Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.1.085

Seeking Alternative Models and Research Trends for Big Deals in the Electronic Journal Consortium  

Kim, Sang-Jun (Librarian, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology)
Kim, Jeong-Hwan (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information)
Publication Information
Journal of Information Management / v.42, no.1, 2011 , pp. 85-111 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to seek a workable alternative to replace a big deal related to the journal budget for the maintenance of academic libraries with the largest issue on the E-journal consortium. The contents of this study was to present it. It had examined the current situation, strengths, weaknesses and corresponding to replace the big deal contract. After reviewing the literature, we looked into the alternative activities for the big deal such as open access-based, usage-based, consortium improvement-based, publishers lead, and other models. As a result, the 'consortium cost reapportion model' was an alternative for the KESLI. The alternative was in the short term for cost division format, but long-term oriented for a consortium single(bloc) payment type or national licence model. The model was based on the data from the last year. It had evaluated download the PDF and HTML documents, but the three times weighting more than others, and the rest of 14 factors of 0.5 to 5 out of 100 total score. The total amount negotiated by national units 10, 20 and 30 grades for the final step was allocated to the participating library on the KESLI consortium.
Keywords
Alternative Model; Big Deal; Consortium; Cost Division; Electronic Journal; KESLI; Open Access; Pay per View; Research Trends; Scholarly Communication;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김상준. 2010. 전자저널 컨소시엄의 당면과제와 해결방안 모색. 정보관리연구 , 41(4): 93-118.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
2 김정환, 이응봉. 2009. KESLI 컨소시엄의 주요 이슈 분석에 관한 연구. 정보관리연구 , 40(3): 99-123.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
3 신은자. 2007. 학술지 빅딜판매의 문제점 및 개선 방안. 한국문헌정보학회지 , 41(1): 373 -389.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Baker, Gayle and Eleanor J. Read. 2008. "Vendor-supplied usage data for electronic resources: a survey of academic libraries." Learned Publishing, 21(1): 48-57.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Ball, David. 2004. "What's the 'big deal', and why is it a bad deal for universities?." Interlending and Document Supply, 32(2): 117-125.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Best, R. D. 2009. "Is the 'Big Deal' dead?" The Serials Librarian, 57(4): 353- 363.   DOI
7 Bevan, Simon, Pete Dalton, and Angela Conyers. 2005. "How usage statistics can inform national negotiations and strategies." Serials, 18(2): 116-123.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Bucknall, Tim. 2009. "A comparative evaluation of journal literature access options at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro." Interlending & Document Supply, 37(3): 140- 142.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Bucknell, Terry. 2008. "Usage statistics for big deals: supporting library decision -making." Learned Publishing, 21 (3): 193-199.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Cole, Louise. 2009. "The E-deal: keeping up to date and allowing access to the end user." Serials Librarian, 57(4): 399-409.   DOI
11 Cox, John and Laura Cox. 2006. Scholarly publishing practice: academic journal publisher's policies and practices in online publishing. ALPSP. [cited 2010.03.14]. .
12 Cox, John and Laura Cox.2008. Scholarly publishing practice, third survey 2008: academic journal publisher's policies and practices in online publishing. ALPSP. [cited 2010.03.14]. .
13 Fowler, David. 2009. "The bundling and unbundling of E-serials: introduction." Serials Librarian, 57(4): 350- 352.   DOI
14 Friend, Fred. 2010. A journal business model to replace the big deal? Learned Publishing, 23(1): 69-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Harwood, Paul and Albert Prior. 2008. "Testing usage-based e-journal pricing." Learned Publishing, 21(2): 133-139. [cited 2010.04.11]. .   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Frontline Global Marketing Services Ltd. 2009. Consortium Purchasing Directory. [cited 2010.03.14]. .
17 Gatten, Jeffrey N. and Tom Sanville. 2004. "An orderly retreat from the big deal:is it possible for consortia?" D-Lib Magazine, 10(10). [cited 2010.03.08]. .
18 Gibbs, Nancy J. 2005. "Walking away from the 'big deal': consequences and achievements." Serials, 18(2): 89-94.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Jackson, M. E. 2005. "The 'bigger deal' is OpenURL." Interlending & Document Supply, 33(3): 172-174.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Ives, Gary and Steve Fallon. 2009. "Stung if you do, stung if you don't the good and the bad of the big deal." Serials Librarian, 56(1): 163-167.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Karasozen, B., A. Kaygusuz, and H. Ozen. 2007. "Patterns of e-journal use within the Anatolian University Library Consortium." Serials, 20(1): 37-42.   DOI
22 Kohl, David F. 2007. Ten Years of Big Deals. [cited 2010.03.08]. .
23 Rowse, Mark. 2003. "The consortium site license: a sustainable model?" Libri, 53: 1-10.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Kyrillidou, Martha and Les Bland. 2009. ARL statistics 2007-2008. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries. [cited 2010.03.08]. .
25 Maron, Nancy L. and K. Kirby Smith. 2008. Current Models of Digital Scholarly Communication. Washington: Association of Research Libraries. [cited 2010.06.05]. .
26 Research Information Network. 2008. Activities, costs and funding flows in the scholarly communications system: key findings. [cited 2010.03.14]. .
27 Research Information Network. 2009. E-Journals: their use, value and impact. [cited 2010.03.14]. .
28 Rightscom Ltd. 2005. Business models for journal content: final report. London: Joint Information Systems Committee. 64p.
29 Russell, Ian. 2009. ALPSP survey of librarians: responding to the credit crunch - what now for librarians and libraries? [cited 2010.03.14]. .
30 Stange, K., K. Hormia-Poutanen, K. B. Gronvall, and Eeva Laurila. 2003. "Cost division models in BIBSAM and FinELib consortia." Serials, 16(3): 285-292.   DOI
31 Tattersall, M. 2003. "Big deals: reflections on electronic journal acquisition 1996-2003." Serials, 16(2): 201- 204.   DOI
32 Taylor-Roe, Jill. 2009. "To every thing there is a season: reflections on the sustainability of the 'big deal' in the current economic climate." Serials, 22(2): 113-121.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Termens, M. 2008. "Looking below the surface: the use of electronic journals by the members of a library consortium." Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 32(2): 76-85.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Wolverton, R. E. and T. Bucknall. 2008. "Are consortium 'Big Deals' cost effective?: a comparison and analysis of E-journal access mechanismsworkshop report." Serials Librarian, 55(3): 469-477.   DOI
35 Wolfe, Donna., Narda Tafuri, Noella Owen, Rebecca Day, and Marcella Lesher. 2009. "Smoking out the big deal: getting what you want without getting stung." Serials Librarian, 56(1): 116-121.   DOI   ScienceOn