• 한국정보교육학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2004.01a
• /
• pp.321-330
• /
• 2004

21세기는 지식정보사회다. 지식정보화 사회에서 정보과학영재와 정보과학영재의 판별방법에 대한 연구는 꼭 필요함에도 불구하고 미미한 것이 현실이다. 영재와 정보과학영재에 대해서 여러 학자들의 의견을 바탕으로 정의하고, 수학, 과학 영재아의 판별사례를 살펴보고 이것을 바탕으로 정보과학 영재아의 영재판별을 위해 초등 컴퓨터교과의 단계 및 영역을 바탕으로 초등정보과학영재의 판별의 원칙, 절차, 검사방법을 에 대한 판별방법을 살펴보았다.

• 한국정보교육학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2004.08a
• /
• pp.253-262
• /
• 2004

본 논문에서는 영재와 정보과학영재에 대해서 여러 학자들의 의견을 바탕으로 그 개념을 정의하고 수학, 과학 영재아의 특징, 판별사례 및 판별절차를 살펴보고 이것을 일반화하여 초등 정보과학영재의 영재판별 원칙, 판별요소, 판별절차를 제안하였다. 제안한 판별절차에 따라 초등학생을 대상으로 직접 적용했으며, 적용에 의해 선발된 영재집단과 수학 과학성적이 우수한 일반집단과의 비교를 통한 검증도 해 보았다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for the Gifted Conference
• /
• 2001.05a
• /
• pp.89-107
• /
• 2001

영재는 그 다양한 특성으로 인하여 객관적인 판별도구를 개발하는 것에 한계가 있으며 판별절차에 관한 학자들의 이론도 다양하다. 특히 고도의 창의적인 능력을 나타내는 수학 영재아의 경우에는 더더욱 그러한 면이 심하다고 할 것이다. 본 연구에서는 인천과학 영재교육센터에서 실행했던 중등 수학영재선발과정에 대하여 살펴보고 이에 대한 문제점을 검증함으로써 앞으로 더 발전된 수학 영재아의 판별을 위한 방안을 제시하고자 한다.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.18 no.3 s.20
• /
• pp.103-116
• /
• 2004

영재교육진흥법과 그 시행령이 발표된 이래 2003년 현재 초등의 경우 91개의 영재교육원과 101개의 영재학급에서 전체 학생의 약 0.22%가 교육을 받고 있으며, 점차 그 대상이 확대 운영될 예정이다. 영재교육을 실시함에 있어서 우선적으로 해결할 문제는 '어떤 사람이 영재이며, 영재를 어떻게 판별할 것인가?' 그리고 '그들에게는 어떤 교수 ${\cdot}$ 학습 프로그램을 제공할 것인가?'이다. 그러나, 현재 영재에 대한완전한 정의가 내려지지 못했으므로 표준화 될 수 있는 판별 모델도 없다. 본 연구에서는 영재 판별에 관한 문헌 연구 및 현재 실시중인 영재교육원 중 몇 곳의 영재 선발 과정 비교 ${\cdot}$ 분석을 통하여 우리 실정에서 실현 가능한 영재 판별 방법 및 절차에 관한 모델, 판별 시 고려사항 등을 알아본다.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.257-287
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to develop an identification model for gifted students, based on class observations and nominations. The definition, issues and methods of identification were examined to achieve the research goal. Gifted identification model based on class observations and nominations consists of 4 steps: The first is the collection of multidimensional information on students, and the second is the evaluation of the students' portfolios with the rubric that has the criteria of rating scales on each information. At the third, students are observed in the class. Then the students are interviewed for the evaluation of their cognitive and non-cognitive characteristics. At the fourth, the identification committee makes a final decision for the selection of gifted students, after considering all the results from the steps. This model will be helpful to identify gifted students who are regarded to have potential abilities, especially economically disadvantaged students.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.7 no.5
• /
• pp.221-226
• /
• 2016

This research was conducted as a necessary preliminary research for topics related to young gifted children education such as whether young gifted children education is really necessary, how to define the concept of giftedness, and on what grounds the identification of giftedness should be conducted by. For this purpose, the research examines the concept of giftedness in both western and eastern cultures and searched for development direction focusing on domestic research trends in the identification. The research holds its value from provision of rudimentary data in adequate identification of young gifted children in convergence era.

• Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.307-317
• /
• 2011

Identifying gifted students in the valid method is one of the most important issues in the filed of gifted education. The Identification processes should be based on the theoretically sound definition of the gifted. However, the concept of giftedness varies according to the culture and philosophy of each society. Furthemore, we do not have any direct measure for evaluating students' giftedness. So far. there is no satisfactory single tool which is universally accepted as an absolute identification method. Recently, programs for gifted students are regarded as the channel for entering prestigious high schools as well as competitive colleges by many parents in Korea. As the result, education business for preparing young students to be accepted to gifted programs are growing rapidly. This study was performed in order to (1)analyze the problems in the current identification methods, (2)establish the strategies for identifying gifted students whom the future society needs, and (3)suggest the procedures and tools which can be adapted for the proposed identification methods.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.251-279
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study was to develop a comprehensive model to identify underachieved gifted children in elementary schools by utilizing multiple methods. From March 1st, 2006 through September 30th, 2006, we developed and applied a 6-step comprehensive identification model for underachieved gifted children by examining 1980 children attending S elementary school located in Daegu Metropolitan City, starting from the first step of teacher nomination to the last step of committee's final decision. As a result, 4 students were identified as underachieved gifted children. For comprehensive and appropriate identification, we adopted, adjusted, or developed several standardized tests, teacher nomination form, parental questionnaire, self-report checklist, and school achievement tests, which were fine-tuned in the application process of this identification model. Based on this study, we suggest that a comprehensive identification model for underachieved gifted children in public elementary schools consist of 6 steps: a) teacher nomination, b) simplified standardized testing, c) student's self-report, d) multiple standardized tests, e) qualitative analysis, and f) a committee decision for the final identification.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.11 no.1
• /
• pp.99-117
• /
• 2001

This study looked at the validity of assessments of academic giftedness in young children, details of assessment procedures and tasks related to them. It has shown that academic giftedness in young children can be reliably observed and reported by parents and teachers through similar characteristics to older gifted children. But for young preschool children since the potentiality rather than the current performance level is more important to detect and children's abilities are not fully differentiated, more systematic and comprehensive assessments are needed. Parents'and/or teachers' referrals, behavior checklists for the gifted, tests for creativity, short or group forms of standardized tests and finally individualized tests can be used as a comprehensive battery but these methods can be used stepwise for the sake of efficiency and economy. Especially the variability of performance in young children during the rapid developmental phase as well as their vulnerability by situational factors ask for the repeated assessments as regular bases. In this study different measures for gifted young children, specialists' qualification, and procedural guidance were reviewed and the necessity for various screening tools for different programs for the gifted was discussed. Finally it was emphasized that early assessment and following educational arrangement are needed for gifted young children for their optimal development.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.21 no.1
• /
• pp.107-122
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to explore the perception of the observation and nomination system for the identification of the gifted and to find out the importance and practice level perceived by the gifted education teachers using the concept mapping approach. For this, twelve gifted education teachers brainstormed and gathered ideas for the ideal ways of observation and nomination system and the gathered statements were solicited. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis were also used. In addition, 112 gifted education teachers rated the importance of and the practice level for the suggested ideas of observation and nomination system. Results were as follows: First, 36 statements were solicited and as a result of concept mapping the suggested observation and nomination system were categorized as 'attainment of professionality', 'attainment of administrative support', 'attainment of fairness', and 'considering points for recommendation.' Second, there were significant differences between the perceived importance levels and the practice levels. Based on the results, imlications of the study were discussed in depth.