Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2015.16.3.003

Alternative Evaluation Method of GFI-based Construction Value Engineering  

Kim, Sooyong (Department of Civil Engineering, Pukyong National University)
Lee, Youngrok (Hyundai Development Company)
Yang, Jinkook (Research Institute of Construction Technology, Jung Ang Engineering Co., Ltd.)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management / v.16, no.3, 2015 , pp. 3-10 More about this Journal
Abstract
Value engineering (VE) of the construction project is classified into design phase value engineering and construction phase value engineering. Design phase value engineering must apply to over 10 billion public construction projects by government law. Therefore, the design value engineering apply to actively in construction projects. In contrast, the construction value engineering apply to a limited certain construction project. The reason is that construction value engineering process can not reflect practical demands quality. The construction value engineering can implement to positive impact through the feasibility verification for constructability. In this research, we propose a method of construction value engineering that reflect the practical demands. This method is experts alternative evaluation of using by GFI-based. And, this study was applied to the practical cases to verify the applicability of the proposed method. As a result, proposed alternative evaluation method were analyzed highly efficient in terms of applying the process as well as the method compare to the conventional method.
Keywords
Construction VE process; Demands quality; Alternative Evaluation; Gut Feeling Index (GFI);
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim, J. D. (2003). "(A)study on the problem analysis and improvements for the application of construction VE in construction projects", Chungang University Master's Thesis, pp. 1-121.
2 Park, H. and Song, J. Y. (2000). "A Study on the VE Methodology and Policy Revitalization", Public and Private Infrastructure Investment Management Center(PIMAC) of Korea Development Institute, pp. 1-179.
3 Park, C. S. et. al (2003). "Improvement Scheme of Construction VE system for improving productivity in construction projects", Construction and Economy Research Institute of Korea(CERIK), pp. 1-87.
4 Son, M. S (2003), "VE Implementation Status and Case of Dong Ah construction company supporting the management", Korean journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, pp. 52-56.
5 Lee, K. Y. (2009). "A study on the improvement strategy of construction work VE", Chungang University Master's Thesis, pp. 1-61.
6 Jeong, S. B. (2008). "A study on the Cooperative Relation for Achieving Value Engineering in the Construction Stage", Hanyang University Master's Thesis, pp. 1-41.
7 Jeong, J. H. (2003). "A study on the case of application in the VE of underground work at downtown area high-rise building", Pukyong National University Master's Thesis, pp. 1-66.
8 Lynn A. Robinson (2010). "Trust Your Gut", daum thinking, pp. 1-264.
9 Yang, J. K and Kim, S. Y. (2005). "Improvement and Systematization of Pre-Study Work for Design Value Engineering in Construction Projects by Quality Function Deployment", Korean journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 6(4), pp. 122-132.
10 Yang, J. K. (2014). "Potential Value Improvement Target Choice Methodology(PVTCM) in Construction Projects", Korean journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 15(4), pp. 11-19.   DOI