and science-related attitudes.

• Korean Journal of Mathematics
• /
• v.19 no.4
• /
• pp.495-521
• /
• 2011

In this paper, the self-evaluation, the peer-evaluation and the instructor evaluation on virtual mathematics lesson have been performed. The method of checking on the given evaluation item have been used. In result, a lot of difference was shown between self-evaluation, peer-evaluation and the instructor-evaluation toward virtual mathematics lesson. Pre-service teachers were shown as lacking awareness on instructional Virtual Mathematics Lesson' evaluation. Therefore it seems that we must have the opportunity to reflect on the teaching method through a great deal of experience on self-evaluation and peer-evaluation of virtual lessons.

• Journal of Science Education
• /
• v.47 no.1
• /
• pp.75-87
• /
• 2023

This study analyzed correlation among peer evaluation, self-evaluation, and instructor evaluation of argumentation writing conducted in the 'Biology logic and essay' class. To this end, 14 pre-service biology teachers wrote argumentation four times, and peer evaluation, self-evaluation, and instructor evaluation were conducted on these results. The peer evaluation for argumentation writing averaged 2.70 points, the self-evaluation average was 2.68 points, and the instructor evaluation average was 2.71. Looking at the average of each sub-evaluation area, scientific knowledge was the highest in peer evaluation, and the composition area was the highest in self-evaluation. In addition, the area of scientific knowledge was the highest in the instructor evaluation. As a result of examining the standard deviation, the standard deviation of self-evaluation was the largest. As a result of analyzing the correlation between evaluation types, there was a high correlation between peer evaluation and instructor evaluation, and there was a moderate correlation between self-evaluation and instructor evaluation. On the other hand, there was no significant correlation between peer evaluation and self-evaluation. As a result of analyzing the correlation by evaluation area, there was no significant correlation between peer evaluation and self-evaluation in all four areas of scientific knowledge, scientific argumentation, composition, and expression. On the other hand, in the analysis between peer evaluation and instructor evaluation, there was a significant correlation in the areas of scientific knowledge, scientific argumentation, and composition. In addition, there was a significant correlation between self-evaluation and instructor evaluation only in the area of expression. The results of this study show that peer evaluation is highly likely to be applied in the 'Subject logic and essay' class. It also suggests that it is necessary to subdivide evaluation criteria according to the type of evaluation in order to use peer evaluation and self-evaluation.

• 한국정보교육학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2006.08a
• /
• pp.275-281
• /
• 2006

정보통신기술의 발달과 인터넷의 등장으로 원격교육은 새로운 교육패러다임을 주도할 역량있는 교육방식으로 대두되고 있다. 하지만 이런 시점에서 학교교육을 보다 효율적이며 실용적으로 지원할 수 있는 방안이 모색되어야 한다. 특히 초등교육에서의 원격교육은 이제 걸음마를 시작한 단계이며 평가분야에 대한 연구는 전무후무한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 학습자가 동영상 원격교육으로 학습과정을 진행한 후 만족할 만한 성취수준에서 자기평가를 실시하고 동영상 촬영하여 평가자료를 탑재하며, 이를 토대로 교사가 피드백할 수 있도록 시스템을 구축하였다. 이는 학습자가 학습과정 뿐만 아니라 평가영역에 있어서도 개인의 수준과 여건을 고려하여 자기 주도적으로 자기평가를 함으로써 자기주도적 학습능력을 향상시키며, 초등교육과정을 지원할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

• The Proceeding of the Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science
• /
• v.5 no.4
• /
• pp.64-70
• /
• 1994

the magnetic field homogeneities of the induction coils of various sizes and shapes were investigated in order to prepare for the magnetic field immunity test under the power frequency, the pulse and the damed oscillatory fields recommended by the IEC. For this purpose, we analyzed the magnetic field homogeneities in the two induction coils with $1m\times1m$, and $1m\times2.6m$, , and the double square coils with 0.8m and 0.6m spaced. The testing volume within $\pm$3dB in the double square coil with 0.8m spaced in twice bigger than single square coil with 1m side in the z-direction.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2010.05a
• /
• pp.1536-1540
• /
• 2010

자료기반 수문예측 모형은 서로 자기상관이 다른 자료계열에 대해 예측결과만으로 모형의 성능에 대한 상대비교가 어렵다. 그러나 관측치와 예측치간의 평균 오차만을 기준으로 판단하는 기존의 모형 성능평가 기법은 대부분 이러한 자료기반 예측모형의 특성을 고려하지 못하고 있다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 자료기반 수문 예측모형의 성능을 보다 객관적으로 평가할 수 있는 새로운 모형 성능평가 기법인 상대 상관계수(Relative Correlation Coefficient; RCC) 제시하였다. RCC는 자기상관계수에 대한 관측치와 예측치간의 상관계수의 비로 산정되며, 자기상관정도에 따라 예측성능의 결과가 달라진다. 본 논문에서는 다양한 자기상관을 가지는 선형, 비선형 자료계열에 대해 자료기반 수문모형을 적용하여 기존 모형평가 기법의 한계를 제시하였다. 그리고 기존의 성능평가 기법과 RCC를 비교분석하여 자료기반 수문예측모형의 성능평가에 있어 RCC가 보다 객관적이고 일관성 있는 성능평가가 가능함을 보였다.

• Journal of Internet Computing and Services
• /
• v.23 no.2
• /
• pp.107-114
• /
• 2022

In this paper, availabilities of student-evaluations of team activities in the computer science basic classes were analysed. For the purpose, correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the relationships among peer-evaluation, self-evaluation, and academic achievement, and it was found that there was a statistically significant positive correlation among them. Moreover, the gap between peer-evaluation scores and self-evaluation scores was analyzed. When a one-sample t-test was performed, it was found that the gap was very significant. However, the size of the gap was not different between the two classes. That is, regardless of grade level, the students' self-evaluation scores tended to be on average higher than the evaluation scores received from peers. Finally, when analyzing the relationship between the gap in peer-evaluation and self-evaluation scores and academic achievement, there was no significant correlation between the gap in scores and academic achievement. In other words, there was no difference in the tendency of evaluation for students with high or low academic achievement. The results of the analysis shows the availability of student-evaluations of team activities in the evaluation of team-based instruction. The high correlation between self-evaluation and peer-evaluation indicates the objectivity of student-evaluation. Although it is clear that the self-evaluation score is higher on average than the score received from peers, it is more useful in terms of objectivity because it does not vary according to grade, subject, or academic achievement.