• The Journal of Korean Academy of Orthopedic Manual Physical Therapy
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.41-49
• /
• 2008

임상추론은 환자를 평가하고 관리하는데 사용되는 임상가의 필수적인 생각 또는 동적인 인지과정이라고 할 수 있다. 임상추론은 환자의 문제를 인식하고 식별하며 더 나은 환자관리가 이루어지도록 환자의 상태에 대처하며 정보를 해석하고 분석하는 것으로서 이를 위해 임상가는 적절한 지식을 가지고 있어야 하며 임상추론 기술과 관련된 폭넓은 이해가 요구된다. 임상추론은 치료사, 환자, 그리고 환경간의 상호관계를 가진 복잡한 과정으로 임상추론과정에서 치료사와 환자간에는 충분한 협조가 이루어져야 한다. 임상추론에서의 해석적 모델로는 진단적 추론, 상호작용의 추론, 이야기적 추론, 협조적 추론, 예언적 추론, 윤리적 추론, 추론의 교육 등이 제시된다. 임상추론 과정에서 필수적인 주요 요소는 충분한 지식, 인지와 초인지 기술을 포함하며 이들 요소는 치료사와 환자간의 관계에서 발달되어야 한다. 이들 기술 중에 어떠한 실수라도 임상추론의 오류를 초래할 수 있다. 추론에서 오류의 원인으로는 암시된 정보의 잘못된 인지, 임상페턴에 대한 지식부족, 특정 상태에 대해 알려진 사실을 잘못 적용하는 경우를 들 수 있다. 오류는 임상추론 과정의 어떤 단계에서도 일어날 수 있으므로 효과적인 학습전략을 통하여 이들 오류를 예방할 수 있을 것이다.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.11 no.10
• /
• pp.181-186
• /
• 2020

In this study, an attempt was made to investigate the clinical reasoning of nursing students and to identify the factors that influence it. This study was held to grasp the learning ability related to core nursing competency for 297 3^rd and 4^rd grade nursing students. Results indicated that there was a significant difference when comparing clinical competence by grade(p=0.001). Also variables effecting clinical reasoning competence were Problem solving ability, Clinical Decision making ability, Clinical practice performance, and grade of nursing students were found to be significant (p,.001). Outcome of this study can be used as the basis for the development of various curriculums to enhance the clinical reasoning competence, in the future, research for this education development is expected to be needed.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.1874-1883
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study was to verify clinical reasoning of nursing students as well as clarify the relevance between clinical reasoning and academic achievement. 87 students broke into 30 groups of two or three. The students performed post operative care for adult patients in the simulation practicum course of their final semester. Data were collected by evaluating the video-recorded nursing practicum using the clinical reasoning rubric. Clinical reasoning of 61(70.1%) students was limited to the beginning level and that of 6(6.9%) students of the highest scoring was at the third level among the four levels of ability. There was no significant correlation between clinical reasoning and the final cumulative GPA, while there was low level of significant correlation between clinical reasoning and GPA of adult health nursing course or adult health nursing practicum course. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the nursing curriculum to enhance nursing students' clinical reasoning.

• Journal of Convergence for Information Technology
• /
• v.9 no.7
• /
• pp.57-66
• /
• 2019

This study is a descriptive research study for investigating the factors influencing clinical reasoning competency of senior grade nursing students. This study was targeted at 160 senior grade nursing students in M city and G city and data was collected from April 15, 2019 to May 15, 2019. The collected data was analyzed using the SPSS/WIN 21.0 program, and t-test, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and multiple regression analysis were carried out. There was a significant correlation between clinical reasoning competency, critical thinking disposition, metacognition, and empathy. The factors influencing the clinical reasoning competency included metacognition(${\beta}=.48$, p<.001), critical thinking disposition(${\beta}=22$, p=.021), and empathy(${\beta}=-.19$, p=.012). These variables explained 35.0% of the clinical reasoning competency. Based on the results of this study, a demonstration study for developing a convergence education program including metacognition, critical thinking disposition, and clinical reasoning competency and verifying its effect is necessary.

• Journal of Industrial Convergence
• /
• v.21 no.10
• /
• pp.111-120
• /
• 2023

This study is a descriptive research to examine the effects of meta-cognition and resilience on clinical reasoning ability of nursing students who have completed the simulation education integrated with problem based learning. The study subjects were senior nursing students who had experienced SIM-PBL education, and data was collected by using a structured questionnaire from September to December 2021. The collected data was analyzed employing descriptive statistics, correlation, and hierarchical regression analysis using the SPSS program. The results demonstrated that meta-cognition and resilience had a significant positive correlation with clinical reasoning ability. The chief factors influencing on the clinical reasoning ability of nursing students were as follows: confidence in participating in the SIM-PBL education, meta-cognition, and resilience. In addition, the three factors explained the clinical reasoning ability at a high level of 75%. The clinical reasoning ability of nursing students may be cultivated by applying internal reinforcers of self-confidence, meta-cognition, and resilience into a SIM-PBL simulation.

