• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2014.08a
• /
• pp.3-6
• /
• 2014

국내 인용 데이터베이스에서도 해외와 마찬가지로 저널 영향력 지수가 핵심 지표로 제공되고 있으며 저널 평가나 연구성과 평가의 기준 지표로 사용되는 경향이 확산되고 있다. 그러나 국내 저널에서는 논문이 발표된 당해년도에 인용되는 비율이 해외에 비해서 높기 때문에 이를 반영하지 않는 영향력 지수는 국내 저널에 대해서는 더 불완전한 지수라고 할 수 있다. 이 연구에서는 여러 해에 걸쳐 발행된 논문이 특정 연도에 인용된 횟수로 평가하는 저널 영향력 지수와 달리, 특정 연도에 발행된 논문이 여러 해에 걸쳐 인용된 횟수로 평가하는 통시적 영향력 지수의 개념과 산출방법을 알아보고 정보관리학회지를 대상으로 시험 측정한 결과를 살펴본다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2011.08a
• /
• pp.29-34
• /
• 2011

최근 인용 네트워크 분석을 통해서 단일 문헌의 인용 영향력을 측정하려는 시도가 다양하게 전개되고 있다. 널리 알려진 PageRank를 보완하려는 일부 시도와 함께 h-index를 단일 문헌의 인용 영향력 측정에 적용한 단일문헌 h-index도 제안되었다. 이 연구에서는 Web of Science에서 검색한 계량정보학 분야 문헌집합을 대상으로 여러 측정 방식의 특징을 비교해본 후, 새로운 인용지수 2종을 제안하였다. 제안한 인용지수는 PageRank처럼 전역 네트워크 분석 방식인 지수 1종과 h-index처럼 지역 네트워크 분석 방식인 지수 1종으로서 상황에 따라 선택하여 사용할 수 있다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.52 no.4
• /
• pp.71-90
• /
• 2018

The importance of citation measures has been increasing in the evaluation of scholarly journals and it becomes a major issue for Korean Citation Index (KCI) journals. The Journal Impact Factor (JIF), a widely used measure for academic journals, has a problematic issue that it does not include the number of citations for a paper immediately made in the year in which the cited paper was published. On the contrary, the Diachronous Impact Factor (IMP) includes the number of citations made in the published year, but IMP is a measure for papers published a few years ago, not in the last year. It does not represent the recent value of journals effectively. To overcome these problems, Total Impact Factor (TIF) and Mean Impact Factor (MIF) are proposed as new journal citation indicators. This study calculated the performance of proposed indicators experimentally on KCI data. The result shows that TIF is a promising measure for the multidimensional evaluation of humanities and social sciences journals in Korea because it has high stability by year and includes the immediate citations of the published year.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.44 no.2
• /
• pp.357-379
• /
• 2010

The citation analysis is not applied to group measurements but to individual papers finding their impact factors among citation chains which are created by tracing citing-cited relationship between any two papers in data set. The individual impact factor is measured by adding each value derived from citation chain. Each paper's impact factor index is calculated by adding the values of each index by direct citing-cited relationship, and the values of each impact factor made by indirectly influencing to the papers in the citation chain. The research introduces a grace period, in which the system holds the papers not cited by other papers yet, but are expected to be cited within this period. Eventually not cited papers after the grace period would be eliminated by the system. The experiment suggests a reasonable database in which the highly influenced papers are gathered, and could be serviced in stead of buying databases filled with worthless not-cited-papers.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.38 no.4
• /
• pp.271-289
• /
• 2004

In this study, we analyze out citing and cited references among researchers, using KSCI (Korean Science Citation Index) database that is developed by KISTI. we generate and analyze that impact factor and immediate index with same method in JCR's. KSCI's impact factor and immediate index compared to JCR's, and with this basis, this study propose the need of development KSCI database and present new service model for evaluate of domestic journals.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2018.08a
• /
• pp.139-142
• /
• 2018

