Journal of Gifted/Talented Education (영재교육연구)

The Korean Society for the Gifted (한국영재학회)
권호 표지

Identification Model Development for Gifted Students Based on Class Observations and Nominations

영재학급 대상자 선발을 위한 관찰.추천 영재판별모형 개발 연구

  • Received : 2010.03.22
  • Accepted : 2010.04.22
  • Published : 2010.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop an identification model for gifted students, based on class observations and nominations. The definition, issues and methods of identification were examined to achieve the research goal. Gifted identification model based on class observations and nominations consists of 4 steps: The first is the collection of multidimensional information on students, and the second is the evaluation of the students' portfolios with the rubric that has the criteria of rating scales on each information. At the third, students are observed in the class. Then the students are interviewed for the evaluation of their cognitive and non-cognitive characteristics. At the fourth, the identification committee makes a final decision for the selection of gifted students, after considering all the results from the steps. This model will be helpful to identify gifted students who are regarded to have potential abilities, especially economically disadvantaged students.

본 연구는 교육청 산하 영재학급의 영재선발에 적용되는 관찰과 추천에 의한 영재판별모형의 개발을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해서 영재 판별의 정의와 가능성, 현재의 영재선발, 영재판별의 방법에 대해 조사하였다. 관찰 추천 영재판별모형은 모두 4단계로 구성되었다. 1단계는 다양한 정보들의 수집이고, 2단계는 포트폴리오 구성과 그 내용을 루브릭으로 평정하는 것이고, 3단계는 2단계에서 선발된 학생들을 대상으로 수업과 면접을 실시하여 학생들의 문제해결능력과 정의적 특성을 알아본 다음, 4단계인 영재선정심사위원회에서 최종적으로 영재선발을 결정한다. 본 영재판별모형은 영재프로그램에 배치되고 나서도 영재에 대한 지속적인 관찰을 통하여 영재의 재배치나 상위 영재기관에의 추천 근거자료로 사용하도록 되어 있다. 본 모형은 현재 영재성을 발휘하거나 앞으로 발휘할 가능성이 높은 잠재적인 영재의 선발에 도움을 주며, 특히 소외계층의 영재선발에 일익을 담당할 것으로 보인다.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육과학기술부 (2010). 올해부터 시험 없이 과학영재 발굴. 교육과학기술부 2010년 4월 1일 보도자료.
  2. 김영천 (2006). 질적연구방법론 I. 문음사.
  3. 박춘성 (2006). 초등영재선별을 위한 평정척도의 타당화 연구. 박사논문. 서울대학교.
  4. 서울경제신문 2010. 2. 1일자 사회면 기사: 방과 후 학교 형태 '영재학급' 설치.
  5. 서혜애 (2009). 세계의 영재교육기관에 대한 이해. 과학고 입학사정관 전문연수 자료집. KAIST 과학영재교육연구원.
  6. 이순묵 (1999). 대학생 선발용 면접의 기능과 방법에 대한 통합적 고찰. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 19, 56-75.
  7. 이신동 (2006). 영재판별을 위한 지능검사의 타당성 고찰. 영재와 영재교육, 5(1).
  8. 이신동, 이정규, 박춘성 (2009). 최신영재교육학개론. 학지사.
  9. 한국교육개발원(KEDI) (2008). 한국교육개발원 영재교육센터 영재교육현황.
  10. Archambault, F., Westberg, K., Brown, S., Hallmark, B., Emmons, C., & Zhang, W.(1993). Classroom practices used with gifted third and fourth grade students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 103-119.
  11. Baum, S., Owen, S., & Oreck, B. (1996). Talent beyond words: Identification of potential talent in dance and music in elementary students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(2), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629604000206
  12. Bolig, E., & Day, J. (1993). Dynamic assessment of giftedness: The promise of assessing training responsiveness. Roeper Review, 16, 110-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199309553552
  13. Borland, J. H. (1978). Teacher identification of the gifted: A new look. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2, 22-32.
  14. Borland, J. H. (2008). Identification, In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp.261-280). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  15. Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (1994). Identifying young, potentially gifted, economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 164-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629403800402
  16. Bracken, B. (2000). An approach for identifying underrepresented populations for G/T programs. Presentation at the College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA.
  17. Brown, S., Renzulli, J., Gubbins, E., Siegle, D., Zhang, W., & Chen, C. (2005). Assumptions underlying the identification of gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(1). 68-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900107
  18. Clark, B. (2008). Growing up gifted: developing the potential of children at home and at school (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person Prentice Hall.
  19. Clasen, D. R., Middleton, J. A., & Connell, T. J. (1994). Assessing artistic and problem-solving performance in minority and nonminority students using a nontraditional multidimensional approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629403800104
  20. Cleary, T. A., Humperys, L. G., Kendrick, S. A., & Wesman, A. (1975). Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist, 30, 15-41.
  21. Coleman, L. (1994). Portfolio assessment: A key to identifying hidden talents and empowering teachers of young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 65-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629403800203
  22. Coleman, M. R. (2003). The identification of students who are gifted. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning. (ERIC Digest ED480431).
  23. Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted. (1999). The 1998-99 state of the states gifted and talented report. Longmont, CO: Author.
  24. Cunningham, C. M., Callahan, C. M., Plucker, J. A., Roberson, C., & Rapkin, A. (1998). Identifying hispanic students of outstanding talent: Psychometric integrity of a peer nomination form. Exceptional Children, 64, 197-210.