• The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.353-361
• /
• 2024

Simulation education is a method that allows learners to learn repeatedly in realistic simulated situations. It solves the limitations of clinical practice that lacks direct nursing performance and is useful for acquiring and developing the knowledge, nursing skills, communication skills, learning self-efficacy, and clinical reasoning required for nursing students. The purpose of this study was identify the effects of High fidelity simulation-based education on communication ability, learning self-efficacy and clinical reasoning of nursing students. The subjects were 84 nursing students who were enrolled in the senior who had received simulation training using dysphagia patient care scenario. Data were analyzed using SPSS/WIN 22.0. As a result, There was a statistically significant difference in the communication ability, learning self-efficacy, clinical reasoning. And the mean score of simulation effectiveness is 2.64 points (a perfect score of three). Therefore, In order to improve the communication ability, learning self-efficacy and clinical reasoning of nursing students, it is necessary to develop and apply realistic scenarios that reflect various clinical situations.

• The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.373-382
• /
• 2024

This study attempted to identify the relationship between nursing competency, clinical reasoning competence, and empathy ability according to the center of enneagram power for nursing students. The subjects of the study were 218 students enrolled in the department of nursing at two universities located in one region, data collection was conducted from 16 October to 27 October 2023. Data analysis was performed using SPSS/WIN version 26.0 program, descriptive statistics, and difference verification were analyzed by t-test, ANOVA, pearson's correlation coefficient, Results, The enneagram personality type of the subjects of this study was the most common type 9. And in the enneagram center of power, the instinct-centered type had the highest nursing competence, the thought-centered type had the highest clinical reasoning competence, and the emotion-centered type had the highest empathy ability. In addition, nursing competence and clinical reasoning competence showed a significant positive correlation, and clinical reasoning competence and empathy ability were also found to be positively correlated. Therefore, it is important to continue to develop and apply individualized competency building programs that reflect personality type tests to nursing students. In addition, the higher the empathy ability, the higher the clinical reasoning competence, so it is thought that it is necessary to develop a standardized curriculum that can improve nursing competence and clinical reasoning competence and verify its effectiveness.

• Journal of Korea Game Society
• /
• v.19 no.3
• /
• pp.65-74
• /
• 2019

This study presented specific alternatives for the use of digital storytelling elements as college education and provided basic data for future Serious games to be more popularized and used as reference materials in various academic circles by considering the criteria for the quality evaluation of game contents, which had been pointed out as limitations of functional games. In particular, the factors to be considered were mainly in developing functional games to learn the clinical reasoning process.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.18 no.4
• /
• pp.304-310
• /
• 2017

This study is a methodological research study that tests the validity and reliability of the NCRC (Nurse Clinical Reasoning Competence scale), an instrument developed by Liou and his colleagues as the basic data for enhancing the clinical reasoning competence of nurses, by translating it into Korean and checking the similarity of the sentence structure and meaning (between the two versions?). This study verified its validity and reliability by examining 166 nurses working in four tertiary hospitals located in Seoul and Busan. An analysis of the content validity by experts showed that all of the items have a content validity higher than CVI 0.8. From the exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, it was found that the instrument includes a total of 15 items consisting of one factor. In addition, the correlation with the Korean version of the Nurse Clinical Reasoning Competence scale is confirmed to test the concurrent validity, by using a measurement tool of nurses' critical thinking dispositions and clinical decision-making abilities (correlation coefficient =.55-.64(p<.001) and Cronbach's ${\alpha}=.93$). Thus, the Korean version of the NCRC may be a useful instrument for evaluating the clinical reasoning competence of Korean nurses and providing the basic data for assessing their clinical reasoning competence and developing their promotion strategies.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.21 no.8
• /
• pp.107-114
• /
• 2020

This study was conducted to examine the effects of simulation-based education on the clinical reasoning competence, clinical competence, and satisfaction with simulation experience (SSE). The research design was one group pretest-posttest. Study participants were 89 third-year nursing students from C University in G city, who were engaged the simulation-based education for eight weeks from August to October 2019. Learning scenario titles were blood transfusion reaction patient care with postoperative total hip replacement, hypoglycemia patient care with diabetes mellitus, and hyperkalemia patient care with liver cirrhosis. The data were analyzed by paired t-test using SPSS Win 23.0 program. After applying simulation-based education, nursing students' clinical reasoning competence (t=-17.082, p<.001) and clinical competence(t=-18.40, p<.001) improved significantly. SSE score was 4.65 out of 5 points. The results indicate that the simulation-based education in this study gave the students the experience of providing qualified and secure nursing care under conditions similar to those in the real clinical field. To improve the clinical reasoning competence and clinical competence of nursing students, various cases scenarios are developed and simulation-based education should be applied to more subjects in the nursing curriculum.