References
- Bae, J., & Cha, H. (2014). Analysis of the types of claims and argumentations in science debate classes of fifth graders. KNUE Journal of Research in Science Education, 20(1), 63-83.
- Bang, S. (2012). A Study on strategies of self-directed learning to promote smart learning. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 8(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.26857/JLLS.2012.04.8.1.93
- Banks, J. A., & Clegg, A. A. (1973). Teaching strategies for the social studies: Inquiry, valuing, and decision-making. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co..
- Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
- Bell, R. L. & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understanding of the Nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87(3). 352-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10063
- Brockriede, W. & Ehninger, D.(1960). "Toulmin on argument: An interpretation and application. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 46.
- Chen, S., & Caropreso, E. J. (2004). Influence of personality on online discussion. Journal of Online Interactive Learning, 3(2), 1-17.
- Cho, S. (2014) The Effects of Personality Traits and Science-related Attitudes on Scientific Academic Achievement. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 22(3), 311-334.
- Chung, Y., Mun, K., & Kim, S. (2010). Exploration of socioscientific issues(SSI) in the science textbook. Exploration of socioscientific issues(SSI) in the science textbook, Journal of Lerner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 10(3), 435-456.
- De Bono, E. (2012). Six Thinking Hats. TM.
- De Raad, B., Hendrikes, A. A. J. & Hofstee, W. K. B.(1992). Toward a refined structure of personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 6(4), 301-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410060405
- De Raad, B. & Schouwenburg, H. C. (1996). Personality in learning and education: A review. European Journal of Personality, 10, 303-336. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199612)10:5<303::AID-PER262>3.0.CO;2-2
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289-2315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667582
- Hong, S., (2014). The Argumentation structure of SNS debate and its character-focusing on mobile debate on the NAVER BAND. The Korean Journal of Art and Media, 13(2), 157-173.
- Jang, E., & Chang, H., (2013a). The differences between Web-based debate and Social Network Service(SNS)-based debate on social presence, learning flow, satisfaction and self-evaluation. Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.29.1.1
- Jang, E., & Chang, H. (2013b). Exploration of debate strategies on SNS tools, creativity techniques and group size for Social Network Service(SNS)-based debate. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 19(4), 693-721.
- Jeong, E., & Kim, Y. (2001). The Views of secondary biology teachers and students on bioethics education. Biology Education, 29(2) 144-167.
- John, O. P., & Strivastava, S. (1999). The Big-five trait taxonomy: History, measurement and theoretical perspectives. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (2nd edition). NY: Guilford.
- Kang, M., Um, S., & Lee, J. (2010). The Effects of learner's traits and interactions on Web-based collaborative learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 53-79.
- Kim, E., & Kim, J., (2011). A Development of Android based debate learning system for divergent thinking cultivation. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 14(1), 137-146.
- Kim, H., & Lee, S., (1996). Secondary students' attitudes toward science-technology related issues in korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 16(4), 461-469.
- Ko, Y., & Shin, W., (2011). An Analysis of discussion using online discussion forum and smartphone. The Korea Educational Review, 17(3), 129-150.
- Koo, Y., & Seo, J.,(2014) Effects of collaborative reflections using SNS on college student' learning motivation, problem solving competency and academic achievement in Creative Problem Solving activities. The Korean Association for Educational Methodology Studies, 26(4), 659-685. https://doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2014.26.4.659
- Kurfman, D. G. (1977). Developing Decision-Making Skills. 47th Yearbook, 1977.
- McCroskey, J. C. (1970). Measures of Communication-Bound Anxiety.
- Ministry of Education and Science Technology(2008). Middle School Curriculum Reference Book(III). MEST.
- Moon, K. (2003) Development and application of web-based discussion model for value inquiry in biology education. Master's Thesis. The Graduate School of Seoul National University.
- National Research Council [NRC] (2010). Conceptual framework for new science education standards. Available at: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Standards_Framework_Homepage.html
- Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 729-780). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issue: A Critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
- Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry?. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
- Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
- Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The Philosophy of science (Vol. 14). Genesis Publishing Pvt Ltd.
- Um, S. (2010). Verification of the predictability of learner's traits and interactions on Web-based collaborative learning outcomes. Master's Thesis. The Graduate school of Ewha Womans University
- Yun, M. (2006). (The) Analysis of decision-making based on the nature of science: Focus on socioscientific issues. Master's Thesis. Graduate School of Pusan National University.
- Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., Ruzek, M., Linder, A., & Lin, S. S. (2013). Cross-cultural epistemological orientations to socioscientific Issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 251-283. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21077
- Zeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M. (2003). The role of moral resoning and the status of socio-scientific issues in science education. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socio-scientific issues and discourse in science education (pp.7-38). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Zeider, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgement through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20281
- Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A Research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
Cited by
- 과학관련 사회쟁점을 활용한 대학생 인성교육의 효과 -개인-집단중심성향에 따른 비교- vol.37, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.3.395
- 과학관련 사회쟁점(SSI) 토론 수업에서 스마트 기기의 활용 방식과 수업의 특징 vol.37, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.5.787
- 윤리적 궁지 해결 수업이 고등학생의 의사결정 능력에 미치는 영향 vol.45, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2017.45.4.477
- 의사결정 유형 및 성격특성에 따른 예비생물교사들의 SSI(Socio-Scientific Issues) 토론 담화 차이 분석 vol.38, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.5.739