• Korean Journal of Child Studies
• /
• v.33 no.6
• /
• pp.71-84
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between decision making abilities young children and their self-directed learning abilities. A survey was carried out using 160 young children in the J region. The collected data were analyzed by Pearson correlation and multiple regression techniques using the SPSS statistics program. The conclusions are as follows : First, decision making abilities in young children exhibited a positive correlation with their self-directed learning abilities. Second, decision making abilities in young children were an influential variable in terms of their self-directed learning abilities. As a result, decision making abilities in young children were an important variable in predicting their self-directed learning abilities.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.21 no.7
• /
• pp.73-81
• /
• 2020

This study is a single-group study to check the effectiveness of nursing students on their communication credibility, communication confidence and clinical decision-making ability by implementing SBAR-applied simulation training to improve the difficulty of delivering clear information to medical personnel during transition. By combining simulation practices and SBAR training based on emergency situations of mothers and newborns, programs were developed and applied to communicate clearly and briefly to the medical staff about emergencies and to enhance communication skills. The subjects were 91 fourth-year nursing college students from one university in B metropolitan city. The data were collected from Feb. 18, 2019 to Feb. 28, 2019 and were analyzed using the SPSS/WIN 18.0 program as a paired t-test. The results revealed that the communication clarity measured after the simulation exercise (t=-3.99, p<.001), Communication Confidence (t=-8.60, p<.001), Clinical Decision Capacity (t=-4.66, p<.001) Statistically, it has increased significantly. Therefore, the purpose of this research is significant in that it seeks to promote the expertise of nursing college students by developing and applying simulation practical education programs to enhance the communication skills and clinical decision-making skills of nursing college students as prospective medical personnel.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems Conference
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.247-250
• /
• 2006

급속도로 변화하는 환경에 적응하기 위해서 환경의 변화에 대한 요구와 신속한 응답능력을 향상시키고, 에이전트간 의사결정의 지속시간을 줄이기 위하여 에이전트간 효율적인 조정에 관련된 의사결정을 하기위한 대안(alternative)결정과 사용자의 선호도를 어떻게 유도할 수 있는가라는 문제가 요구된다. 본 논문에서는 사회적(Pareto) 최적성이라는 관점에서 의사결정의 행동을 효과적으로 시뮬레이트하기 우해 퍼지 의사결정에 기반한 멀티에이전트의 효율적인 조정방안을 제안한다. 또한 제안하는 방법에서는 가중치를 사용하여 각 속성이 멀티에이전트와 관련하여 최적의 대안을 생성하고, 퍼지 의사결정에 기반한 멀티에이전트의 의사결정방법에 기존의 방법보다 가중치를 사용한 방법이 높은 신뢰도를 가지면서 더 빠른 의사결정을 한다는 것을 확인하였다.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.16 no.12
• /
• pp.511-521
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of critical thinking, clinical decision making ability, patient safety knowledge and attitude ability to perform patient safety activities during clinical practice on nursing student's. Data were analyzed using t-tests and one-way ANOVA using the SPSS 21.0 program. As a result, the subjects' safety nursing activities was positively correlated critical thinking disposition(r=.278, p=.001), clinical decision making ability(r=.202, p=.014), patient safety attitude(r=.421, p<.001).The significant predictors of perform safety nursing activities were gender(${\beta}=.175$, p=.031), patient safety education(${\beta}=-2.266$, p=.025), critical thinking disposition(${\beta}=3.354$, p=.001), patient safety attitude(${\beta}=.368$, p<.001). These factors explained 31.5% of the variance(R2=.561, F=4.56 p<.001). It is necessary to establish a curriculum for critical thinking disposition, clinical decision making ability, and patient safety education in order to improve patient safety performance necessary for clinical practice education of nursing college students.

• 한국벤처창업학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2017.04a
• /
• pp.36-36
• /
• 2017

기업 간, 브랜드 간의 치열한 경쟁은 날이 갈수록 심해지고 있으며, 좋은 제품을 만들 수 있는 기술력이나 우수한 인력, 양호한 재무능력은 기업이 생존하기 위해 기본적으로 갖추어야 할 필요조건이 되었다. 그런데 기업이 성공하기 위해서는 어떤 능력이 필요할까? 바로 마케팅능력이다. 마케팅 능력이 있어야 충성도 있는 고객을 창출할 수 있고 시장점유율 제고를 통해서 목표하는 바람직한 성과를 산출할 수 있다. 마케팅 부문의 능력이나 지식은 타 부문에 비해서 기업성과에 미치는 영향이 크며, 궁극적으로는 기업의 지속적 경쟁우위를 달성하기 위하여 반드시 갖추어야 할 요소라는 것을 많은 연구들은 보여주고 있다. 이때 기업이나 브랜드가 윤리적인 모습을 소비자에게 보여준다면 경쟁자에 비해서 훨씬 용이하게 충성도를 이끌어 낼 수 있을 것이다. 따라서 마케팅윤리는 매우 중요한 이슈이다. 최근 소비자의 감정을 상하게 하는 국내외 기업행태가 매스컴에 자주 오르내리고 있는데, 이러한 소식을 접한 소비자들은 해당기업에 대해서 부정적인 인식을 가지게 되어 제품이나 서비스를 구매하지 않으며, 주변사람들에게 좋지 않은 입소문을 내기도 하므로 기업의 마케팅 담당자는 윤리적인 측면을 고려하여 의사결정을 내려야한다. 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)과 마케팅윤리는 상호 연관된 개념으로 보아도 무방하다. 그런데 마케팅의 윤리적인 측면을 고려하다보면 의사결정 상황이 마케팅 분야에만 국한되지 않거나 소비자의 이익과 기업의 이익이 상충하는 경우가 빈번하게 발생하게 되어 의사결정을 어렵게 만든다. 특히, 스타트업의 경우는 기존기업에 비해서 업력이 길지 않고 우선적으로 처리해야하는 업무가 많다보니 마케팅 윤리적 측면을 중요하게 생각하지 않는 경향이 많다. 하지만 마케팅 윤리는 단시간에 구축하거나 보완할 수 있는 것이 아니므로 스타트업의 경영자들은 이 문제를 중요하게 생각하여야 할 것이다. 본 연구는 기존의 마케팅 윤리연구 동향을 분석하여 스타트업의 마케팅윤리 연구의 방향을 제시하고자 한다.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.36 no.5
• /
• pp.757-768
• /
• 2016

