• School Mathematics
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.289-308
• /
• 2015

This study analyzed mathematical processes elaborated in the mathematics curricula of Korea, China, Japan, and the US. Ten mathematical processes were extracted: (a) learning of concepts, principles, laws, and skills; (b) problem solving; (c) reasoning; (d) communication; (e) representation; (f) connections; (g) creativity; (h) character-building; (i) self-directed learning; and (j) positive attitude toward mathematics. This study specified the meaning of such processes and their sub-domains, noticing similarities and differences among the curricula. On the basis of the results, this study includes suggestions for the development of next mathematics curriculum in Korea.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.18 no.3
• /
• pp.311-334
• /
• 2015

This study compares and contrasts elementary mathematics curricula of Korea, China, Japan, and USA, as a part of efforts to compose contents of global elementary mathematics. This paper analyzed the similarities and the differences of mathematical contents in the domain of geometry. On the basis of this comparative analysis, this paper included implications that are expected to be informative in the revision of the Korean mathematics curriculum.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.123-137
• /
• 2014

In this paper, the format of the Korean 2011 & the Japan 2008 elementary school mathematics curriculum are compared especially centered on elements, areas, objectives, and lesson time numbers. Through this comparison, suggestions can be obtained as follows. First, grade-group system which does not meet the actual elementary mathematics education needs to be reconsidered. Second, the area name 'number and operation' needs to be reduced into the area name 'number and calculation'. Third, using the area name 'pattern' needs to be reconsidered. Fourth, using the area name 'probability' needs to be reconsidered. If 'possibility' which some event occurs is seen as ratio, it can be contained area 'quantity relationship'. Fifth, containing the nature of mathematics into the school mathematics objectives needs to be reconsidered. Sixth, it is necessary to enhance the phase of mathematics in elementary education.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.24 no.4
• /
• pp.407-428
• /
• 2021

This study compares and analyzes the mathematics assessment items of the middle school's national-level academic achievement tests in Korea and Japan, recently revised as a competency-focused curriculum. By comparing and analyzing the assessment items in each country, the analytic framework is integrated into content areas, contexts, and competencies. The characteristics of each country's assessment items developed for each content area were analyzed using the framework. We suggested some implications on developing and improving national-level academic assessment items.

• The Mathematical Education
• /
• v.58 no.2
• /
• pp.187-223
• /
• 2019

This study aims to investigate the aspects of revision in the external and internal structure of curriculum and documentation in Korea and Japan and to propose the direction and task to enhance the current framework of the national curriculum. Japan has been selected for comparison in that it explicitly prepared social changes such as the dramatic evolution of artificial intelligence and population aging in its new curriculum. Therefore, various aspects of revision were analyzed the 2009 & 2015 revised mathematics curriculum of Korea and the 2008 & 2017 mathematics curriculum of Japan respectively in the elementary, middle, and high school grade bands. Then, the differences between the two countries were identified through comparison. First, the structure of the mathematics curriculum in Japan was connected with the general guidelines more tightly than Korea, and the external structure of the mathematics curriculum stayed consistently after the revision. Second, contrary to Korea, which pursued the appropriateness and reduction of mathematical content, Japanese mathematics curriculum has been pursuing detailed contents both quantitatively and qualitatively. Lastly, Japan emphasized statistical problem-solving ability. Based on this, we suggested considering of consistency in the structure curriculum documentation, detailing contents of the curriculum, and strengthening of statistical education.

• Proceedings of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education Conference
• /
• 2006.10a
• /
• pp.63-78
• /
• 2006

