• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.43 no.2
• /
• pp.329-350
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study is to develop the indicators of user satisfaction for Korean public library evaluation. This is an attempt to overcome the inequality of indicators, which mainly consist of inputs and outputs. User satisfaction indicators are constructed through literature reviews and the prepared indicators are tested through a user survey of public libraries. Notably, the test is focused on the applicability of indicators for public libraries with a variety characteristics such as scale and operation organization. Based on the analysis of the results, this study suggests a total of 10 indicators.

• The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.33-50
• /
• 2004

This paper presents the evaluation model which is included in a quantitative evaluation methodology for evaluation processes of validity and effectiveness of information budget investment and improving conformance of ROI(Return On Investment). That is, the right efficiency targets of information investment for the development project to GDOC (Government electronic Document Distribution Center), and KPls(Key Performance Indexes) which enable to evaluate objectively effectiveness in the preliminary and post evaluation phases are developed, and then the results were come out by practical investigation study using quantitative evaluation methodology.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.18 no.11
• /
• pp.445-453
• /
• 2017

The Korean government's recent R&D policy has focused on encouraging government-funded research institutes (GRIs) to develop mid-term, long-term, and large-scale R&D projects. It is necessary to prepare thoroughly for the new R&D strategy, but there is no systematic accumulation of planning expertise, and there has been continued demand for good examples of research planning. Therefore, this study analyzes the reports of preliminary feasibility for government R&D programs through a meta-analysis of detailed evaluation items and contents to help researchers enhance their project-planning ability. The evaluation items that can be applied to R&D planning for GRI were reviewed, and twelve detailed evaluation items were selected through content analysis. The results of this study could contribute to practical R&D project planning and the improvement of evaluations.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.124-145
• /
• 2014

Market failure occurs when Pareto efficiency is not achieved through market mechanism. In order to solve this problem, government intervene market; paying great attention to the optimum state of resource allocation. However, as the size of government investment in R&D goes up, many professionals emphasize the importance in efficient management system. This work is the result of exploratory study to look into life-cycle management of governmental R&D program. Literature reviews and empirical research on governmental R&D programs elicit improvements for effective life-cycle management of governmental R&D program as follows: consistent discrimination between capital expenditure and recurring expenditure, dual management system by spending properties, implementing total cost management system in capital expenditure, and discrimination between preliminary feasibility study with confirming total program cost in recurring expenditure.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.8 no.4
• /
• pp.247-254
• /
• 2008

This research was conducted to investigate the feasibility of aviation safety technology development. The important subjects of aviation safety technology development, aviation accident prevention and damage reduction technique, aircraft safety certification development, BASA promotion in an aircraft class, were included to investigate the the feasibility of aviation safety technology development. The survey technique using Benefit-Cost Anlysis was performed and the results showed that aviation safety technology development brought scientific technique effect, industrial and economic effect, and the rest effects. Also, the benefits from aviation safety technology development were much greater than the costs.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.203-223
• /
• 2012

This study aimed to identify the factors of failure in cases where there was feasibility but was not successful in commercializing technology. For the study, 92 feasibility reports for new technologies were collected, and among these 4 studies that showed definite failure in commercialization of technology were analyzed in depth. Further analysis was based the factors pointed out by previous frameworks such as 1) discussion on success or failure in commercialization of technology, 2) that of venture company, and 3) valuation of technology studies. Previous studies pointed out success and failure factors as lack of funding, uncontrollable accidents, managing ability, inability for mass production and so forth, which had little difference to the pre-feasible evaluation of four cases. However, real reason was the lack of understanding technologies such as composition of technologies, production technologies required by stages, and lack of understanding of floor technologies. The misunderstandings were occurred regardless of CEO's experience and expertise. We did not touch the evaluation model of pre-feasibility studies, although we dealt with the failure of the pre-studies. The reason we do not generalize the results of this study is the fact that we dealt with only small cases.

