• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Rock Mechanics Conference
• /
• 1994.03a
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 1994

현재 국내 터널의 설계와 시공은 대부분 NATM의 원리를 적용하고 있다. 그러나 터널의 설계 접근방법과 시공의 상황을 살펴보면 NATM을 국내 지질에 적용하는 것이 항상 최적이 아니라는 것을 알수 있으며, 국내 터널의 시공에 있어서도 NATM과 다른 개념의 도입과 정확한 이해가 필요하다는 것을 많은 기술자가 느끼고 있다. 따라서 보다 경제적이고 안전한 터널 시공방법의 결정을 위해 NATM의 개념과 다른 터널 설계 및 시공방법으로 노르웨이 터널 시공법(Norwegian Method of Tunnelling, NMT)을 소개하고자 한다. (중략)

• International Journal of Highway Engineering
• /
• v.9 no.2 s.32
• /
• pp.101-114
• /
• 2007

Dowel bars in the jointed concrete pavement are used to both provide load transfer across pavements joints and prevent the joint faulting leading to longer service life. On the contrary, the misplacement of dowel bar can provide negative results including the joint freezing(locking) that may cause the joint spatting and unexpected mid-slab cracking. The dowel bar can be placed using the assembly or dowel bar inserter (DBI) during the concrete pavement construction. In the domestic practice of the concrete pavement construction, the dowel bar is placed using the assembly method. This study primarily focuses on the comparison of these two dowel placement methods using the field data from the KHC test road in which both dowel placement methods have been applied to a certain length of the concrete pavement. The field data regarding the alignment of the dowel bars placed by both methods was collected using MIT-SCAN2, a nondestructive measuring equipment, and processed to compute Joint Score and Running Ave. Joint Score which are used as indicators of the dowel bar performance. The comparison of the methods for the dowel bar placement using these indicators shows that the DBI method provided much better alignment of the dowel bars reducing the risk of joint freezing than the assembly method. In order to improve the quality of the dowel bar placement using the assembly method, the current weak points of the assembly method including the fabrication, storage, and installation of dowel bar assembly were investigated and the solution was suggested. The improved dowel bar sets based on the suggested solution have been applied to an actual practice of the concrete pavement construction. The field data shows that the improved assembly method suggested in this study can highly reduce the risk of joint freezing.

• Proceedings of the KAIS Fall Conference
• /
• 2011.05a
• /
• pp.471-473
• /
• 2011

도로경계석과 측구는 차도와 인도의 구분에 의해 주행하는 차량으로부터 인도의 보행자를 보호하고 강우 시 노면의 배수를 용이하게 하기 위한 도로시설물로서 그의 시공품질은 보행자의 안전은 물론 도시미관의 측면에서 매우 중요하다. 그러나 기존의 시공법은 콘크리트를 몇 회로 나누어 분할 타설하는 방법을 사용함으로써 시공불량에 의해 도로경계석이 원 위치에서 이탈하거나 기울어지는 사례가 종종 발생하고 있다. 이러한 문제점들을 해결하고 시공품질을 높이기 위하여 도로경계석과 측구의 일체형 시공법으로써 거푸집 레일과 두 가지 형태의 지그를 사용하는 방법이 최근 제안되었으며 본 연구에서는 새로운 표면처리장치의 개발에 의해 콘크리트 측구의 표면처리방법을 개선하고자 한다.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.3-10
• /
• 2015

Value engineering (VE) of the construction project is classified into design phase value engineering and construction phase value engineering. Design phase value engineering must apply to over 10 billion public construction projects by government law. Therefore, the design value engineering apply to actively in construction projects. In contrast, the construction value engineering apply to a limited certain construction project. The reason is that construction value engineering process can not reflect practical demands quality. The construction value engineering can implement to positive impact through the feasibility verification for constructability. In this research, we propose a method of construction value engineering that reflect the practical demands. This method is experts alternative evaluation of using by GFI-based. And, this study was applied to the practical cases to verify the applicability of the proposed method. As a result, proposed alternative evaluation method were analyzed highly efficient in terms of applying the process as well as the method compare to the conventional method.