미국에서 학교 수학 수업에서의 개방적 접근은 일본과 미국 연구자들의 공동연구의 결과물이다. 우리는 그것에 대한 세 가지의 측면을 실례로 살펴보면 접근을 시도하겠다. : 1) 개방된 과정(open process)(문제의 해답에 이르는 방법이 여러 가지이다: 2) 개방형 문제(open-ended problems)(문제에 대한 정답이 여러 가지가 될 수 있는 문제), 3) 일본에서 '문제로부터 문제(from problem to problem)'라고 불리는 것 혹은 문제고안(problem formulating)하기(학생들이 새로운 문제를 명확하게 나타내기 위해 자신의 생각을 써 내려 가는 것)수학 지도에서 일본의 개방적 접근에 대한 우리의 이해를 바탕으로, 우리는 미국에서 보다 효과적인 수학 지도를 위한 몇 가지 방법을 선택 적용해 보았다. 이러한 접근의 대부분은 학습 계획안을 만들 때 여러 교사가 함께 참여하고 일련의 토론과 수정과정을 거친 뒤, 많은 부분이 개선되고 효과적인 계획안을 만들어 낸다는 점에서 미국의 수학교사들에게 새로운 것이다. 또한 이 접근법에서는 교사가 문제를 해결하는 과정에서 학생 개개인이나 그룹을 활동적으로 관찰하여 그들의 활동을 비교하고 토론한다.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.24 no.1
• /
• pp.45-65
• /
• 2014

Today, people need to prepare key competencies demanded for life to be worthy of individual and to be successful for not only individual life but development of society. We can look for these competencies in the process of analysing of present and future society. On the basis of this cognition we desire to suggest certain key competencies in korea mathematics curriculum and to investigate how to realize them in this paper. First, we investigated key competencies demanded generally from several articles to deal with key competencies. Secondly, we inspected backgrounds and processes of implementing mathematics curriculum in Korea and Japan and checked the reason for laying key competencies on the center of curriculum. Thirdly, we arranged key competencies suggested in mathematics curriculum of two countries and compared how to realize them. Finally, on the ground of third contents we proposed current affairs to Korea mathematics curriculum.

• Proceedings of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education Conference
• /
• 2006.04a
• /
• pp.39-43
• /
• 2006

일본에서는 영재아를 위한 특별교육에 약간을 제외하고는 충분한 관심을 갖지 못해 왔다. 왜냐하면, 전후 일본의 교육시스템의 여러 특징들 중 하나가 지나친 평등주의였기 때문에 교육의 장에서는 물론이고 교사와 부모에게서도 그러한 교육은 때때로 무시되어졌다. 다른 이유는 학교에서의 주입식 교육 때문인데 이것은 도쿄대학이나 쿄토대학과 같은 유명한 대학에 입학하기 위한 시험의 합격을 위해서 고등학교 과정에서 꼭 필요한 것이었다. 그러나, 1997년에 영재아를 위한 특별교육의 약간의 시도가 시작되었다. 교육부는 "1년을 뛰어넘어 대학에 들어가는 것"을 인정했다. 이 논문에서는, 다음의 세 가지 주제들이 논의될 것이다. 1. 17살 고등학생들의 시바대학 입학등록 2. 일본 수학 올림피아드 협회에 의해 실행되어진 여름 세미나 3. 교육부에 의해 설립된 특수 과학 고등학교(Super Science High school) 프로그램.

• Education of Primary School Mathematics
• /
• v.24 no.3
• /
• pp.115-134
• /
• 2021

This study implemented a comparative analysis of the international mathematics curriculum on time learning. It aimed the improvement of challenges students facing when they learn time. As a preliminary step, I reviewed the previous literature on teaching and learning of time, and based on this, I drew five issues that require to be considered for better time learning. The coverage of time contents and the learning periods of respective time contents were compared across the mathematics curriculum of Korea, Japan, Australia, the United States, and Finland. The textbook cases of those countries were analyzed with a special focus on the five issues. The results showed that the Korean curriculum assigned time learning contents compressively during short periods compared to other countries. responded to the issues on teaching and learning of time, several improvement ideas were deduced from textbook cases of other countries. Implications for the curriculum reform were discussed underlying the results.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.23 no.4
• /
• pp.481-506
• /
• 2019

Perpendicularity and parallelity are important concepts in Mathematics as well as real-life contexts. However, those concepts are rather reduced in 2015 revised curriculum compared to previous 2009 revised curriculum. This study firstly analyzed teaching method related to perpendicularity and parallelity in a series of mathematics textbooks of Korea, Singapore and Japan. Moreover, the unit of perpendicularity and parallel was redesigned in a way to understand the concepts meaningfully and to give opportunities for students to explore how to make perpendicular and parallel lines. The results showed that noticeable changes has been as the curriculum was revised in Korea. Also, three countries showed some differences in concepts definition and learning activities. This study is expected to suggest implications for how to teach perpendicularity and parallelity in elementary school mathematics.