학술지 인용 영향력 지수 JIF에서는 학술논문이 발행된 당해년도에 즉시 인용된 횟수가 포함되지 않는다는 한계가 있다. 특정 연도에 발표된 이후의 모든 인용을 포함하는 IMP 지수는 논문발표 당해년도의 인용을 포함하지만, 몇 년 이전의 논문에 대한 평가가 된다는 한계가 있다. 이를 극복하기 위한 새로운 방안을 제안하였다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.33 no.2
• /
• pp.61-76
• /
• 2016

This study aims at proposing three prestige indices-closeness prestige, input domain, and proximity prestige- as useful measures for the impact of a particular node in citation networks. It compares these prestige indices with other impact indices as it is still unknown what dimensions of impact these indices actually measure. The prestige indices enable us to distinguish the most prominent actors in a directed network, similar to the centrality indices in undirected networks. Correlation analysis and principal component analysis were conducted on the author citation network to identify the differentiated implications of the three prestige indices from the existing impact indices. We selected simple citation counting, h-index, PageRank, and the three kinds of centrality indices which assume undirected networks as the existing impact measures for comparison with the three prestige indices. The results indicate that these prestige indices demonstrate distinct impact dimension from the other impact indices. The prestige indices reflect indirect impact while the others direct impact.

• 한국벤처창업학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2022.04a
• /
• pp.117-122
• /
• 2022

최근 국내외 ESG 연구가 활발해지고 있는 가운데, ESG 연구는 급격한 양적 성장을 하고 있음에도 학술지의 질적 수준을 평가할 수 있는 계량적인 논문은 부족한 상태이다. 본 연구는 한국학술지인용색인(KCI)에서 경영학 분야 내의 KCI 인용지수를 활용하여 상위 10개의 학회를 선정하고 이들 간의 ESG 논문 인용빈도와 네트워크 분석을 하였다. 상호 인용빈도를 활용하여 연결망을 작성하고 네트워크 분석 관점에서 ESG 주제에 관한 각 학술지 간 상호인용빈도를 통해 주어진 학술지의 영향력지수(Impact Factor)와 중심성 지수를 기초하여 연구하였다. 이러한 연구를 바탕으로 학술지들이 핵심 문헌을 식별하고 학문 내 지적 구조를 규명하여 경영학 분야의 ESG 연구 동향을 파악하고자 한다. 본 연구는 국내 발간된 경영학 학술지의 ESG에 대한 학술지의 영향력 인용지수를 비교해 보고 나아가 경영학 학술지의 자기 인용 비율을 확인하고 경영학뿐만 아니라 타 학문 분야에서 경영학 관련 학술지에 대한 인용이 이루어질 수 있도록 다학제적 교류와 추가 연구의 필요성을 제기하고자 한다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.45 no.2
• /
• pp.119-143
• /
• 2011

This study identifies the characteristics of recent citation-based indicators for assessing a single paper in the context of their co-relationships. Five predefined indicators were examined with three variants of h-index which are convened in this study; the formers are PageRank, SCEAS Rank, CCI, f-value, and single paper h-index and the latters are $h_S$-index, h1-index, and $h_S$1-index. The correlation analysis and cluster analysis were performed to group the indicators by common characteristics, after which the indicators were calculated with the dataset from KSCI DB. The results show statistical evidence that distinguishes h-index type indicators from others. The characteristics of the indicators were verified with citation frequency factors using correlation analysis. Finally, the implications for applications and further studies are discussed.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.23 no.1 s.59
• /
• pp.221-241
• /
• 2006

This research suggested a new patent index based on patent citation technique using cited information, For this purpose, comparison research on library and patent information related citation database providing citation index was done. The information quality and meaning on the impact factor of JCR and the technology factor of CHI were reinterpreted. The former emphasizes the quality of continuous publication using relative citation frequency. The latter only emphasizes the information itself because it assesses the quality of patent characteristics. To overcome these difficulties, the latter re-authorized a relative quality to the organization possessing the patent using technology impact factor. Three new patent index were proposed on the basis of cited information to complement this. However, the comparative object was limited to American patent information that presented cited information of patent applied cases, and the comparison and research of domestic patent information could not be done.