• 한국정책학회보
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.91-122
• /
• 2012

국가 재정사업을 평가하는 재정사업 자율평가제도는 2005년에 도입되어 2010년까지 두 번의 평가주기가 완료되었다. 본 연구는 이러한 시점에서 2차 평가주기(2008년~2010년) 동안 평가된 재정사업을 대상으로 평가결과에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 검토하였다. 본 연구는 1차 평가주기(2005년~2007년)의 평가결과를 분석한 기존 연구의 확장연구로서, 이전 연구결과를 재확인하고 일반화 가능성을 보다 제고할 수 있을 뿐만 아니라 이전 연구결과와의 비교를 통해서 평가제도의 변화가 평가결과의 변화를 가져왔는지를 검토할 수 있다는 점에서 의의가 있다. 또한 2차 평가주기가 완료된 시점에서, 향후 제도 개선을 위한 정책적 시사점을 줄 수 있다는 점에서 의의가 있다. 본 연구의 주요 분석결과 및 정책적 함의는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 1차 평가주기에 비해서 2차 평가주기의 평가결과가 향상되었다는 점에서 사업의 성과향상 또는 제도에 대한 실무자들의 이해가 보다 증진된 것으로 해석할 수 있다. 둘째, 성과계획항목이 평가결과에 지나치게 강한 영향력을 준다는 측면에서, 이에 대한 제도적 보완이 요구된다. 성과지표의 설정 및 목표치의 결정은 집행 이전에 적절히 이루어져야 할 부문이기에 이를 계획수립 시 사전적으로 지도할 필요가 있다. 셋째, 집행항목과 성과항목 간 부(-)의 관계를 가지므로 이에 대한 적절한 제도적 보완이 필요하다. 넷째, 제도의 타당성을 저해할 수 있는 비평가요인이 총점에 영향을 미치고 있다는 점을 감안할 때, 이에 대한 제도적 보완이 필요하다.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.289-308
• /
• 2014

We analyze the risk factors identified for ex-ante evaluation regarding government R&D programs. In particular, we empirically examined to what extent each risk factor is perceived to be important by the stage of R&D, technology field, researcher's career and experience. The empirical results show that technology risk is perceive to be less important for basic research, while market risk more perceived to be important in the IT field. Political risk is perceived to be less important for the university faculty, while researchers with government R&D project experience gave more value to legal risk factor.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems
• /
• v.16 no.6
• /
• pp.742-746
• /
• 2006

Evaluation of learning ability of students is classified a step of diagnostic, formative and summative evaluation. This step-by-step evaluation is the standard of synthesis judgement, from a student's prior learning of preparation state to devotion of learning process and even learning result. In this paper, we propose the method of synthesis learning evaluation which is considered evaluation of each step in using fuzzy inference. In order to get objective evaluation of learning ability, we applied to the weights by evaluation steps. And we reflected defuzzification values of final evaluation membership function interval obtained by fuzzy inference about diagnostic, formative and summative evaluation. As a result, it processes definite inference ensures objectivity and shows validity of the synthesis evaluation method.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.10 no.11
• /
• pp.263-273
• /
• 2019

Pictorial typography is a fusion of image and type, which makes it possible to easily and quickly recognize information by complementing the boredom of characters and ambiguity of images. In this study, 6 classes were assigned to the 30 students in A specialization design class and applied artistic propel method to the pictorial typography design class, followed by the process of perception, reflection and creation, We analyze the two evaluation factors, functional and aesthetic changes, and verify the validity of the artpropel course. In the pre-post survey conducted in this study, the self - evaluation and the peer evaluation were improved. Functionality increased by 5.34 points in self evaluation, 5.4 points in peer evaluation, and 2.1 points in self evaluation and 1.8 points in peer evaluation. As a result, it can be seen that the pictorial typography class through the artpropel process helped to improve the functionality and aesthetic, and the effect of functionality was more significant than the aesthetic.