• Education of Primary School Mathematics
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.225-236
• /
• 2011

This study basically investigated the mathematics curriculum of Finland. The curriculum is similar with the 2009's revised mathematics curriculum of Korea in terms of formats, but is different in terms of contents. The mathematics curriculum of Finland is organized into grade bands: grade 1-2, grade 3-5, grades 6-9. And also, it provides the purpose of each grade bands, the purpose of each content areas, the expectation of assessment tested at the end of grade bands.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.18 no.2 s.19
• /
• pp.125-132
• /
• 2004

대학 교양수학 과정에서 수학적 명제를 증명하는 과정은 중요하다. 선행 연구들은 주관식 증명문제의 시험이 어려워 증명문제를 피하고 더 나아가 포기하게 만든다고 한다. 여기서는 대학 교양수학 과정에서 필요하고 중요한 기본 개념이나 정리를 선정하여 선택형 또는 참, 거짓 평가문항으로 개발하고 학생들에게 시험을 보게 하여 결과를 분석하고 이를 통해 증명문제의 두려움을 조금이라도 줄여주고 기본개념의 확실한 이해를 위해 도움을 제공하려고 한다.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.26 no.2
• /
• pp.137-158
• /
• 2023

This study aimed to analyze the shifts in the mathematics domains of the College Scholastic Ability Test (CSAT) since its inception in 1993, with the intent of identifying improvements for the future. The goal is to provide insights for exploring the direction of assessment in Korean high school mathematics education. To this end, we focused on the test system, content area, and behavioral area within the CSAT mathematics domains. Key findings include: first, the test structure influences the assessment factors and item types, in addition to the examination time and number of items. Second, by analyzing the content area, we established a correlation between the national curriculum and assessment area, and confirmed the importance of setting the assessment area. Third, the examination of the behavioral area tended to the item-type fixation, demonstrating the necessity of the ongoing modifications in evaluation item types. Building upon these findings, we discuss the direction of an evaluation that considers the evolving demands and shifts within mathematics education.

• Proceedings of the Korea Society of Elementary Mathematics Education
• /
• 2010.08a
• /
• pp.157-172
• /
• 2010

본 연구는 현행 초등학교에서 이루어지고 있는 서술형 평가의 유형과 문제점을 분석해 보고 2007개정 교육과정에 따른 수학과 서술형 예시 평가 문항을 개발해 보는데 목표가 있다. 학교에서 시행되고 있는 평가 자료의 분석은 수학교과서, 국가수준 학업성취도 평가지, 서울시 교육청 보급 2010 장학자료집, 서울시내 학교에서 시행되고 있는 평가 문항을 분석해 보았다. 그리고 예시 서술형 평가 문항개발은 2007개정 교육과정에 따른 수학과 4학년을 대상으로 하였다. 평가 문항 분석의 결과는 문항 유형이 단순하고 교과서와 장학자료집의 수준을 벗어나지 못하고 있으며 창의성 영역의 평가는 거의 이루어지고 있지 않았다. 서술형 예시평가 문항의 개발은 수학과의 내용영역과 인지적 영역뿐 아니라 교육계의 화두가 되고 있는 창의성 영역까지 평가내용으로 포함시키고자 노력하였으며 영역별 1-2 문항을 개발하였다.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.18 no.3
• /
• pp.505-518
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study was to examine how pre-service elementary teachers develop mathematical tasks in the elementary teacher education program. Elementary pre-service teachers revise their tasks in clarifying representation, reflecting curriculum, modifying mathematical errors. Elementary pre-service teachers' perspective on assessment has been changed from focusing on tasks to focusing on students.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.16 no.4
• /
• pp.899-925
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study was to examine how constructive-response questions in regular test was in aligned with the nature and goals of 2007 Curriculum Amendment. For this purpose, data were collected and analysed by using the framework for mathematical task and the cognitive demand of tasks suggested by Smith & Stein(1998) and mathematical proficiency suggested by National Research Council(2001). In particular, it aimed to reveal the overall picture of the level of cognitive demand and the proportion of mathematical proficiency of constructed-response items created by secondary mathematics teachers. The findings from the analysis showed that 70 percent of the constructed-response items were at low-level and the rest at high-level in terms of cognitive demand. Also, the constructed-response assessment focused on conputing (89%), understanding(45%), applying(30%) and least reasoning(17%). Most of the constructed-response items included computing and were algorithmic.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.259-283
• /
• 2014

This research investigated the Revised mathematics curriculum and the National Achievement Test of Japan that advanced by leaps and bounds in PISA 2012. As compared with Korea, Japan shows similar trends in the affective domain and the cognitive domain of international achievement test. To put it concretely, this research compared and analyzed the mathematics contents domain of the 2009 revised mathematics curriculum of Korea and the 2008 revised mathematics curriculum of Japan being applied. The analysis was conducted in many aspects including overall of Japanese mathematics education system, the contents to be covered in each grade, and the methods of essential learning themes. We compared the mathematics contents dealt with each country based on the framework of analysis such as