• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.47 no.4
• /
• pp.187-210
• /
• 2013

The consumption through e-journal consortia makes researchers locate and use academic resources and information extensively with comparatively cheap costs. This study analyzed and investigated substantive benefits of the big deal contracts for e-journal subscriptions in terms of efficient information use. In other words, this study compare concretely the differences in efficiency of using information between large-size institutions and small-size institutions who participate in the e-journal big deal contracts. This study suggests solutions for the problems which occur persistently and repeatedly in the big deal and new counter plans which can replace the current methods of big deal contracts in a long-term perspective by revealing the gaps of acquiring and using information by the size of participating institutions.

• Journal of Information Management
• /
• v.42 no.1
• /
• pp.85-111
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to seek a workable alternative to replace a big deal related to the journal budget for the maintenance of academic libraries with the largest issue on the E-journal consortium. The contents of this study was to present it. It had examined the current situation, strengths, weaknesses and corresponding to replace the big deal contract. After reviewing the literature, we looked into the alternative activities for the big deal such as open access-based, usage-based, consortium improvement-based, publishers lead, and other models. As a result, the 'consortium cost reapportion model' was an alternative for the KESLI. The alternative was in the short term for cost division format, but long-term oriented for a consortium single(bloc) payment type or national licence model. The model was based on the data from the last year. It had evaluated download the PDF and HTML documents, but the three times weighting more than others, and the rest of 14 factors of 0.5 to 5 out of 100 total score. The total amount negotiated by national units 10, 20 and 30 grades for the final step was allocated to the participating library on the KESLI consortium.

• Journal of Information Management
• /
• v.41 no.4
• /
• pp.93-118
• /
• 2010

This study was aimed to establish a workable strategies to operate KESLI consortium reliably. To encourage the research purposes, it was mainly investigated international literature on current challenges for the e-journals consortium in comparison with the domestic implications. Major issues and challenges are divided to six items by scholarly communication changes and e-journals percentage increase, a big deal for a contract -based consortium pricing model in vogue, a consortium of the price hikes and making budget difficulties, use the standard statistics by the results of the use, archiving and archive security uncertainty, and contracts public availability of such external conditions. As a result, the international challenges of E-journals consortium was similar to KESLI, but the depth of information and research on domestic was weaker than the international research. To see more research and a rational perception based on scientific evidence and alternatives that enable KESLI working in the field was needed to be.

• KSLA Bulletin
• /
• s.2
• /
• pp.43-56
• /
• 2010

Since core scholarly journals have been digitalized, license contracts for e-resources have been dramatically increased. Librarians have had difficulties in understanding various and complex license models that are proposed by publishers in a period of time. The standardization of license models for journals have been more in demand and standard model license for journals have been developed by librarians, publishers, consortia and the third party. In this study, we explain the development of the standard license model of KESLI consortium.(hereafter, KESLI model) The availability of KESLI model has been analyzed by comparing with established standard license models. As a result, KESLI model is proved to be adopted and used in a practical contract process of e-journals through consortium.

• Journal of Information Management
• /
• v.39 no.1
• /
• pp.27-52
• /
• 2008

Electronic information, especially e-journals took their position as core resources in current scholarly communication. However, the publishing and pricing structure of e-journal licensing process have not yet succeeded to be reorganized in accord with newly changed electronic scholarly communication environment. That resulted in a lot of challenges scholarly communication now faced. This study aimed to analyze key issues regarding big deal, pricing, licensing, archiving, copyright and public access by conducting comprehensive literature review and examining movements of world wide scholarly institutes and alliances. And then this study eventually purposed to draw some strategies which domestic libraries and consortia should take in order to lead current changes in scholarly communication.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.29 no.4
• /
• pp.143-163
• /
• 2012