  25. Ford, D. Y. (2003). desegregating gifted education. In J. Borland(Ed.), Rethinking gifted education(pp.143-158). New York: Teachers College Press.
  26. Friedman, R. C., & Rogers, K. B. (1998). Talent in context: Historical and social perspectives on giftedness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  27. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.
  28. Gardner, J. W. (1984). Excellence: Can we be equal and excellent too?, New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Company.
  29. Gear, G. H. (1978). Effects of Training on Teachers' Accuracy in the Identification of Gifted Children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22(1), 90-97.
  30. Geary, D. C., & Brown, S. C. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-ofprocessing differences in gifted, normal, and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 398-406.
  31. Gronlund, N. E., & Waugh, C. K. (2009). Assessment of student achievement. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  32. Hadaway, N., & Marek-Schroer, M. F. (1992). Multidimensional assessment of the gifted minority student. Roeper Review, 15, 73-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199209553467
  33. Johnsen, S. (1997). Assessment beyond definitions. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 136-152.
  34. Lee, S.-Y., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2006). Comparison between talent search students qualifying via scores on standardized tests and via parent nomination. Roeper Review, 28, 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190609554355
  35. Maker, C. J., Nielson, A. B., & Rogers, J. A. (1994). Giftedness, diversity, and problemsolving: Multiple intelligences and diversity in educational settings. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27, 4-19.
  36. McCarney, S. B., & Anderson, P. D. (1998). The Gifted Evaluation Scale-Technical Manual(2nd ed.). Columbia, MO: Hawthorne Educational Services.
  37. Monks, F. J. & Pfluger, R. (2005). Gifted education in 21 European countries: Inventory and perspective. Radbond University Nijmegen.
  38. Naglieri, J. A. (1999). The essentials of CAS assessment. New York: Wiley.
  39. Pfeiffer, S. I. (2002). Identifying gifted and talented students: recurring issues and promising solutions. Journal of Applied school Psychology, 19(1), 31-50.
  40. Pfeiffer, S., & Blei, S., (2008). Gifted identification beyond the IQ test. In Pfeiffer, S. I., Handbook of Giftedness in Children, pp. 177-196.
  41. Pfeiffer, S., & Jarosewich, T. (2003). Gifted Rating Scales. TX: Psych Corp.
  42. Pfeiffer, S., Kumtepe, A., & Rosado, J. (2006). Gifted identification: Measuring changes in a student's profile of abilities using the Gifted Rating Scales. The School Psychologist, 60, 106-111.
  43. Renzulli, J. S. (1986). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  44. Roedell, W. C., Jackson, N. E., & Robinson, H. B. (1980). Gifted young children. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
  45. Ryser, G. R., & McConnell, K. (2004). Scales for identifying gifted students: Age 5 through 18. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  46. Sarouphim, K. M. (1999). DISCOVER: A promising alternative assessment for the identification of gifted minorities. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(4), 244-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629904300403
  47. Schack, G. D., & Starko, A. (1990). Identification of gifted students: An analysis of criteria preferred by preservice teachers, classroom teachers, and teachers of the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 346-363.
  48. Shore, B. M., & Tsiamis, A. (1986). Identification by provision. In K. A. Hellerand J. F. Feldhusen(eds). Identifying and Nurturing their Gifted. Berne: Huber.
  49. Smutny, J. F. (1998). The young gifted child: Potential and promise, and anthology. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  50. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  51. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). The theory of successful intelligence as a basis for gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620204600403
  52. Stevens, D. D., & Levi, A. J. (2005). Introduction to rubrics. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  53. VanTassel-Baska, J. (2002). Assessment of gifted student learning in the language arts. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13, 67-72.
  54. VanTassel-Baska, J., Feng, A. X., & Evans, B. L. (2007). Patterns of identification and performance among gifted students identified through performance Tasks: a three-year analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(3), 218-231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207302717
  55. VanTassel-Baska, J., Johnson, D., & Avery, L. D. (2002). Using performance tasks in the identification of economically disadvantaged and minority gifted learners: Findings from Project STAR. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 110-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620204600204
  56. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds. & Trans.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes(pp. 92-104). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.