• American Studies
• /
• v.44 no.1
• /
• pp.81-112
• /
• 2021

As polarization intensified in the United States, the voting support of the presidential party lawmakers has become the most important source of power for the president. The presidential party has been believed to legalize the president's agenda in a unified government and prevent legislation opposed by the president from being passed by the Congress within a divided government. However, even under party polarization, all the lawmakers and factions of the presidential party have not voted in accordance with the president's policy preferences. Statistical analysis shows that lawmakers who corresponded to the ideology median of the presidential party most strongly supported the president's agendas during the unified government. However, lawmakers with extreme ideologies voted more actively for the president than those with median ones during the divided government. Furthermore, this trend has been amplified regarding ideological factions.

• 주택과사람들
• /
• s.201
• /
• pp.22-25
• /
• 2007

정부와 여당은 지난 '1.11 부동산 대책'에서 토지 임대부 및 환매 조건부 분양을 2007년 중 시범 실시한다고 밝혔다. 과연 토지 임대부 분양과 환매 조건부 분양이 정부가 주도하는 부동산 시장 안정을 위한 해결책이 될 수 있는지 알아보자.

• Survey Research
• /
• v.12 no.3
• /
• pp.25-48
• /
• 2011

In this paper, we overview the sample design, sampling error, non-response rate and prediction errors of the exit poll conducted for 2010 local elections and discusses how to detect a prediction bias in exit poll. To investigate the bias problem in exit poll in regional(Si-Do) level, we analyze exit poll data for 2007 presidential election and 2006 local elections as well as 2010 local elections in Korea. The measure of predictive accuracy A proposed by Martin et al.(2005) is used to assess the exit poll bias. The empirical studies based on three exit polls clearly show that there exits systematic bias in exit poll and the predictive bias of candidates affiliated to conservative party (such as Hannara-Dang) is serious in the specific regions. The result of this study on systematic bias will be very useful to improving the exit poll methodology in Korea.

• Korean Journal of Legislative Studies
• /
• v.24 no.1
• /
• pp.103-133
• /
• 2018

This paper examines whether the budget making process has improved since the Automatic Submission of Budget Bills to Plenary Session Act was enacted. The budget bill was passed before the Dec. 2 deadline from 2014 to 2016. Several researchers, therefore, concluded that the clause is in favor of the ruling party and the majority party. However, this study confirmed that the argument is valid only under the condition of unified government. In other cases, the government party can have a limited impact on the budget-review process, and the aspects of the budget screening process are similar to those before the Act was enforced. Under the conditions of the divided government and two-party system, it is difficult that the budget bill is passed by the legal deadline. In the case of the divided government and multi-party system without majority party, the third party exerts a very significant influence on the budget-review process.

• Korean Journal of Legislative Studies
• /
• v.22 no.2
• /
• pp.53-75
• /
• 2016

This article presents a descriptive analysis on national security policy platforms promoted by the ruling parties of South Korea during general and presidential elections. National security platforms made during the elections campaigns are a window that allows us to see how the ruling party perceives the threat environment, opportunity-structures, policy preferences and material capabilities faced by the state. South Korea presents a unique case since it faces constant military threats from North Korea and interacts with China and the United States. Therefore, the national security policy platforms, which are explicitly campaigned during the general and presidential elections, showcases the worldview of the ruling party. The study essentially focuses on three areas of the platforms - its threat perception on North Korea, the ROK-US alliance and the future vision for the Korean peninsula by covering two presidential elections and three general elections for the last 20 years.

• Venture DIGEST
• /
• s.62
• /
• pp.5-5
• /
• 2004

침체된 경제를 살리고 장기적으로 우리 경제의 회생 기반 마련을 위한 원천은 결국‘벤처’라는 인식하에 청와대와 정부 여당이‘벤처 붐’조성을 위해 나서고 있다. 언론 또한 이헌재 부총리의‘벤처회생을 위한 특단대책’, 중기청의‘신벤처정책’등 정부정책에 많은 관심을 갖고‘벤처 재도약’, ‘벤처만이 희망’, ‘벤처신화’등을 주제어로 벤처를 재조명하고 있다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2000.06a
• /
• pp.201-203
• /
• 2000

• NEWSLETTER 전기공업
• /
• no.99-23 s.240
• /
• pp.3-13
• /
• 1999

• 주택과사람들
• /
• s.220
• /
• pp.86-87
• /
• 2008

새 정부가 출범한 지 6개월이 지났지만 갈수록 침체되고 있는 부동산 시장은 언제 회복될지 알 수 없는 상황이다. 이렇다 할 만한 정책을 내놓지 못하던 정부와 여당이 최근 들어 부동산 세제 완화를 비롯해 규제 완화 정책과 미분양 후속 대책을 잇달아 내놓고 있다. 기대감만큼 시장 불안에 대한 우려의 목소리가 있는 가운데, 부동산 전문가 3인과 함께 시장에 대한 궁금증을 풀어보았다.

• Korean journal of communication and information
• /
• v.52
• /
• pp.5-26
• /
• 2010

This study explores how major Korean television evening news report, interpret and evaluate the Korean Grand Canal Project(KGCP). For this research, 488 news clips regarding the KGCP are selected among the MBC, KBS and SBS daily evening news. As a result, the findings are as follows: First, the ratios of analyzing reports for MBC, brief reports for KBS, and straight news for SBS are outstanding. At the same time, the three news companies show that they are against the KGCP through the reporting attitudes. However, the most frequently broadcasted news frames is the authoritative political execution for both MBC and KBS, and the political agenda for SBS news respectively. In terms of the most frequently interviewed group for all three news is the government and ruling Grand National Party; they are the most favor of the authoritative political executions and the political agenda news frames. However, the NGO groups and the opposition parties which are against the KGCP support "Process" in terms of the frames activity. Finally, MBC speaks out the frame activity of "Process", supporting the political opposition parties and NGO groups. On the country, both KBS and SBS speak up the government and ruling party, supporting the KGCP, stressing frame activity of "Aspiration". This it concludes that both KBS and SBS are short of the social responsibilities as a social media mediator for the social disputes between the government and the NGO groups, including opposition parties.