The dominant model of acquiring scholarly contents at academic libraries is so called big deal where libraries subscribe to a bundle of hundreds, if not thousands of journals in a multi-year contract with fixed annual rate increase. The bid deal, started in the mid-1990s, offered a number of advantages for academic libraries and their users. However, escalating prices for these packages have become a serious issue casting doubts about the sustainability of the subscription-based model. At the moment, it appears there is no viable alternative other than pay-per-view method that is being tested at some libraries. Libraries' budget situation will remain a key factor that might change the situation. Open access started in the 2000s as a vehicle to eliminate barriers to publishing and distributing peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles. Open access publishing is witnessing two-digit growth annually. Open access articles now occupy close to 20% of two major citation databases: Scopus and Web of Science. Google Scholar service, debuted in late 2004, is now a popular tool for discovering and accessing scholarly articles from a vast selection of journals around the world. There is a call for taking Google Scholar seriously as a potential replacement of library databases amid concerns regarding the quality of journals indexed, limited search capabilities vis-$\grave{a}$-vis library databases, and monopoly of public goods. Escalating budget problems, rapid growth of open access publishing and the emergence of powerful free tool, such as Google Scholar, need to be taken seriously as these forces might bring disruptive changes to the existing subscription-based model of scholarly contents at academic libraries.

• 한국항공운항학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2016.05a
• /
• pp.249-254
• /
• 2016

저비용항공사들은 전세계적인 항공수요 증가 등으로 약진을 하기도 했지만, 2000년대 초반부터 세계 항공산업은 테러위험, 유가급등, 오일머니를 등에 업은 중동 항공사들의 급성장, 그리고 2008년부터 시작된 세계경제위기로 미국과 유럽, 일본 등 메이저 항공사들은 일단 최소한의 생존가능 임계규모를 갖추고자 뼈를 깎는 구조조정을 수반한 인수합병, 대외악재에 대한 대응능력 제고, 새로운 보조수익원 개발을 통해 위기를 헤쳐나갔다. 그러나 2013년 11월 단행된 중동 항공사들(Emirates, Qatar, Etihad)의 역사상 유례없는, 한화 약 170조원 규모의 항공기 구매계약에 미국과 유럽은 물론이고 아시아 메이저 항공업계까지 다시 한번 커다란 위기감에 휩싸이게 되었다. 이러한 상황하에서도 효율적 경영의 선구적 역할을 미국의 Southwest, 유럽의 LCC Ryan Air, 아시아의 LCC Air Asia 등 LCC산업은 극심한 경기침체를 겪으면서도 해당 산업의 규모는 지속적 성장을 거듭할 전망이다. 결론적으로, 이러한 상황에서, 비록 미국과 유럽 항공사들이 대규모 구조조정을 겪고 2012년 이후부터 점차 회복기미를 보이고 있긴 하지만, 중동 항공사들의 영향력에 대응하기 위해 향후에도 추가적인 구조조정은 물론 인수/합병 등 생존을 위한 메이저 항공사들 간의 빅딜이 이어질 전망이며, 일본처럼 내수시장이 넓지 않은 한국도 중국 등 성장잠재력이 높은 국가들과의 항공자유화 등을 적극적으로 추진하여 보다 넓은 시장을 확보하지 못한다면 머지않아 수익성에 큰 타격을 입을 수밖에 없다는 결론에 도달하였다.

• Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
• /
• v.35 no.3
• /
• pp.137-159
• /
• 2024

This study analyzed the number of electronic journal subscriptions, subscription fees, usage, cost-effectiveness, etc. of university libraries to identify limitations and problems. Based on this, a case library was selected and the simulation tools Unsub was used to compare the efficiency of package subscriptions and individual subscriptions and suggest improvement measures. In the case of C University Library, SAGE and Emerald were found to be cost-effective as package subscriptions, while ScienceDirect and OUP were found to be worth considering for individual subscriptions. In particular, OUP was found to save £6,063 per year with individual subscriptions, and the ratio of accessible and usable articles reached 85.8%. In addition, ScienceDirect was found to be the most effective model for combining individual subscriptions and pay-per-view systems, considering budget savings and ease of use. Based on the results of this case study, the limitations of Unsub's application and policy tasks for developing a 'K-Unsub' version suitable for the Korean situation were suggested.