This study developed an SSI (Socio-Scientific Issue) discussion program that applies a creative technique called six thinking hats, and then investigated the differences in argumentation patterns and effects on the decision-making abilities of each character feature of students between SNS debate and existing face to face debate. There were three SSI themes - Designer Babies, embryonic stem cell study, and legitimacy of abortion. Students were divided into two groups, the debate group using SNS and face to face debate group. The character patterns of students were divided to 'extraversion,' 'agreeableness,' and 'conscientiousness' through test sheets for character features for each student. Both groups were educated for creative discussion methods using six thinking hats and then, the class progressed. As a result of analyzing argumentation patterns used in SNS debate and face to face debate, the most used argumentation pattern was the "cause pattern." But comparing to face to face debate, other patterns (mark, inference, authority, motive) were also used in SNS debate. The study analyzed three factors of decision-making ability for each character feature of students such as complexity, perspectives, and inquiry. As a result, for 'complexity' factor, there was a significant difference between SNS debate group and face to face debate group only in the student group of Agreeableness. For 'perspectives' factor, there were significant differences between SNS debate group and face to face debate group in all three characters. Finally, for inquiry, there were no significant differences between SNS debate group and face to face debate group in all three characters. Accordingly it would be necessary to apply SNS debate using the six thinking hats in SSI education to enhance perspectives.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.54-63
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of decision-making activities in lesson on improving decision-making ability to meet bioethical issues in everyday situation. Worksheet for decision-making was consisted of six steps: Identification of problem, searching relevant information, generation of alternatives, identification of values for selection criteria, evaluation of alternatives, review of consequence. The results of this study showed that the scores of decision-making were increased by the activities of worksheets. The scores of identification of problem, generation of alternatives, and evaluation of alternatives were increased meaningfully. However, the scores of searching relevant information, identification of values for selection criteria, and review of consequence were not increased. It seems that all steps of decision-making ability could not improve by short-term learning. Low level performance was appeared on the step of searching relevant information and evaluation of alternatives. This result indicated that students could not apply the biological knowledge to decision-making in the face of bioethical issues. In conclusion, the learning experience of decision-making is essential to foster rational decision-making ability. The activity of decision-making should be included in science class and curriculum.

• 한국경영정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2008.06a
• /
• pp.440-445
• /
• 2008

기업 간 공동의사결정은 기업의 업무 효율성 향상을 통하여 기업의 성과에 영향을 미친다. 두 기업이 상호 목표를 동시에 이루기 위해서는 협력적 공동의사결정이 매우 중요한 역할을 한다. 따라서 협력적 의사결정의 선행요인과 결과요인을 파악하고 실증적 연구가 필요하다. 본 연구는 PLS 통계적 방법을 이용하여 제시된 가설을 검증하였으며, 그 결과 상대기업의 지식창조 능력, 기입간 프로세스 모듈화, 기업간 신뢰가 기업간 협력적 의사결정에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 결과적으로 업무성과와 기업성과를 향상시키는 것으로 나타났다.

• Proceedings of KHEA Conference
• /
• 2002.04a
• /
• pp.129-129
• /
• 2002

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.3 no.4
• /
• pp.1-41
• /
• 2008

The Korean semiconductor industry has made a great contribution to growth of Korean economy for the last decades by maintaining a top position in terms of Korean total annual export volume. However, the advanced semiconductor equipment and materials that are used for the production of semiconductor devices still depend on the suppliers from Europe, Japan, and America who have an influential position in the Korean semiconductor industry. The objective of this study is to empirically investigate the attributes determining the extent of autonomy in decision making for the Korean subsidiaries of multinational corporations in the semiconductor industry. This study found there were differences in the extent of autonomy in decision making in terms of the global strategies the multinational corporations pursue. This study surveyed employees at the Korean subsidiaries and joint venture companies of semiconductor multinational corporations and collected 726 survey questionnaires. Several statistical analyses including frequency analysis, reliability analysis, factor analysis, multiple regression analysis and ANOVA were performed using the collected sample data. Based on the analyses, this study found as follows: Firstly, from the factor analysis, this study found Korean subsidiaries faced three sources of uncertainties stemmed from political conditions, competent conditions, demand and supply conditions. The internal resources were characterized by the independencies of production capability, financial capability, marketing capability and human resource management capability. The operational performance was determined by total revenue, net profit and market share growth. Secondly, it was found the uncertainties from political condition and competent condition and the independencies of financial capability and marketing capability partially influenced the extent of autonomy in decision making. The independencies of production capability and human resource management capability significantly influenced the autonomy of decision making in the most areas. It was also found an increase of total revenue, net profit and market share growth partially affected the extent of autonomy in decision making of the Korean subsidiaries. Finally, it was found that the polycentrism of global management by multinational corporations seemed to bring a higher extent of autonomy in decision making than ethnocentrism or geocentrism of global management. Based on the results, this study provided managerial implications regarding the extent of autonomy in decision making for Korean subsidiaries of multinational corporations in order to help management to enhance their business capabilities.