• Proceedings of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute Conference
• /
• 2010.04a
• /
• pp.297-300
• /
• 2010

본 논문에서는 일반적인 해석, 시공단계를 고려한 해석, 시공단계와 장기거동을 고려한 해석의 3가지 해석방법을 사용하여 수평부재의 설계에 적합한 해석방법을 제안하였다. 80층의 2D 구조모델에 3가지 해석방법을 적용하여 각 해석방법에 따라 부등축소량, 수직부재에 작용하는 축력, 수평부재의 단부에 작용하는 내력의 해석결과를 얻어 비교하였다. 또한 부재의 내부에서 철근과 콘크리트의 하중분담율의 시간에 따른 변화양상을 알아보았다. 해석결과 시공단계에 의한 영향은 수평부재에 작용하는 축력과 부등축소량 예측, 부재 내력 해석에 있어서 반드시 고려되어야 함을 알 수 있었다. 장기거동의 효과는 기둥축소에는 크게 영향을 미치지만 수직부재의 축력, 수평부재의 내력에는 변형만큼의 영향은 보이지 않는다. 시공시의 보정량을 결정하기 위해서는 장기거동이 반드시 고려되어야 하지만 부재의 단면설계의 목적으로는 제외되어도 무방할 것으로 판단된다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
• /
• 2002.11a
• /
• pp.1-4
• /
• 2002

철근 콘크리트 건물은 반영구적이다. 하지만, 이런 사항은 시공방법에서 항상 언급되지는 않는다. 철근 콘크리트 건물의 내구성은 콘크리트 시공에 크게 의존한다. 따라서, 다음의 관점에서 철근 콘크리트 시공사 다음 사항을 언급할 수 있다. 1) 시멘트 수화작용과 콘크리트 내구성의 관계 2) 부실 공사 및 콘크리트 내구성 3) 콘크리트의 파울링(fouling) 메커니즘과 그 대책

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.37 no.4
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study is to examine the design ＆ construction methods of the traditional landscape space of the past and the repair and maintenance of cultural heritages to maintain it today. To this end, the method of narrative description, process extraction and construction related to traditional landscaping were compared to each other based on the 『Imwongyeongjeji』 「Seomyongji」 and 'Standard Specification for Repairing Cultural Heritages'. The results are as follows; First, to analyze at the description methods of the 『Imwongyeongjeji』 「Seomyongji」 and 'Standard Specification for Repairing Cultural Heritages' and related processes in the field of traditional landscaping. 『Imwongyeongjeji』 「Seomyongji」 was an encyclopedia of the overall construction method of the living space, describing the location, effect, and advantages and disadvantages of each component and presenting quantitative figures to institutionalize the construction of traditional landscaping spaces. 'Standard Specification for Repairing Cultural Heritages' presented the entire process of repairing cultural heritages, and it is becoming a kind of guide for reference at the site. Among them, foundation construction, roof construction, landscape construction, and fence construction were drawn as items that could be applied to traditional landscaping areas. Second, the traditional landscape space construction method was divided into the processes of foundation construction, roof construction, landscaping construction, and fence construction. Foundation construction is a way of repeating the process of land-tramping. During the construction of the roof, the tile-roofed building was built on top of the rafters and roofed with tiles. And thatched roof was made to a number of rice straws bundles to cover the roof one after the other. Instead of tiles, the stone roof was made of thin and wide stones, and the wooden boards were used for the single roof and the bark roof were constructed with many layers of dried corrugations. Landscape construction mainly consists of the Paving technique through tramping rubble and the construction of terraced flower by planting stone, plants, and shrubs on the top. According to the building materials, the wall construction was derived from the earth-stacked earthen wall, stone walls using stone and clay, marble walls made of tile patterns, and the construction of a board wall using a wood board as a wall. Third, comparing the construction methods of the 『Imwongyeongjeji』 「Seomyongji」 and 'Standard Specification for Repairing Cultural Heritages', 『Imwongyeongjeji』 「Seomyongji」 focuses on standardizing the construction methods to create a new traditional space. There is a difference in the setting of the scope of the 『Imwongyeongjeji』 「Seomyongji」 and the construction because 'Standard Specification for Repairing Cultural Heritages' provides the overall construction procedure considering the diversity of the cultural heritages. In addition, the traditional landscape space used to be a residential space in the past, but today, the maintenance process of the already established facilities as designated cultural heritages has been carried out, and construction methods have been added to create viewing conditions. In terms of the succession of traditional knowledge, some similar methods were found in the repair of cultural assets today, and some cases were also confirmed in the reconstruction of traditional technologies such as application of some materials or mix, separation of added facilities and introduction of efficient construction methods.

• Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.51-58
• /
• 2010

In a companion paper, a simplified method for the evaluation of the slab construction load was developed. Unlike existing methods, the proposed method includes the effects of shore stiffness and concrete cracking on the construction load. In the present study, construction loads were measured in actual flat-plate slabs. For verification, the measured shore-forces were compared with the predictions by the proposed method and existing methods. Further, the proposed method was applied to a wall-slab structure, and the prediction results were compared with the measurements. The comparison results showed that the proposed method well predicted the construction loads, furthermore it gave better predictions than the existing methods did.

• Journal of Welding and Joining
• /
• v.9 no.3
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 1991

근래에 들어 국민들의 소득이 높아지고 생활수준이 향상됨에 따라 어려운 일은 하지 않으려고 하는 풍조가 사회전반에 걸쳐 만연되고 있다. 용접공정은 우리사회에서 가장 어렵고, 고된 일종의 하나로 인식되어 있고, 그 중에서도 특히 수도용 대형 강관의 용접시공은 열악한 작업현장 환 경과 전자세 용접등의 어려움 때문에 매우 높은 임금을 제시해도 용접공들사이에서 기피되는 대표적 사례이다. 따라서 앞으로의 원활한 상수도 공급을 위해서 긴급하게 요구되는 대형강관의 설치를 위해서는 용접공정의 자동화가 절실히 요구되는 실정이다. 이와 같은 문제의 해결을 위한 연구의 일환으로 선진국의 수도용 대형 강관 용접시공 방법 및 자동화의 현황을 파악하고, 우리나라의 용접시공 현황과 비교, 검토하여 현실에 적합한 수도용 강관의 용접시공 방법 및 자동화기법을 도출하기 위해서 미국, 이태리, 일본의 관계되는 회사들을 방문하였다. 이와 같은 해외방문목적을 요약하면 아래와 같다. 1) 선진국 대형 강관 용접시공의 현황파악 2) 수도용 대형 강관 용접시공자동화의 가능성 조사. 3) 대형 강관 용접시공 자동화를 위해서 필요한 장치들의 성능조사.

• Korean Journal of Heritage: History & Science
• /
• v.42 no.2
• /
• pp.40-61
• /
• 2009

A new construction methodology has been proposed on a scientific basis to reason a rational explanation for the structure and the present configuration of Chum-Sung-Dae. This is because there is no way to otherwise explain the gap between our expectation that the people in Shilla are assumed to be and the problems, such as the use of a temporary supporting structure including falsework, the use of a conveying device for stonework and the practice of soil fill, raised when the construction method in nowadays is applied to the structure. Furthermore, it is because the questions, such as the difference of an azimuth angle between the southward opening and the square podium, the skewed circular plan in layers of the body, misalignment between neighboring layers of the body, disagreement between the inclination due to slight sidesway and the eccentricity in each layer of the circular body, perfectly aligned vertical and horizontal joints and the existence of soil fill, raised from the present configuration of Chum-Sung-Dae, also require a reasonable explanation based on scientific evidences, if any. Therefore, the proposed new construction methodology, in which the soil hill outside as well as the soil fill inside the Chum-Sung-Dae may have been utilized as a temporary scaffolding system for construction, is the highly probable one that the builders of Chum-Sung-Dae might have inevitably employed. The existence of great tombs, scattered in Hwang-Nam-Dong close to Chum-Sung-Dae, implies that the people of Shilla might have accepted the proposed new construction methodology as a natural one.